Native Americans respond to "Christopher Columbus"

Nov 26, 2015 1:27 PM

internetgod

Views

74701

Likes

2876

Dislikes

458

This should be posted for Columbus Day, not Thanksgiving. As skewed as Thanksgiving history is, Columbus is irrelevant here.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 10

Native north Americans never even saw him.

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 4

"First Terrorist in America", it's not like groups like the Aztec, Mayans, or Comanche raided and enslaved before white people arrived.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

As if anyone celebrates thanksgiving for anything other than a bigass meal now. Asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

As an aboriginal, the past is the past. You can't change what has already happened, you can only create your future.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Tell that to the European descendants whenever they want to celebrate one of their holidays or teach us ancient history.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I do.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I read "Guacamole" instead of Genocide

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Seriously, how can they have these strong feelings 500 years later, when all their lives is formed in a completely different society?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

natives don't have a good track record, every race has done awful shit, get over yourselves

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

*scrolls to negative comments*

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh you don't need to. Just look at the regular comments.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The lady with feather earrings is feeling way more than is realistic. Would she be considered a Drama Queen?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Get over it. Seriously

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I'm gonna go ahead and ask what the hell Christopher Columbus has to do with Thanksgiving.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Amazing how people could so thoroughly misunderstand their own history.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 12

lmao... I suppose as a decent of Wales I should be pretty salt about England's actions... Except, I'm not retarded.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A lot of people seem comfortable telling natives to "get over it" but I doubt any of you would be brave enough to tell African Americans to

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 32

If you're upset over things that happened to people who's bones were dust before you were born. You have a problem. Yes. Get over it.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Germans owe me money for my great grandfathers blown up farm. Give benefits.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get over slavery. What's the difference?

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 20

They should get over it. They're lucky the slaves weren't killed off like it usually happened around the globe.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I love how 90% of the replies to you are people actually saying African Americans should "get over" slavery...and by "love" I mean "hate."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

why do you hate it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I tell them both to get over it. It didn't happen to anyone alive today. Move on. EVERYONE has been enslaved or invaded at some point.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 6

Well, it happens today and racial bigotry is a thing, so it is a bit more sensitive matter than Columbus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More recent. And unfortunately I think a lot of them are the ones telling black people to get over slavery.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No no, I would tell them to get over it because it's over, just like how athiests need to get over the crusades. Both were bad but it's done

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I find it weird that one half gets upvoted and the other doesn't. Really sums up imgur and its fickleness.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Or it reflects the popular opinion. Not really rocket science.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The upvoted now make my comment look weird. There were 2 half of the same point with one upvoted and the other down voted

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an Irish person I tell Irish people to get over the English atrocities in Ireland, you can't live in the past.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So b/c of this I just told my g/f to get over slavery.She called me a dumbass b/c she's an adult that doesn't blame slavery for her problems

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

An example is Andrew Jackson. Refused to accept a SCOTUS decision and committed genocide through Trail of Tears. Still on the $20 bill

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's not about blaming slavery for their problems. It's about understanding the history and how that culminated into today's problems

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Yeah and not bad choices. Lord knows that they had absolutely no chance to change their situation in 500 years. Brilliant EXCUSE

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If it was easy to change just like that, then we wouldn't even have poverty. People don't work like that mate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They have every opportunity I have plus more because of their ethnicity if they don't like their situation improve it! YES IT IS POSSIBLE.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The kind of rhetoric that accuses them of scapegoating and making excuses is part of the reason why reservations hesitate on gov involvment

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If some one offers you help its your choice. Sorry the world doesn't give you what you want the way you want when you want it!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lastly the 500 year timeline doesn't seem right at all. Can you expand on why you say 500 years?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

2015-1492=? Blaming Columbus for the current situation is like blaming Marco Polo for global warming.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Some native american reservations have done extremely well, others haven't. There's some that are really really bad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And a third of my extended family is Native American and they openly admit most reservation problems stem from the reservations economics

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow these comments are terrible

10 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 23

Not the Leif Erikson one.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Hard to have sympathy for people complaining that their ancestors were conquered and murdered. Because that is the case for every human.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

It may be hard for you. I'm not Native but I do have sympathy because it was a terrible thing and it still somewhat affects them to this day

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

It only effects them because they won't let it go. They chose to dwell on it, to obsess over it. No one's fault but theirs.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 13

