FCC Being sued for not disclosing discussions with ISP's

Jul 27, 2017 4:32 PM

richincleve

Views

213872

Likes

4996

Dislikes

122

It seems that the nonprofit American Oversight has requested "records related to communications on net neutrality between Internet service providers and Chairman Ajit Pai or Pai's staff."

The FOIA requests have a 20-day limit, which was passed without the FCC providing the requested information.

Instead of providing the information, the FCC basically dragged its feet...hence, the lawsuit.

For the most part, people see this as basically Pai giving the middle finger to the Freedom Of Information Act.

Sorry. I have no idea how the above image got in my post.

And for a bit of history, you can thank President Lyndon B. johnson for signing this Act into law on July 4, 1966, a fitting date.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/lawsuit-seeks-ajit-pais-net-neutrality-talks-with-internet-providers/?comments=1 (among others)

Edit: thank you everyone! I just found out this post made post viral!

Article misspelled Cunt, needs better proofreading.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cunt deserved it

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i wonder if anyone has tried to assassinate him yet.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ajit Pai gives indians (India) a bad name

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Wait... Transparency means WHAT? Oh hell no! We're doing the other thing." - Ajit TicTac Dick Pai probably

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never enough love or credit given to lbj. Very much an under appreciated prez.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

OFF WITH HIS FUCKING HEAD!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's been said before but it can't be said enough: Ajit Pai is a C U N T!!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait wait wait woah woah woah. 2nd image. FCC has no idea about net neutrality comments getting DDoS?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Open your eyes. They DDoSed themselves so people couldn't access the site to make complaints this time around

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was thinking the people going against them dog DDoS'd and they claimed to have nothing to do about it,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The FCC Chairperson isn't a member of the cabinet. The FCC is an independent agency of the USG, not falling under any cabinet Secretary.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

don't you know, we must POLITICIZE EVERYTHING warblegarble

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So who is doing the suing?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hey LBJ:

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank God for people like American Oversight. If it were up to me, I would have Favorited the comment with the link to complain to the FCC.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So bascially by being sued Pai bought himself a 2+ year extension.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I love these moments in history where everyone stops their petty bullshit long enough to rally against a common foe. Now maintain that unity

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Sadly next week there will be conveniently be something intended to distract and divide the people

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

give republicans power prepare to get fucked. comeon people we know this.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

"Give politicians power, prepare to get fucked." FTFY

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

ill gladly accept a counter list

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dems: Responsible for more war & war crimes in 20th century. Anti-school choice. Mass surveillance on citizens, kill jobs for low-income ppl

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

the only one that has any muster is surveillance. The rest are il informed talking points.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Up until GWB, Dems were far more belligerent. They generally oppose freedom of choice in schooling, and shun economic science. All true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

if your not paying attention sure that can be your thing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

if we dropped this 2 party bullshit, all the evil politicians set to make a buck wouldnt have the huge awning of their party to hide under

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Don't call Pai as a "cunt"...he lacks the warmth & depth.

9 years ago | Likes 224 Dislikes 4

Right.... I don't really think that's why we call people cunts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like you.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I appreciate that. Yet I've stolen some else's remark.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have good and bad news for you: I still like you. DEAL WITH IT!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds aggressive...I like you too!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, an asshole then?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Asshole is full of shit. This... This is much more...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How about "cornhole?"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"hello my name is Ajit and I like to eat shit"

9 years ago | Likes 311 Dislikes 5

You know it's true because it rhymes

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ajit has wares if you have coin

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I like to eat asheet*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Welcome to Jackass"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ajit shit, and die! Bastards!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"When you think of garbage, think of Ajit!"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ajit, this is a court order. It says you can't eat shit anymore.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

I'm hooked.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well Jerry, when you're right you're right. Now I'm hooked

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think this comment deserves more appreciation. It fits pretty great

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

DOWN WITH TEAM CHOAD

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah this lawsuit is going to stagnate for years, unfortunately. Ajit and FCC have the $ to sweep this lawsuit under the rug.

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

Ive said it before, sabotage the isps cables. Show the who really has control over the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm wondering how much of the FCC actually agrees with Pai's leadership and how much would love any opportunity to get rid of him.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Just like the lawsuits against Trump's immigration bans? I think we can expect it to move along with due process just like every other >

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

> court case against Trump's administration and its policies. There's already too much exposure to just sweep it under the rug.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely hope you're right! Much rather you be right than me with this one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The one thing we have going with this administration is where they are stupid, they are Grade-A Stupid. They will fuck up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a cunt? If so, it's one of the cunts I would only fuck with a rusty ice-axe.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"i am not a crook!" *proceeds to crook*

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

To the left or right?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"eh he said he's not one so he's not! Uh... HILLARY LOST" -Republican voters

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What can one expect from someone with the name "A Shit Pie"...it's what his name sounds like in my head, anyway

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 11

I now choose to call this man Shit Pie.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wish I could upvote this more. Silver linings

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

singing the freedom of information act was probably the ONLY good thing Lyndon B. Johnson ever did.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 18

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 24, 2017 3:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

a lie doesn't become true, no matter how often or how many people repeat it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was responsible for the creation of NPR, the finest news source in the country.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

