Syrian children gasp for air and foam at the mouth as Assad is accused of killing 150 people and injuring 1,000 in ANOTHER horrifying chemical attack against a rebel-held Damascus suburb

Apr 8, 2018 2:24 AM

ispeak4dexitorwrithing

Views

174437

Likes

3682

Dislikes

147

The timing is interesting.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is terribly disturbing.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

this shouldnt be happening..

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And again!! TV was there...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Trump just said we are going to be pulling out of there too. I guess someone didn't want us doing that.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Oh my god these babies

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Which god?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it's called propaganda and the scary thing is, that people will fall for it.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 10

Its funny because its literally sourcing the white helmets which is an Al-Qaeda affiliate

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Source?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My people :(

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This shit breaks my heart. I have done some horrible things in my life. But dont hurt kids. They should br playing in the fucking park.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

My cynical brain says these kids will be the next terrorists as they will bring pain to others as pain was dealt on them

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is why i am upset. Little bastards should be playing around. On the jungle gym and shit. Not getting bombed. Anyone would turn into a

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cunt if thats what they grew up with.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So they started using different children now

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

what am I looking at?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’re looking at a kid who was “saved” from from three different chemical attacks in three different locations in Syria. Imagine that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was it really Assad....last time a this happened it turned out to not to be his regime but in fact was rebels trained and aided by the US...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This was Sarin gas, dropped from a barrel drum from helicopter.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Western terrorist propaganda. I’m from Lebanon, beware who you actually support. Nothing here is what it seems like.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Good to see outright Propaganda is alive and well in usersub

8 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 30

Well as long as people are able to comment doupt it is acknowledgment of suffering of the innocent.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I love it how everyone blame assad with 0 proof. Same as Skripal situation in London. 0 evidence that the FSB was behind it.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 14

Because people keep thinking with their emotions. Thats what this propaganda is designed to do.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Just to clarify, Im not saying it didnt happen and that USA is behind it. I think it someone who benefits from blaming Assad

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Riiiight, because Russia has no history of assassinating or trying to assassinate people that they perceive as a threat.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And that is exactly what western countries are trying to use. "They did it before so it must be them again. Case closed."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Right. Of course. Next you're gonna tell me the moon landing was fake.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It wasn't. There was lots of evidence to it. But not in that case, no hard evidence, but fingers are pointed and charges were pressed.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And USA has none? Try entire fucking latin america, coups, assassinations, election rigging

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Never said anything of the sort. Although in Latin America, mostly the killing was done by their governments, while the US provided intel.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anybody who is willing to do this to children should lose the right to be considered human. They are monsters.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Monsters trained and equipped by the United States

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you have a source?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, the other false flags worked, may as well throw in another to sway public favour before a peace conference, hmm?

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 13

So... fake news just like last time?

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 35

Are you saying it didn't happen?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

He's saying it happened, but the perpetrator is not who we're being told it is, and this is all serving an agenda.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Yes, that's it.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Oh, yes.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 11

to all the useless retards calling this a false flag and fake news: go fuck yourselves

8 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 33

It's St. Petersburg troll factory at work.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and Iraq totally had those WMDs, right? This story makes no sense; Assad was winning, the rebels were almost done.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

He knows damn well what kind of international reaction there would be for a chem attack. This gains him nothing, but it sure helps the rebs.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Wait... but chemical weapons are illegal he can’t do that! (Joking)

8 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 37

He didn't, he gave all of Syrian chemical warfare to the US to be destroyed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Assad was allowed to keep Chlorine and undeclared chemical weapons. Total amateurs running the State department.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Legality in this case gives, whoever wants to, the mandate to bomb the fuck out of the perpetrator.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"Even Hitler didn't use chemical weapons!" /s who remembers that little gem?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I thought the Russians helped disarm Assad of his chemical weapons. LOL JK the Russians probably sold him new ones to use on kids.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The thing is if rebels actually succeed and take over then chemical weapons are in their jihadi hands. Either way Assad has them or 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Terrorists have them. Something has to be done to take them out of the country and I believe that Assad will allow the UN to take them. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah we banned chemical weapons. Mission accomplished.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

As long you got yourself backing by a similar country who uses that on former spies?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His enemies couldn't attack lealist villages and then call the West press and say that Assad did it,no jihadi are too honorable to do it. jk