A lot Native Americans, just like a lot black people, are stuck in the vicious of poverty because things that happened in the past. 1

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Hand what it is like. It's awful. But it is because they chose it. The government already pumps so much into into the communities but 2/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Through their own corruption and mismanagement they are starving and isolated and alone. But they can leave. 40% unemployment. Insane. 3/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

They have the resources at their disposal to make a better life but they don't. I cannot have sympathy for it. 4/4

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

Because they chose not to evolve. They sit in their reserves and they stagnate. I've been to reserves in northern Canada, I've seen first 1/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

I'm thankful that my parents did what they had to do so that me and my brother could have a good life. 1

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean in the north of Canada it's kind of still a thing.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Education is provided by the government. They should be the most educated demographic in the country but they aren't. Why is that? 2/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Have you been up there? Have you seen it first hand? I have. It's a third world country. Yet they chose to stay. Their post secondary 1/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

I agree with you, i've never been there but i heard horror stories. Canada is no promise land.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i actually misunderstand what you said and i think we can only agree to disagree. You can keep on voting for Harper. Good day

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It could be. Just don't live in the middle of bumfuck nowhere. I've been coast to coast in the big beautiful country. It IS the promised 1/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Land. Just be smart. Don't live in places only accessible by bush plane. It isn't rocket science 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Why in a country that prides itself on its 'Equality' does a group of people have tangible benefits based solely on their race? 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Cristopher Columbus lived 500 years ago...I mean, I'm not american but this seems very exaggerated.

10 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 22

It is. A lot. Most don't fucking care

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

It's pretty stupid, I mean I live in the south part of Sweden but I don't cry about the war between Sweden and Denmark. Which is more recent

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

And how old do people claim Jesus to be? People still get their panties in a twist with him

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

They believe he's still existing and will come back, so I can see why they won't let go.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well personally I think that's silly as well, not a very religious person. So that's not really an argument...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The entire history of mankind has been people conquering each other. No one is exempt. All we can do is better, not fix all of history.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But he never stepped foot on North America...

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 4

Exactly. Where he actually landed was around the Bahamas.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

He did 4 voyages and landed in the entire East side of Middle-America.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol they mad cause they lost tho

10 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 102

ez win frm n00bs

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

first time a actually LOL'd instead of just exhaling. Take my +1 you glorious bastard.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

No chill

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Ya. You filthy mudblood.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

200% savage, 0% chill

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

SAVAGE

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 6

Christopher Colombus never landed on the continent, so he was never "in America". Shut up and enjoy your day off.

10 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 71

People get that day off?!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol thank God you said it and not me, enjoy your 1 up vote of the day

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

2) Like he denied them a life that they can personally remember, like he killed their grandma or something.

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 13

These ppl act like C.C. personally raped and stole their land. It in no way directly affected them. Just eat the fucking turkey , jeez.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

My point is that all these "native americans" are from the western US & were never affected by Columbus, and yet are on the verge of tears1)

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 19

You can't be this big of a fucking moron.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

I am not American and even I know this.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 9, 2016 11:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Wonderful analogy. I have friends in New York who lost people who are less emotional and dramatic than people from "Don'tTreadOnMeLand".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A better analogy would be to say that people in Panama weren't affected by 9/11. Native American tribes were like separate countries.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The did sort of get mashed into an extended nation by persecution and prescribed 'schools.' But that was later.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course they were. Columbus spearheaded the transatlantic slave trade which eventually reached areas far from when he initially landed.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 28

Columbus was an explorer, things would have gone the way they did regardless of how he treated the few tribes he encountered

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And that's also not true. Slave trades were portuguese, Spanish monarchy and African war tribes. CC did not enslave.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

Eh? Columbus spearheaded the transatlantic slave trade. Who do you think CC worked for?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

More: "A hundred castellanoes are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm...[girls] from nine to ten are now in demand."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

""Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold." His own fucking words from his journal.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He still established a brutal tyranny where he landed, costing the lives of many natives and landing him in jail in Spain (4 a short time).

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 16

Soap isn't wrong.. Columbus's West Indies were in the Caribbean.. Last I checked that's not North America..

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Yes the west indies are in the Caribbean.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not much of that is true. He was actually nice and did not enslave. Only bad things he did was on behalf of King and Queen.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Uh, there's kinda a lot of info that his party returned with enslaved natives.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And? Welcome to the whole history of all of mankind.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Just saying, a saint he wasn't. He would have done the same had he landed elsewhere.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

This affects your life today how? You get a day off, sales in stores and maybe a parade? Waaaah!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Don;t take it out on me! Doesn't affect me at all. Just stating facts! I'm Italian so we don't get a day off (even though he was Italian).

