Space Shuttle Fun Facts

Dec 9, 2017 12:51 AM

The Space Shuttle was internally known as the Space Transportation System (or STS) and is why all the shuttle missions were denoted as STS-XX. The origins of the Space Transportation System was rooted to a series of vehicles and spacecraft that in unison could make spaceflight of all sorts easier and cheaper. Sadly the only concepts to make it to light was the Space Shuttle and the earth orbiting space station.

The space shuttle’s main engine was the RS-25. An engine that is fueled by a mixture of fuel called hydrolox (liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen) which is stored in the external fuel tank. The engine produces 512,300 pounds of thrust in space (2,279 kN) and produces 418,000 lbf (1,860 kN) at sea level. The engine was also capable of being reused and also boasted the ability to adjust the thrust it produced and it was capable of an impressive 10.5° degrees of gimbal (changing the angle of thrust).

The space shuttle launch stack stands at 56.1 m (184.2 ft) tall with the highest portion being the external tank. With the orbiter having a wingspan of 23.7m (78ft).

Space Shuttle Columbia (OV-102 (OV, Orbiter Vehicle)) flew 28 flights, with the second made orbiter being Challenger (OV-99) which flew 10 flights. The third orbiter to be created was orbiter Discovery (OV-103) which flew the record 38 flights. Followed by Atlantis (OV-104) which flew 32 flights followed lastly by Endeavour (OV-105) which flew 24 flights.

The only vehicle to fly but never be launched was orbiter Enterprise (OV-101). It was built to test the aerodynamic model of the space shuttle. It was even mated to the external tank for structural mating tests. After the Challenger disaster, NASA considered repurposing Enterprise for spaceflight however it was found to be more costly to modify it than to remake a new orbiter. Which they did to make orbiter Endeavour.

Although coming in various sizes (and painted white for STS-1 and STS-2), the external tank could carry around The external tank held 143,000 gallons (541313.885 liters) of liquid oxygen and 383,000 gallons (1449812.71 liters) of liquid hydrogen

The space shuttle being America’s longest lasting space program to date. Lasting 30 years from 1981 to 2011. Whereas Apollo lasted 7 years from 1968 (Apollo 7) to 1975 (Apollo-Soyuz Test Project). The Gemini project lasting one year and Mercury Program lasting 2 years from 1961 (Freedom 7) to 1963 (Faith 7).

To achieve orbital speeds, the space shuttle’s main engines have to accelerate the orbiter to 17,500mph or approximately 8 kilometers per second to orbit the Earth. Initially during launch the orbiter’s three main engines are not capable of lifting itself as the external tank is too heavy, so to get enough thrust, the space shuttle uses two solid rocket motors to assist until the external tank is emptied enough to a point where it’s light enough for the orbiter to continue carrying it into orbit.

When the space shuttle de-orbits, it encounters the atmosphere at approximately 17,000mph. At such high speeds the orbiter passing through the air creates heat through friction in a process known as ‘re-entry’. To protect against the heat of re-entry, the orbiters bottom is covered with silica tiles and the leading edges of the wings are protected by carbon carbon panels.

The sound of Launch is to loud that the air pressure generated from it can travel up to a mile from the launchpad and impact nearby structures and objects and reflect the sound back at the orbiter and launch pad and cause structural damage. To muffle the sound, NASA implemented a series of water jets under the main engines to absorb the air pressure and minimize the damage it can cause.

Because the hydrogen and oxygen fuel must be stored at sun-zero temperatures (as cryogenic fuels) any boil-off from the external tank can cause a fire (or worse an explosion) as the hydrogen is highly flammable (as is seen in the Hindenburg disaster). So to burn off any excess fuel vapor around the rocket, NASA has a series of sparklers to passively burn it off. Some think those sparklers are needed for the ignition of the RS-25s, which is false as the ignition process is contained within the engine system and is not viewable from the outside.

Once the external tank is jettisoned in space, the three large space shuttle main engines no longer have any fuel to function on. So to adjust its course in space, the orbiter uses two Monomethylhydrazine (MMH)/Dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4), AJ-10 engines. These requiring no oxygen (as it’s a byproduct of combustion) and can be ignited many times during a mission making it apt for orbital missions.