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 11

Except so far the "defense" for Assad's gas attacks have been that the rebels were gassing THEMSELVES, the exact opposite.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There have been reports of missing lealists (previously kidnapped by jihadis) found among the dead gassed bodies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tbh do we know Assad is doing this?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Nope

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If the Russians would stop blocking the international efforts to get proper answers we would. Russia support Asshead so we can extrapolate.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

TL;DR: no

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The proper answers? How about the US stops creating problems for the rest of the world, eh? They've done enough searching for "answers"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The first UN inquiry found clues about the jihadi being behind the attacks, so it wouldn't be in Russian's interests to block inquries.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

They also found evidence to implicate the Syrian government as well. Yet they can't be sure whose doing what ATM outside of a few cases 1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I'm sure this time there is proof that 's been Assad and not the Jihadi scum like they did in the past (ask Carla Del Ponte).

8 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 15

There is a difference between ruthless and retarded, Assad is the former, and I have seen no indication that he is the latter.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh yes this time is definitely real, look at the children!!! Don't you care about the children??????

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 7

Of course! We cared enough to drop 13,000 bombs a year on them. Let's do more!

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

Unfortunately we were hitting the wrong target. The FSA are on the GREEN parts of the map, not the red.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Its funny when killed children is used to justify actions that will kill more children. Well not funny but incredibly sad

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Oh thank god Im not the only one whos uses critical thinking skills

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Don't worry the Russians will muddle the waters so soon nobody will be able to blame anyone and there's no-one responsible.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's pretty strange that Assad does a chemical attack every time the jihadis are cornered. If you followed the news 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You'll know that the bombing campaign in that area started about 1 or 2 weeks ago,this was the end of it,why gas now that the jh are leaving

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Again? Sauce please?

8 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 10

The Ministry of Truth

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Are you serious? It's been all over the world news.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

oh, you mean it's on the TV? shame

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just like in Ghouta, Syrian rockets covered in sarin gas. But the rockets hit a rebel held sarin depot. Fuck Assad, but fuck all this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That’s not how shit works. Sarin gas isn’t stored mixed, the components aren’t mixed until it’s to be used. If you bomb a sarin gas…

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

…stockpile, you just put the isopropyl on fire and that’s it. Getting sarin gas from bombing binary components is ridiculous.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They never proved it the first time and the first time was just as weird and nonsensical as this

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

'Murican?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The bbc is run by nonces. This will have been faked just so thay could film half dressed children.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Lmao if bbc says its true than it must be true. They were in the front with cnn lying about iraq’s WMDs

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 46

He's right, though.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That was Bush who made that claim popular...

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That last kid really needed that oxygen, was staring to go blue....poor bloke

8 years ago | Likes 742 Dislikes 15

Cyanotic is the term.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was a beta agonist, astma medicine.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That’s not oxygen

8 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 6

They weren't saying it was oxygen, just that the kid really needed oxygen...

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 15

Bullshit. Nonsense propaganda. Syria is almost free. Why the almighty fuck would he use chemical weapons on his own people you 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 25

Yep 90% of the rebels had already withdrawn from Ghouta the last pocket agreed to leave then changed their Jihadi minds.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

free huh

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Fucking morons. Chem weapons have always had the harshest response so why would he jeopardize his power? Ask yourself who would? 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 16

I don't understand why people believe any of this. The UN has never turned up any indication he has chemical weapons ANYWHERE.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Didn't happen in world War one? Or the kurds in iraq? Or kosovo?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, if we want to reach back into history, false flags are hardly uncommon either...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has done it many times before. (according to the UN, USA & OPCW)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

No he hasn't you fucking liar. Stop reading bullshit sources. The UN has NEVER conclusively said he has chemical weapons. Look it up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The last one I recall the U.N. inspectors ruled the rebs accidentally gassed themselves. Kerry & State used YOUTUBE as his source there.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Tillerson admitted there was no proof Assad had ever used chemical weapons.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actualy, no. He didn't. That's the thing. Everytime there's some rebels getting wrecked chem attack happens. Mysterious isn't it?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

So you are saying that the UN is lying?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Look up the Carla Del Ponte video stating that the rebels likely did it and not the gov. She was the leader of the UN investigation

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What UN? UN haven't said a word yet about who did this attack.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I never said that they did. But I did say the the UN have confirmed chem attacks from Assad earlier in the war.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This whole thing makes no sense. Assad was winning, and he knows that pulling a stunt like this would only hurt him. Real fuckin fishy.