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and it was almost 500 years before I was born, there was no place in the world that wasn't a brutal tyranny.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Yes, yes, but the atrocities committed by European colonists in the Americas have to be some of the worst ever perpetrated by mankind.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Am I supposed to feel bad? Civilization is built on the ashes of defeated peoples. That's history for you.

10 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 25

Well the Spanish Certainly did, as when word finally reached mainland Spain of Columbus' treatment of the Taino, he was stripped of his rank

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and imprisoned for his crimes. Why do you think the Spanish stopped financing his voyages? He was not a victim of his times, he was bad

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

even by there standards. And to continue to honor him is disgusting.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact that something was the norm in the past doesn't mean it's not a big deal

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's not just the past it still happens and will continue.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's just evolution. Eventually we'll fall to a superior society or be forced to assimilate, too. The world keeps spinning, man.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's the same argument though; it's just "nature", so we shouldn't feel bad. What is the logic behind this? Be precise cuz this seems lazy

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To provide a precise answer, I want to clarify the quest. What is the logic behind what?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The assertion that, because something is "nature" or inevitable, it's not a big deal, e.g. Native Americans being assimilated

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, dont feel bad, I agree with you. But there's a difference between accepting the past, and celebrating it. Just my 2 cents.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

This

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Holy crap. Well said. Put on your big boy pants and accept this.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

What is that from?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Buffy thanksgiving episode

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should be mad at the diseases he unknowingly brought with him, that did the most damage

10 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 16

Even discounting the diseases, if you read contemporary accounts of Columbus, he was a pretty evil, sadistic dude, to a degree that 1)

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

Shocked and horrified Spanish priests who witnessed the treatment of native Taino and Arawak under his colonial regime.. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

He was also an arrogant cock who was just an all round asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not to mention the genocide, forced labor, rapes, slave trading...the list goes on.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

All of which the native americans did prior to European arrival, and add human sacrifice and cannibalism to the list.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

THANK YOU. I get tired of people thinking Natives were all "loving and innocent until the evil European devastated entire cultures".

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

YouTube search: Cgp Grey

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thing is, even though it was the worst part, it was the only unintentional disaster. You really can't apologize for being immune.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 29, 2015 3:55 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Uhh that was the US Army some 400 years later.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Columbus was a moron who miscalculated the size of the earth by a VAST margin, he had no concept of germ theory. Though it was divine curse.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 29, 2015 3:55 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The blankets with smallpox thing is presumed to be a myth from the 1800s Army as nobody's ever been able to actually find any evidence of it

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I still don't understand how Columbus day is still a thing.. We should be celebrating Leif Erikson..

10 years ago | Likes 867 Dislikes 44

big part of Columbus day is Italians wanted a day celebrating their heritage, shrugs, I want a day celebrating Asians how bout Dim sum day?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The cornerstone of U.S.A. existing are lies upon lies. That, plus ignoring the truth.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm related to that great man.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

No we should be celebrating Admiral Zheng He

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That guy was fucking impressive

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about the unknown Polynesians who got here before the land bridge?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe the Native Americans?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is a Chinese explorer who may have also found America before Columbus.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The point of Columbus Day isn't about him "discovering" America. It's about kicking off colonization of America, the start of our culture.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

At the cost of an already existing culture...

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Blame the Spanish

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, I absolutely 100% agree on that and think Columbus is one of the last people in the world who should be remembered as "good".

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Some people do celebrate Leif Erickson day. At least here in MN it's a somewhat popular minor holiday.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is it celebrated on C Day or is it held on a different day?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

October 9th every year.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sweet. I will be celebrating next year! Any traditions I should know about

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I celebrate Leif Garrett day.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me too! It's the day I do heroin and listen to disco. It's like most days, but I normally don't listen to disco

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are awesome. I do the more reformed potsmokin Leif Garrett day, not the orthodox heroin slamming tradition.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Native peoples weren't born on that continent they arrived there, there were many who discovered and rediscovered America.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We can educate each other and change it from a day of celebration to a day of remembrance for the atrocities he committed. Trash his legacy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

October 9 is Leif Erikson Day

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hinga Dinga Durgen!

