Four Horsemen + Wallpaper

Sep 29, 2017 2:04 AM

calibratenoodles

Views

152393

Likes

3506

Dislikes

80

A while back I favorited a post by @ImProbablyJoking where they included the four horsemen by Ryan Begley. I put them all together in a 1920 x 1080 wallpaper for anyone who wants it.

There's a man, going 'round, takin' names

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sǫᴜᴇᴀᴋ?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Which one is Moe?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Prepare for the Skeleton War!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, neat artwork

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thanks @op I was looking for this !!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 - I thought they drove the following: War: A cherry red 2009 Ford Mustang. Famine: A black Cadillac Escalade.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 Pestilence: A green Hornet Wagon. Death: A pale grey 1959 Cadillac Series 62.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh shit! You got it son. It's a Psi Op!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The way Death is darker than the others reminds me that, while the other three are always around mankind, it's Death that never rests.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yes, Good Omens is a great book and you should read it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These are super cool! Part of me is sad that the artist didn't color the horses. But still I love this type of art

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How very Alphonse Mucha

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bleh, all of them are skeletal, Death does not have his pale white horse, it looks more like cards for an RPG about undead.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This style reminds me of some of Peter Nixon's work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dawkins, Harris, Dennett and Hitchens

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The leading horse is white, the second horse is red, the third one is (a) back, that last one iiisagreeeeen.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a kid I always thought it was kind of redundant. Wtf death doin there anyways. These guys kill with cause...I'll just take the old ppl ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Upvote and Favorite for getting Conquest right. Thumbs up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I need a reapers of the apocalypse deck of cards.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Awesome

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

only horseman i care about.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i love the art, but conquest/war ruins it for me. but they all seem like they're simply facets of Death... i just analyze things too much.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an allegory for the progression of war. Starting with glorious conquest, to primal war, to the following famine, to death taking all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well i guess that makes sense.. but also kinda makes it much less cool.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, I quite like it, but I'm also a huge fan of good usage of literary devices.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, conquest is NOT one of the horsemen of the apocalypse. Redundant of war. Real pretty though. But where's my fucking pestilence bitch?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conquest is, pestilence is a modernization that fits better for the modern uses of the four.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great Art, I love the Art Deco touch.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*Art Nouveau

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're absolutly right !

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

no biggie

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They seem like nice enough chaps.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Honey, there's a Mr Death at the door! Well invite him in!

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

it was the salmon mousse

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But I didn't have the salmon.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought the 4 horseman were War, Pestilence, Famine, Death

9 years ago | Likes 555 Dislikes 6

pestilence and famine are considered the same in some old interpretations of the bible, leaving the fourth as conquest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I thought the horsemen...you know, had horses.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interpretation is that conquest is the equivalent of greed and the constant fight about different ideals. Like we fight to show we are right

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was just Eredin, Imlerith and Caranthir.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seems like most of them are made irrelevant by death.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel it needs some modernisation: Ignorance, Entitlement, Apathy and Gluttony make the older horseman look like teddy bears.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

That's because Conquest doesn't sound evil enough, and media always uses them as evil.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The only horseman named in Revelations is Death. The others are not named.

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 1

You made me look it up. Nice!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Correct! "I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death"

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

How can some people not believe it is a fairy tale ? It's strikingly written like one.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Dudu du du du dudu. There's a man goin' round....

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Universal Pictures presents DAWN of the DEAD

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Taking names. And he decides who to free and who to blame.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Demonic carnage would know

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought they were War, Death, Fury and Strife

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

No, you're thinking gonads and strife, the song.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Damn, took my line.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GONADS IN THA LIGHTNIN!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No that's from the Darksiders series. Good games though.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Pestilence quit during the 1930's.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Mumbling something about penacillin

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Is that from good omens?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It is indeed. He's Pollution after that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If only the old chap knew what was coming

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or to go with the other option: it's those 4, plus Kaos, who quit before they were cool...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was death, rock, paper, scissors.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought they were 5 you forgot Kaos the milk guy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What I don't get is, why are there 3 things that causes massive amounts of death, and then ALSO "Death"? Why not just Death?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're allegories for war and tyranny. Conquest drives men to take over other lands. War (or Battle or Murder) appears after Conquest (1)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

because the Conquerors bring war with them. Famine comes in this context as a result of war, as resources are rationed and brought to (2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the front. And then Death appears, as a result of Famine and War and Conquest to harvest the souls and to wreak their own havok (3)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's important to note that in the Bible only Death is named. The others are simply representative of war and its effects.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would also assume that conquest is redundant to war. Pestilence makes more sense anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most seem redundant to Death. the four horsemen is an allegory for the progression of war. From conquest to war to famine to death.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conquest can also be done with money and politics.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The reason we've moved to using conquest instead of pestilence is because it fits more with what the original author was (1/4)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

trying to convey. He wants to show how war progresses within culture. It starts out flashy and amazing with triumphal parades, but (2/4)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

eventually that turns quickly to the gruesomeness of war and its not so pretty anymore. Finally it take its toll on economies and (3/4)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

livelihoods and finally leaves people without their loved ones. He's showing how the we spiral in a cycle of killing one another. (4/4)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Pestilence is a more modern interpretation, older Bibles have it listed as Conquest. They're interchangeable though.

9 years ago | Likes 349 Dislikes 3

Good to know!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm glad I know that now, +1

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Maybe a translation error?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And it's more widely used in pop culture. Which is why most people are more familiar with it than with Conquest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost as if there wasn't one authoritative version

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pestilence would be more like disease than conquest, which seems closer to war. I think pestilence refers to the plague epidemic.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Pestilence" should also cover things like locusts swarming, and if it covers them then swarming Mongolians ought to be covered as well.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

fair enough =)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think pestilence being iterative in the nature of spreading makes it replaceable with conquest.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought conquest was interchangeable with war?

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 4

Conquest is listed as: "... a white horse ... and he went out conquering and to conquer." Some interpretations list this as Attila 1/

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

who was of the White Huns. War is "... a red horse, went out; and to him who sat on it, it was granted to take peace from the earth..." 2/

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

So white horse is more a conqueror, and red horse is more a war bringer.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Pestilence, aka disease makes more sense than conquest indeed.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

It might feel that way due to what we're used to, but by the descriptions in the bible, conquest makes more sense.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Famine can lead to disease, and death kinda covers everything so you can interchange any really

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Pretty much. "Pestilence" can lead to famine as the crops or field hands die from a disease or the crops are eaten by a plague of locusts.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If death covers everything can we replace the other 3 with cooler ones, like a trumpet skeleton and the one stuck on a wheel that rolls

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Maybe from a storytelling perspective, but from a historical interpretation, the horsemen represented disasters and events that were 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

contemporary to early Christianity. In this case, some scholars say that Conquest, the White Horse, is Attila, the White Hun. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0