8 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 10

There’s a lot of weird shit going on but it should be noted the civilians are the victims not the rebels which is odd and evidence 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

this x1000

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It's for that exact reason why I don't believe it has anything to do with Assad. It's more likely what's left of IS or FSA doing this

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 9

Remember the last chemical attack that was blamed on Assad and it fizzled out

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

As an arab... the syrian army has not used chemical weapons nor the heaviest of missiles/bombs. A heavy scud could flatten a neighbourhood.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Winning but why blow up the building with people in side when with chemicals he kills the people but doesn't destroy the buildings

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Because he knows damn well that he'll lose a lot more than a few buildings by pulling some shit like this. He isn't stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Exactly. He's striking positions that rebels have agreed to leave? Sus as fuck

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It’s imgur. Dont expect anything from here because we are all a joke.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

It’s a sad that the civilians should have to suffer because of the wants of two groups of dumbasses 3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Regarding these chemical attacks also show that the rebels have also been using such despicable tactics. This war is one with no good guys 2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

might be a double bluff. he can very believably claim that such thing would only hurt him, allowing him to actually pull this off

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Again, this would prove nothing and only provoke the US and give the war hawks another juicy target. Does he want to end up like Gaddafi?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

unless he successfully convinces them that it was a provocation by FSA or ISIS

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which still wouldn't make any sense because he can take that suburbs through other means without the US pointing fingers

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

then why he didnt yet?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because others are telling him not to kill everyone because they're retards who aren't really fighting a war but yelling to take the moral

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

high route and try to end this peacefully which has been impossible for years now,but they don't care because it's not their country getting

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Didn't the americans destroy all his chemical weapons in agreement with assad early in the war.?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Hey! the Danish Navy was also involved

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They seem to be very good at hiding WMDs

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know so little of the politics of that area and the whole thing that I don't believe I'm in any position to pick sides or point blame.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Look up Scott Horton. You’ll learn so much about the region.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

-the rebels' faults but we have seen them hide in hospitals in their battles against the Kurds up in northern Syria.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted May 31, 2018 10:02 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Turkey just used rebels as mercenaries to capture the Kurdish city of Afrin. They displaced the Kurdish residents and are replacing them w/-

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Arabs and Turkmen. There's also a lot of rebel infighting because Turkey is terrible at reigning in their proxies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assad doesn't have that much of a reign on his forces. This could have been an isolated incident from some officer as much as it could be-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Bashar is like his father. It’s not just about winning. It’s about the message. Read up on Hama.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This shit is insane, why is America not swinging its dick around

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 13

You remember all that criticism Bush got for acting like the world cop? How the next guy won the election by promising to be different?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Damned if we do damned if we don't. Let the Euro's step up for once and handle the peacekeeping. Maybe then they will understand reality.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its probably good that we aren't pushing hard in Syria just simply because its clear that we don't have the will needed to fight in the ME.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*stick

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bc WWIII

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Because russia's got his balls out and if we touch them, it's gay.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Murder all those Soviet fuckers! Nuke Moscow!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Easy tiger.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

America swinging it's dick around is exactly why shit like this is happening

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Are you mentally deficient?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Hot take from “hurrdurr69”. Where did you study diplomacy again, “hurrdurr69”?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

The real question is: why is the US is illegally occupying almost half of Syria? Should the US retreat the war would end immediately.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 19

No the REAL question is why did Obama use chemicals to turn the frickin frogs gay

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Even with all the financing from Saudia Arabia, the jihadi could do very little against a trained army.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

No shit. But we're there because Shell found fucking oil and the pipelines to Europe are of critical importance.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mate don't try. Fuckin sheep on this website. Don't understand Assad gassing his own citizens is the last message he wants sent. Was not him

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The real question is, do you really believe that garbage? That's reads like some crazy Russian Facebook "news" link.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah he should quote cnn, they’re trustworthy right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Russian facebook? LOL Just turn on a TV and look at a map of Syria. The "Kurdish"zones (ususally yellow) are the ones occupied by the US.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because it’s true? American forces occupy much of northern Syria along with the SDF, they are building bases. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Only part they don’t occupy is the Turkish enclave. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He's supported by Russia and Iran and nobody cares enough to fight them over it. Sad but true.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 8

