Public Good

Jul 21, 2021 5:41 PM

LordHavelock

Views

83360

Likes

2131

Dislikes

90

Elon is kinda doing it, but still, its going pretty slow even with an ambitious billionaire whos endgame goal is to colonize mars.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I hate Amazon.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Agreed, now can we all get together and send Bezos into the furthest corner of the galaxy?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All that to ride a dick for ten minutes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 3

All you need is a possible nuclear war.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He calls his employee bathroom breaks "space-breaks" bc he makes everyone pee in bottles at their stations

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a billion dollars a minute for his 5 hour trip

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Silly comparison, silly conclusion

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only time we ever hoped for a shuttlr explosion

5 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 21

As foretold

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We were happy to get the Cosmonauts and Astronauts back however.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was 1960's government, now they could fuck up a 2 car funeral.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was told I paid for this.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Faster alone, further together. We gotta start thinking of the long term and the big picture or our species is fucked.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Imagine what we could do if billionaires paid taxes and we didn't blow it on stupid wars!

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Next time, make it a one-way trip.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Apes together strong!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

But they're doing it with public funds. Checkmate communist.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

wait? what?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Governments (mostly USA) are funding them (Musk, Bezos, Branson).

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok Im' naive i thought they ware using their own billions but they're using taxpayer's money that could fund NASA? Any source on that?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. I don't have the links now, neither I have time to re-search them, but I'm bookmarking this question for the next time...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... and it's even worse bc they're walking on military contracts and deals, then many budgets are secret.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 60's space race was in ICBM pissing contest between the US and the Soviets

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and it accomplished a lot more for a lot less money.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The space race of the 60s was paid for by taxpayers. The space race of today was paid for by tax dodgers.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Still paid for by taxpayers, though..

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fair point.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In 1969 astronauts were made of the right stuff.

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 6

The Right Stuff was a great movie.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they still are. NASA is just underfunded as always since apollo cancelation.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Now THIS is a point right here, thanks pangolin. Will you go to prom with me?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I mean, the Gagarin beat all of them

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same stuff as today. Only thing missing is money for beating the c ...I mean space exploration.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Saturn V rocket was made by North American Aviation and Douglas, the lunar lander by Northrop Grumman. Shuttle was Rockwell

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Public private partnership.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, a public private partnership. None of those companies would ever have built those things, let alone to work together, without NASA.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You guys still believe the moon is real?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He didn't do it alone. He had to make his employees pee into bottles because they couldn't have breaks. He even mentioned his employees.

5 years ago | Likes 1204 Dislikes 22

no shit

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

He didn’t do it at all. He pushed funding to the company he owns and rode up there like he actually did something.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, his company is doing that because they can. He could have gone to space just the same paying them well and allowing them proper breaks.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He mentioned his employees paid for his little trip, what a douchebag.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He literally said to his employees "you payed for this!". What an absolute turd.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He then used that money to pay an army of engineers who he didn’t thank.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The engineers were probably the only employees who make a decent wage though. So he’s probably bitter about that.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They still had to watch their boss go to space with roughly zero percent chance of any of them being invited.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

its AWS that makes the big bucks for Jeff, not the online store. its companies like Imgur hosting with AWS that paid this, tbh.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm imagining a direct line of causation like all the piss bottles were the rocket fuel or something.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also paying people who actually know wtf they're talking about to do it for him.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also used corrupt influence over a US Congresswoman from Washington to secure an additional several billion dollars from the government.

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

He doesn't make them piss in bottles. They can always get fired.

5 years ago | Likes 164 Dislikes 0

Then they’re no longer employees ?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*Most of them will be fired anyways, cause work there is incredibly seasonal

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Allegedly Bezos personally wants low level employees fired after a bit instead of being promoted because he considers them stupid and lazy.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

He might, but this is common practice at shitty jobs. Fire employees before they get their raises. Keeps quartly profits higher.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I hate bezos but this is a blatant mischaractization. He think low level employees should leave after a few years because once they get

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Comfortable they do less work and look for more ways to game the system. Which is like, totally true with any worker in any field.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

All the people did was generate the money. That's like saying livestock are responsible for feeding people.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What year? Nice

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And we're not even mentioning Gagarin

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I note that NASA aims to spend $100B (SLS+orion+gateway+...) in putting around a dozen landers on the moon with a total payload of 5 tons.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

"a dozen landers" kinda sells short the longterm projects (and the funding secured for them) that are going on. its missions too.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, ... If you read through what the ongoing support is, it is ongoing support in order mostly to support those landing missions. There

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is a very small and limited station, which is not designed for even semipermenant manning,

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there is an electric propulsion element which is almost predicated on stuff in lunar orbit being murderously epensive. There are proposals

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for useful components amongst this, but the main architecture is very much designed around 'how do we get stuff for the moon for ten billion

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SpaceX, if their goals are attained, can put a hundred tons on the moon for $50M. NASA is comedically inefficient.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 16

It's almost ones a publicly owned company with little to no oversite on what they spend on equipment or credentials for the scientists

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If pigs magically flew out of my ass I could solve world hunger. Ifs don't mean shit. NASA can, and has, repeatedly delivered. And the 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

investment almost always produces much more useful stuff worth a lot more than what they spent. Big differences. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's a big unproven "if".

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Quite. However most components of SLShavenot actually flown either. Basing your plans around a rocket with a minimum cost of $2B nonreusabl

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a big "if", and NASA owns their own work, building institutional knowledge. If was just about $/ton the Russians are still cheaper.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

'If' being the key word there. Cos Nasa will do what they said they'd do. There's a decent chance Musk will fail and call the director of

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Nasa a paedo.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Using technology pioneered and perfected by NASA*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How much has SpaceX spent just getting to this point to be able to launch for $50M?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Around $5B. Much, admittedly government money, but they only got paid that money by being the cheapest offering.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The contract cost structure of the commercial/cargo programs required the competing companies to put up their own money as well

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So a bit different than $50M?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Per launch to the moon. Arbitrarily repeatable by reusable vehicles.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're an idiot.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Hey Maxie when was NASA's last maned flight?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2