Interesting Perspective

Jan 18, 2015 6:46 AM

homosensuel

Views

499825

Likes

11634

Dislikes

356

Are you sure it wasn't from a goat's?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Space is actually a volume, not an area, and the Milky Way is named after milk squirted from the breast of Hera, unless I'm misinformed.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Matter can be created and destroyed.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That's not how shadows work. Light doesn't come to a grinding halt when it hits a object...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We are not actually the age of the universe, many of the heavier atoms were created in later fusion processes in stars. sry for partypooping

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thanks, BuzzFeed.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How did this bullshit reach the front page??

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

#3 completely overlooks the fact that we can create light here on earth???

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's what the government wants you to think.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I need #8 without the text

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There you go with a similar one. https://gfycat.com/DefinitiveClosedFunnelweaverspider

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can watch a timelapse of the pulsar in the centre which is awesome, but that stereo image is artificial. Google "crab nebula animation"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

actually the starlight hitting your eye is pretty young, since all the stars we can see with the naked eye are fairly close to us

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

that and light doesn't travel through time, only through space, so light has no real "

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

age"

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seeing as most of this is inaccurate, I don't get why it has so many upvotes and so few downvotes

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Because oooh cool science, let's upvote it blindly without checking the facts, it's not as if someone would lie on the internet.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes, that and it is copied directly from buzzfeed

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being accurate on imgur is not a guarantee against down votes, unpopular accurate posts get seriously down voted

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Clearly this doesn't take your breadth away.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You are correct. Misinformation does nothing for me :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually, we named every galaxy after the secretions of a cow's udders, just in Greek. We named ours after it twice (galaxy = milky way).

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Half of this shit in BS. Wtf OP?

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Buzzfeed. This is all pulled directly from a buzzfeed post.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL milk only comes from cows udders

11 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 3

tell your mom this

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i don't know why everyone says udders plural... last i knew they only had one... and like to attack with horns, how so much milk?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

TBF, they did say multiple cows, so there would be plural udders. I know what you're saying though. Plural teats on one cow. Single udder.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

an oldie but still funny

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cows have four or five udders, and cows used for milking usually have four udders

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A cow has one udder, but multiple teats.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I realize my mistake

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Actually, according to Greek mythology, the udder that created the Milky Way belonged to a human, iirc.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

ew

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The wikipedia talks about Hera and Rhea, but not Iirc...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

am I the only one freaked out about the second to last one looking 3D?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Calm down Jaden

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

First 'fact' is false.

11 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 8

Looks like imgur does not like facts stopping them from enjoying a terrible post.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I just took it to mean the atoms you are made up of has always been around..

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stopped reading after that.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

Liar.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Last one too.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how so?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Matter can be created and destroyed.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

mass' is a version of energy conservation and not a law of nature. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The short answer is that relativity allows for the conversion of matter into energy. So, in non relativistic physics, 'conservation of(1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As is the last fact. The most distant stars we see are about 4000 light years away, I think. Certainly not billions. What the fuck.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Ahh, wrong here. Light from billion light year distant galaxies is arriving in your eyes...it's just too dim to perceive without a telescope

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. You are the same decaying organic matter as everyone else

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I always upvote Fight Club references

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm getting a serious Jaden Smith vibe here. Except a lot more interesting so illallowit.gif.

11 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 4

If you like Jaden Smith, you'll *love* Deepak Chopra.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This "Jaden Smith vibe" is called positive thinking. Slowly I understand why this whole motivational circlejerking allways reaches FP.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

No. A Jaden Smith vibe is when someone tries really hard to sound deep and intelligent with seemingly abstract but ultimately unoriginal

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And what is "originally deep"?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

and nonsensical POOP.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah also, Strange Wilderness the nature documentary scenes. "Sharks have killed less people than WWI and WWII COMBINED."

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A great start with #1 already being wrong. Matter can be converted into energy and it is this energy that can't be destroyed.