No its fucking not you fool. Why would he gas his own people when he almost has control of his country again? Why would he risk 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

A fucking UN incursion to stop the Chen attacks? It ain't fuckin Assad gassing people is what I'm guessing at. But terrorists 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Gassing a village to get more western support does not seem more likely to you? Learn some fuckin critical thinking. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I don't assume anything about it this early, and neither should you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they can't touch him?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Russia it's on the right side for once (since the other side is Talibans, Al Queda and ISIS).

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

There's way more sides in Syria than just those two though

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taliban is in Afghanistan dipshit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Salty? Look at a map, Afghanistan is not far from Syria.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

What's your definition of not far? Damascus to Kabul is about 10% of the Earth's circumference.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Why do you say "for once", over the annals of history it's probably been on the right side more often than the wrong side.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And by annals of history you mean a few years during the early 20th century.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's just a figure of speech, I didn't count the times they were in the right and the ones they were in the wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Are you saying my country doesn't actually care about the well being of the world?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

It depends, what is your country?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Can we make money from it?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Not saying the country doesn’t. Just almost everyone with actual authority capable of helping.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Welp, tell the squad who went to Bin Laden's house to start stretching. Somebody needs a paddlin

8 years ago | Likes 1882 Dislikes 55

Guess who's getting Freedom for Christmas!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Never gonna happen. Assad is Putin's ally, and Trump is Putin's bitch. That's why we're pulling out...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your comment screams "I don't pay attention to the news".

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Ahahahahahahhaa nope not this time. Russian-back. That means no problems.

8 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 12

Riiight, and push us closer to a war with Russia? Never happen

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 26

That will never happen both have too much to lose and nothing to gain from it. Those big words from usa and russia are just propaganda

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who? Asaad? He dies, and then what? You'd get a dozen others nowhere nearly as powerful, but all with their own agendas.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

An d more bloodthirsty. Its like Libya: either way theyll still be run by Libyans. Can only be so choosy

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

They all died last year

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget that dog!

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

the US doesnt want Assad gone.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Seal Team 666, because Assad ain't no ordinary evil.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

U mean the ones that crashed a helicopter outside his compound?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Well he did crash a few planes into buildings... it only seems fair.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone needs a paddlin indeed and has been in need of said paddlin for some time now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Id be happy to assist

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

IKR? Are they taking applications?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yes, at the Armed Forces Recruitment office. It is a great adventure, I can attest

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... And its the FSA fucks who did this for attention so they could blame Assad.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Because because that fucking solved everything last time right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow, you're so smart. Where are you getting your sauce from CNN? Dumb fuck.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Why do you think CNN lies? Show me a single article from CNN that is wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hugh rawr right with you and all bro but we are the baddies too so don’t get your hopes up unless you go yourself Mercica dont care about em

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Get the SAS to do it and they might not crash the helicopter

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they actually gave a shit about this they'd have done something years ago, during the Arab Spring. They don't give a shit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Situation in Syria is horrible sure, but what about US stops dicking around where they don't belong.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 18

Yeah cause it’s just the US working in Syria right now

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

US and Russia need some place to show off their toys, make their people believe terrorism is being fought

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I'll tell you what. When you convince Russia, China and whoever else is playing power games to stop, then I'll agree the US should too.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Who else will stand up to evil? Unless you think this isn't an affront on basic human rights?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

US should deal with their own issues before going around creating them for others. Middle-east would be better off if US was never there

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yep. In 06 I'd be all like "Kick their shit in!" over gassing kids. Now...eh.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It's the criminal Russians that need to stop dicking around.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Give them boys Intel, and unleash those glorious bastards. And stay the fuck out of their way.

8 years ago | Likes 255 Dislikes 15

Why do they need a well-regarded computer processor?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Especially their helicopter pilot

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We know exactly where Putin is though.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Hes already waiting for them

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah hes in russia. has attacking russia ever worked?

