Sanctioned insider trading

Aug 17, 2021 11:00 AM

Lanhdanan

Views

74618

Likes

1922

Dislikes

44

https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-says-its-absolutely-wild-members-congress-can-buy-sell-stocks-1618712

Literally her only intelligent comment.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How about they have to disclose every transaction immediately? Like boardmembers have to when buying or selling stocks of their own company

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Term limits. Expulsion for using position to gain knowledge to trade stocks actively.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

these people have a license to steal and no term Limits. voted in again and again by the morons in their district.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Downvote Repubs, even tough you may agree. AOC said it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Always upvote AOC!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Clearly they just clicked through the annual mandatory Ethics training...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But are we going to do anything about it?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who else clicked play?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly that they don't have to just use blind trusts or the like is ridiculous

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

please explain to me why this is happening, and to top it off they can be on the board of directors of a company.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fucking spam bot.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 33

Snowflake

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Think she's going to vote for her own pay raise?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, how else are they going to commit insider trading?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you write the laws, you can set up a situation where a stock will do well. Then there's no big move of funds before it spikes.

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

When you write laws daily and we get to ‘vote’ every 2 years, not sustainable.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It would be less insane if at least they didn't receive insider information before making huge moves

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Or, you know, signing very specific laws

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Invest in defense stock. Vote to appoint defense company CEO Secretary of Defense. Award contracts to company. Profit!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But why aren't the American People saying that, and doing something about it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

We've been saying it for decades, and the only thing we can really do about it is hope one of the people we can vote for wouldn't do this.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We're all too beaten down to care and accept the corruption and graft in our system as "normal," which will be our downfall eventually.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even here there are comments about how "both sides do it" and "AOC takes corporate donations, too!" as a way of avoiding the issue.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Brit here. Same in the UK. Even the Cabinet are at it - plus all their rich mates of course.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's absolutely wild that some old fucker, at the age of 70+, thinks he or she can represent any majority of Americans that are 40+ years...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... younger and more in-tune with society than they will ever be AND remain in Congress forever, as long as they keep getting elected by ...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... the same morons that elected them to begin with, who are still in a far different age/social/economic bracket then they are.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She is right.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Do they also route that to darkpools?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They can go to parties in Vegas, have prostitutes sent to them, be lavished with drugs and liquor, and gamble the night away on a lobbyists

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dime. Then they can use campaign funds to reimburse those costs which the lobbyists funded as business expenses.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like China, the US has a controlled economy. But while China is focused on power growth, America's power withers for it's billionaires

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

china has more billionaries than any other country

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

China also has more people than any other country.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

98% of what the lady tweets, my somewhat-conservative father agrees with as long as he doesn't know it came from her. He just has a bias

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

picked up from exposure to negative news a la Fox, though thankfully he doesn't watch it much these days. Amazing how strong that stuck.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It is, though. It's fuckin' fucked.

5 years ago | Likes 328 Dislikes 2

What is more fucked is when the supreme court allowed unlimited campaign contributions...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

lol well said

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Initial reaction was if they’re individuals then same rights as any other. But they are not individuals like you or I...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should lose some rights. The perks more than make up for it. Kind of like how a president can never drive again. Makes sense. Go girl!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What's even wilder is the fact that they keep doing it as there are no repercussions.

5 years ago | Likes 164 Dislikes 0

I think the repercussions are supposed to be us voting their asses out. Some cats been sitting in same seet for decades.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Do we just lack decent competition? One legislator can stay bought for decades, try buying 10 people in the same time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly dont know why we dont change seats more often. Is the competition for these seats just so low we cant replace them? What gives???

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shorter term limits mean more time and money is spent on re election campaigns. How much less AOC could get done if she had to run every 2yr

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well there aren't really. If a crime is never punished than people ignore it's validity. ?‍♂️

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Alternatively, if the punishment is a fine, then it's just the cost of doing business.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LOL the press is so fucking weird. Liz Warren introduced a bill in 2018 to make it illegal but AOC sent out a tweet so it's frontpage news.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Bill half-heartedly introduced with no real follow up

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Lol it passes or it doesn’t, there’s no such thing as “half heartedly” introduced.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not to mention that if ACTUALLY INTRODUCING LEGISLATION is half-hearted, what the fuck is a tweet?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They introduce bills all the time that had no hope of passing but were simply so they could tell people they introduced that bill.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ah of course, she didn’t MEAN it, not like AOC tweeting. Fucking embarrassing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's absolutely wild that they can receive bribes.

5 years ago | Likes 886 Dislikes 2

Its kindof a structural part of the system

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, even AOC gets large corporate donations.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It's absolutely wild they can vote for their own pay increases.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Only sort of. They can vote for pay increases for the next Congress, but not their own, giving voters a chance to vote them out.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Its absolutely wild that gerrymandering is illegal and is so blatantly done that its a meme and yet...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well more than lobbying, not sure but if you know say the US govt is going to give a huge contract to say Microsoft you can gobble up stock

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Knowing it's guaranteed to skyrocket. That's real insider trading. Not unlike with the wild rich lobbying system where they didn't want

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Legal consequences to their corruption, So they legalized it! CORPORATIONS are people?! It's the same sham run again n again.To big to fail.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

(Until now)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Man, I hope so. But I'm done being siphoned so some jackass can buy a yacht or shoot their dumb asses into almost space for 5 minutes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, AOC, our hero. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 29

She's progressive, forward-thinking, caring and seems to have a brain. I see no similarities to the old boss.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

That would be a good point if you could show the similarities, but so far she seems demonstrably different.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Hiring her boyfriend ?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

In what capacity?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And, yes, he had a small role on her election campaign in his professional capacity of web development, but that's about it. He is NOT a >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

member of her Congressional staff in ANY capacity & if this is about his .gov e-mail address, that was disproven within minuted of moronic >

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Good question

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And there it is, ladies and gentlemen...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I just lost 36% in 40 hours. Stocks are not the economy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Are you a member of the US Congress? No? Then she wasn't talking about you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh man. I was agreeing. I was just stating I fukt up

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Losing money no fun. It was less than 100 bucks. So. At least I now not broke. I already was tho.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0