And now he is the US Secretary of State

Sep 10, 2017 1:20 PM

JarJarDrinks

Views

153010

Likes

3513

Dislikes

315

This story is about seven years old. That guy is now Secretary of State.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah... that story is a bit more to it than that.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

I side with Diane Nguyen on this subject

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Guys, when will you learn? One set of rules for the rich and one set of rules for us fucking scumbags at the bottom of the septic tank.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's not safe we have rivers of fire where they frack here in Australia. sauce https://tinyurl.com/jua6ekq

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What a fracking douche!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fracking sounds like a dirty word... lol

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Maybe because it was used in Battlestar Galactica to replace "Fucking"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I bet he still won't drink the water...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

If a well is cemented to code then fracking would have no effect on the watertable. It is however ear damagingly loud.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He probs went toto Bradford County, PA and met folk whose livestock have no hair from drinking contaminated water.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The guy has been the secretary of state since February. Are you that far behind OP?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

This seems like the right thing to do. Any time someone says an environmentally dangerous act is safe, do it right near their home.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Works for me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apart from this being a dicks move, since when do we allow to take ecological advice from companies who caused things as Exxon Valdez crash?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"And my wife told me, God's not done with you yet." Like him being Secretary of State is a spiritual calling. Pff

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jes the Evile Spirit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you Exxon for flooding this chat with your bullshit "supporters".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not in my backyard.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The same guy is now the Secretary of State. So much for draining the swamp.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

Seriously. The conflict of interest alone should have been enough to disqualify him.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

"Gasland Documentary" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mp4ELXKv-w

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

French minister of ecology is working on a ban on all fracking exploration and exploitation in France. Hope he succeeds.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Me too! A weak French energy sector is good for my portfolio.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

There are still about twenty nuclear power plants remaining anyways. ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can one of you lovely people explain to a lesser mind what fracking is if you guys and gals would be so kind

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Chemicals shot in to the ground - http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-14432401

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

www.google.com

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Basically drill a hole that turn horz. for a long distance then use water to create fissures https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YemKzEPugpk

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hydraulic fracturing. Drill a hole, pump pressurized water in the hole to break up the pockets of methane, collect the methane.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

pressurized water, and sand, and proprietary chemicals

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's like popping a blister by making another blister next to it or inside it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mp4ELXKv-w - "Gasland" - This is an excellent documentary on the subject.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

deleted, but I've seen it before. Fracking. Do you want your water flammable? Because this is how you make your water flammable.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well, well, well...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember that time Mnuchin and the Treasury sued EXXON for actions taken while Tilerson was CEO. It's like they have a circular fire squad.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Source?

9 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 16

This happened three years ago. Also, who would want anything similar built near their house.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Exactly. "Build it near someone else's house instead." -Exxon CEO

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

-Everyone* For example no one wants power lines in their backyard but everyone wants/needs electricity.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That is a terrible comparison. Electricity hums; fracking turns the ground and water to poison.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was comparing industrial structures and whatnot not direct impacts of each.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bojack horseman season 4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He joined the suit to stop the construction of a WATER TOWER

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

And your point is?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 22

A water tower is different than fracking? It seemed pretty obvious.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The water tower is part of the fracking infrastructure, duh.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or is it?! I knew those water towers were up to something!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

February of 2014....

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's OK, he'll edit in a Slowpoke to this post in another few years. Really being authentic with that meme.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Construction is also pretty safe but that doesn't mean I welcome it happening next door in the middle of the night.

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 8

I lived next to the Lightrail in Minneapolis when it was being built for two years. What a fucking nightmare

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should be a requirement that if you vouch that something is safe for the public you must test it out and prove it safe on yourself first.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 13

That would be an interesting idea to apply to medical treatments. Kinda think it would bring the rate of progress to a sudden halt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go frack yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For everyone downvoting, you can go to Flint Michigan and drink some water bc that was deemed "safe for consumption" by the government.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Haha is this actually true ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something can be completely safe and still not something you'd want near your home. An enthusiastic metal band, for example.

9 years ago | Likes 337 Dislikes 35

WTF.. I LOVE this..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I would love this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not safe though.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 25

like this? /a/74yLS

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Completely safe"

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 20

If done to code it is.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm sure they're only minor earthquakes. And minor groundwater contamination. It's all very minor, perfectly safe. Surely

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

I mean, the oil industry wouldn't LIE to us about something, would they?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Fracking is not fucking safe you fucking moron

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

In this case, its not safe, but I get your point

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

Here I was just reading how there is pressure to stop dumping of radioactive waste in my state, some of it from fracking. >

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Where in the fraccing process does the waste originate? Only radioactivity I ever encountered was in the densometers. Genuinely curious.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, radioactive waste from fracking?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Huh, just read an article about it. You're right.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oil spills, too. Shit's scary.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Nearly everything underground is radioactive. In Colorado "radioactive waste" from drilling can be less active than surface rocks. ...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

...Its just scary talk to make people not like fracking because they don't understand radiation.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

