Bob isn't the problem.

Aug 5, 2019 6:24 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

146894

Likes

6200

Dislikes

410

Meanwhile, Trump is imposing EXTRA TAXES on solar. https://imgur.com/9TcDfsm

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 19

Stop letting mainstream media tell you what to be mad at. Be mad at injustice. Be mad at millionaires buying laws and politicians! Go vote!!

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Bob has fallen on hard times since his takeover of youtube

7 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 9

In many cases Shell employs Bob and pays him a shit wage so he qualifies for food stamps. taxpayers subsidize Shell and feed its employees.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about Shell just not employ Bob at all, and then he makes no money? Blaming the employer for the wage is stupid.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The minimum wage is $0, which is what you earn without a job. Also, oil workers get paid very well.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd say the stupid graphic is stupid.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 13

Why not complain about both and be ideologically consistent?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who only gets $1500 a year in food stamps?!?!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay I looked it up it's $126 per person on average per month. Good to know

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"I love politics on imuger" -no one

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Correct. Because that's not how you spell "Imgur."

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

BUT If the government didn't give them $2B in subsidies, they would only make $19.4B/yr in profits. So,.. think before you talk next time.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I am grateful that people are seeing and saying this. I've been telling my generation this for forty years but they just look to cash in.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

v

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 12

Yeah... Fuck Bob and his wanting to feed his family.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That’s...that’s Bob from “What About Bob?”, a 1991 comedy film

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

My username is finally relevant.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We all know food stamps are what is killing our spending. Right? Right guys...? Politicians wouldn't lie to us...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Medicare and Social Security are, then military, and then other entitlements.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dealing with both would be great

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

from a personal exp, i have witnessed employed people on welfare deliberately self limiting their hours to maintain welfare eligibility

7 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 37

Sounds to me like the solution is to change it from a hard cut-off to a gradual decrease.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Maybe they'd otherwise not get enough to live on? But of course, someone cheats every system, but that's a minority.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Yeah because that extra $100 costs them $1000 in welfare.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

One of my colleagues would lose a ton of money in child support if he worked just a few more hours so he has to cut his overtime

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Because otherwise they lose more than they gain. The problem is structural and it can be fixed.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Man, you know a lot of people on welfare. Have you used it too?

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Trump would call that a “smart business decision”.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My mom had one of her nurses have to decline a small increase in pay because it would have cut her welfare to a point she couldn't afford

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

There is such a thing as the poverty trap. If there are hard income numbers that determine eligibility, it can be better to stay lower.

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 3

Then you've likely witnessed people making a smart financial decision. The extra hours were likely worth less than their welfare check.

7 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 7

Nail on the head.

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Also an very strong indication that their hourly wage isn't sufficient for their living costs in the first place.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

And don't forget: Bob isn't actively trying to render this planet incapable of sustaining life.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about vagene?

7 years ago | Likes 745 Dislikes 33

Hey beatiful

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Bitch lasagna

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

I feel sad for knowing this reference. I spend too much time on the internet.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(I feel so bad for the Indians that don't do this)

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Read as "Italians". Was confused.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Read as constipated. Was perplexed.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Read as perspex. Was baffled.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Shell? Rookie numbers... Look at Lockheed and Boeing, just how much gov money they get.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The War Machine needs blood, gotta keep those missiles flying.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a false equivalency.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

This isn’t accurate. Tax subsidies aren’t super helpful to oil companies with the price of oil this low.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There should be zero corporate subsidies. The social safety net needs to be totally revamped - it too has become an industry.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 15

A tax break is not a subsidy. It is just have less stolen from you.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Lol good luck buying veggies and dairy/poultry for less than $1000 per pound if you want no subsidies

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 19

[citation needed]

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

As an agricultural engineer, I would suggest avoiding making comments while you are this high.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

That guy has clearly never been to a farm stand, or Farmers market. Best produce around, one third the cost.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What all do you do in your job day to day?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Replace human jobs with machines. Cutting, sorting, packing product. Sensing, testing, calculating field/plant variables. Horticulture only.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Currently I'm working on software (everything is software now) to detect the extent of a white fly infestation on tomato crops. It'll be

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

used to map and direct a little vacuum robot that will rustle the leaves and vacuum up clusters of white flies.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but Bob can’t contribute to any representatives election campaign. Why should the representatives care about him? He can’t help a rep

7 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 4

This this and this. The system has become so corrupt the very idea of representatives is failing. They are no longer representatives of

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Have you tried turning your system off and on again?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The people. They represent themselves and whomever will help them in their effort to continue their enrichment.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Money doesn't buy votes.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

But it does by the ads and the politicians. You can't survive as a major league politician without the support of companies

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Maybe. Obama won through Twitter funding by individuals. And company donations tend to follow whoever's popular, not the other way 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Shell = 1,333,333.333 bobs

7 years ago | Likes 752 Dislikes 23

Only a small portion of the employees collect most of the money. The executives.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the transfer rate between bobs and vagene?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Safe to assume .75 vagenes per bob on account of (1) bobs who like bobs and (2) young bobs

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where is the unit conversion bot when you need them...