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

A good thing, then, that the total energy of the Universe is equal to zero.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You need to define the energetic point from which downward energy is negative. Since that's arbitrary, isn't your statement a bit void?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why is it expanding then?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And a great end with #9 being wrong as well, since the most distant visible stars are only a few thousand lightyears away.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You can see the Andromeda galaxy with the naked eye, that's 2 million light years (and blows my mind). But it's not billions.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, that's not a visible star, although I guess you could say it's still "starlight".

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Icelandic the Milky-way is called Vetrarbrautin, which translates as The Winter Street. (In Iceland you can only see the stars in winter)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's called "the winter street" in swedish as well. :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#1 Bullshit in the first picture. Yeah not gonna read the rest.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Don't you just love it when OP makes it easy and saves you time?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

calm down there jaden

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/9 Matter can be destroyed (see particle and anti-particle collision).

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2/9 I don't know what you are going with here.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3/9 False, it's constantly absorbed and remited by air molecules every 68 nanometers in average.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4/9 Or wind. Or a bucket of water. Also, the ocean does a lot more than that.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5/9 You do know that cows are not the only animals that produce milk, right?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

6/9 And insect's collective experiences dwarfs ours (some 10^19 insects).

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Matter can be created AND destroyed

11 years ago | Likes 273 Dislikes 5

The post might've been referring to energy (soul). Which could be a philosophical debate in itself just my take on it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unless we're talking about quarks. That's some tough shit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OP doesnt know about QFT

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plus, "you" are an arrangement of matter that is always changing. Just because your atoms have been around forever doesn't mean "you" have

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

called mass defect. when an atom fissions, is we take all the remaining matter, and all the energy and added it all back up, theres still

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

when a nucleus fissions it releases nuclear binding energy which indistinguishable from more mass inside the nucleus

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mass Defect: The video game where Commander Shepard is missing a few chromosomes.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

if you mean mass, sure. If you mean mass-energy, nope

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

something missing.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't even need to read the comment to upvote, the username is all it takes.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

was just about to say, matter is created and destroyed constantly within the universe (see antimatter - matter interaction)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I must break you." - Ivan Drago to another form of matter, Rocky IV

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

"DRAAAAGGGOOOO!!!" - Rocky on top of that mountain

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"I must break you"-Ivan Drago to a proton at CERN, studying quark confinement and hadron jets

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe I've always gotten it wrong, but E=MC^2 refers to mass provided by rest energy holding the atom together no? Not to a fluidity between

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, only energy, which can be in the form of matter, is conserved.

11 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 1

I actually did not know this until now. Mind explaining it a little more?

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

make other particles, so energy can be converted into matter. And the principle of conservation of energy states that energy is converted 2)

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nuclear reactors convert uranium-235 to barium and krypton. The weight of which is lighter than the original atom. Byproduct? Energy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man this is blowing my mind. Cheers.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

from one form to another, but isn't destroyed or created. So matter can be "destroyed" or converted into energy, and vise versa, but the 3)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

total energy involved is the same. Hopefully that explains what you wanted to know. Character limits make things tricky. 4)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, you know E=mc^2. That's just saying that matter can be converted into energy. In particle accelerators, energy from collisions can 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I prefer the Louis C.K. version of the first bit of bullshit: "the vast majority of your existence will be spent being dead."

11 years ago | Likes 1237 Dislikes 27

Ah but what if you believe in reincarnation!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We're just dead people who haven't died yet." Love him.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Feb 7, 2015 2:51 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Your body not existing doesn't make you less dead. More dead, if anything.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Louis CK is my spirit animal.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or not born. Who knows what happens. ;)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It takes a whole ocean and the moon to erase marks on sand? I HAVE THE POWERS OF THE MOON AND THE SEA!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I saw that show a few days ago, He will always be hilarious

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it” -Mark Twain

11 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 3

He is funny in a very depressing way. Haha!

11 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 1

want to see where CK probably got that line? http://youtu.be/Z9PzSNy3xj0

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't help but feel that there is SOMETHING after..

