Just asking questions

Apr 5, 2022 1:37 PM

seehemewe

Views

114890

Likes

1551

Dislikes

47

Does Tucker out peanut butter on his junk and have his dog lick it up?

I’m not saying Tucker does this, I’m just asking questions.

Why can’t I ask if Tucker kills a cute kitten with his bare hands during eat commercial break?

#traitor #russianasset

Traitor: Gives aid and comfort to enemy in time of war. Just shoot him now.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tucker is like that guy at work that everyone hates that says stupid shit, then says "well someone had to say it!"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is Tucker Carlson into scat porn? Does he rub one out to pictures of cow droppings on a daily basis? I'm just asking questions.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

does his audience know how much his net worth is?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perfect response.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying that Tucker Carlson keeps underage Filipino boys caged in his basement. I'm just asking, "What if he does?"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rupert Murdoch is a Russian asset

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did Tucker really asked those questions? Sources? Fuck dude. How much more demeaning can this man be?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No, he didn't. OP is spreading misinformation and doing the Russian's job for them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if Tucker chugs cum? What if Tucker likes getting triple penetrated with bowling balls? What if Tucker sucks D from the back?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying any of this is true, just asking the questions.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thus proving that there are such things as stupid questions

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My question was does Putin peanut butter his junk for Tucker to lick it up or does he use Puddin? Just asking questions…

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if Tucker Carlson is a pedophile who assaulted his neighbour's kid? Not saying he did. Just asking the question.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is satire unless a SOURCE is provided. I'm 90% sure the Joe Walsh tweet was a "joke" tweet. As in "I bet we'll hear him say..." tonight

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's what it was

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ppl srsly suffer from some type of dementia making them believe propaganda disappeared from their own country and that deception isn't real.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does Tucker Carlson put peanut butter on the cocks of stray dogs and lick it off before french kissing his children? #justasking

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know this is on purpose but God damn he sounds too fucking dumb to be on purpose

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't think he directly said this? Some paraphrasing maybe. Not that i wouldn't believe he said it i just haven't seen the clip

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

No, he didn't. People are taking this as fact and he didn't say anything remotely approaching it up to this point.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I read it as that's what he BELIEVES Carlson WILL say

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Are we talking about Tucker "I Lie" Carlson again?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone have a source video of this? Want to forward to ppl who still watch him

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seen here demonstrating the size of dicks he's able to suck to be on air.

4 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 1

but that's the end-side width he can swallow, right?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should've gone with width, you're right. v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bro that’s dinky. I could suck that Dick and I ain’t even gay. This fucker probably deepthroating Ron Jeremy levels of cock.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Why? Here's why https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Very close cousin of "Betteridge's law of headlines".

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it was wonderful fun to do in internet forums in the early days of trolling, but Tucker is doing it to lead his audience

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nice, straight out of urban dictionary, looked it up before replying to you. Did not realize I needed this perfect phrase.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if Tucker fucks his kids every night? I'm not saying it's true, I'm just asking a question.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Why can't we ask these questions?" asked the political commentator with the largest platform in the country.

4 years ago | Likes 494 Dislikes 2

He can ask the question but should also provide the proven answer when it's knownalready that it WAS Russia.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should not be allowed to use the word “news” anymore.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because he can't state it as fact, he's just avoiding lawsuits. "Hey, I just asked questions! Nothing more!"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

He can ask the question, but the answer is still NO

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can he go an entire show without asking insinuating questions? Maybe do a little research if your show masquerades as a news program. (1

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

2) Proper news isn't to report what is being questioned but to find out themselves. If you hear it is raining outside, then go look.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

ye but that sounds hard, id rather just listen to tucker carlsen the millionare tell me that poor people are the problem!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That's why they make up their own imaginary evidence they swear up and down was true on Facebook group Freedomeagle.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Let me explain to you how IM the victim here"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did Tucker Carlson rape and murder and 14-year old girl in Washington, D.C. in 2002?

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

14? I heard she was 4. Don't know for sure, just what I heard!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People have to do their own research, see I heard she was 14 but there were 4 of them.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I looked this up and cant find anything about the 14, 4 year-old old girls. This is proof that it has been scrubbed by the deep state!!!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He didn't ask the question. This is a fabricated quote.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is Tucker Carlson a pedo? A psychopath? Not saying it’s true but why can’t we ask these questions?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We reached out to him but he refused to comment. Why would he do that if he’s innocent? We’re just asking questions he doesn’t want asked.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I HAVE BEEN SILENCED!

