Maple flavored sass

May 14, 2017 6:27 PM

We can't really have a Southern area, since most of the main population of Canada is all along a curved line.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

HER CLOTHES MELTED ON TO HER SKIN

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just means we have some really good lawyers!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The coffee might be more nuanced, but there are still the frozen dinners that all need to tell you to take it out of the carton first. >_<

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey! The old lady just wanted her medical bills to be paid, she didn't want to go to court but McDonalds cornered her.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Oddly enough. The story of the lady with the hot McDonald's coffe is actually pretty bad. She went to hospital with serious burns and 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Was really close to dying. Google Stella Liebeck lawsuit. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Nobody ever mentions her namee

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man I expected to be pissed at the comments. I am so happy I'm not :)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That poor woman has been mocked, but all she wanted them to do was cover like 10k of medical expenses when she had to get skin grafts

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Canada is sorry if you don't smart enough.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

I am not immune to the internet. I went to go find images of the lady that got burned from the coffee,&I don't want to share them.Fuck that.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

But the cup still has a message about the temperature of it's contents

9 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 3

You're not invited to my birthday party

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Its for tourists, sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 10

Do they know the lady from that lawsuit that got McD's to put that on the cups nearly died of shock after 3rd degree burns from that coffee?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I first read this as 'Maple Flavored Ass'.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm American so can't confirm, but I bet they have maple flavored asses

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think you have to be Canadian to confirm this. You just have to know a Canadian.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know Canadians but I don't know any Canadians in a way which would tell me what their asses taste like.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds like a situation that could be rectified. Heh. Rectified.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't forget to mention that it is made out of paper and you have to hold it with your hand.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Clever Canadians!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Punitative damaged for the win! Simple invention to screw up your whole society

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

When a company makes 1.35 million in just coffee A DAY, any amount tends to be very trivial with no incitement to change their practices

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The actual story is more complicated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is always is. The root cause why you have to have disclaimers everywhere is in punitative damages. It screws up lots of other places too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald%27s_Restaurants simple invention to punish a company that otherwise would have laughed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just so many lawsuits. America

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

The McDonald's lawsuit occurred because their coffee was at 180 degrees causing third degree burns in 2-7 seconds.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The point of the jury awarding high punitive damages was to make McDonald's actually change and lower the temp rather than take the $ hit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By the McDonald's quality manager's own admission, 700 burn incidents in 10 years or so was economically too few to bother changing policy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The point of the "warning" isn't to actually warn people, just to prevent them from being able to sue

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Disclosure statements don't stop lawsuits and aren't a defense in court. They just help prevent them.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

sorry for being sassy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

We may be sassy, but the Canadian geese are Evil FCUK's!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

the McDonalds lawsuit was far more nuanced than its reputation. They served coffee dangerously hot, hotter than safety standards allowed

9 years ago | Likes 428 Dislikes 4

Yes, but this probably implies that the legal loopholes that caused the warning/legal mitagation of company/payout wouldn't have happened

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The reputation came when McD's legal and marketing departments got together to go full "Tazmanian Devil" spin doctor on the whole lawsuit.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

It was so fucking hot it gave the woman third degree burns almost instantly. They were serving lethally hot liquids as a beverage. Fucked up

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

yeah, the woman went into shock and almost died, all she wanted was McDonalds to pay her medical bills but they wouldn't so she had to sue

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Yeah.... I'm not buying McDonalds anymore. I can't read that and go "yeah nah that's about right.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thing is nearly every fast food place would be like that :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup and the woman got 3rd degree burns on her genitals. Almost died, and just wanted Mcdonalds to pay her medical bill. They refused.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Yes.. it drives me crazy when people say "spill some coffee on myself, get a million dollars, har har har"

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Those companies put a lot of effort into making the people who sue them look like greedy morons

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The same company that had just ignored 700 previous burn incidents because $1.35 million a day in just coffee is louder than their pain

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shhh you're ruining the theme of 'stupid americans don't know coffee is hot lolz' with logic and reason.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If I recall correctly, it was like 190??° and 212°f is boiling. And she just wanted help paying her like $20k medical bills and McD's was

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Like "nah fam here's $500."

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Correct.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because many people have burned themselves on hot coffee and so they wanted to say "no more!" And a bad time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*And at a bad time. Arguably the worst time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The woman had never litigated in her life and only initiated the suit after McD's offered her $730 towards her medical bills

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

800+ reports of burns caused by 180 degree temp coffee and still didn't change the policy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Correct. They were cited for it being too hot previously, just under boiling. She only wanted medical covered. They said no.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Paralegal here: Correct. They'd been cited by the health dept multiple times for the coffee being too hot - almost boiling. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 1

(4) She sued for just the $10K, not for pain or suffering. She won.

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

McDonald's wouldn't settle so it went to court. The jury thought McDonald's should be punished and awarded her millions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The figure arrived at I believe was based on the daily revenue from McDonald's coffee sales

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

(3) She needed months of extremely painful skin grafts, which cost her over $10,000. McDonald's offered her $500 to settle.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

(2) They handed the woman 200F (95C) coffee with a loose lid at the drive through, and it spilled on her lap. She got 2nd degree burns.