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There is :3

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was watching that for the first time at the approximate moment that you made this comment.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"You're all just dead people waiting to die. that's it."

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kinda off-topic, but I don't believe in ghosts because I feel that with how many people have died on this planet, it would be kinda crowded.

11 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

What if, when you die, you enter the 5th dimension, and you can choose to interact with the 3D world, and those who do are seen as ghosts?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The universe is huge, like, unfathomably huge. I bet ghosts will prefer to watch twinsunrise in another galaxy far far away.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

then why do alien ghosts never show up here?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have you seen... here? Most people already here don't want to be here.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think that's exclusive to earth. Whether you are human or Xylarian, the grass is always greener somewhere else

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if ghosts only stay for a while, then leave? Like there are old ghosts and young ghosts?

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Did you say, G-g-g-g-g-GHOST????

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or not everyone gets to be a ghost

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or reincarnation...came back to life as something else ...either here on earth or elsewhere in the universe

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy fuck. I only thought of reincarnation being limited to our planet but this changes everything!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If ghosts aged, then would it be considered a second life on an alternate plane of existence?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't think they would age so much as just mature and then move on, or maybe dissipate over time.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like purgatory, kinda.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That just ruined my day

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Light isn't interested in the ground, it traveled 93 million miles to shine on me.

11 years ago | Likes 2809 Dislikes 4

You crazy diamond.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Light that hits the ground is light that misses its target

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the attitude!!!

11 years ago | Likes 282 Dislikes 3

inb4 melanoma

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

That was the most inspirational thing I've ever read

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Now that's the right attitude

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Becaus your fabulous!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also, at that speed, the light wouldn't even get to experience the distance.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nah. get out the way bitch

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you favorite a comment? 'Cause dayum.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The sun don't shine on the same dog's ass every day

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except in the light's frame, the sun and you are in exactly the same spot. Relativity! Science!!!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except by relativity a photon experiences no time, so from its perspective it pops into existence at the star and instantly interacts w/ us.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, aren't you special.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yup.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the light bulb in my room certainly didn't travel 93 million miles to shine on me

11 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 2

That light is just not as patient

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

O, I thought we all just sat in the dark on Imgur

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Neither is the blue glow of my PC monitor..................

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

assuming you've bluescreened and are commenting via phone.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

...and also the ground.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Because when you're cool, the sun shines on you 24 hours a day."

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That was my thought as well. I SAVED that light from hitting dirt, damnit! I LOOOOOOVE my ass.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's the most inspirational thing I've read all year.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You glorious fucker

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And a lot of it hits the ground anyway, as it reflects off your glorious form.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Kanye?? Is that you?!

11 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 3

His life is dope and he does dope shit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Flashing..... Lights....

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

You deserve more upvotes. +1

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

wud u belib in wut u belieb in if u da onli 1 who belieb init

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

E=MC^2. Mass can be converted to energy. It is no longer mass, hence it was destroyed. But yes, most of the atoms in our body are old.

11 years ago | Likes 422 Dislikes 14

no, its just been converted from one form to another. correctly speaking mass-energy can't be destroyed. A positron electron annihilation 1)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2) can produce massless photons or energy from proton collisions can produce jets of hadrons but the mass-energy remains constant

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And since they haven't been destroyed yet, they most probably are as old as the universe itself.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically, it is not destroyed because it is still in existence. It is simply in a different form.m

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

E=MC Vagina

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

Vagina, vagina, i wanna have sex with your vagina,

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

My love is like lightning, it gives girls orgasms

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

oh and BTW, that's only valid for a stationary particle. You need to add the Lorentz factor if you want that to be valid for moving particle

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, it can be converted, just not created or destroyed. Fusion and fission are the conversion of matter and energy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thank for spread the will of mother physic my friend, may the force, equal masse.acceleration, be with you

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I drop a mass from my butt, I have more energy and I no longer have that mass. The science checks out.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong term, bro. Mass and matter are not the same thing.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're misusing terms here. When you say "mass", you actually mean "matter"; mass is a property of both matter AND energy.