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

But it’s spring. We have all year.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We could use the mongols tbh

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Seal team 6

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 8

The amount of focus and control these entities posses is staggering.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My buddy from high school died in that crash. Whether it’s true or fabricated I don’t know. But his kids will never see their dad again.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wasn't trying to be insensitive, but if you took it that way I apologize. I was just trying to show people the story about them that I saw

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah but fox lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an atheist, I really do hope I'm wrong and there's a god out there where he'll fuck up those kind of people in the afterlife.

8 years ago | Likes 674 Dislikes 26

Atheist..... Go Agnostic.

8 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

Or OR.. hear me out.... We could DO something to make this kind of shit dangerous for the perpetrators? Like assassinate them EVERY TIME?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You need to identify the perpetrators first, and then convince every Murican of the truth. In other words, impossible.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As another atheist: Even if god exists, he s the biggest war criminal and he let all of this happend, so he don t deserve worshiping.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Reminds me of a reported Holocaust survivor quote that went "if there is a God, he will have to beg for my forgiveness".

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As an atheist, I can think of no better punishment than total oblivion.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If there is a God. Fuck him for letting that happen. People did this, plain and simple. It's humanity's job to demand their heads.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately if God is real it is quite apparent that it does not choose sides.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Tell that to Ramses

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as a fellow atheist I hope there is a god out there so I can fuck him up for allowing this to happen.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats what we do. We destroy everything for an excuse

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How can you care for them if you do not believe in morality? (I am assuming you are a materialist and mean no disrespect but don’t follow u)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 16

Are you saying morality comes from religious beliefs? It doesn't. Morality is part of the human condition. Parents teaching the golden rule.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I mean he seems pretty ok with it happening in the first place.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can't leave these things for god

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Atheist are like vegans

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You're thinking of Christians.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh, I don't think I would want there to be a god if that was the way he operates. Useless punishments in the afterlife don't really help.

8 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 8

I’ve really always hated the mindset that because people do horrible things that means god is shit. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

When theres insects that's life's purpose is to burrow into other animals eyeballs to lay their eggs and god is supposed to have 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Intelligently designed them, it comes into question.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean.. i don’t hear the insect complaining. Sounds like a good deal for him.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

2/2 it’s like if you hit someone with a car and I went “Damn you automakers!!”

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

So god isnt in control of anything? He just made adam and eve & sits back saying "let's see what happens"? What's even the point of prayer?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Sure, why not. And probably not much point even with the existence of a diety. Couldn’t hurt?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, your automaker is a shite comparison. Our autos have safety features. They're designed to keep you safe even if they fuck up. And they

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Didn't really expect for this to spark a conversation, but what I'm saying is that I wish the concept of a hell or karma or something..

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

...similar is true to punish people who do such things. Though you have a point, if such an entity exists, why would he/she/it permit it to

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(1)If there is a higher being, it's exactly the direct reflection the the world created. No amount human understanding or imagination can...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) explain away the existance of both cruelty or... to an equal degree, compassion in the first place.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Happen.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If there were a god that could do that, there wouldn't be an attack in the first place

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Well, God works in mysterious ways, he has a plan for all of us, everything happens for a reason, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's what lazy people that don't want to drive their own life say.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The plans for these kids is to traumatized for the rest of their lives or die from a Chemical attack... what a great plan that is!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes there would - without free will and the possibility for grave evil you would be a robot.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Free will and omniscience are mutually exclusive. If a god knows everything, and can do anything. Then everything is what the God decided.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Reformed Christian Theology (which I believe for the most part) teaches that we are both correct and that the two facts together r a paradox

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They *can't* both be true though. Calling it a paradox doesn't explain that away. Omniscient and omnipotent means there can be no free will.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That really depends on your definition of a God, I'd say. There's many.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That said, I'm an agnostic. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agnostic doesn't mean anything in this context. You can be an agnostic theist.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, I've most likely misinterpreted the definition/meaning of agnostic then. My bad

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m usually not an aggressive person but I wish that I could end the people who hurt these children.

