I just love him

Apr 8, 2016 4:54 PM

Our 2 party system is a bowl of crap, looking at itself in a mirror - Lewis Black

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I am gonna start a new radical politica The truth is one red baloon, unless you are Nena, then there are 99 of them in Germany somewhere.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both parties are flawed, but implying they're equal is batshit crazy. There is nothing close to a Democrat version of Trump or Cruz.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Someone remind me the problem with Socialism? It seems to work well for Europe

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Please come back you glorious human being...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You are an idiot if you can't tell that one of the parties is evil. Or Jon Stewart. Or a teenager.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I believe this is from the fantastic 'America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction'. The audio book is a better listen.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Earth (The Book) is great too (the audiobook has Sigourney Weaver in it)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He annoys the fuck out of me, but he's spot on with this.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

"Unbearable series of apologies" It sounds like an American's trip to Canada.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hardly. They're both the same party, the Business Party, just one is incrementally closer to Fascism.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 17

Sad but true...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Shaka! When the walls fell!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Stewart is a liberal hack!

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

lol, I've come to notice anyone who uses the word "hack" doesn't really know what it means

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

hack is a bastardized term meaning a professional who does a lousy job of their profession! Stewart hacks at one side no matter what!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except he did a great job of what he was supposed to do. Disagree with him, or not find him funny, he did his job perfectly.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think he makes it clear Democrats offer no more real solace than Republicans, but it also happens to be the time to be progressive. 1/3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That being said, I just have one thing to say to a /person/ like /you/....:

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bam-ba-lam.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would just be a nice, and long overdue change if they grew up and worked with each other instead of acting like the other has cooties.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Thats the catch. If a republican compromises with democrats he will be ousted and replaced with someone more conservative and vice-versa.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Well it's not so much a catch as it is the status quo. You don't work together. And that's enforced. I'm saying grow up, do your damn jobs!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are doing their jobs. Republicans are doing what their base wants, Democrats are doing what theirs wants.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wont help. We need more parties. 2 parties will always lead to corruption with an uninformed electorate.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm not suggesting it is the only way forward. I'm suggesting that doing their fucking jobs and working together would be nice, like adults.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I here ya. Just wish more people would vote 3rd party. Need to pass rank choice like here in MN. At least its better than lesser 2 evils.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd vote for Jon Stewart in a heartbeat. I think a lot of people would.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

Yes. In a heartbeat.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

he's a comedian, brah.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

#rallytorestoresanity

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wait - republicans are the left wing right?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have become criminal organizations masquerading as political parties.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The world is powered by one and only one thing - GREED. Once you understand that everything else makes sense.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Amen bro. The more I know people, the more I like pigs.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very interesting interview of Milton Friedman in 1979 I recently heard: http://youtu.be/RWsx1X8PV_A

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's funny. I have a U of C MBA. Will check it out tomorrow. Starting to watch Creed w/ my kids now. Look forward to it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great clip. Gecko would be proud! But Marx says the success of capitalism will be its downfall, which feels like current theme-labor rebels

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is true. Unbounded it becomes a problem. Like the referee to gecko.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol. If you are ever in KC, I'd like to buy you a beer.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So many great quotes from the original Wall Street

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One last thing. Thanks for the Friedman reference. Have now watched 5 of his clips.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is not a view of the world that leaves a lot of room for improvement. Just sounds like an excuse to accept a status quo.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In my opinion, the dems are light years closer to the happy medium than the reps are

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 12

Not really. The dems just hide their batshittery behind a screen of politeness whereas the GOP are proud of their asshattery

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

There's a difference though, Hillary and Bernie actually make sense when they talk. Because they know how to do that unlike cruz n drumpf

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

This is rich, coming from the guy who defined "left wing shill".

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Steeart can't deny the truth about Democrats anymore, but he can't admit it. So... both sides bad!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How non-partisan of him. But when push comes to shove, which party gets his ire the most?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So Democrats want to turn America into Canada?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What they really do is act as opposing forces ideally keeping the nation in a moderate middle on most issues. Everyone is upset about (1)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

things but not as much as they could be keeping the nation from making drastic change every election cycle. Change becomes generational. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Problem is current generations are very idealistic and want change for themselves, not their grandchildren. It was nice while it lasted.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I don't know if it's that so much as the sides are farther apart now than any point since the Civil War like an overstretched rubber band.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Disagree, talking to the others of my generation has shown me we want our generation AND future generations to succeed and have the 1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the absolute best opportunities for themselves and their children. Ya kow, that American dream we've been hearing about our whole lives. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How can you believe the American Dream wasn't anything but nationalism? Why do you think you said the pledge of allegiance in class?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah i get it, disliking both parties is cool, disliking the DNC is cool. difference is i know my political science and i love the DNC