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

His hypocrisy so loud it echos around the world

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Silence him with a claw hammer.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you include the phrase "I'm just asking questions" in your hot take that should automatically warrant a brick to the face.

4 years ago | Likes 236 Dislikes 3

Do I get a pass? Or should I just hang out by the closest ER?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would you settle for a boot to the head?

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Both.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They usually prefer boots on the tongue

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And another for Jenny and the wimp.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Especially when the answers are easily found and yet you never follow up with the answers, or even *actually* ask someone who might know.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why can't we throw a brick to his face? I'm not saying anyone should, I'm just asking questions.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's valid to question reporting. There's a lot of propaganda. Questioning credibly verified reports is fucking dumb though.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Particularly questioning them without any shreds of evidence to the contrary.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

A motive or gain for deception can be used as evidence. But when an abundance of material evidence exists, that can be discounted.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the classic Qanon approach "Oh, they'd have so much to gain if they did that heinous thing despite any proof at all that they did"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What sucks most about Qanon is that many of the claims have a tiny grain of truth. Yes, there are politicians who are pedophiles. But then >

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure but TC is not a journalist and has no credibility. It’s also clear what his motives for his ‘questions’ are.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

True on point 1. But the motive would obviously be to demonize Russia. In this case, it seems Russia is actually just a demon.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait hold the fucking phone. He actually said this shit? I thought it was a joke.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

This was from 9am Mon morning and F*cker Carlson doesn't air until the evening I think the original tweet was an assumption based on 1/

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The tweet says 8:37 PM unless I’m missing something, sorry, I probably am

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The reply is from that evening. The original is from the morning. And it’s been confirmed satire.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotcha, thanks!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the weekend's news. Aka "here's how he will 'spin' this devastating news and suck Putin's peen at the same time..." 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No way he actually said this. I also thought it was a joke... is it not?!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He didn't say this. It was Joe's prediction of what he'd say

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh thank god

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What the fuck? Why isn't the CIA questioning this idiot?

4 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 3

It’s not like they would be accusing him of anything either. They would just be asking him questions. And maybe some fists have questions.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because he's just a sock-puppet for Murdoch, who has enough money to tell them to leave him alone while he destroys America apparently.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't work stateside /s

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sort of. They don't investigate American citizens unless they're affiliated with foreign actors of interest. *Focus* is external.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because he’s just an ass. Not an asset.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Agents are aware of what they're doing. Assets don't have to be. They can be conveniently manipulated. Carlson is definitely an Asset. >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

< Also an Ass Hat.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Legally he's not doing anything "wrong" because Fox has repeatedly claimed they're not a news agency. It's commercial entertainment. It's

4 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

jersey shore. Real people know it's fucked. The few that don't are chastised. Lots of laws need to change to make him legally responsible :/

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Should be under the category of satire. With a half out of five star rating.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They 100% operate as a propaganda machine until they get challenged legally, and then they hide behind the "it's entertainment bro" defense

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Perhaps they are being used as a honeypot, albeit a dangerous one.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They have 'News' in their name for fuck's sake.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fox is a news cannel but the tucker Carlson show is not legally a news program. It's like watching Futurama on the stupid "Box" network

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My understanding was that isn't an actual quote, but rather a mocking imitation of what he's likely to say.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I checked, that is indeed a satyrical imitation that's gone viral but that a lot of people (as myself) could take seriously. That's saying >

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

something, that we need to put a disclaimer bellow that kind of parody. It sounds so likely people don't even know if it's a joke anymore.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Agreed. There's enough real things to make judgements with and folks throwing around stuff like without the disclaimer only makes it easier

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

for his defenders to dismiss arguments by saying info is inaccurate, made up, unfair, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He is a great asset of Putin whether or not he even knows it. By the way I think of this as Putin’s war, not the Russian people.

4 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 5

I doubt he does take money from Russia. He's just so bent on stirring hate that he'll say anything

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think of the American Revolutionary War as the US declaring independence from the King, not so much England. And if a King is nothing 1/

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2/ more than a rich guy in power selling lies to the masses that they’re special & should remain in power, I think there is nothing more

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

3/ American than taking down rich murderous bastards.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4/ I have no problem with many millionaires, but billionaires only get there by doing unethical (even if legal) actions. We should put

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5/5 them all on notice.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0