Ring / bar pendulum

Sep 21, 2021 2:44 AM

oldbaldjewishman

Views

107990

Likes

1390

Dislikes

9

Ring / bar pendulum

Where can I get one?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can someone please scale this down into a desk toy like those five balls on a string. I want this.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Just a double pendulum with extra steps

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

It's not though. The double pendulum don't have a counter balance

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Moving the center of mass of one of the pendulums doesn't make it not a double pendulum

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is this any different than regular double pendulum? I would assume it would be the same with a bar with the same center of gravity.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

My eyes wtf

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can, someone tell this guy he made a perpetual motion machine? Quick... Before big oil kills him off.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

How would it work in space? ?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well this is mesmerizing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the tentacle with the knife

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me, trying to dance

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really don’t like that I can’t predict the movement

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I want this. My children wouldn't get any homework done but I want this.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would make the pit and the pendulum a lot scarier.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sauce: https://youtu.be/foxqlkQ1VBA

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ball bearings on this thing gotta be SMOOF

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are getting sleepy…

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Me too, ringbar pendulum. Me too.

5 years ago | Likes 392 Dislikes 2

Does the ring slide and pivot on its bearing or only pivot?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Robot Olympics

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I liked it when it turned around

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 100% confident that the laws of physics are being obeyed, but man it looks like they arent.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Does not compute

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally, something with worse rhythm than me.

5 years ago | Likes 291 Dislikes 2

aaaaah! I couldn't figure out why this video irked me. That's it! That's exactly it!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd high-five you for that comment, but if probably miss.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's debatable.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

?1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

These have always looked to me like damned souls suffering fiery torment.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 2

I've always wondered if this was intentional.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

I can take the stairs two at a time

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

This is exactly what I thought of

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's a maths equation that describes that

5 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 1

Isnt this the chaos one? Or is that a triple pendulum?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A math equation that is guaranteed to get the wrong answer in the real world - The best kind of math.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Go home physics, you're drunk?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sadly it's part of chaos theory so good luck.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

No. It's only "chaos theory" if you envision even a normal pendulum being randomly struck by air molecules, and bearings with stick-slip.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It is chaos theory because it's behavior can't be predicted with any sort of certainty beyond a small timeframe.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's similar to the 3 body problem isn't it?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

3 body problem has a pretty simple equation, with forces, and thus acceleration, only dependent on the distances. A double pendulum, 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

on the other hand, is a mess, because the forces also depend on the velocities of the two pendulums, and not on an easy way. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It equals 42

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might be right, but it's most likely going to be some Fourier series bullshit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I learned to hate Fourier.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The man or the method?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Back then I wouldn't differentiate.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something like this. Not quite, as this equation makes some simplifying assumptions that don't hold here.

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

I remember dynamics being deceptively simple. It looks complicated as fuck, but if you understand the pattern, you’ll get it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Working out the forces in a double pendulum is tough as hell. Go the Lagrangian route instead. Mush easier to work with energies here.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m glad someone remembers it. It’s been 12 years since I took that class and that info is gone. I got a good grade though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have to take your word for it...

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I haven't double checked. I just image searched "double pendulum equations" and took the first result that looked reasonably familiar.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Average imgurian googles double pendulum equations and sees something familiar, is this the real life

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The main assumption is that each of the two moving parts is a perfect pendulum, with all the mass concentrated at the end.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

assume a spherical cow

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This equation is call the Vatz distribution and describes the cylindrical pattern of sound waves at the molecular level.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh. I thought it'd just be {-x;y???}

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I boy that takes me back.. i have worked out that problem a few years ago in class. Not a fun time, sooo many pages of math to get to that

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's half a dozen lines of math if you go the Lagrangian route. Sure, some lines look like that one, but it's quick and no heavy thinking.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes but my professor made us explain each line of math with english showing we knew what we did in detail so it became a lot of mathematica

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kudos to your prof making sure you actually understand what you are doing and not just spew out a formula you learned by heart.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Technically, yes. However, it's so sensitive to exact starting conditions that it's effectively worthless for predicting motion.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0