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Why? I consider myself progressive and informed and I am really curious as to what drives your support for the DNC?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i mean if the worst Jon Stewart can say about the DNC is that they tend to be more polite than a racist biker skinhead, wow thats terrible

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

who backs up the president's veto to protect democrat laws? who prevents government shutdowns? who confirms liberty-friendly judges? etc

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I mean, they are obviously the better of two evils but why not support a party that's less corrupt? I see where you're coming from but,

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The DNC is precisely what you said. A more polite RNC. Granted a far less crazy one. Have you considered a party a little further left?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

hell no, i could have moved to europe if i wanted that much socialism or stayed where i was born. i was born in cuba and love capitalism

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I, for one, support the Republicans in their endeavor to sink the ship just to kill the captain.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 18

As a matter of fact, I hope the democrats do the same. Just burn the whole thing down.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"When things get REALLY bad, doesn't some small part of you hope they get way worse? Just to see what would happen?" -George Carlin

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It appears that's the mindset of most of the population now. Just "fuck it, let's see what happens,"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If you're interested look up alexander de Tocqueville's review on the Principle of the Sovereignty of the people, its pretty similar to this

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

His writing on the American Revolution is considered by some to be the standard in colonial theory so his views might be a bit slanted.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was an aristocrat and those most definitely were the times, never the less he's passed the test of time. The "candidate" gets (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

reshaped into a political force who can only get to power by "win[ning] their (masses) favor at any cost. false promises of return or utopia

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The two party system has not been very effective. Still better than an one party system though.

10 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 6

Say what you like, but at least a one party system doesn't get eternal deadlock when it comes to passing laws.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sure... throw your vote away! -Kodos

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bring back the Whigs!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how about a no party system?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

No way man I love to party

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Parties do have a legitimate purpose in the democratic process, but they need to be flexible and numerous

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ultimately the problem is size. The more people you have, the harder it is for any government to work.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's true, you need federalism in a big country to share the work load. The downside is that it slows the political process down

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Federalism helps, but I don't think it's necessary. I think that democracy need engagement and freedom of information to function properly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's another party?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A number of countries use a "one party" system where there is literally only one party. At least our system does give us some choice.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry, but 'At least our system does give us some choice.' sounds like you're cool with not really having a choice.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I understand that in order to avoid violence change has to come slowly. The system is not perfect, but it's better than the alternative.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks for intelligent conversation. Your comment makes it clear you get it. I don't want any violence, but the current system does beg it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I really disagree that is has been ineffective. Look at some of the great presidents we've had over the past hundred years all from that

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A fair argument, I was trying to invoke that one Winston Churchill quote

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah yeah "Democracy is by far the worst system of government invented...besides everything else that has been tried that is"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually Benevolent Dictatorship would be the most efficient, effective system. Unfortunately no human is capable of universal benevolance

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Some are. The problem is what happens after said dictator steps down or dies off ...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Chang Kai Chek and Franco were both effective leaders who left their countries better than they found them. They still did terrible things.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm not sure you could say that China at the end of the Cultural Revolution was much better off than China at the end of the civil war.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be Mao, Chang is the guy who ended up ruling Taiwan. Which is now one of the most free and richest countries on the planet.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chiang never thought of Taiwan as a country, and there was a time when he would have had you executed for suggesting that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then why ever suggest it as an option

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1/2 Because under ideal circumstances it's the best possible system. It's wrong to say "what we have isn't perfect but still better than X".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But if you follow it up with "but its not possible" then whats the point

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 We shouldn't be complacent. There's always room for improvement. Even if it means being led by non-humans (AI?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh jesus christ. Im sorry I didnt realize you were joking

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's called the illusion of choice

10 years ago | Likes 162 Dislikes 9

oh look we got an edgy both sides are the same dude, well one of those parties gave me healthcare and one is going to nominate trump

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

except the parties really do enact very different policies that affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Like when you tell a toddler he can either wear the blue shirt or the red shirt.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

But no matter which shirt you pick, you're still going to the doc for shots.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

When in reality they need to wear a green shirt cause it's St. Patrick's day and everyone's going to pinch them for not wearing green

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Grey, because he's colorblind

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But nobody ever wears green shirts any more.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strawmen, strawmen everywhere.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

It's Jon Stewart...so yeah.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Out of curiosity what makes this a strawman? I thought this was widely perceived as true

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Please explain to be why is it a strawmen. You guys just write "strawmen" in you comments hopping to sound smart, isn't it?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Please elaborate.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You're asking a user called "TruthHammer" to support their shallow, pseudo-intelligent point? Good luck.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's a complex topic but I believe this gif can sum up my argument.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0