How the IOC is Ruining the Olympic Spirit

Jul 7, 2016 8:52 PM

raraluiz

Views

548

Likes

22

Dislikes

7

This is Kate Grace. If you have been watching the Track & Field Olympic Trials, you may have noticed she won the women's 800m in 1:59.10. I mean, we can do that...on our bike...maybe. But that's not the point. See, Kate is sponsored by Oiselle. They've supported her financially and emotionally through her training and now she's going to the Olympics! And Oiselle should be able to scream in support all over their social media and web pages right?! Wrong. The Olympic Committee recently threatened to sue Oiselle if they did not delete their pictures on their social media accounts on Kate Grace winning the 800m. This doesn't just apply to Oiselle, it applys to all athletes' sponsors that do not pay the Olympic Committee big bucks.

The International Olympic Committee has what is called Rule 40. It's all about advertising and how the Olympic Committee can get as much money as possible. To sum it up, if you pay the Olympic Committee lots and lots of money, you can advertise for your athlete at the Olympic games. If you don't pay the Olympic committee, you can't advertise, publicly support/cheer for your sponsored athlete. What this can't be what it seems? Well...it's exactly what it seems.

So during the blackout period (July 27-August 24), we'll us Oiselle and Kate Grace as an example, Oiselle cannot publicly advertise Kate Grace and her journey to Rio.

So above I have pasted the Rule 40 from the IOC's page (link can be found at end of post). Still using Oiselle as an example, they literally cannot use any of the words in the boxes above. If Kate Grace were to win the Olympic 800m, not only could Oiselle not congratulate Kate publicly, Kate could not publicly thank Oiselle! Now, how is this enforced you might ask? Well we're not entirely sure. I'm guessing it will be through stripping of medals/lawsuits, etc. Now this doesn't apply to the average joe blow, just sponsors who pay and support their athletes, but not the IOC.

Look at the language Sally with Oiselle has to use in the above post. To follow Rule 40 she has to say "the Big Event in the Southern Hemisphere" aka The Olympics in Rio. So, at this year's Olympics, if you post about your favorite athlete, make sure to include the sponsor that has supported them all along. This bullying has to end.

Rule 40: https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/IOC/What-We-Do/Protecting-Clean-Athletes/Athletes-Space/Rule-40-Rio-2016-QA-for-Athletes.pdf

Article on Explanation of Rule 40:
http://www.oiselle.com/blog/birds-eye-view-rule-40-explained?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=boost&utm_campaign=blog+rule+40+explained+032116

Why do cities bid for it? They always bankrupt it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'd think the IOC would want any and all positive publicity it could get given what a shit show Rio is going to be..

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the olympics are awful. I have decided I will not be watching at all

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The NFL is doing the same haven't noticed supermarkets and local TV stations referring to the Super Bowl as the Big Game or Super Sunday?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Scumbag IOC.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We would not like to congratulate our mon athlete on making it to the not summer small event.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't the Olympics also basically bankrupt any city it comes to?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's a budget-buster for the city...Tourist dollars come in, but it's way overbalanced by costs for building, housing, security, etc

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I for one, do not want to see any sponsorship/advertising directly in the games, and that's what you're arguing for. knock it off.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The fact the athletes cannot thank their sponsors in post sport interviews is an overreach of the IOC's power.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not directly in the games. I arguing for the right for the sponsors to talk about their own athletes on their own pages.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and downvoting me because i disagree is poor sportsmanship. this whole post is a flagrant violation of what you're arguing against.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

you can, but can't imply that you're contributing to any olympic effort. for instance, you can say '2016', but not with olympic context.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which is shit. It's ridiculous that Oiselle can say "Good luck in Rio Kate"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*cannot

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, thank you. Sometimes my fingers are faster than my brain.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0