... and downvoted by people who don't understand radiation. lol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All drilling (rock, oil, gas, water) has norms. Normally occurring radioactive material. It is just natural rocks with natural radioactive 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isotopes in it. As well after years of iron drill equipment touching these norms in the ground they get slightly radioactive as well and 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Need disposing of so it does get mixed into the recycles metal supply of the world and ruin it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

> That doesn't sound completely safe to me.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

but if he supports it, he should put up with any consequences of that support.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 47

So...do u drive a car? Take a bus? Want an oil well, refinery and fuel depot in your back yard? No? Then STFU

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 8

If I had oil in my backyard, I would damn well try to extract and refine it

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If I also ran the company that did all those things, then you'd have a stronger case. Wait, this guy ran that company!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Except he isn't, because he wouldn't file a lawsuit against himself. He'd just not do the fracking there.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"He wouldn't file a lawsuit against himself" ...Have you been paying attention to America's corporate culture and practices at all?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe it's safe but he doesn't want an industrial operation next door, damaging his property values.

9 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 30

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I'm not an expert. But I've studied the process of horizontal shale fracking, and heard the arguments against. It seems fine and safe really

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 18

The area i live in has 1000's of fracked wells and ive never heard of a single problem.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I guess I got downvoted for having taken a higher level college course on oil collection and refinery rather than my opinion.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Never understood why everyone hates on fracking. I live on the Canadian side of the bakken and all our wells are fracked. 10's of thousands

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And ive never heard of a single case of it fucking up anything.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Neither does anyone else. Also, flaming tap water.

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 14

Which is a myth bro.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Flaming tap water is not real, they found out people were putting butane in the water lines to make viral videos

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 16

Not terribly surprised to learn that's a hoax - still, it's more the impact on health from air and water quality I'm concerned about.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean we've had flaming rivers due to pollution. Flaming tap water doesn't seem unlikely. Also source please.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, fracking can cause flammable materials to mix with ground water.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

It can but never to the extent that water is flammable. I am a geologist

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Flaming water has nothing to do with fraccing.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Fracking is fine, as long as it's done far away from me."

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 17

I support wind energy but I'd be pissed if the govt. built one beside my house.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

I wouldn't mind I think they look cool.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're loud and spoil the view.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like through an Indian burial ground.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

/s

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

At least Mr. Peanutbutter stuck with his views.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

What's your opinion specifically on the matter?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I have an orgasm every time there is a shift in power

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see, an another BH fan! How was the 4th season?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

depressing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still sobbing. It's fantastic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The expression "Wish I hadn't but Glad I did" comes to mind.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of the best. It was satisfying to see bojack finally have a happy ending.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've just watched up till eps 11, sad for PC, sad/angry for Beatrice, all and all i feel i want to end my feelings/life. I'm happy 4 BJ tho.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's trying his absolute best to be better in this season, and I genuinely hope it goes through. (I'm still sobbing) didn't have the

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Strength to watch the last eps. I need a hug.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sending_hug.gif

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The lawsuit contends the project would create "a noise nuisance and traffic hazards." safe and annoying are too different things.

9 years ago | Likes 1249 Dislikes 105

All these comments are bought and paid for

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

His company is a huge Fracker, when would he ever say fracking near his home is dangerous and wildly unsafe?...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But, but, that doesn't match up with the narrative they are trying to push!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

two*?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

100 acres is 52,800 feet square. The perimeter will likely have trees, so the noise is unlikely to actually be annoying.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My house sits on a 60x100 property as a comparison

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that wouldn't help OPs attempt to make it seem the CEO is a hypocrite

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And you're the same old kind of money driven asshole. I pity you, you pathetic fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 47

Man, I hate when I reply to the wrong comment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That escalated quickly

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

yeah.. money driven..'m not going to make up lies to drive an agenda.. at least have some integrity, you fuck nugget.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Traffic hazards aren't safe.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

neither is breathing..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's a traffic hazard as in there will now be traffic of people going to work on the small country roads near his house

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Almost as if fracking has negative consequences that outweigh the benefits.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It sounds like you actually believe that bullshit. Do you believe fracking is safe? Are you happy to allow fracking near your water table?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

See, this shit confuses me. Imgur as a collective is dumb enough to vote OP to front page, but then this comment is top upvoted too??

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

People are motivated by more than agreement and disagreement, us vs. them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well he's hardly going to say "because it might fuck up my groundwater" now is he?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Exactly!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Fracking is not 100% safe you guys need to learn more about it as should I.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

I can tel you more people died from goats last year than from fracking.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Nothing is 100% safe.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

That doesn't make all things equally unsafe.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Never underestimate NIMBY. Geophysical engineer by training, here. Fracking is safe. Noise is annoying. That's the gist of it.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

Explain the increased seismic activity in Oklahoma and if they knew the consequences? Also how do you inactivated a fault?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Oh that's the one definite side effect. When you lubricate a fault it will slip. That just happens when you do it too enthusiastically. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

2/2 it also happened in Denver with the injection of the Rocky Mountain arsenal project. One of the first recorded cases.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

3/2 it's VERY small quakes in the scope of things, but it happens in places without quake building codes, causing damage.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Just as too and two are different ;-)

9 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 24

Know their knot.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

twoché

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I just caught that.. well.. I've gone two far :P

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I salute you v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Although too can still make sense here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Uhhhh.......

