Brothers from different mothers

Jun 17, 2017 12:13 AM

kendie2

Views

113524

Likes

2487

Dislikes

74

Apparently this means those kids are biologically siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The one chick on the left is hot

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I wonder if they mix and match

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

but it's the same flavor

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: one brother fucked both girls, and got away with it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Keeping it all in the family /a/muQRI

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

IS THIS A SURPRISE?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What are the chances?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"hey mom!....wait....no...is that auntie?......and which one is dad?!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and genetically the two are siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say they all look alike.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

they could make the ultimate porn

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lets keep this ball going guys

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This should be a TV show

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of each married twin has a big head.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is because genetically those little boys are not cousins but siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the kids are genetically brothers

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WHATDIDYOUEXPECTED ????

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, those people, they all look the same. Just sit around and expect other people to take care of them. Obviously I'm not a fan of babies.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, it's still strange the women got pregnant at allmost the same time. It's not always easy getting pregnant.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Right sister is hotter

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*who look alike, who for people, that for things.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well no shit. You dont say.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is twins marrying twins considers wrong? Because aren't they like in laws?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

At that age, all babies look identical to me.

9 years ago | Likes 921 Dislikes 5

That's ageist!

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 17, 2017 9:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Eh, I mean these ones are black. They look different to the white ones. And the black AND the white ones looks different to Asian ones.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They all look like either Wallace Shawn or Don S Davis.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention that those kids are genetically siblings. So no shit they look alike.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

*like potatoes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do look the same. Unless its your kid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The sisters don't really look that identical either.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Ageist!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Big headed puking pooping alien creatures.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Cause they are black? Racist! Just kidding. All babies do pretty much look the same to me also.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Ahaha racism, the funniest joke of all.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes, because they're black.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I'm gonna show you a ginger baby than a super black baby

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most people look very similar to most other people (in the face) to me. Like, almost every redhead could be close cousins or even siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Do you have Prosopagnosia

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Probably not. I can distinguish faces. But faces tend to look similar.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yea what about the black white brown or asian 1s

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Especially after they're spit roasted.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those children are genetically siblings, not cousins. pretty cool

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Did you bang my wife? " "nah bro"

9 years ago | Likes 611 Dislikes 3

Not sure

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"... at least, I don't think I did..."

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Why even bother

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

" did you bang my wife?" " I honestly cant tell the difference"

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

how would she know if it was they look the same oops wrong brother oops babys

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

*Black guy points to head*

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

DNA test won't work on the kid either. If a pair of them has an affair, it might be hard to prove ^^

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Sounds like a screenplay.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

A very hard to follow screenplay

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They could have an affair and not even know it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now THAT's the screenplay ;)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe those children are genetically twins.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 24

Genetically siblings, same DNA parents with 2 different zygotes and gestations

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Siblings, not twins.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

effectively fraternal, not identical.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Genetically any kids both couples have they will be considered siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The babies are classified as twins

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 20

Nope. Meiosis has a shuffling effect. Same reason two siblings of the same gender aren't genetically identical.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's a rather simplistic, and incorrect, way to put it. Sure.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The technical term would be double first cousins, as genetically related as full siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

This would be different as assuming both sets of parents were fraternal, the babys' DNA could be identical

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Double first cousins are for any combination of siblings as parents. You get the genetic part only with double twins as the parents.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Thank god for the role of the dice with genes and they are not genetically the same! That would be even more weird.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I forgot that bit...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think DNA *quite* works like that, but I'm interested to know why you think they are

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I don't know. It's a fun fact. Look it up.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

The Dad's and mom's both have identical DNA. So genetically they are siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That's not how it works. Genetic variation occurs in creating the sperm and egg so the children will have different alleles

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Siblings but not twins? The way genes are assigned for the children it's unlikely all the same genes from the one parent have been passed on

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

They wouldn't be twins. But if they were born on the same day, that would be pretty funny.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Genetic siblings. Not twins. Actual cousins.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

i hope they tag the kids... otherwise mixups may happen

9 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 2

Same with the wives.. ;0)

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Always wondered, would it really matter?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A little bit. Genetically identical at birth, but their genes change over life and differently

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Would they be identical at birth? I mean siblings aren't identical because it's a bit random every time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

My bros are twins. Identical. Fraternal are not identical. My bros are mirror twins...one left handed one right 0_o twins are interesting

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The kids look a few months apart

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

their genetic material will be identical, but I agree with @dennisNedrey, fingerprints will be different.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Similar but not identical. They will be siblings genetically.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. It would be the same as if the same couple had kids twice. If you have a same sex older or younger sibling are they identical to you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if both of their parents are identical twins, wouldn't they be technically identical twins as well?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. The genetic code of the babies are different. Each baby came from a different sperm and different egg so different DNA.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Think it like this: "one" set of parents has multiple children. Will they all be identical?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If the parents are both identical twins, this babies are biological siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 581 Dislikes 4

o.O

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*the

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

*these

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

So if he turns out to be a bitch, he's really a son of a bitch?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My friend is the son of a similar situation and he calls his little cousin his brother since they're basically siblings

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

. . So if they ever need a kidney. ...

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The kids knee grows.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My dad has an identical twin. All my siblings are half siblings (same mom). I'm as genetically similar to my cousins as I am to my siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please explain I'm very confused

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait so your dad and his twin swapped places for banging your mom? Does she know?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically same dad but different moms? Did I get that right?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, dad is a twin. Same Mom 2 different dads

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

from what I understand, your mom slept with your dad and his twin?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

not mine, but yes that is what they meant

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you sure? Twins don't rule out the fact that your parents sibling is your aunt/uncle and their kid is your cousin.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 21

If they are identical twins, they could be considered the same person genetically. That would make the children genetically siblings.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Ah, I understand. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

BIOLOGICALLY means the 2 kids have around 50% of their genes in common. People have 25% in common with an aunt, 12.5% with a cousin normally

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Ah, I gotcha. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think they meant that the children are biologically similar in a way that normally only siblings would be

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Ah, I see. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 10

Yup. God, I love genetics

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Siblings are people who share genetic material from the same two parents. Identical twins have identical information, in a pairing like this

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

Because both sets of parents can contribute only the same genetic information, their children are siblings, not cousins, genetically. source

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

I'm actually a geneticist.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

But wouldn't it be most likely that they kids aren't like each other? I understand how they're siblings but crossing over should occur

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0