My ex will never gonna see the movies, she is true book fan

Jul 15, 2022 1:37 PM

baronfin

Views

119768

Likes

1342

Dislikes

40

21 years ago... fuck.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I read the books first. The films are cold garbage comparatively - come at me, nerds

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

As a woman & literate, I absolutely accept being referred to as a jolly fellow in a yellow hat named Tom Bombadil

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Loved the books, read The Hobbit at 10 and finished ROtK at 15, the films were brilliant, so no prizes for this sort of self-denial....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By fire, sun and moon, harken now and hear us! Come, Tom Bombadil, for our need is near us!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was there 44 years ago

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I haven't sat down and watched them, but the movies brought a wonderful world to lots of new fans, and that's a good thing.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow. Bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Tbh, the new trailer has me afraid Bezos is gonna present us with a total shitshow that butchers the source material even worse than PJ did.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Iarwain Ben Adar. Oldest and fatherless.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*if* the new fans arrive.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I tried to read the trilogy the summer between 10th & 11th grades. Only got partway thru 1st book. Very dry. That was 40 years ago.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"will never gonna"?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But that is not for us to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the new shows that are given to us.

4 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

*chef's kiss

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cherish what we have, count our blessings, and patiently wait another 10 years for the next attempt.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Please no ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gatekeepers are douchebags, no matter the IP.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And we will invite them to join us both, no matter where they started their journey.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TV show is gonna suck donkey dick. Lets be honest. I mean, they fucked up the Wheel of Time one.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Fuck off tom bombadill you lazy fucking god who could have ended everything with ease but didnt want to leave your hoe for a week...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What's in September 2022? Wait ... no ... I don't want to know. It can't be anything good in these times.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

New Bastardized Lord of the Rings series from Amazon.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wait. What's happening in September?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Autumn Solstice for one thing.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love Bucky’s comment about The Hobbit in Falcon and the Winter Solder

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Decades before the movies, LED Zeppelin was rocking with Hobbit lyrics in some of their songs.

4 years ago | Likes 203 Dislikes 2

In the darkest depths of Mordor, I met a girl so fair.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

But gollum and the evil one crept up and slipped away with her.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I dunno, Shire of Frodo with Castle of the Elfin King is the real masterpiece

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love when helper and brock have the argument about that, ok fine, and hobbits. ttps://i.imgur.com/gmOlROd.gif

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

And before that, Leonard Nimoy: https://youtu.be/BC35cQKHwzg

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Spock has a singalong about Bilbo. It’s trippy, and not because of all the hippies.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also Rush. They have a song called Rivendell

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Beautiful song as well.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love Light Emitting Diode Zeppelin! They rock!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might enjoy Blind Guardian

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

WE ARE FOLLOWING THE WILL OF THE ONE THROUGH THE DARK AGES INTO THE STORM!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NOW YOU ALL KNOW….

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HIGHLY recommend Bo Hanssons LOTR album as well.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Damn, got a Bo Hansson hater

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every time I reread the Lord of the Rings I thank God that Peter Jackson cut out Tom Bombadil from the films!

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What is wrong with you?!!!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Old Tom bombadil, tom bombadillo, old tom bambadil… shoot me now!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You fool. Peter Jackson *was* Tom Bombadil.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(Actually, there's is a compelling fan theory that is literally true. The theory is that Tom Bombadil was the reader: there before the...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...beginning, can respond to anything a character says/does, isn't affected by and can see through the One Ring.)

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My favorite reaction to people saying the hobbit movies could have been shorter is "Bitch you wanted Tom Bombadil in lotr"

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

And the Scouring of the Shire. Which would have been cool to see but there's no way to include it without screwing the 3rd film's structure

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn right I did!!!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you comparing Bombadil to rubbery barrels bouncing along a river for 15 mins or a stupid, cringy love triangle?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Yes both of those are better :) Thank you for listening to my TED talk.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Honestly the movies are better than the books because they cut out so much bloat (and still end up at 3 hours each...)

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

I’m fucking triggered

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Tolkien was a linguist first, n world builder second, and an author third. His prose is bland and tedious, but its contents legendary.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Definitely better as a story in terms of structure and pacing... and they don't kill the action every few pages for another fucking song!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But the way he did we don't only have 3 movies but a whole universe. Creator can take that and expand it without contradicting each other.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So many games, maps, books have been created with that universe as foundation. I'm glad we had the books.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Stories can be enjoyed in multiple fashions. 'Never watching the movie just because it's a movie' is closed minded. Grow up.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

But not watching it because you're afraid it will ruin your future re-read, is a valid way to look at it. Let everyone do what they do.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Fear a movie will kill a reread is potential to close one's mind in baby steps

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure. You could think that. As said: you do you.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One does not simply walk into a fandom without gatekeeping.

