Yo, cut it

Nov 10, 2020 2:49 AM

ARussianAndHisBike

Views

75934

Likes

2763

Dislikes

37

Double chainsaw

The opening sounds like every CGI overloaded fight scene in a Japanese martial arts movie.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perfect tool for a bris.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Bet that dude from 124 hours wishes he had this... ... I'm so sorry you guys.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is that an assault saw?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jimmy Fallon changed jobs, i see

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Looks like something outta bloodborne.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You hit the switch form button while you're mid stab to do a ton of bonus damage.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quincy ‘s tavern?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I sincerely doubt there's enough pressure in that tiny springloaded contraption to enable that bottom blade to do anything useful.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I don't think you need much pressure in the lower blade. In fact, I think it would be worse cus the teeth would sink too much into the wood

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sawscers.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Invented by a mohel?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sawssors

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fine inovation

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Double the blade, double the fun.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks (and sounds) like a Bloodborne weapon

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How has noone though of this yet?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who dis

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The first prototype of when chainsaws were invented?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What a genius invention

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 9

That will cut approximately 3 more times before falling apart

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh super, now you can't saw from the top or bottom to avoid pinching the blade.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

just need a second pneumatic device to do the sawing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup, notice how both branches cut are only about 2 inches thick, dead wood? This would bind like crazy.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Put your...

5 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 2

wood in it!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... uncircumcised dick in it

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Log in it?

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

Wood. Put your wood in it.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Make sure it's soaked in wood first!!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Money down and invest in it!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

twig in it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hammer on it!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right foot in...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I saw what you did there

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On thicker lumber the bottom blade would bind.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Soy un perdedor

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

I'M AH LOSER BAAABY SO WHY DON'T YAH KILL ME fuckin good stuff.. drive-by body pierce

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Things are gonna change, I can feel it

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

thought this was the the weapon for a new Final Fantasy character

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So twice the resistance but half the time. Still the same ammount of effort required.

5 years ago | Likes 1377 Dislikes 21

What if you did middle out?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Time is money baby.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You're also probably getting a smoother cut

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’d be more. It’s not 1+1=2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think its to have no pressure on the blades while cutting.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not as much effort required. You don't have to apply down pressure because the blades are providing pressure from the spring system.

5 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

But twice the resistance from two surfaces. I suppose it would depend on how much you were pushing down to begin with.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Assuming linearity, which is unlikely

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Title of my sex tape

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but you're ignoring the fact it has a trigger that makes it go nom nom

5 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 4

A fair point

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plus it just looks badass.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Take your physics and logic and leave this place at once. Only demagogs allowed here!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The motivation for this is probably speed.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

what if we add a block and tackle

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not sure if I agree with that. Plus faster is better if you’ve ever had to cut a big pile of wood.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

quicker and less swipes also means less chance of going crooked and if the effort is the same, why wouldn't you pick faster?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget non-controllable jaw force, and the reliability issues with more moving parts. It's really just a novelty "I wonder..." thing.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Its pretty mechanical, idk how much tension is on Springs but maybe they'll be the first thing to break

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

One trip groceries bag trip

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This is the way!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But, sometimes.its easier to go hard for half the time...trust me I know ?

5 years ago | Likes 604 Dislikes 8

Yea.. like bringing groceries in! Always worth getting it in one trip..

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Only if you are twice as strong.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

If you hard then you hard

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea, I assume the "half the time" part outweighs everything, especially if you've built up the arm strength already.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You seem like someone who thinks they are popular with the ladies...

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 46

He said easier, not more gratifying.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No he's right, I rather swing a heavier hammer less times to get the same job done

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

Seems like an old guy to me.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Or just an honest one

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 0

I always go hard for a fraction of the time. I'm not sure whether it's easier, but I won't say I've been told it's better.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Makes getting the undercut done (and lined up) easier though.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If there is a lever to tension the spring then you might use evvverrr so slightly less energy due to the stored energy in the spring, no?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, because you had to put the energy into the spring when you open the ‘jaws’

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I might be thinking of work not energy? Idk my friend got me through physics

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

A trigger pull would at least use a different energy source/movement to the rest of the arm that's doing the work here.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't look like the bottom blade is doing much

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some times its better to get something over with quickly. Your mom for example...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2x more energy which is renewable, for 1/2x time which is not, sounds like a net gain to me

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 3

Wait it could be america 2x more energy normal time, double the product, same amount of pay!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, some people have a hard time coming up with complete cost/benefit analyses.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The benefit I see is that there is no chance of it lifting off the branch as the bottom blade keeps it pushed down.