You fucking retard. LBJ passed more good legislation than anyone except FDR. Medicare, Medicaid, voting rights for blacks...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You woefully misunderestimate what LBJ accomplished. Read some history then mouth off on the Internet.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Excuse me? He accomplished NOTHING. He simply signed laws because he HAD to. Progress was accomplished by OTHER people. Not him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

His "jawboning" is what got the Civil Rights Act passed. Please, Please go read some history.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Including the voting rights act in 1965 which we just had stripped away recently.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

They argued that it wasn't needed anymore because there had been very few cases of discrimination recently. That's like saying "We don't >>>

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

need these wet floor signs because no one slips when we have them up." It's because the signs are doing their job. The VRA was working.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yep, then they skewered it, and now we have lawsuits because of racist voter suppression in Wisconsin and North Carolina.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Public Broadcasting, Clean Air. Gun Control, Economic Opportunity, Medicare. Open a history book.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

He was a lying fuck who had no problem of using a false flag event to throw the US into Vietnam war and do the opposite of what Kennedy did.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

What? And destroy my preconceived notions? Psssh!...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also pulled his dick out a lot and liked to get in peoples' faces: ... pretty gangsta, if you ask me. lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget public education reform.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That wasn't HIM! He was simply putting it into action. Why do people think only because he signed it that it was all HIS idea? >_>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Uh, he also rammed civil liberty shit down congress' throats.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

After he fought against all these civil liberties while being a Senator. Nice try. Next.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

No, not next, sorry. He changed his mind and did a ton of good work for civil liberties. You can't just pass that off as nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You folks really are one hell of a gullible species… geez…

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Hey, even Nixon did some good things. Maybe not a lot, but some.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Honestly, the only reason he's not in the top 10 for best presidents is Watergate.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I do remember a high school history teacher telling me that as far as the US economy went, he was more than decent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nixon created the EPA. GWB funded PEPFAR for AIDS relief.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Nixon also vastly helped relations with China.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

sining* damnit… my keyboard failed me once again. Singing... WTF....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

I wouldn't mind if our leaders were required to sing their legislation to the public.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Signing* ... once and for all.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

thank you. As a german… i never get this right. Goddamn silent characters in some words… just like "Wednesday" >_<

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Okay you can blame the Scandinavians for that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finnish language doesn't have silent letters.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a German in the US (almost 30 yrs), I think I've gotten the hang of it...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah, using english every day has it's benefits :O

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tell me, what is net neutrality ?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[ This comment only available to AT&T™ Deluxe Package© subscribers ]

9 years ago | Likes 243 Dislikes 10

[ This reply only available to Verizon Premium© subscribers ]

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

[ Error 582: User too poor to afford sending this comment ]

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

[Comment Deleted due to cancellation of subscription]

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

So, what you mean to say is that it's only available to Ajit Pai?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 678 Dislikes 5

v

9 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 1

Corruption: the reason the Western democracy is probably fucked.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/3McsTSoSEps exactly. It's the main source of almost every issue today imo.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's explain middle East geopolitics

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Am I a bad person for expecting an explosion edited in?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

No,a really bad person would edit the body crashing on the ground and add the capitation "miserable failure"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

v

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There is a Russian saying: one cannot earn all the money in the world. Don't politicians have already enough money?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Greed. It's not unique to the USA, but basically no one ever thinks they make enough money until they run out of things to spend it on.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This probably isn't to far off from what the 1% and the hopefuls do with their money https://youtu.be/46zrey2IAak

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Loooool

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if only we'd elected a presidential candidate who was pro net neutrality http://imgur.com/XRYMPtx

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 15

Honesty deez nuts should have won.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gary?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Gary was anti regulation, being a libertarian. He wouldn't have given a shit about FCC repeals.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's probably true. Between the republicans, libertarians, and the lobbyists we have to shout very loudly that we want the protection in

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

place.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Gary Johnson's entire campaign was based on deregulation.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why is that every defense from either party seems to be "well my guy isnt as bad as your guy". Thats not a defense. Its a redirection.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 7

On one side, because there are substantial differences between the two parties. On the other, because false equivalency obscures that fact.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When none of the candidates are a good choice - the American people should just be able to randomly select new candidates.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

they are...its called a write in.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not how how president election works. Write in is worthless as the EC can vote against popular votes - and they have.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, that's how it works... that not how we use it and you are confused on how the EC works in its representative form.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can be practical and vote for the lesser of two evils or idealistic and get the greater. In a two party system, that's it. Unfortunately

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes, but "evil" is subjective and you will end up in a downward spiral using a lesser of two evils concept.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But if you take the idealistic approach, the practical effect is that you cede the election to the greatest evil. So now your options have »

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

once again come down to two evils: the downward spiral, or simply letting your biggest opponent win.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You shouldn't have to vote for who you consider the lesser of two evils

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Well, if there are two evil options, then who are you going to vote for? The lesser or greater? OR let others decide for you?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Voting is done. You cant compare them anymore to defend actions.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not defending actions. I'm saying that type of thing should never have happened to begin with.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah sorry, wrong thread

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Last US election that was the case for many people. Either a corrupt politician or a delusional businessman.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There were other choices. No one voted for them, but they're there every year.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1