10 years ago | Likes 220 Dislikes 3

Ah, durka durka!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

No Team America fans in this thread? My bad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dear Spongebob: went to get more giant paper. Uhhhh.... Patrick.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

PS. Happy Lief Erikson day! Hinga Dinga Durgen!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I think I love all of you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I concur

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Something about Catholics wanting a holiday celebrating another catholic. Probably didn't know the facts when they picked him.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It was the Knights of Columbus

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

IIRC George H.W's father was on eof them

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was my understanding as well

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, vikings have a history clear of rape and pillage.

10 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 17

That's worth at least a week off!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never committed genocide of forced religious conversions. So they got that going for them.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not more than any other civilisation at the time.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually the Vikings were not known for rape. The confusion comes in from the old Anglo-Saxon chronicle that refers to them as rapine 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

2/3 which is another word for pillaging. Some most certainly did rape but pillaging was much more their calling card and really only for

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

3/3 the western vikings. The Swedish vikings were far more interested in trade, albeit they did conquer Kiev and found Novgorod.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Good ol' Holmgarðir.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The vikings were great merchants and a lot might be overdone since the records of them comes from their enemies that set them in a bad light

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So.. Because of that "mark" we're suppose to ignore their history ?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about we celebrate Leonardo DaVinci, he was a great inventor, didn't engage in any genocides, and was actually fucking Italian.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would be surprised if this post goes far. Cuz people don't want their great white heroes shit on.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 33

I don't think I've ever seen anyone mention Columbus without bitching about him. Columbus Day should be called "Bitch About Columbus Day".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact that columbus was white (italian) has nothing to do with how people view him.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I dislike how one sided this is. They lived in an Imperialistic world at the time. Everyone was, including these tribes.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 6

Bingo I have read the histories of both sides and the Native Tribes enslaved, murdered and damaged the environment too.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

This is moving into "Well, Africans enslaved other Africans, too!" Territory.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

It doesn't excuse what was done, but it's silly to pretend that white men brought these concepts to the new world.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Well, that's the thing. You can't cry at something someone did if you're trying to do the exact same thing. That's hypocrisy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Native Americans were destroyed by disease not genocide, estimates up to 3/4 the native population lost from unforeseeable disease.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yet very few people seem to know this.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The smallpox blankets get blamed for that, lumping these deaths in with intentional ones, though it was a whole host of diseases.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except smallpox blankets have no evidence for their existence, its thought to be a myth from the American West.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Columbus Day was created for the Chicago World's Fair (formal name the "Columbian Exposition"), meant to open 1892 (400 years later).

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 2

Source?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

in 1792, not 1892 when the Columbian Order first held an event for the holiday. In 1892, a hundred years later, then-president Harrison(2/?)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Inaccurate, so he probably can't give one. 1) Columbus day was already being celebrated, it just wasn't an official holiday. 2) It was (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

officially named a National Holiday, by then-President Roosevelt, mostly because the Knights of Columbus were lobbying for it. (4/5)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

issued a proclamation essentially making it a national holiday NOT just for the world's fair. 3) It wasn't until 1937 that it was 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check out his username. Clearly he has his sources.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And it wasn't to celebrate the man, but the journey. SAUCE: http://www.history.com/topics/exploration/columbus-day (5/5)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Awful lot of Columbus apologists in the comments... He did tons of terrible things, both on purpose and on accident.

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 21

he did good things as well, doing shitty things doesn't negate this.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

I'm not an expert on this topic; what good things did he do?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

the whole thing he's celebrated for: creating contact with the Americas and a huge role in igniting exploration and expansion.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes? So did Julius Caesar. We named a month after him

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 28, 2022 2:07 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

'we' didn't kill no indians. Well, I didn't, dunno your life. Those are similar in a "should we excuse for old things we did'nt do?" way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So should we change it then? History is bloody wherever you look, people lost, people died. Are we to hate the pope for the inquisition?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Fuck that pope tho

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, people are annoyed by historical revisionism and anachronistic applying modern morals where they don't belong. Even if he was a dick.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't understand that. Why shouldn't we judge the past by our morals? How could we excuse the things he did?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

as amoral because (a)morality is founded contemporary to action in question, not by today's higher standards. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That makes sense in an academic context, I guess; I still don't think Columbus deserves a holiday or anything like that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because morals are changing with time and place, and you can't understand history properly without this cultural context.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Science is about being objective, not judgmental. You can note that, yes, this or that would be immoral today, but not dismiss some1 (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blaming Columbus because they LOST the land they claimed through force and trade from other Native Americans seems slightly hypocritical.