8 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

I'd like to join this club. I have several fantasies I want to make true with those people, it will take few years tho, I'm ok with it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you said it right, first people need to verify the claim that this was from Assad, there's no excuse for who did it 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

but journalism when it comes to Assad and what he's doing is spotty at best, don't make one tragedy into two by running in without the info

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that's okay. your aggression would only be concerning if you started fantasizing about torturing him, I've seen way too much of that here

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A simple kill all children muderers button would be ideal, I’m against torture. Torture shouldn’t be used against anyone, good or evil.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you’re agnostic?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

No, fuckup. Atheist means “not believing in a god”.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

"Not believing in anything". You believe in the universe having a scientific purpose for you? Not Atheist.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Now you’re inventing new meanings as well. Look, it’s very simple. Theist = believes in a god/s. Atheist = doesn’t.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't be a butt.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think he means that this is the one exception to his rule of not believing in God. Bc the ppl that do this do it in the name of a God.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yep

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not really the meaning of agnostic.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Agnostic means you don’t know, you’re neutral. Their comment implies they’re neutral.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He said he's an Atheist that would like to be wrong. That doesn't imply he he thinks he might be. Same as if someone said they want to...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) believe in Santa, it doesn't mean they actually have any inclination to it being a possibility. "Want" vs actual beliefs. Key difference.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agnosticism is more of a “I don’t know and I never will know” type of attitude toward religion, god (big g or little), and an afterlife.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More an "I want to believe" than "I do believe" I suppose

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, exactly. Thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, God is dead. We, his most cherished creation, have murdered him. I would say God save us all but... oops?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If there is, why the fuck is he letting this happen now?

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 12

There isn’t, obviously, but way to fail reading comprehension.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Because God is incomprehensible to humans and it's useless to question. Don't bother with the source of good and evil, just pick which 1/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

side you want to fight on because good and evil will continue on regardless of faith.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Free will is a thing

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Watch 'the adjustment bureau'. Some romantic stuff but the concept is pretty cool

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not for children. In fact it’s not thing other that a believed subjective reality. Just cause you say it doesn’t mean it’s true

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shit excuse. Free will is already hugely bounded, human bias, greed, and evil is predictable af. If we were created by a god it didn't (1/?)

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

just give us totally pure and random freedom of thought, it designed our psyches to operate and respond to stimulus in a very (2/?)

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

That's not what free will means though, it's pretty clear what's meant by free will is God not intervening and changing your choices

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

particular way. So why didn't it design us to be generally nicer to one another? To be less susceptible to delusion and dishonesty and (3/?)

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Free will & God's plan are contradictory

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because everyone keeps screaming that He is fake. Would you help people who decided to go do their own thing and not believe in you?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

You are wrong God is constantly helping the wicked and those who hate Him. I do not have the answers but God is not petty

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

spoiler alert: he doesn't exist.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So he allows the cruel treatment to children who can’t understand what a god is. Also do religious people not suffer ?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Ummm billions of people believe, so that claim is absurdly untrue.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yes. Because I am neither sadistic nor a complete asshole.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Would you write people like that in a story you wrote?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Some people don't believe. Better subject kids to a gas atrack." Yep, sounds like the "loving" lord I was raised with.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What does that have to do with CHILDREN? If your imaginary friend punishes children for the actions of adults then he's a piece of shit.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Exactly

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A wonderful example of how fucked-up the Christian mind is, and a perfect explanation of why their god is so fucked-up.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's your God as well, you just don't know it yet. For EVERY knee shall bow etc etc . Our mind cannot comprehend His will. Like an

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

anthill in Africa knowing about the moon, stars and the universe to the 10th power. There will be a Judgement day. Our wishes in this

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Because this doesn't matter,it's temporary. Those who suffer get to go to heaven, so this is actually good. At least according to the Bible.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

That sounds like a pretty weak excuse.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is. it's just something that was made up a couple thousand years ago, to make people feel less shitty about their lives.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Except according to the Bible these kids will go to Hell, too.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Why exactly? I'm guessing because they're Muslim, but you could argue they had no choice in the matter.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That’s one of the reasons the Bible is bullshit dude it doesn’t matter wether or not they had a choice different religion equals hell.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yeah but there's no exception carved out for non-Christian kids. Not baptized = hell bound, according to the church.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Not planning for a religious debate, but that viewpoint defers depending on which denomination you are. Some believe Hell is a temporary /1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

punishment, others believe it is permanent. Many of the "fine points" of religion in general is still up for debate within their own /2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

believers; that's why there are so many religions in the first place. The worst issue is that everyone thinks they are the right party, /3

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I did not know that. I feel like "Eternity in hell" would be a staple since anything temporary wouldn't deter some people from sin.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0