Despite being a glider on its return to landing, unlike traditional Manned gliders like the Glaser-Dirks DG-808, which descends at approximately 0.5m/s (100ft/s), the Space Shuttle descends closer to 3,000m/m (10,000ft/m), or at the same speed as a skydiver at free-fall. This is done so the space shuttle can conserve speed for landing.

The space shuttle carried many ethnicities into space along with it. Of them are, Canada, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine and even Russia (post USSR).

*Apollo-Soyuz Test Project Tax

You want to see something launch into orbit, you should see my wife when she’s pissed!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a kid, I always thought eventually I would be able to see a launch in person. This post makes me sad, it was a point of national pride!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Endeavor Sonic Booms 07/31/09 at 13 sec https://youtu.be/pbChnPzrxKY

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

whats virgin galactic been up to these days

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much water is used in the pools next the main thruster to defuse the heat of the initial burn phase during liftoff...............titties

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool story bro

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good info mate...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL Belgium is an ethnicity.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The new KSP looks so real

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#3 At ignition the shuttle wants to rock back & forth like an inverted pendulum. At one point in the rocking the shuttle is straight up 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 & down. It was my husband's job to calculate that point for each payload and "blow the bolts" for lift off.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The OMS doesn't need oxygen, but still has NTO as an oxidizer, sinilar to the SSME with oxygen. Oxygen isn't a byproduct of combustion...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I BEGGED my dad to take me to one of the last-ever space shuttle launches. He said no because I would have missed school. I don’t remember

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

A thing about that day in school, but I darn well would have remembered a space shuttle launch.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Radio Fun Fact..all the radio/tv stations east of the Mississippi start with a W and all of them west start with a K

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

except KDKA, Pittsburgh

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Explain the images in this post #flat_earth-society #takethatflatearthers

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

"Fisheye lenses"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The images have been photoshopped". - see there's no logic that can change their minds.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

We should have stuck with the Saturn V

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Too expensive. Besides, no one wanted to have their hardware go to aging systems. Plus, we were entering a recession. Had to cut it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So serious question. In plenty of sci-fi shows, rocket launches use a ramp system. Why is this not feasible?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generally not effective as it shows. Plus it causes strain on the rocket.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Additional fact: The external tank was painted white in the earlier years to reflect UV rays, keeping the tank cooler. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was stopped as the paint added ~600lbs and the loss of thermal protection was negligible. This allowed for greater payloads. 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mom worked for Martin Marietta in Michoud, LA where the external tank was built. Their company picnics were absolutely enthralling.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some say launches aren't as exciting without people on board, but the heavy rockets provide the same noise, if that's what you're into.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Night launches are great but you can see the sounds waves coming across the river on a calm day.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You missed my favorite fact: by the time the astronauts reach the top of the launch tower, they are going over 100mph

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Re-entry heat is not caused by friction well not much is anyways, most the heat comes from the gas compressing.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Typed this out, figured I'd better look if someone else had made the correction first before I sent.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heat of re-entry is caused by compression, not friction.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also love the "twang" seen in pic 3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still want the shuttle that would take off from a runway and land at a runway like I was promised in high school.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look up the Skylon.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I saw a night launch. Something you'll never forget.

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

I was with the press corp for STS-116. It was unreal.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I got to see John Glenn when they finally let him return to space. It's a moment of my childhood I'll never forget.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So jealous

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:29 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Doesn’t make me less jealous lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I saw the last night launch. 20 miles away & there was so much fire I wondered if everything was alright. It lit up the park like day time.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was supposed to be there. Was on the causeway for the weather-scrubbed launch. Had to fly home before the next launch :(

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:29 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Badass. I was gutted but to just see the shuttle on the pad was worth it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just want to correct your Hindenburg reference. Although the presence of hydrogen did help the burn, the primary fuel was an 1/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aluminium based compound in the paint that was extremely flammable, ignited by static. Hydrogen burns up, the Hindenburg burnt down.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Canceled because it was too expensive, then replaced by a program that is even more expensive (SLS).

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Truth is, NASA is primarily a jobs program. Shuttle and SLS create lots of jobs, the actual space part is incidental.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's actually complete bullcrap.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If the US government actually cared about space exploration, they'd be doing a much better job at at. SLS only exists so that all the 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

people who worked on the shuttle don't lose their jobs, which are spread out over a lot of different states. SLS is also hilariously 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

obsolete now that reusable rockets are a thing, and won't even fly for another 2-5 years at best. There's a reason its nickname is 3/4

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0