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 14

Actually its pretty easy, its called not being a cunt

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except ATLA.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

... ...idk...on the rare occasion someone says they like the live action movie they get gate-kept to fuck

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gatekeepers are like Walmart Greeters. Just blow right past them and pretend you don't see them. Like what you like, how you like it.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Welcome to LoTR, I love you.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Like all those universities gatekeeping their diplomas, and the hospitals gatekeeping the surgery suites..

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 37

What are you babbling about?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How in the unholy fuck is that even close to relevant

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You downvote and all I see is a bunch of people that like the phantom menace best.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Nobody cares what you think about what they like my guy. Why should they? Where do you think your approval fits into that equation?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Slight difference between liking a band/book/movie etc and going to a hospital or university, no?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We’re comparing liking a story because you first encountered it in a specific media with high skill scenarios like surgery? Come on.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you trying to walk into my gate keeping fandoms? Wow. Name every gatekeeper. I’ll wait.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, is it gatekeeping? Neither the books nor the movies ought to be seen as "dated" at this point. The books are written in a "heroic" 1

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Style that's heavily inspired by antique and early medieval epics. The movies completely hold up and will for decades. If ya need a show 2/

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That takes a lot of questionable liberties with the source material to get into the "fandom", it feels like that person is more a fan of 3/

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Flashy production values and modern Hollywood-style storytelling and not of LOTR.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I don't think the post was inherently gatekeep-y, but it's not too far from 'you're not really an LOTR fan until you've read the books' 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean, yes what you just said is gatekeeping. It’s entirely possible for some younger folks this could be their FIRST introduction to LoTR…

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 0

How have I never seen this?

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Because it's quite recent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoNb3Tf6Pl0 (sauce)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know who made this but.... I just......... *slow clap*

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So who would Bill be?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tom Bombadil

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No that's Bobby

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The Witch King?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tom bombadil

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

One Propane Tank to fuel them all.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

One grill to bind them

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

One steak to bring them all and in the back ally bind them

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I didn't even know there were new movies! Exciting times. Honestly, it could not be any worse than The Hobbit movies, such a low bar.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

I own some of those Hobbit ones, haven’t gotten through them. Give me the Rankin-Bass cartoon.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Down down to goblin town!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't it a series on Amazon Prime that's being released in Sept? Not movies?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And its a prequel, apparently. I really hope nobody asked "can we reboot Lord of the Rings?" in a pitch meeting.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's a Bastardization. And that question has been asked.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep, The Rings of Power series on Amazon. Covers Sauron's first rise to power and the fall of Numenor. A young Isildur (the one who wouldn't

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

cast the Ring into the fire) is one of the characters, along with Galadriel and Elrond.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"What if we made a Fantastic Beasts, but for Lord of the Rings?" - Hollywood loves a lazy pitch!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it seems like they also compressed a massive amount of the timeline to try to make it all fit instead of an anthology over centuries

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh my sweet summer child… the hobbit sequel had by far more quality than some of these Star Trek / Star Wars sequels… imagine a 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

“Picard-like” sequel in the lotr universe… uhh I shiver….

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But imagine if it's "Strange New Worlds" in quality. That would be a delight. Although I won't get my hopes up.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hey Lower Decks is unexpected brilliant new Trek

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Average at best imo. Got a few chuckles but forgettable beyond that.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the film adaptation of the hobbit was a terrible abomination. Not Peter Jacksons fault, but damn what a terrible set of movies.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I hadn't read the book yet. after the dwarf lava-surfed in the second film I went home and bought the book to finish the story, never 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

bothered watching the third movie. The actual adaption was done pretty well, but they added so much unnecessary bullshit to stretch 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the story it was maddening. 3

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was borderline angry about it lol

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I still am! I hold the firm belief that anyone who genuinely thinks it is a good trilogy does not understand what a good film is about.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It had some individual scenes that were excellent (e.g. the riddle scene) and the casting was spot-on, but overall it was too bloated

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Snobby, I know, but I just can't help it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This new series is going to suck so hard. They're already changing the established Lore. Just look at what Amazon did with Wheel of Time.

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 8

Oh no! Not the precious established lore! Anyways...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

What lore have they changed? All I’ve seen is some cosmetic stuff.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Changing the look of already established races is also changing the lore pretty heavily.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

As in, casting non-white people for roles? Or like, making dwarves tall and elves have rounded ears?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Not really. As I said: Cosmetic. Cosmetic differences happen every time you get someone else making an adaption. Up to and including the

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Illustrators of the work. The beard issue is far from cut and dry, while Tolkien initially had all dwarves as having beards in the War of

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The Jewels, later when he was discussing who all had beards he specifically excluded Dwarf women. Singling out dwarf MEN as being bearded.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dropping the Istari into Middle Earth in the second age. Removing Celeborn completely from the Lore. And that's just to start.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Depending on what they are adapting their arrival in the second age is accurate. If they are going with "peoples of middle earth" books .

