Not alternative facts

Jan 24, 2017 8:07 PM

Sunglasses420

Views

112704

Likes

2907

Dislikes

284

nice memes got any sources to back up those claims?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They are spending millions to raise roads and add pumps in Miami.Wonder if the Rs still deny it as they budget to get ahead of flooding?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I wanna see one about the Great Barrier Reef

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe these are just called "facts".

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Keep it up. Facts are facts.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

But there not facts

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 17

Their, there, they're?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

Third one. Thankyou.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I listened to 2 co-workers argue about whether or not there could be "alternative facts". I felt dumber just listening to them.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you sure? I don't see any of this information on government websites.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

These are alllll alternative facts! *does sweeping arm motion*

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

This just in: imgur users straight from facebook dont understand sarcasm

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

We're fucked. We should have stop debating about this over a decade ago.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Its a chinese hoax" - alternative fact

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

but my air conditioned house has been the same temperature the whole time D:

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wasn't 2015 supposed to be the hottest year on record? Oh....wait...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The ocean acidity is terrifying. If that number climbs high enough all ocean life collapses except for jelly fish.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So Archaeologist believe that the Myans died because of climate change...not man made CC. Swirl that around in your marble for a while.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And the people of Pompeii died of a natural disaster. One civ dying due to natural climate change doesn't negate evidence to the man made

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Considering that predates the Industrial Revolution, it's not relevant

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It shows climate change occurs with or without human interference. Dating CC after the industrial revolution is hysteria. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also proves the theory of cycles. To be prepared for that change instead of trying to stop naturally occurring cycles.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Taxing us into oblivion won't change anything. Not an alternative fact.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2016 may...was the hottest year on record but there were more "snowflakes" than ever before. amiright?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

America needs to swap FAITH and BELIEF for actual facts and reason. Its getting embarrassing now.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There is no scientific proof for carbon dioxide to cause the earth's climate change. Not an alternative fact.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 23

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 25, 2017 12:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And you are artificially restricting your statement to avoid the overwhelming evidence that it does. Like that you can calculate the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

increased radiative forcing of the increased CO2, or that Venus is hot enough to melt lead because of its 96% CO2 atmosphere. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Have you every actually read a scientific fact??

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There is scientific proof that carbon dioxide absorbs specific wavelengths of light, which then causes it to release thermal radiation

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You can literally model this on a smaller scale

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

(youtube climate 101 with bill nye)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The last 3 years have been the hottest on record, not just that one year.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You can only have 1 hottest year.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The last 3 years have each been hotter than all the years before them. Can't remember where I read it now, was about a week ago.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And the only reason it wasn't a longer streak is because 97 was a huge outlier. Also why people say warming ended in 97.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Serious question, isn't most of the ice melting not attached to land so wouldn't it already have the displacement in the water?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Depends on where the ice comes from. Sea ice, you are correct. Glaciers over land, you are very wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, most of the ice melting *in the Arctic* is not attached to land. The Antarctic is a landmass, losing ice.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But I thought the Antarctic wasn't losing ice... again not trying to be condescending or anything I really just don't know.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At the temperatures we are experiencing now seasonal sea ice forms more readily because of more snow, but the land glaciers melt more (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and more every year which actually affects sea levels as opposed to sea ice which (mostly) doesn't. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It had a high point recently (around 2012-2014) but it's back to rapidly losing ice mass like it was before then.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chemical properties make ice is less dense then water. Thats why ice floats. Essentially water takes up more space then ice does.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wouldn't that mean it takes up more space though? Same mass, more dense = less volume?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ice in water displaces the same mass as if it were water, meaning there's no level change if the ice is IN water. However, the issue (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is that not all the ice in the world is IN the ocean. Much of it is on land. When that melts and runs into the sea, it will rise. Also, (2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rise will be due to that as well. (4)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to a lesser extent, but still important, is the fact that warmer water in general takes up more space than colder water, so some of the (3)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why don't we all say clever thing to refute this that suggest we know what the fuck we are talking about

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A recent major university study found 78.2% of statistics to be false.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 14

Ahhh, but these have Data to back them up. unimaginable amounts of Data.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And 79.7% made up on the spot!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Wondering what's going on with that 1.5%

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

hmmmm either you are lying or telling the truth... 50/50

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sea ice declining at 13.3% oh good. then it will never totally be gone

9 years ago | Likes 630 Dislikes 13

Lmao

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an accountant this made me chuckle.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is *currently* declining at that rate. The rate likely will not stay constant. (Not to kill your joke, though. I'm just sayin'…)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sea ice isn't the problem. It's only meters thick. Land ice declining is the problem. In the antarctic, it's kilometers thick.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