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Soooort of. I mean yes he means matter but "energy has mass" is only sort of true since there are different things we mean by mass. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh ignore the 1/2 I don't feel like completing this. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or: mass and energy are the same thing. Matter can be converted to energy, but total mass of the system remains within observed frame.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

thank you.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I scrolled down just to post this. I'm late to the party, though.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I stopped reading after the first one to scroll down to the comment section. Saw op's reply to you, there is no need to read the rest.

11 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 4

OP didn't create this. It is not his/her OC.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Nevertheless OP had a very stupid reply. Stupid people make stupid replies and stupid people post stupid things.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I would have missed that, if you hadn't commented, so thank you!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ditto

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That equation is for mass. Not matter. Matter is comprised of both matter and energy. More specifically, light as both particle and wave

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like your response. My understanding of light photons reflected by a mirror are that they are destroyed into the vacuum then...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

recreated out of the vacuum for the reflection. Comment?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't really understand your question. If light is reflected off a mirror it's just redirected into a different direction

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, photons are destroyed. A new photon with similar properties is created and emitted...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, matter is just a form of energy, so nothing is really destroyed. Our atoms/energy is as old as the universe...

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Conservation of mass isant really true, its the conservation of energy that is a law.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's what I'm saying

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) for example hadron jets in proton collisions are a good example, thanks to quark confinement, but the mass-energy is a constant

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not even really true. its the combination of mass and energy coupled together which doesn't change. you can take energy and turn it to mass

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You literally could not be more wrong, while it is correct that the first fact is wrong, Mass absolutely CANNOT be "converted" to energy

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 258

...OP I feel you may actually know the difference between "mass" and "matter" and have been unjustly downvoted by people who don't :/

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

He even gave you the equation. Energy = Mass^2. It's how fusion works friend. Of course that equation is simplified for bodies at rest

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Mass is energy my friend, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Energy is a much larger than you clearly understand.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

The sun also has an impact on the tides, not just the moon. Also sunlight isn't unobstructed, it comes into contact with our atmosphere...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are so wrong.. So how do you suppose nuclear reactors(or our sun) gets energy?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Loser

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a scientist...I am disappoint.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rekt.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I laughed out loud when I read this. Such confidence in such a wrong statement.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh wow. Did you not even read about how stars work before posting this? Also, E=mc2 is the most famous equation in the world...

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

do u evn science bro

11 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

So, so wrong. You literally could not be more wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the kind of comment I need popcorn to read.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...I'm gonna guess you did middle school science poorly and that's the extent of your knowledge.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Energy is what cannot be created or destroyed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy

11 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Apr 6, 2016 12:58 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy" the universe does not meet this criteria, so its conservation of energy here

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You just got scienced

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As much as it makes zero sense to me, I am going to trust people who know shit about physics, because odds are they're right.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So tell me about matter-antimatter anihillation and pair production.

11 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

You read bro?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shut the quark up OP, no one thinks you matter.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Where did you go to school? The entire inner workings of an atomic bomb are a very very small amount of mass being converted into energy...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's always fascinating to see someone preach nonsense with 100% confidence. You obviously can't be confident because you researched it 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 1

2/2 so where does that confidence come from ?

11 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

From energy :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You literally could not be more wrong, while it is correct that the first fact is wrong, Mass absolutely CAN be "converted" to energy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Matter can be both created and destroyed. Matter/Antimatter annihilation, for example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Really, what about atomic bombs and nuclear reactors?

11 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 9

that's not mass being converted to energy, that's the energy used in holding the atom together being released

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

It's the difference in mass being converted to energy that results in the energy released though.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_energy#Mass_change than is litteraly mass turning into energy.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yes, because particles are ejected, particles that have mass, says so right there in your link :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

yes, because particles are ejected, particles that have mass, says so right there in your link :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/eneein.html mass-energy conversion.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

+ 1 for you my friend

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0