7 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 2

I gave +1 without even checking. Keep your +1

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

All this talk about bobs but nothing about vagene

7 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

+1 came here to make this comment

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

21.3% of the country uses welfare or 52,000,000.000 Bobs

7 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 2

Don't forget about all the bobs in prison, they cost more then welfare!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well according to my research about 600-700B are spent on people and subsides make up about 100B so we have a 1/7 Bob to sun ratio.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

39% of children. I don't know how many children equals one Bob

7 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

So 52,000,000 -38% = 32,240,000

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Going on avgs I’d say I could stack 1.5-2 kids on top of each other =1 Bob. Let’s hope he tall thi cause that’s a lot of kids to saw in half

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well, Bob used to be 1 child, so Bob no longer being a child is worth at least -1 child, right?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Easy, 3 + a trenchcoat.

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

o_0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is this true? I'm genuinely asking... it seems high

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Based off 2015 numbers. If they have decreased Trump will try and take credit for that

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

TANF supports 4m Americans. Medicaid covers 110m. CHIP covers 6m. SNAP (food stamps) covers 43m Americans. EITC gives tax rebates to 27m.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TANF is the program that most Americans call "welfare". But all the others can be bundled in to distort perceptions.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh! I almost forgot that just over 2m are on what used to be "section 8" housing assistance.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welfare includes a lot of things. Seniors on Medicaid, veterans, children, widowed parents receiving SS benefits. It's not just poverty.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Hmm that probably includes social security which probably shouldn't count since each person pays for their own social security in theory.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's.... Not how it works tho? If you're working you're paying for other people's social security. It's not a savings account.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

ironically, a lot of bobs work for shell.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As someone in the petroleum industry, i highly doubt that. Refineries pay high for minimum output. And gas station employees are not same.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I didn't specify the position, but I count the guys selling cigarettes and mountain dew if the paycheck comes from shell.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't think their paychecks do. Just because it's shell logo on the station doesn't mean shell owns it, let alone sells shell fuel.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's like Pepsi. They're an associate but not the retailer. Taco Bell sells pepsi, but isn't an extension of Pepsi.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No but if someone works at a shell petrol station, they are getting paid by shell aren't they ?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shell employees 1,333,333.333 Bobs, they don't have that many Bobs, they're not slaves. A few are probably on Food Stamps too

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

It's not saying employees that many bobs, she'll is the equivalent of that many bobs.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I see your point but it’s 92,000. I know cause I wanted to make the same point but checked google first so no one “ackshuallys” me

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Yeah you're right. My point was that its not people, and people wouldn't die if a company fails, and that money needs to go back to everyone

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

When a company tanks, people's lives are definitely destroyed.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Losing a job doesn't usually destroy your life, but not getting food stamps could. Or like many recently, rationing insulin

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But what about bob

7 years ago | Likes 815 Dislikes 13

But what about dragons?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

baby steps to the front page

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

My favorite movie.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 0

I sail! I’m a sailor! Ahoy!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My favorite part ♥️

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only real Bill Murray fans will get the reference

7 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 4

Or Richard Dreyfuss fans.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There are dozens of us!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Obviously. Because he made that movie only for his biggest fans and all his biggest fans know about it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only real Bill Murray fans have seen movies with Bill Murray!

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We subsidize industries b/c in a global market a socialized government can and will use its tax base to undercut the market to its exclusion

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 17

Yes, no one seems to understand this. We don't exist in a bubble.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

We are a socialized government if we give bailouts to private businesses

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

It's only socialism when its redistributing money to the poor. When its corporations and billionaires getting help its capitalism. /s

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Being serious, that's corporatism, not capitalism. Under capitalist principles, the banks should have been allowed to collapse in 2008.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And that would have been absolutely disastrous for the country. What should have happened is that the gov't seized control of the banks, -

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I agree that the capitalist response would likely have been the wrong one. But the banks need to understand that they cannot drive...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

paid out to members of those banks (non-investors) their money, snatched control of any loans they had, and just dissolved the corps. As it-