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 2

If that's the case, replace the bottom saw with something like mounted rollerblade wheels. Same pressure without added friction/resistance

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The bottom blades extra friction also reduces twisting if doing this by hand. You only need to counter the forward and back motion, not the

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Twisting that a single blade already causes. If you wanted to do things proper you would use the proper tools, macgyvering is always fun tho

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, yeah. It's all unnecessary modification in the name of creativity. If you want to counteract accidental twisting of the blade, 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats what i was thinking about. And easier to start a straight line with out bouncing around

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

So make the bottom smooth- holding power, less resistance.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But you will be limited to branches that are small enough to fit in between the blades. So I’ll pass

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah sounds great and all. Until you try to cut some walnut, and plus there is now a 100% percent of a branch binding whilst cut. 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 Plus side is a cool scwish sound though, better buy two.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And because of how muscles work you'll be able to perform less labor overall

5 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 6

because of how physics works - no, you won't.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Because of how the internet works - no one cares.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look at this nerd, acting like he has musculees. Also that thing would totes get caught up in harder wood.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Muscles how do they work?

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Hydrolysis of ATP causes a conformation change in myosin.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Magnets

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats a lot closer to a correct answer than you might realise

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

From someone who just spend way to long, and gave up trying find a good Scandi reference username

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is for a doctor going for an amputation speed run

5 years ago | Likes 701 Dislikes 2

Robert Liston intensifies

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

99% mortality, glitchless.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I need an amputation in the field then fast is best.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

300 % Mortality here we come again.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just a bit of armless fun.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Robert Liston https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Liston

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Portrait by Samuel John Stump

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only surgery with a 300% rate of failure in lifesaving.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Invented by a Saudi “doctor” and tested in an embassy in Turkey.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you know that chainsaws were initially invented as a hand cranked machine used to widen the opening for women during childbirth.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oh I forgot to mention why that was relevant——- they were later evolved to be used for amputations.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Civil War doctors are drooling over this.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google why chainsaws were invented

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I need a gif of that doctor from Atlantis with the super bone saw

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That record coincides with the record mortality for a single procedure: 1 amputation, 3 dead

5 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 0

Lmfao

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Not even a joke. The patient died, an attendant lost a finger and it got infected, and an onlooker had a heart attack

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

For what it’s worth speed was vital to successful amputations which is why they ran them so fast and what led to chopping of innocent finger

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Oh shit, I thought they were joking. That's wild!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 166 Dislikes 5

Chainsaw ^ -1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A smaller version of this jigsaw is used to cut through vertebrae sometimes

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need an unexpected Michael Cera on this

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I’ve had to use these with a weighted bag and cord to throw up over high tree limbs. They VERY OFTEN get stuck while sawing from pressure

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It becomes a huge PIA to get it dislodged. Best to move around and try various angles to make large grooves.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well mark me as horny AND horny.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had one of those. Does not work as well as advertised. Even this clip is edited to make it seem shorter

5 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 0

Nice try big chainsaw,

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It definitely skipped in the middle ya. Also I imagine they edited out the "ow, fuck!" as the log hit the guy

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

also good luck getting a straight cut and not having the last few centimeters awkwardly snap off instead being cut.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

unmotorized chainsaw

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ooooh i want one!

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They look neat, but if I remember right, most are garbage and only last for a few uses.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bought a higher quality one of these. Didn't work that great. But after a good sharpening, it cuts REALLY well.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

So was it worth it in the end? Or is a silky saw still good enough or the better option?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Never owned a silky saw, so I cannot speak for it. It was worth it for me to sharpen. It's a good option when backpacking.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I've never had these type but the best saw me or any of my backpacking friends have used is non-collapsable Japanese curved saw. Yes you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lose compactness but it comes in sheeth and works great & doesn't bend, lose rigidity or sharpness like in more compact saws that I've used

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0