Whether or not this is legitimate, it's interesting.

Jan 26, 2017 6:24 PM

KeetSqueet

Views

260943

Likes

6786

Dislikes

488

if this was fake it would not have been shut down.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't know if this is legit but FWIW I believe that this is what's going on.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There's people probably taking everything on here literally.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

and then someone died

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I wait for my Samsung 7 to notify me of news updates. Then I laugh myself sick at "Trump tries to build wall" and similar. Clowns are funny.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

While much of this SOUNDS true, without any kind of verification, it's meaningless. Any one of us could make an account and do the same.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It's probably preibus. Like Plutarch Heavensbee all over again.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I always like big government people realizing they can't control everything. Unfortunately that lesson never carries through to next time.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

PLOT TWIST: The leaker is Trump, himself!

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Why?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He's not that smart.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Haha yes, turns out this is all a plea for help.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nice try, Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm a whistle blower too and everything is just fine!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

"Fake news is a big problem." "Hey check out this super vague, unverified, anonymous Twitter account." Fucking morons.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Just because you hate something, don't believe everything, "exposing" it/them. It just makes you stupid

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Would be all for seeing some leaked, but verified, info on the new administration. Transparency is what I want regardless of how I voted

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Yea lol I'm not gonna believe some random twitter account lmao.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Whether it's real or not this whole presidential run has been a circus. Looks like that won't change anytime soon

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 6

Ofc he wants to investigate voter fraud. He wants to prove that he actually lost.. He don't want to be there.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, his daughter was one of the people registered in two states, so...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Gossiping about everything you see in an office and whistle-blowing are two very different things.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I just wish trump would go away. He's too ignorant to be president.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Might be fake. But it's all consistent with other leaks and reporting.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Getting answers to tweets without those tweets included is dumb.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if the news agencies are making all these fake twitter handles and just making shit up?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

What if!? Either way, it matches the verifiable information coming out of the White House. This isn't going to last the year.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Alternative facts are just fine...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is more true: this account, the Chinese invented global warming, 3 million illegally voted, or Trump's inauguration record attendance?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Well, this account MIGHT be real. We know the other three are false.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

exactly. does it even matter anymore?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hey mister those are all alternative facts!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AAAAANNNNDDD.... Twitter account is now gone. The twitter ban continues

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes, it's likely fake, but the scary part is NO ONE would be surprised if it turned out to be real.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 8

To be fair, I wouldn't be surprised by anything from any politician at this point. Bohner kid toucher? Sure, Sanders granny sex ring? Sure

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I would. Mostly because Twitter of all places is a horrible medium for leaking this kind of information.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It isn't fake, its just #alternativefacts. Those count now, didn't you hear?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

...media argues crowd size and "alt facts" they ignore the wall, Mexico City order, keystone pipeline. It's out of the Art of War.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Altfacts is BS, just like the crowd thing was bs. Trump isn't stupid, its a bait and switch tactic that's been used for years. While the...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The fact is, the way social media works and without evidence, this is strictly entertainment. And some of it is pretty good like fan fic.

9 years ago | Likes 458 Dislikes 14

It's not entertainment, it's "alternative facts."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but facts don't matter much these days. Whether it's true or not isn't as important as it simply being out there and talked about.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Many people believe it because they *want* to believe it. Validates their own beliefs. I'm not a fan but this crap makes me stick up 4 him.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's well done actually, but very easy to make these things up based on what we can all imagine is happening and what we are seeing.

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 3

Notice they aren't providing much in terms of new information, just responding to other inputs.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Does it bother anyone else that our reality entertainment is now our government? It used to be the kardashians...what happened...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's the thing, without proof this could simply be fiction based on current events. Like alternate history science fiction.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Account is already shut down.