10 years ago | Likes 214 Dislikes 104

Yeah, the Native Americans fought at times. They also managed not to commit GENOCIDE on one another, eh?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

EXACTLY. by that logic Europe should be completely barren right now.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Look at this apologist horseshit! Are you fucking serious? You cannnot be serious with this shit right now!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Well... 90% of all native Americans dying from disease had a hand to play in that as well.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Accidentally. ANY European that contacted the native Americans would have started that.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 12, 2020 9:31 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The spread smallpox intentionally

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

*they

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well no, the vikings didn't.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Yeah, 'cause they landed in Canada and did nothing. Compared to the few thousands of Spaniards landing in Mexico, the Vikings were nothing.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Lord Above, are we so hesitant to even think about what marginalized people are going through that we'll blame THEM?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

No we don't blame them, but sorry we don't feel it's a crutch to blame their situation on.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well, small-pox kind of helped that along.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Do you also think we shouldn't blame the Nazis for the atrocities they committed in Eastern Europe, because Eastern Europeans had been 1)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fighting and conquering one another for centuries, too? Seriously think about what you're saying and stop being a genocide apologist. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 28, 2015 12:57 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

People have been fighting each other over land in the Americas for as long as there have been people in the Americas

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just like Europe but that doesn't make Hitler and good guy. Also a lot of early reports of savagery where exaggerated to justify genocide

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

There is evidence to suggest an Caucasian settlement on the other coast thst predates the natives. Due to a law that says all remains 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Found before a certain year belong to the tribes, no further research is being allowed to be done in that direction.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Yeah I'm an anthropology student, & that's complete bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Prove it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Earliest undisputed evidence of people in NA is roughly 14000 ya; likely to have been here much longer, but little archaeological visibility

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because actualy history isn't taught in high schools. And if these people are from reservations they have probably been brainwashed.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

And yet you have not?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

In a sense everyone has, especially when it comes to history. Having talked to natives, it gets really bad on reservations.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Isolation of any kind tends to do that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah as a history major it just makes me kind of sad. History is brutal and bloody. Ignoring or changing it just means more blood comes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wonder why people on land they were forcibly relocated to might feel that way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

These generations aren't forced onto them. They choose to live on them or not. Reservations are basically dead ends, smart people get out.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Has no one actually read Columbus' logs? The man was an asshole. And he was definitely the start of a whole host of problems.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 7

And

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sure, he was an asshole, and personally committed a lot of atrocities, but blaming ALL of the things ever done to the native people, and 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Being a Native-Am/Black and knowing lots of Native Americans, believe me no one is blaming ALL the atrocities on Columbus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ANYTHING that happened outside of the Caribbean on him is hugely ignorant. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Same reason we talk about Hitler differently than we talk about any other Euro leaders warring against each other: Scale and Genocide.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

But Columbus didn't commit genocide or anything large-scale, he's just a figurehead, blamed for everyone that came after him

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He set the precedent. He reported by that they should be enslaved. History would have been very different if he had been more civil

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He didn't report that any of those peoples ancestors should be enslaved, he never found mainland.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Columbus hardly did anything personally. He accidentally introduced small pox. Any European would have resulted in the same

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thirty Years War. AFAIK, it took bigger percentage of lives than WW2 but we don't go out and forbid Catholicism/Protestantism.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank You. No one says a damn thing about the original natives of New Zealand. Why? Because the Maoris killed them all. Stop sooking.

10 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 21

Thank you! Was about to comment this, every Maori history class I've had tends to skip the part where they raped and ate the Moriori

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

What, who were the original natives of New Zealand then? Baby kidnapping eagles? Although their extermination still pisses me off

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 26, 2015 10:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Fucking A right man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same practice has occurred all over the world and will continue. If one has the power and leverage they will take from the weak.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

lmao So their claim to the land is less valid because THEY took it now YOU.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pretty much need me to draw the picture in crayon?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes apparently because you still can't take my house even if I acquired it from someone else.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just saying no has always stopped invading forces brilliant argument. What your favorite flavor of paint? Just curious.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Now Maoris try and claim that they need special treatment because we're using their wind, beach, land ... what else was there

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

That pisses me off, my Maori history teacher said its a Maori belief that no one can own Mother Nature, yet now it's like "this is my land"

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They play the whole "we have been robbed of our land" card and even some Maoris are sick of their shit lol

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the one that starts crying annoys me

10 years ago | Likes 188 Dislikes 90

A black lady cries when she talks about slavery at my Church. The comments in this thread tell me I can tell her to stfu and get over it

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 10

Well, there have been plenty of likewise images here doing just that, so don't be so surprised when that shows up here...again.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What the fuck is wrong with Imgur right now?