It's not the ice itself that's the problem, but the decline causing serious damage to wildlife and their hunting / mating.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sea ice melting is still a problem indirectly. Ice has a higher albedo than water.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Best analogy I've heard (from a Vice episode: sea ice is the same water melting and freezing, but when land ice melts, more ice is added.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

For those that don't get it, it is an asymptotic function, there will always be SOME left. Just not a lot.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 3

It's all fun and games until you split an atom

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If you split an atom made of dark matter is it alternative fission?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure. Except the rate of decline changes :(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as long as it is not 100%+... the math still says there will be some left.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, except in the real world melting ice absolutely would end up with a rate of decline of 100%.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HOW DARE YOU BRING REAL WORLD INTO THIS! YOU FUCK OFF WITH THAT NONSENSE!!!!!! :P

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Right, like even when there is literally a baseball sized piece of ice left, it will only shrink 13%

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

No, once it gets to the size of a baseball the process reverses cos global warming is just a natural cycle. Alternative fact of the day.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Oh blow it out your asymptote

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

wow guys, 424 pts? bonus Alternate Fact!: Sea ice is only declining 0.111% each month. That is like nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't The earth go through times of heating and cooling. isn't that what the ice ages is?

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 17

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2017 10:54 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Sure, but there are no "natural" reasons for the warming.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, it is the speed at which it is happening that is at question.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

And the cause, which is only questioned by, well, you know.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And this current speed is all wrong!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup! The earth does go through changes. And if the earth heats up by about 5-8 degrees coastal cities get wiped out and crops don't get rain

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and how long have we been officially recording temperatures?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 18

You may now remove the latter part from your name.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

For asking a question? Foolishness.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We can figure it out through geology

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Which ice age was caused by man?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There was a little, but measureable decrease in global surface temperature after the mongols killed everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So how much are the bodies of the current population of Earth contributing to its temperature?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It wasn't a body-heat thing, it was that there were fewer people burning things during the winters for generations, so, rapid reforestation

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And the resulting carbon sequestration. This is what caused the planet to cool by much less than a degree.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

YES. scientists don't actually know how much humans contribute to climate change. There is no formula that tells us "this much emission =

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

This much rise in temp".

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

That used to be the case decades ago, not so much anymore: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ6Z04VJDco

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

there are models... but its not an exact science since there are so many variables with such a complex system ie: ocean dissolving co2...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...forest density increasing from higher concentrations of co2 etc

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but you can do things like measure the concentration of co2 in the atmosphere, and how much thermal radiation is is being released from...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...earth into space and you can get a pretty good idea of how co2 concentration and global average temperature is related

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1-Dude, the earth has SEEN SOME SHIT. 3 mile high megatsunamis, global firestorms, the ocean has turned to acid and most marine life

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3-a step above supernova) and stripped off Earth's ozone layer thus flooding the planet with deadly radiation, at one point billions of

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4-years ago it's even believed that Earth collided with another planet! That's a theory for the moon's formation: it's collective debris

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But we're here now this isn't about the planet itself but the inhabitants of the planet

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2-drowned, flooded with methane and turning the air into an explosive, poisonous gas, (possibly) a nearby supergiant went hypernova (that's

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5-from that cataclysmic collision. Just because something's not new doesn't mean it's not catastrophic and we shouldn't try to avoid it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, thats nice. We won't survive it, tho. The Earth? She'll live. Just not us. I'd prefer we survive too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what I mean. Also, I like listing some of the shit Earth has been through for all the silly bastards who think "humans are the worst

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thing that has ever happened to this planet". LOL, we don't even rank.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We already know bad things have happened to the Earth far worse than humans, its just that, now that we're here itd be nice if we could stay

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

those damn chinese.....

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

So does Climate Change only effect the North Pole? https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

2. In theory, cold places could see ice sheet growth for a time because warmer air (still below freezing) can produce more snow than

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1. Check out the editor's note at the top of that article

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If the temperature on the Antarctic stays well below freezing, warming ironically causes increased land ice: more precipitation => more ice.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3. colder air. Eventually, though, the avg temps rising above freezing will make rain, not snow, and away go the ice sheets.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Major underrated comment here.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

*overrated.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 25, 2017 1:53 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"Fuck you, ocean currents don't exist, and neither do ice shelf calves"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"These are alternative facts that greatly dispute my opinion and are therefore WRONG!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"No, I just post bullshit science denialism on imgur because my parents are republican, shut up"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, 2016, but it's 2017 now! And it's cold here!

