Hopefully this is a good sign for Nov

Sep 1, 2022 12:40 AM

kingbudo101

Views

72007

Likes

1164

Dislikes

8

Source: https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1565128699019571200

C-C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did he ever say “a democrat will have my seat over my dead body!”?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell yeah, a qualified native democrat woman in office. Nice work, Alaskan voters

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Does she stand for election again in November, or does she get a 2 year term?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How the fuck can you have the dame geezer in power for 46 years

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

49* and people keep voting for him in the primaries and general

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well it did take ranked voting, which isn’t a nationwide thing, so it might not be as big of a good sign for Dems

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude in office longer than my older sister been alive (even by republican standards)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*died*

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Died.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't get cocky, but FUCK YEAH!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This shit? This is not how a 'Red Wave' begins. A spark of hope returns for the future. Maybe.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You all need term limits.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow! IT’s a new chapter !

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell yea

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Died.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

Jesus fucking christ. Is that a record term for the nation?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to Wiki he's 6th longest tenured in the House and 9th longest tenured combined Senate & House. Record holder had almost 60 years.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There was a dude that went 2 months short of 50 years and lost renomination...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When does the term end?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She has to win again in November, or else she's out in January.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't he sorta crazy?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well hes dead sooo

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No more Sarah Failin.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This was just to fill the seat til the end of the term in January, Peltola goes up against Palin again in November to decide next term, so>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>hopefully this doesn't scare republicans into getting out and voting but it might.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

awesome picture of her, too

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.billtrack50.com/legislatordetail/15576 his track record isn't actually horrific. He's OG GOP though.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

OG GOP isn't great buy it's a lot better than current GOP.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The previous guy? Yeah, he held the seat for nearly half a century straight. He started his terms before Reagan started his.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank god. I hope she does great things

4 years ago | Likes 242 Dislikes 0

Fuck doing great things. Just hope she sticks around half as long as her predecessor.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

She should start by winning in November

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

She only has a few months before she needs to win another election, but, if Palin runs again, well, she already beat her.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She has another election in November

4 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Outstanding. Side note: Fucking term limits, ever heard of them? Jesus fucking christ....

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

With how fucked the US is with corporate corruption, term limits would actually makes things a lot worse. Aside from that, If a politician

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

can keep winning there primaries and general elections, it means they are well liked by their constituents. Whats wrong with that?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I would like an explanation on why term limits make corruption worse, because I honestly don't get that. As for the second point, 1/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

a system that favors the incumbent means that opposing votes can be suppressed and artificially prolonged by a powerful minority. Which 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

should sound familiar to any one subject to a first past the ballot electoral system. 3/3

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Politician's final terms turn into massive give aways to corporations in attempt to get cushy jobs for after office. We already see this

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

now. Adding term limits would make it happen much more frequently.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And she won using a ranked choice system which I never would have expected Alaska to try before so many other places. Great news

4 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 0

We have it due to having a ballot initiative process in our state law, bypassing state legislature.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have it in Maine and it's awesome. One political party hates it, for reasons.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If there's virtually no risk of a democrat winning, GOP is game for whatever. This election is thanks to Sarah Palin haters :D

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

We are surprisingly liberal in some ways… but not the ones that matter most, most of the time. Hopefully this is the beginning of the change

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ranked choice is easier to pass in smaller elections. Lots of cities have it.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The fights against it so far are like... it's not just counting it's MATH!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

RCV is the "common core" of election methods. I was going to say it's the CRT of elections, but that's already CRT.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alaska has UBI too, pretty crazy how progressive some of their policies are when they're so vocally conservative.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They don't have UBI, they have an annual stipend.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok fair, but it's closer to UBI than most other places.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fucker has been there since 73!??? That shouldn’t happen anywhere. No one should “lead” for that long.

4 years ago | Likes 622 Dislikes 6

Seniority gives committee placements which brings money back to his constituents. Senior shitty reps literally cost money to replace.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MOAR LIKE DON OLD M I RITE!?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, he Don Dead now, so lol

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks like you need term limits to limit the abuse of political power.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

1973, same year as Roe ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Name recognition is a hell of a drug

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They serve longer than many kings and dicators.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep. 100% fuckkkk the fact a rep can be in office this long.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That is longer than I’ve been alive and I’m old af!!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's really hard to get a change over in House seats unless there is a large local demographic change. Gotta love ranked choice voting.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guess they didn't want to vote them out.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dumb people fear change. "Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change."

4 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 1

Dunno. Change is not inherently good. Some changes should be feared.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude was 88!! Wtf is someone that old doing in government??!!!

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Making laws on them tubes that runs the interwebs or something of the such.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's OK, his name was "Young"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well people keep voting for him in the primaries and in the general. If that's who the constituents want, than what's wrong with that?

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 14

Well, how you draw the districts determines how those votes count so... who knows, I guess? (Do districts apply to these elections?)

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

for Alaska, they only have 1 House seat. gerrymandering doesn't apply here.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Sep 1, 2022 1:34 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

In the US term limits would make the already rampant corruption much worse. Final terms would into massive give aways to corporations in a

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

attempt to get a cushy job after they leave office. If they keep winning primaries and general elections, it means they are well like. Whats

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

wrong with having a politician that's well liked by their constituents?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Even with a 20year term limit he would have been out 30 years ago!

4 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 1

Term limits are undemocratic and would increase the amount of corruption in politics, not decrease it.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 48

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Restricts voting options and makes money matter more for winning elections. Think about an issue past how you "feel" it'd work just one time

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes because a lack of term limits has worked so well for the Supreme Court & many authoritarian pseudo-dictatorship countries

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The supreme court's problem is that it's an unelected position. If you're telling me who I can and can't vote for, you're not democratic.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i want you to read what you just wrote, think about it for a few minutes, then TRY to explain it to the rest of us.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Jesus, you're dense. It's undemocratic because it restricts who people can vote for. It increases corruption by making reputation 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

insignificant in terms of a politician's career prospects. Why would I vote in my constituent's best interest if they can't keep me employed

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then why does POTUS have term limits?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It shouldn't. If the people want to keep a president around, they should have that option. Notice how the establishment only established 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

presidential term limits after the first wildly popular socialist president had a run that was a little too long for the elites' liking? 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

explain

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Imagine the government telling you you couldn't vote for someone. That's how it's undemocratic. As for how it increases corruption: more 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

churn means money matters more in elections since you can't run on rep, and maintaining rep matters less since you can't be reelected. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How on earth are term limits undemocratic. Please, for the love of God explain that to me.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You're telling the people they can't vote for who they want. How is that NOT undemocratic?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone can vote for literally anyone they want at any election. Term limits do not take that away. You can vote for a fictional character.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll try to explain: if the people want to vote for someone to lead them but term limits prevent this, then their choice is being restricted

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Statisically it reduces corruption. There are great candidates that might be hindered by it, but they too can BECOME corrupt.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Not saying I agree btw, but it's a consideration.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah that whole argument is thrown away when someone who can't be ousted in reasonable time is preventing proper rule.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a problem with the length of a term, not with the amount of terms one should be able to have provided people keep voting them in.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0