9 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

3rd degree burns on 6% of her body, lesser burns on 16%. Permanent disfiguration, 2 years partially disabled.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

The lid wasn't loose until she did so to add cream and sugar, but the temperature served at eliminated a fair chance to respond to a spill

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

and the woman never got her millions. They tied it up in court for years

9 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 1

and she wasn't going after millions, the court was like wtf mcdicks you keep doing this were going to award her millions so you'll stop 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

doing this ffs! People kept burning themselves and they kept not fixing the problem 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And she was seriously injured.

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 0

Yeah I'm sorry if the coffee is hot enough to give you 3rd degree burns, and skin grafts, then yes, you have a legitimate lawsuit.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 1

Also at first she only asked for medical bills

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Her family only asked for medical bills, she didnt ask for anything. It was a measly 60k they wanted help with for skin grafts.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

and her millions was literally just the medical costs.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

This part is wrong. The medical costs were $10k or so. The judge slapped them with a larger amount because of they were jackasses who had

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

been cited multiple times in the past and did nothing about it, then offered a bullshit settlement of $500. It was punitive.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

ya, I put air quotes around the word millions, werent you watching me?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Canada. Where you get a citation for having a cigarette by yourself in your own car away from others.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

Citations for giving yourself cancer?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Just being alive can give you cancer....

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That can happen in Davis, CA now too.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 16, 2017 8:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1) ~15 years ago Davis passed a law that there can be no smoking within 20 ft of a public building door or window. Cars are not exempt

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) so if you are driving down the street in your car (even with the windows up) and you are within 20 ft of a door/window you can be cited

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We stand on guard for non smokers... i suppose

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Don't judge a whole country off the ignorance of a few!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

Watch the doc Hot Coffee.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing you don't know the details of the case. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I know enough! But there's a lot of stupid people here. Doesn't make us all stupid

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

All these comments about coffee being hotter than normal. What the fuck is hotter than normal? You boil water, you make coffee or tea, you/1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

The coffee was 180 degrees, which caused 3rd degree burns in 2-7 seconds. At industry standard 160 it would have taken 20+ seconds for 3rds

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then drink it when it's an acceptable temperature for your taste. And since water doesn't get hotter than boiling, the fuck you expect?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

It's no wonder people can't fend for themselves. Point is, you should expect that coffee by nature is hot, potentially boiling so be careful

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The coffee shouldn't be able to cause 3rd degree burn no matter what.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Coffee at normal temp could, but would take 20 seconds of exposure, not 2-7

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you even know about this lawsuit? 3rd degree burns. It was from a spill.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ay mate lets make fun of an old lady who had 300° coffee spilled on her groin

9 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 17, 2017 2:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That hair tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

how the fuck do we people in other countries survive???

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

What, 300 K? That's pussy, room temp coffee.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Not when it spills ON a pussy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

300 K would literally be pleasant.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You think that a warning label might have kept it from spilling?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I had to watch a video about that case in law school. Her injuries were horrific. The sight was sickening. Poor lady :(

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Water boils at 212... coffee is water based

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It boils at 212, but doesn't stay that way once its passed through dried beans and into a carafe.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It was canned coffe-flavored vape.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's figurative speech. That said, imagine my impression as an SI user when someone replies that it actually was at 180 degrees.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or 202 at 5,300ft in Albuquerque where this happened.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 14, 2017 10:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The main thing the case forced was for companies to use sturdier cups that don't spill as easily, which I think is a good thing.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 14, 2017 9:19 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1970s/80s cars didn't have enough cup holders I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Isn't this the lady who returned the cup twice for not being hot enough, after being told they weren't supposed to make it any hotter?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 34

And now the idiots are DVting me. Don't assume you know what you're talking about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI-OLa8iNOk

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I don't know why you're being DVted. This is correct, it just wasn't on the same day.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

I don't believe so. Iirc she went through the drive thru

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Too long ago to remember details, don't care enough to re-research it. I'm just gonna say I think the wounds have healed, and anything that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

can be said about her is probably worn thin by now.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Basically people kept complaining that the coffee was too cold at the drive thru by the time they got where they were going, so McDonald's..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Why would a warning on a cup saying it's hot prevent you from accidentally spilling something?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

thats not how warnings work. they dont give a fuck about you, they just want to avoid being taken to court.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The warning isn't preventing you from spilling, but from suing.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

It was excessively hot, their machine was set to go much higher than normal, resulting in genital fusing.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

The comparison that apparently won in court was at 180 degrees, 3rd degree burns take 2-7 seconds. At 160°, around 20 seconds

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Or at least, 180 was deemed excessive, 160 is closer to standard and wouldn't have injured her the way she was.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

180°... she had 3rd degree burns & originally only asked for what was needed to cover medical expenses for her 3rd degree burns (~$20K)

9 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 0

Iirc they found that the coffee was being kept way too hot at that restaurant.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Yep, correct.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

McDonalds offered $800, so she lawyer'd up. He offered $90k, & a mediator suggested $200k. McDonalds refused both pre-trial settlements.

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

In the trail it came to light that McDonalds knew the coffee was a burn risk, & ignored it anyway. Jury awarded 160k, & 2.7mil in punitive

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

then both parties settled out of court so all we know is McDonalds ended up settling for less than $600k.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Yeah. You and I could argue that forever and it wouldn't matter.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Because you don't care about other sides even when evidence is presented to you showing your biased view is wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My biased view that she only asked for enough to cover her medical expenses but since McDonald's refused she got more?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2