It's the beginning of the end. If you don't like it now it's only going to get worse.

Jul 7, 2023 9:21 PM

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the so called ai of today can't do a single damned thing on it's own. humanity itself is and likely will always be humanity's greatest enemy.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thankfully what we have now that we are calling "ai" isn't actually ai. It's just predictive text much like the predictive text function on your phone

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Agreed. I keep saying the same thing. No one is listening. No one has bothered to consider how things are gonna go when this technology eliminates every job on the planet. Nah, it’ll be fine….

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

frees up lots and lots of more people to become beekeepers

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But you do?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seeing as how SCIFI has predicted so much tech that exists now..don't you think its safe to assume the same about AI? Heed the warnings and slow down with this stuff.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is the logical conclusion. Just hope it assimilates rather than annihilates

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the beginning of the end the same way the printing press was "the beginning of the end". It's just the end of the way things have been. Next step might be better, might be worse, but the only way we'll know is to experience. The way out is through, same as always.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Geralt: I've lived through a whole dark age and three supposed end of days. It's all horseshit." History will argue the number of "world ending" technologies. It will be a challenge, but any "worse" will be short term from the timeline of humanity. v

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While that's hopefully true, and has been in the past, a whole lot of people got left behind in those transitionary periods.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It can't be any worse than the fat rich fucks in charge right now.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I kind of hope that if AI does develop, but it lacks our amygdala, it may not be susceptible to fear-mongering. That said, hey, I could potentially be the solution to those rich fucks.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'I don't think'.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Imo, AI's replacement of human interaction is a reflection of the psyche of the masses. More and more, we don't like people.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well tons don't believe science and also think the world is flat, so.....

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It depends on how we apply it, like everything else. That said, look what we've done with everything else. It probably won't go well.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yeah, humans are the problem. That's been made quite clear over the last few thousand years

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We weaponize everything.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You haven't used ChatGPT then? It's unbelievably stupid most of the time.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Imo, once there are two sentient machines, it's over for us as a species.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meh, I don't think so. Humans have been evolving, adapting to our technology all along. This will be just one more example. I'm more worried about industrially manufactured food.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't think it's a nuclear apocalypse we're facing but technological/informational.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

One will lead to the other

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i dont think you understand that currently we don't have real AI. it's just advanced chat bots

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

"Artificial Intelligence" is an entire branch of computer science that includes everything from pathfinding to recommender systems to natural language processing. Google Maps? AI. Spotify "For You" playlists? AI. Siri? AI.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

all of your examples are of neural networks, not AI. aka machine learning, aka pattern matching. not intuition

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I recommend reading "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach." It is the gold standard textbook for the field. It covers mainly classical AI, like the examples I cited, and briefly discusses machine learning.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm old. I've heard this far too many times. I also remember "age of Aquarius" beliefs when folks were hopeful~ish. I can't accept that a technology on its own will do anything bad. It's just a tool. A % of humanity has and always will be monsters, and too many of them want and achieve power. There are mixed messages, numbers people will show the data saying we're better off now as a species than we've ever been. But with global warming starting to impact us that twill change. Not AI, people /1

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ignoring data and reality so they can get wealth and power. That's the real enemy of humanity, not the tool they use to achieve it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've also been through a number of these world changing events, but this time, sorry to disagree, this is too much power held in the hands of faceless corporate entities that have already proven they don't care about people.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You must be new to the planet.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we used it to improve efficiency and manage automation of menial tasks we could free up untold human hours, but that means exploring UBI.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Alot of people pay their bills and feed their families doing menial tasks. They are not gonna reach for a book, they are gonna reach for their guns

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think you missed the part about exploring Universal Basic Income, and the clarification underneath about still having a right to live.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(the implication being the majority of humans shouldn't need to work with how our technology has progressed, but still have a right to live)

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The problem capitalists are fighting right now is how to keep all those suddenly useless peons from rising up once they're not useful. Definitely doesn't have anything to do with militarized police, schools like prisons, and it getting harder and harder to vote

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And some are realizing they can't control the AI and getting real scared- they didn't have a problem with AI when they thought they could hold the leash and sick the AI on us peons, but we are all peons to our soontobe new robot overlords!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean really it's just an arms race where the "nukes" Alphabet/Google and Elon and Jeff and snapchat and facebook andandand- will just detonate themselves one day and we have no idea what they'll do, right?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

untold human hours free to be used at other menial tasks :D

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The problem you will always have is megalomaniacs using it to get richer or equally for the wrong reasons

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

This is it - under end-stage capitalism then yes, AI is the end. We need to understand that we are in a post-scarcity world and stop acting like there isn't enough for everyone. And, yes, I mean that quite literally - every person suffering WORLDWIDE is a policy decision, not a lack of resources. Otherwise, old men dreaming of empires will be the death of us all regardless of AI.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

True Dat

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not that we shouldn't worry about AI but it's hard to get worked up about it when there have been at least 10 "WORLD ENDING EVENTS" in my life so far

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

When the McRib was taken off the permanent menu? 😏

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The AIs take over only to get trashed by climate change.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe they fix it instead

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's very optimistic but I respect the fresh take.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say they wouldn't kill all of us to do it

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's that, I guess.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0