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nah.. i screwed the pooch..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Worked at a state oil regulator, just like any dangerous private sector activity, it's safe with adequate regulations and enforcement.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Which places it clearly on the government's table. To treat all fracking the same is to make a silly logical error.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So who over sees the long term maintaince of a well after its expired? And what specific chemicals are used to break down the rocks?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Also please note the statement I wrote is not implying that we have such regulation in each locality, only that such regulation exists.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? No chemicals are used to break down the rock. Hydraulic pressure breaks open the rock. Sand keeps it open. Oil flows through sand.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is all up to the EPA, then the regulator of your state, then the company itself. That's always the order.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Since a company follows a profit maximization scheme by definition, only enforcement and penalties (govt) will factor in to their decisions.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A govt sets these policies in an attempt to maximize the utility (private and public) of a resource. Banning access is not optimal.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wells are plugged, capped, cemented when they "expire". Fracking doesn't "break down rock". That's not what a fracture is.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Water under pressure expands fractures in the rock making the cracks bigger. Sand is used to prop it open so the crack remains.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fracking is literally 99% mechanical energy, 1% chemistry.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Oh so youre telling me the actual fracking is just fine then ? Its the dirtiest, lowest quality oil you can get and its environmentally shit

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

never said it was fine. Just pointing out the lawsuit wasn't because it was unsafe (like the statement implied)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's the same reason people oppose having wind turbines built near their property.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

No it's not.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Is too, na-na-nee-nana

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah uhh. No tag backs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1, 2, 3, I declare you're wrong, I'm right, and 4, 5, 6 I seal it in place. Can't triple stamp this double stamp. I win.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nobody else wants the noise nuisance and traffic hazards near their place either, he's not special.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

But his company will sue the shit out of anyone who tries to block fracking near their homes...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Fraccing sites are loud AF, just the deck motors of the pumping equipment alone are unreal let alone the pumps thenselves, blenders, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know, I wasn't doubting it. Just stating that he's no different so he shouldn't get special treatment in regards to location of fracking.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's pretty common for fraccing sites to be kept far away from residences. He's not asking for special treatment, just normal treatment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hi, I've worked frac for a long time. 100% he doesn't want the noise and road dust near his property. We generate a lot of traffic.

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 12

What are your thoughts on the "Gasland Documentary" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mp4ELXKv-w

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That it was chocked full of inaccuracies. Take the "flaming faucet", a study done way back 1976 found high levels of naturally occurring

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

methane in the water supply, prior to any oil and gas activity. When the maker of Gasland was called out on why these facts were left out

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

he stated "because they were not relevant". There's even a video of it out there.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And I work rig-safety and can confirm ThermoNuke is correct. Caveat: if your country has weak environmental law, may not always be the case.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Source says "He joins suit to stop construction of a water tower near his home to be used for fracking."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are probably referring to an AST. Basically a big, temporary, artificial pond/tank to hole fresh water. Not an actual "tower"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And alot of earthquakes in oklahoma

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not like it was. Now that we understand what causes them (injection wells) they have been on the decrease at we shut those wells down

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Alright well that's some good news!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll add also, we pay a lot of money to treat the roads we're working by with dust control to try to take care of the people around us.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 7

We even hired some guys to re-stain someone's deck after our traffic dusted it while it was still wet. We're not evil like many think.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

But who will I take the pitchforks to now? Were fresh out of witches and the dark ones arent due back for another month.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I don't think most people think you, the workers, are evil, just that the big corporations are. I'm not saying they are to be clear.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

The workers are probably normal and generally decent people. The results of the job itself just have rather disastrous side effects.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

He's fine with introducing that noise nuisance and traffic hazard to others, though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And also "Safe" has many meanings and aspects! Noise safety, water safety, environmental safety, air pollution safety... etc....!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quite possibly legit concerns. If that's enough for a lawsuit, no reason to publicly acknowledge poisoning the entire area too though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I was pointing out that he never implied the fracking was unsafe as the statement implied he did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

True, but also fracking isn't safe and probably doesn't want flammable gas coming through his faucet.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Just so happens that Fracking is both unsafe and annoying.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

But traffic hazards aren't safe. That's what a hazard is.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

The hazard isn't from Fracking as this implies, but from an increase in traffic.. which is hazardous anywhere. Lego.. that shit is unsafe!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Wow it's almost like fracking takes industrial levels of truck traffic and puts it on rural roads and that's a problem with fracking

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

He isnt the first person with money that doesnt want something built near his home. Shit happens all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 8

My old city had all the old rich people up in arms about a Walmart being built near them

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

NIMBY

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

BANANA- Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

+1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'd think that with the push to carbon-neutrality, we'd be embracing the shit out of new nuke tech. But no. :(

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats pretty much everyone in his situation. The reason we have HoAs. And you hear about people protesting walmarts being built next to

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

their neighborhoods. This is neither new or unique.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, but it is the name for it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0