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

Didn't you know, homuraboy? Bigotry is king here! Trying to understand minorities is more of that ol' nasty white guilt the SJWs serve up!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The more people see these likewise opinions like "fuck minorities!" become popular, the more people like that will appear.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

They all became the ultimate authority on everything...don't think too hard on it, you'll only get upset. :/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Imgur right now:

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Lmao, yes!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A more serious reply: Imgur is a den of ignorance, sexism, racism, and more so. All you have to do is ask the right questions and people

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

will let you know what they really think, and seldom people here have sympathy or empathy for minorities.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Or people don't like to live in the past, crying over principles that are no longer in place today.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Doesn't annoy me.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

You don't get to tell someone else what hurts them and what not. And this very comment is the most annoying thing about that post.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 16

You don't get to tell people how to act online. That's the most annoying part about our society. Backwards reasoning like this

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

you dont get to tell me what i can get annoyed about, thank you.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

I'm not telling you what you can get annoyed about. Just pointing out that you are an inconsiderate, unsensitive, dislikable person for it.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 14

You just said that comment was the most annoying thing about that post. So you did try to tell people what to be annoyed about.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Nope, I just told them what annoyed me. You don't get to tell me what I can get annoyed about, thank you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

her reaction his exaggerated and forced and is annoying to me, deal with it.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Please define "exggeration" and what makes you so knowledgeable and worthy to judge that woman's expression of pain.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

+1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Her culture and people are dying out in a land thata doesn't care about them! What a fucking drama queen, am i right guys?"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

dying out seems a tad dramatic

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

As of 2014, Native Americans make up only 2% of the total Population. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/aihmcensus1.html

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

British people make up .89% of the world population. OMG WERE DYING OUT GUYS!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Look at all these people pretending to have been personally traumatized by history, rather than by the way it's been interpreted for them.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

You're not implying that people are over-dramatizing Native American's history in America, are you?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

History, no. I think the story is pretty accurate. These people's RELATIONSHIP to that story is far more tenuous than they're acting.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And you know this how?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. She's reacting unnecessarily.

10 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 39

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 28, 2015 8:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It happened so long ago though. Jews don't cry at the mention of Hitlers name. Irish people don't cry at the mention of Cromwells name.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You can say that because your people weren't massacred and dwindle in population. Trust me if it was your race, you'd be sad about it too

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 52

You can't say that, if you go back far enough I'm sure ThisName....'s people *were* massacred and dwindled at some point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every collection of people have had a massive culling by someone else. History is nothing but bricks built from blood.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Now YOURE being dramatic. Stop the cycle.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But Columbus never had anything to do with her people

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it hadn't happened, would she even exist today? Would her parents have met? or her parents parents? and so forth

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

You can't say that, if you go back far enough I'm sure ThisName....'s people *were* massacred and dwindled at some point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oliver Cromwell decimated the people of Ireland more recently than Columbus. Nobody here will give much of a reaction to his name.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude, I'm Jewish. Trust me she's fine.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

the holocaust was much more recent and I don't see my Jewish friends crying when the name Hitler is said around them

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

They got to go home

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then you don't know any Jewish people you fucking twat.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Sorry but that's not really something you can decide, some of my friends are Jewish and a quarter of my family is Jewish

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Meh. It's like a Jewish person who wasn't even alive during WW2 crying at the mere mention of Hitler. That's not usual.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Nov 28, 2015 8:00 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I disagreed with you until this comment.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

According to the premise described by the first gif, they weren't asked that. It was a word association.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Overreacting much, then? This happened centuries ago and she's reacting like this happened weeks ago to her immediate family.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 23

| Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not being an ass, but can I get a tl;dr?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry if it's unempathic but when something happens so long ago that it's changed history, what can you do?

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 10

the holocaust happened years ago too you mind going up to Jewish families and saying stop bitching that you were on verge of extinction?

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7