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But Shell employs thousands of Bobs! If we don't pay them they won't hire Bob! /s

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 11

If your company can't compete without government intervention then you suck at running a company.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You'd be surprised how often this sentiment gets swarmed with "YOU DON'T KNOW HOW BIDNESS WORKS!!!" comments

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If we dont pay them, they will continue business as usual because they're still out to make a buck. Saying they need subsidies is socialist

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

no, saying that they need to be taxed higher because they make more money is socialist.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

never said anything about taxes & they don't need these subsidies to continue to do business, which is corporate socialism.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Saying they need to be owned by a state-managed people’s collective is socialist. Bickering about tax rates is partisan propaganda.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Higher taxes is not socialist by nature. Especially not when you’re ONLY taxing profit.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

also, your point is wrong, because the 40-70% tax rates in post-WWII era would be considered socialist.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Shhhh, stop talking sense. There's lazy people on the dole that will hate this news.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

A business that relies on handouts and tax revenue in order to hire people is a failure and has no business being alive. Trickle down is BS

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Found the Shell lobbyist

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

He's being sarcastic. A business is ment to take risks not their employees and not their government

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

they were using sarcasm

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Except no, this is how it works

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Conservatives confuse the fuck out of me. “I’ll happily give hand outs to the rich and multimillion dollar corporations, but making sure -

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Less fortunate people get access to healthcare and post secondary education at affordable prices, and thereby create the next generation of-

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: Asked for employment at Shell, and they asked us to pay them to be hired. Sixty fucking dollars.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But its not about one single person. In 2017 roughly 9.2% of the US pop. Claimed food stamps. An average household of 4 claims 7k in food

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 9

And its not about a single company either, so why dont you do the maths on that.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wallmart has gotten subsidies whilst workers need foodstamps. Thats pretty much another subsidy for wallmart cos they wont pay a decent wage

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stamps per year. Now 9.2% of 327.2million people is roughly 30million and some change. Which makes annual spending on food stamps roughly

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

$231,788,480,000. Now i in no way condone all the tax breaks given to shitty corps. But lets just be sure to show the actual stats and not

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

Your numbers are staggeringly wrong. Like five fold too high. Also, paying $50 billion a year to feed poor children is not wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just one side here.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

If we're playing that game, Shell is certainly not the only corporation on the other side of the spectrum

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's not showing the one side. One is a necessity for a citizen of a country to survive the other is getting away from doing your fair

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

part and using corruption getting even more money back. It's obvious that social programs cost money, it's what and how they are used.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

More simply: one is money given to someone, the other is money the government graciously allowed them to keep. The whole comparison sucks.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see what youre saying. And thank you for the math. My point is just to display the numbers, not push any agenda. So thank you!

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

30 million people get to eat food vs. Shell gets more profits. It's not apples to apples. They're both taxpayer dollars, but need vs want.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I think that math is off. 7k per 4 people is 1750 per person x 30 million is like 52 billion, not over 200.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

This is what propaganda looks like. Fake tax facts to confuse people who don't know anything about tax law

7 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 22

Ok, let's talk actual welfare. Walmart employees are so underpaid they collectively receive $6,200,000,000 in welfare per year. That's ...

7 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 5

welfare for the Walton family. They're worth a whopping $140,000,000,000 and force the American taxpayer to pay for food stamps and other...

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

assistance in order to keep their employees from starving or sleeping in homeless shelters. Do you think that's propaganda too? And if ...

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

these ticks on the back of society bribe right-wing politicians to blame the poorest of the poor for high taxes, how is that not propaganda?

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Walmart doesn’t force anyone to pay anything. Every corporation in the US has lower paid workers who are net benefit receivers.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=royal-dutch-shell No the propaganda visible here is the fact that you'd much rather

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Yes, the money issued there is a total over nearly 20 years, and it includes nothing exclusive to oil companies.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy shit did you miss the point, but in doing so you revealed the fact that ALL companies have equal oppertunity to abuse the tax code.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

believe that the man who receives a miniscule amount of money is the villain. Rather than the corporations buying legislation and tax cuts.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Now that's successful propaganda. Blame the downtrodden to protect the powerful.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

This is propaganda, they are trying to generate hate on a successful company and foster class divisions by misrepresenting facts.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

You are the one defending a multi billion dollar enterprise selling fossil fuel in a time where climate change is a global issue. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But somehow the person who tries to point out the blatant abuses in the system and tax codes for corporations is the propagandist? 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0