9 years ago | Likes 1913 Dislikes 14

UN Ambassador is a cabinet-level position but not a Secretary, leading me to believe it's fake because it's WRONG!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I was going to say, it's really only a matter of time til they zero in on people like that. Watch who's around when you say something, (1)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

then have different people around next time. You can cross reference who's repeating what to who was around when you said it. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Smaller and smaller the list gets til, bang, you're caught. Or, as PotUS, you could just have the NSA snoop all the staff :/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

LOL new it was coming. They'll have these guys weeded out in the first 6 months. They're so stupid. This is a potential security risk.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 32

Trump is a security risk

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

lol, ignorant imgur zombie.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

zomg i bet this is Trump, hiding under his desk, texting this in a weird Wag the Dog kinda way for a new NBC show

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Based on what? Did they break any Twitter ToS or did Twitter gave up pretending it matters?

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

are you really that dense? they're discussing private information from the highest position of office.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 20

Agreed, although sadly this is a "unpopular opinion puffin" standpoint nowadays

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

well it's ok to do if you didn't vote for Trump, apparently.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Private not classified or anything of the sort

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

that makes exposing information about your countries most powerful leader ok? wow. good show.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

I'm sure they sign a confidentiality agreement. Don't sign if you can't keep your word.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well there's no reason to get nasty about it; life is too short to get worked up over something so simple.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

me pointing out your stupidity doesn't mean i'm worked up about anything, it just means you're stupid. :-)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

Not as stupid as someone who blindly replies to a person without checking the username; I was defending someone else's post.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Information leaks from the White House could easily be seen as a security threat too, I'm sure they have a lot of leeway in that regard.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

Could be the owner shut it down b/c they were worried about being caught. Or they wanted it to look that way. Or white house found out ID...

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Might have allowed said person to keep their job if they agreed to delete account or hell, maybe they just asked & Twitter caved.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

People saved the posts though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 27, 2017 9:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What's good about that? Only way it'd be good is if it's creator was lying. Granted that's a very real possibility.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's another called WhiteHouseLeaks up. Looks like a clone. Been active for the past 24hrs, existed since last year.

9 years ago | Likes 577 Dislikes 3

People who had been communicating with previous account "confirmed" (whatever that means) not the same account.

9 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 0

@whitehouseleaks is up again, as I'm typing this at least.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

And it's gone

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Must be real then right?

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 10

Being skeptical is fine. Keep an I don't know look on a subject till its confirmed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ordinary claims require quite ordinary evidence. I'd not be at all surprised, it sounds real enough.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

totes.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

But why would you want this to be real? This is terrible for everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is terrible for everyone. He's an idiot

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If the disaster is real, the transparency is better than not. Obviously, no disaster is preferred, just not expected.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but thanks to what's been happening with the park services and everything, we know there's a disaster. This is just offering insight

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They could've kept going on a bit longer if not for some tweets containing information that narrowed down the suspect (If this was real).

9 years ago | Likes 226 Dislikes 5

Maybe, but all it takes is a phone call to the NSA to figure out who a whistle blower is if they arent super careful about how they leak

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and since this guys is posting on twitter, he's not being careful.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dinkleberg!!!

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Republican, was in that specific meeting, friends with Paul Ryan, boss' boss is Trump. Pretty narrow right there.

9 years ago | Likes 228 Dislikes 2

The one about Trump teaching the 4 senators who voted against Haley a thing or two, and possible the one with the meeting.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Yeah I'm pretty sure my seven year old could have figured that out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also narrowed by the fact he was apparently on the campaign trail

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

He may have sanitised his comments, folks....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IT WAS I, DINOKEBAB ALL ALONG!

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

I'M ZORO!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Its always the god damn kebeb!!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*gasp*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh shit waddup

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone else just a little skeptical about this? I mean posting this to twitter and not just storing what you see and leaking it to wikileaks

9 years ago | Likes 878 Dislikes 30

>Implying Wikileaks aren't 100% pro-Trump

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

. Just doesn't sound to right to me.

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 11

It may be that they don't trust any of the possible outlets they could go to, or have any solid facts. He's tweeting hear-say info. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its not like when Snowden had a metric fuck ton of data on the NSA shit. This is just what he hears from others he works with, allegedly2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who the fuck still trusts wikileaks to release stuff without Putin's approval? They have a whole file on the RNC & never released it.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 11

Wikileaks has a ton of stuff they have not released...this isn't weird. Not even Art Bell would take your call with this load of paranoia.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

To be fair, it doesn't seem like anything was even remotely important enough or secret enough to go to wikileaks. Just daily Trump things.