9 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 16

It's january, in chicago, and I have been able to go out w/o a coat for a week straight. It's unnatural.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually this year should be cooler because of el nina but the over trend is still upward

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

today was 82 F here

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nova scotia as well +5°C today and rain. jan and feb are always usually cold and snowy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 1 mile from the pacific in California and it's constantly raining and almost 32 degrees. I concur with you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 out of the 10 hottest years on record have been in the past 10 years

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually this post must be old, 2017 is now the hottest year on record. Global averages have risen 1.7 deg. Covered on NPR last week.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're using (less than) one month of 2017 to make this determination? Interesting. Please continue.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was right about 1.7 deg since we started tracking part, tho. So plz let me get some bonus points for that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope I am wrong haha, i have been trying to stop writing "2016" for the dates so much I legit lost track of what year we're in ha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We're in 2017...haven't even gone through a whole month of it yet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please continue forecasting how 2017 will be the hottest year on record....before it happens.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just ate so there can not be world hunger!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

here in Quebec our ice rinks barely stay frozen. We may need to declare a state or emergency soon

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Though it's the year of the rooster, i.e year of the cock, which probably means it's the year that will fuck us all.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not in Ontario, we should have a couple of feet of snow but the grass is green and we're getting rain

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Here in Sudbury the city hasn't opened any of the public outdoor rinks yet... it's almost uncanadian

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same here, only had 1 or 2 days with some snow so far, same last few years too, 10 years ago it was at least knee-deep in winter

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's how it should be

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Alberta too. It's hovering around 0... it's messed up man. Messed up.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Alberta here too. We had 3 weeks straight of sub -25 temps.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not normal, it's 3 right now. I remember in like 2008 we had 6 ft of snow overnight

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2010/2011 we were snowed in bad here. There was about 4 feet on the ground and it was coming down hard. -30 meant no work it was great.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a Canadian winter, not rain, green grass and 3 degrees out

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's been raining in Minnesota, where it's usually Minnesota.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's 70 degrees outside here and we normally have snow by now here. Indiana

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

It's about 40 here in central IL, no snow. Same weather everyday for the past two weeks almost. Odd to say the least.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i wore shorts... im in illinois... wheres the snow?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fort Wayne here. Can confirm. Normally 2 feet of snow by now, but it's 50 out! No snow!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well it's 29 here in Portland, OR and it's normally 29 here this time of year.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks like I'm moving to Indiana.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good time to move, we just got rid of Pence....oh wait....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It'll go back to snow in 2 days, Indiana weather is not to be trusted

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Shit it was like that in Michigan a few days ago.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's hovering around 0° Celsius here in Thunder Bay. Normally around -20° to -40° around this time of year.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

MN we've had an entire week above 0°F. Send help.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't the earth naturally heating up anyway but we are just exponentially increasing it?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes we are in a naturally occurring global warming stage but we are speeding up the rate at a pretty alarming rate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we're really just trying to see what it's feel like 100k years from now

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For all the 'fluctuation' people: https://xkcd.com/1732/

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 8

We are so fucked.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

To the top with you

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Feels like we're already totally fucked. Just hammering nails into our coffin with the recent ignorance

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

People need to see this

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Fluck you Americans, too!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Two things that not many people make a big deal about but which have a huge impact are meat farms and throwing away food both create methane

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Methane is the second most powerful greenhouse gas

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9000 BCE, do yourself a favor and find that date on this site.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Good eye. Here's some upvotes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also 500 BCE

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoever downvoted me obviously didn't find the date on the site...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why is every reply comment on this being downvoted?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This desperately needs to be top comment.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Does it? I'm the furthest from a climate change denier, but starting the clock at 22k years ago when we have millions of years of ice cores?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

We don't really have millions of years of ice cores. Over millions of years the planet has changed dramatically. If it does so again we die.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Starting the clock further back might change the results of the illustration. Is this what you're getting at?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly... he's disproving cycles without showing far back enough to conclude there are no cycles. I still think the current trend is 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

unprecedented, but you can plug the holes by showing the whole story.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We do not have millions of years of ice cores.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Looks like you are right, vostok has been sealed for 15m years but the cores are only 800k years old. Still 40x longer.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Xkcd has a reputation for well thought out, well researched posts. I'm inclined to trust he did his due diligence.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Not trying to be a jerk, answers only please. Didn't they change it from global warming to climate change because it's not getting hotter?