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Also, they aren't adapting. They're making shit up. They've even admitted it. Don't try to paint this as a positive.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Sure thing pal

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The Istari arrived in the 3rd age of Middle Earth according to The Unfinished Tales which has the most information regarding them.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But they're going with 1600 SA from Peoples of Middle Earth presumably. There is pretext for both is all Im saying

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I wanted to be able to like WoT so much, and the visuals for channelling were nicely done, but YE GODS ITS GARBAGE.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Ah, Wheel of Time, not World of Tanks, was lost for a moment there lol

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Couldn't make it past the first episode. Was *so* bad. I hadn't read it, but wife had and hated it even more.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Jackson changed a lot when he made his films and they were a masterpiece... You're right though, the series will suck

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

The biggest is they are supposedly having Durin III and Durin IV alive at the same time (father and son), when Durin is named for the

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

supposes reincarnation of Durin I. So two Durin's in the line would literally never be alive at once. They apparently compressed

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

centuries into the span of a human life. Maybe they bit off more than they could chew & decided to just try to sell a generic fantasy show

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the motivations for changing the lore back then were not the same motivations people use today to change or alter the lore

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He had to make some changes to properly adapt the books, Amazon is butchering the lore for shameless pandering, their dwarves lack beards!

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Didn't a bunch of the dwarves in the Hobbit trilogy have no beards too? Not that those films were Jackson's best work or anything

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Apparently, that was to make them more visually different from each other, though lorewise, it was a sign of mourning for Thorin.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I remember seeing a trailer that absolutely had bearded, female dwarves. Did they change that?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The woman they showed is, from what I saw, the daughter of Durin III, and her brother is called Durin IV, absurdly...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Masterpiece is a bit strong. LotR films were very good, but the hobbit felt hollow, directionless, and the CGI was too much.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

That's 100% spot on, but I don't think most people are referring to The Hobbit films when they make "Masterpiece" statements.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The hobbit was an atrocious fucking mess not worth the rewatch. The LoTR though was a masterpiece of cinema and endlessly rewatchable

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It sucks because I love the first parts of the first Hobbit movie.. I just turn it off before finishing it every time.. -_-

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I understand that the hobbit was a kids book, and that they wanted to capture that spirit. However, when the "feel" of middle earth was so

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Hobbit films were a huge disappointment. They should have gone with the original idea of Guillermot Del Toro making 2 films in a...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...vastly different style to Jackson's trilogy. The LOTR films themselves are the best things ever made!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The difference is that the films were changed to better fit screenplay, but the TV series is looking like it's going to stamp on all of the-

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lore to push a GoT knock off with more modern ideological views. I think inclusivity is a good thing, but forcing it into a world that's -

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Existed for a long time and has a large cultural significance has often proven to be a bad idea. They should really be creating their own -

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

World that people can fall in love with where the differences can't contradict what everyone loved in the original. Just my thoughts anyway.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sir Ian Mckellen “I was there when Tolkien wrote the blasted books”

4 years ago | Likes 546 Dislikes 3

And who was there when Tolkien's mom got pregnant?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: Sir Ian McKellen "I AM Tolkien."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 176 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Careful, don't want to go beyond your quota

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is gorgeous.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What are the special properties of this particular staff?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wooden. Tall. ....... Wooden.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I found a thingy... https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/Wizard_staff

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You know Christopher Lee would have been that guy if he was still with us. He used to read LOTR once a year.

4 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 1

He's record is amazing: https://youtu.be/CCrtZwF2C-8?t=490 that guy was what a knight should really be !

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

He has gone to the Undying Lands

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He was the only person to have actually met Tolkien that was in the films.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Christopher Lee is so awesome that not only is James Bond based on him, but he also played a Bond villain in The Man With the Golden Gun.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And he was the only one on set whod actually met Tolkien

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Also the only one (that we know of) that had actually killed other people.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

When you're one of the actual James Bond inspirations. Who he later played z villain for, you do epic

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Knew what it sounds like someone gets stabbed in the back, because he had done it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didnt Christopher Lee decline the role of Gandalf, as he thougth that he wasnt noble enough for the role?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've read that he always dreamed of playing Gandalf, but McKellan was already cast, and Jackson convinced him he'd be a perfect Saruman

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He was right.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tolkien gave his blessing to Lee to play it, should they ever make a movie. Given that he died in '73...

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's the Lee he was talking about. Not this one -

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Crap it was Christopher lee I was thinking of wasn’t it?

4 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

Lee was the only cast member to have met Tolkien. McKellen is older than the books, so whether he read it when initial published, not sure.

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

Thx. I was thinking of lee.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Christopher Lee also asked Tolkien if he could play Gandalf, and specifically aimed for Wizardly roles to establish a precedent for it!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

McKellen was the one who carried the book on him so if disputes about it broke out he could directly quote the book.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You could still be unintentionally right. :D

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, pretty sure I saw in a docu that McKellen hadn't read the books but once he got the role he blitzed through them several times and >

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

> would often carry a copy on him during shooting so he could look up stuff as they were going along

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0