9 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 7

Looks more like gossip than leaking secrets. I think twitter is a good place for it.

9 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

#DailyTrumpThings

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, hugely skeptical. Seems like bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

How about the fact that they're apparently a part of every high-level meeting in the white house?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

He said he's not, simply reporting what he hears. but who knows if this is legit.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I believe this as much as the trump swastikas, and hijab pulling, and the "go back home" claims of recent. So many false outrages and lies.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 17

It's hard to publish on wikileaks, they have to do weeks of research to validate information before they publish anything. (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not sure if this is legit, but this probably would be the fastest way to publish widely as soon as possible (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It sounds like some rando college student posting tbh

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

account was registered in June 2016... a little strange.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Posting to twitter I might accept; the crosstagging makes me think it's fake.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At this point, im treating reality like an extension of House of Cards so.. I'm strapped in for the ride! Chaos and pandemonium 2017

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not "a little." I don't believe it. Anyone who believes this needs to reconsider whether they should participate in the political process.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And, for the record, if it's true, you should still reevaluate. This has so little credibility that everyone should write it-off immediately

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

All part of Pence's plan to become president

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wikileaks is basically a proxy for the Russian Intelligence Service at this point. He'd be an idiot to send anything there.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The fact they're @-ing Trump, Ryan, etc. Is a dead giveaway. Real leaker wouldn't blatantly tell those whose secrets he's sharing.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Somehow I can't see how someone with security to converse with WikiLeaks could not have the same level of security in office.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

A West Wing staffer wouldn't call the UN Ambassador "Secretary"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't the fact that this account is shut down add a bit of credibility? I don't twitter but I can't imagine them going out of there way.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a bit. If I wanted to seem credible, I'd post a bit then shut down the account for just that reason.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meh this guy can walk out right now and get a book deal.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Probably more lucrative to stay in for at least a month, if it's a real inside source (which I doubt)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It COULD be true. I WANT it to be true. I'd say there's about a 10% chance that it actually is, though.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

easier to tweet than to try and contact a third party incognito.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Complete and total BS. Priebus would quit because of Fox? Gimme a break.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 3, 2018 11:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Really? I never watch the channel. Go on.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This morning Shepard Smith blasted Trump over voter fraud accusation assertively saying there was 0 evidence. Fox is a total shill.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's interesting. I figured they would have been pretty much a Greek Chorus for anything he decided to do.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Given the nature of Assange, I have very little trust in wikileaks

9 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 31

oh, leave the alleged rapist alone

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Hillary Clinton is a career criminal, Trump is your run of the mill con man. One was a person that held a lot of power, the other a moron.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't really give a shit how decent the candidate is. Just that they dont do stupid shit too loudly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is that?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Because they release certain things while retaining others to progress a political agenda

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Yeah they kinda lost any credibility

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 15

Wait how? I've been under a rock.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

Go read the AMA he conducted recently on Reddit. Redditors used to fear he was dead. Now they think Wikileaks has been compromised.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The tl;dr version is that Assange has been selectively leaking only anti-Hillary docs instead of everything.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 12

He probably considered her a bigger threat thus the selective nature. No one is wholly altruistic in nature and they do have an agenda

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

I am not willing to say that it's real, but it's plausible. Like if I swore to you that I got jumped every day in middle school- 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 9

Couldn't they just track the phone through this account fairly easily? I know where I work they can pinpoint a phone that is using the 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wifi illegally.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

use a buddy's phone at lunch at a local diner? Just off the top of my head.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too many to just be on his lunch break through.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Prepaid cellphone, turn wifi off and use prepaid cards for the data.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good point.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it didn't happen, but there's no reason it COULDN'T have happened.

9 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 3

Every day? What did you do?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

tryna gett weed from random blacl ppl

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He reposted someone else's dank memes

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cardinal sin! People need to know better than that lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0