9 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 23

No, "they" changed it because Bush advisor Frank Luntz decided it sounded better.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Global warming is under the blanket term "climate change". Climate change talks about all effects. Global warming is specific to the warmin

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Climate change because the system (Earth's conditions) is changing, but not necessarily getting warmer in some climates. Trending towards /1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

roam the Earth. This planet doesn't need us, we need it. Time for humanity to start acting like we recognize this fact /3

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

leaving the interglacial period of the ice age we're currently in. Completely typical of Earth, just not at this rate and not while humans/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No. Changed b/c g.w. is only 1 thing that is happening. Climate change is more broad & accurate. E.g., g.w. + sea lvl rise + acidity, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is definitely getting hotter, but no one cares. They will care when all the fish die off from the ocean temp increasing.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You want us to give you an answer to a question which says "because it's not getting hotter?" What fucking planet ARE you on? Serious q

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the 1970s, when people started getting serious about studying climates, some news reporters got ahold of partial information and claimed/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That the world was cooling. The news reports got to the cover of time magazine and a lot of popular places, even if the data was incomplete/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And the reporters were only partially understanding the topic. As it turns out climate data had really been available for hundreds of years/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And once people had access to modern computers you could report on it more accurately. The climate is getting hotter, fact.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is global warming because the globe is warming, not the weather. As NDT stated, weather is dynamic.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

While the Earth is getting hotter (more energy comes in than is radiated out), it doesn't mean it gets hotter *everywhere* all the time. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For the general public the term has been changed to climate change due the the average Joe making the "well its cold here" argument.

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 3

But yes, the average global temperature is increasing and this is resulting in climate change.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Yeah but it snowed just today, therefore it isn't real!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I swear people are retarded. It's like a baby is getting taller 10 cm every day. Just because it's getting taller doesn't mean it's tall.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just because the planet is getting warmer, doesn't mean it's never cold. Smfh

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No. It is getting hotter (and the last several years have all been the hottest on record, even when we expect fluctuation). 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is getting hotter. 2016 was the hottest year ever recorded for the 3rd year in a row. Avg global temps skyrocketed once ind rev started.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No, they changed from global warming to climate change because of political and stigma reasons.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Plus Global Warming really was never a good name for it. Climate Change makes more sense to a layperson on what it all means.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's climate change because warming does not cover all of the issues arising.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hotter on average, which is causing more extreme weather, that may sometimes be cold.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is getting hotter. It would be getting hotter without humans. The issue is how quickly it is happening.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Global temperature change causes more extreme weather due to more energy in the system.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Global warming leads to climate change. They are two different things that go hand in hand together.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Two different things that go hand-in-hand? It sounds like you're saying global warming and climate change are correlated, but not causation

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

While the planet on average has gotten hotter the changes to the plabet will actually make some places colder. The change to the name 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 4

I played with my plabet tonight.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plabet earth made me laugh

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is because u get alot of ppl saying "look at the snow global warming isnt real"

9 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 3

I think 'climate instability' is a term that will be used more in the furture as it is more accurate.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think with the history of ice ages and more temperate periods we can assume that it is a very accurate description.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cont. With ice caps melting salinty in the ocean will increase. This will shut down deep ocean currents and slow the ocean gyres 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

Serious Q: If I melt an ice cube into a half liter bowl of salted water... will the salinity of the water increase or decrease? Discuss.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Salinity would decrease the ice cube is only water. salt does not freeze with water it will precipitate out

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Salinity would decrease since there would be more clean water with the same amount of salt

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

For example the warm for the gulf stream goes north to the poles then goes south along the uk bringing warmer water which makes the uk 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

What? So beyond having 60 something years of data that we only look at 30 years of. The earth has periodically through this and we have life

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 15

Warmer so if this slows and possibly stops the temperature in the UK will drop 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Eventually global warming will peak and boom. New ice age. Such much for warmth

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Technically we're in an ice age, just an intermission. We will most likely enter a greenhouse climate due to human activity.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Might be a few hundred thousand years before that happens though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By 2005. Remember the 90's?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That will happen with or without our help. It's just moving faster than normal

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

So you're telling me we haven't escalated thongs?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

We have, and by a huge margin. The data points from before and after the industrial revolution look like halves of 2 different charts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Escalated thongs"... sarcasm aside, thanks for that chuckle!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Aaaa afaik

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have. But it will happen anyway

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"Why do you mind that I shot him? He was going to die eventually anyway."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Maybe Il put 1000of ice dispensers on the poles?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0