iusemyownusernamethankyou
8
132
23
Sorry for Potato.
Oct 12, 2016 11:56 PM
iusemyownusernamethankyou
8
132
23
Sorry for Potato.
Fialovich
It's a tradition.
Dayrest
I think people would be more willing to vote for a third party if they worked bottom up, not trying top down....
ThatChi11Guy
The ideal portrayed here can be applied to many things in life; especially the economy/stock market.
watadog
Game Theory
assholecasserole
Third party has what plants crave
Error10054
Prisoners Dilemma
TaylorTaco
It's so scary how accurate this movie is becoming as the years go on
infeliciter
The Electoral college is why. It's just their vote that picks a president. Not yours.
thefanaticals
Read all of these as "parly" and "parlies".
jadespider
Okay to explain it for the libertarians for the umpteenth time, voting third party would result in SOMEONE winning with less than 50% of...
jadespider
...the vote, popular or electoral. or even possibly less than 30% of the vote. And it still won't be your 3rd party candidate. If they...
jadespider
...where that good or desirable enough they'd have been in the top 2. "They would have but the system is rigged". Then unrig it. ...
jadespider
...if bernie is your bae (and I won't even touch why he's not) and he was screwed by the DNC, then stop funding, disband, replace the DNC.
DepravedSoul
I choose to write in my vote this year. I'm voting for @razor10000
giveitarestalready
With the voting system we have now, third parties are a bad bet, since it's winner-take-all and if you lose, you've wasted your vote. 1/2
giveitarestalready
But it's not in the interest of current parties to permit this. Change in voting process - *that* would be the revolution.
giveitarestalready
But if we had, say, 1st and 2nd preference, so if your 1st loses, your vote still counts - that makes third parties viable.(2/2) ++
ChiefAlexander
Also known as single transferable vote
ManchegoChz
That insinuates that if you vote for the loser you wasted your vote. Just vote for who you want regardless of their chances