Why is there no public outcry at all against this police terrorism.

Mar 22, 2025 4:20 AM

Sodaguru

Views

22397

Likes

545

Dislikes

44

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2025 6:38 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 420 Dislikes 12

The shopkeeper’s lawyer is named Steve Zissou :O

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh my god, the lawyer defending him is named Steve Zissou ?!?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

…a plant

all for a plant

Cannabis sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis

The complicity to “just follow orders…” is what really gets it for me…and I don’t even smoke ganja…! The blind eye to a fellow human, that is “all in a day’s work…” is what will make the coming fascist state unbreakable for an age that will span the globe for generations…

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"No let's not calm down" way to de-escalate buddy

2 years ago | Likes 265 Dislikes 0

Jumping on the fucking counter. Wonder which week of training that was

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

alright let's not calm down then *pulls a fucking RPG* shall we NOT calm down then bitch?!

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This is not about safety. This is about shoring up overpriced weed at licensed dealers.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Completely illegal. 4th amendment. Fire those fucks, take their pensions and given it to the store owner whose rights were trampled. Will that happen? Fuck no. But it would in a just society.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I didn’t even notice the door until it was opened

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because in some states police are allowed to come in and inspect tobacco shops (as well as alcohol and gun shops) for compliance (such as having tax stamps, licenses, etc.) Those states do not require a warrant for the inspection and the owner would know that since they had to sign paperwork that stated as much in order to get the license. Therefore, the shop manager/owner should have told his employee the correct protocol.

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 6

Then police should have explained that properly, because doing otherwise looks to anyone else that they are breaking the law

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

However as per section 132 [1(b)], you are within your rights to refuse the inspection at the risk of a fine. If refused, the officer must seek a court order and to acquire one, they must show that there is reasonable cause to suspect that the business may be operating illegally.
https://casetext.com/statute/consolidated-laws-of-new-york/chapter-cannabis/article-6-general-provisions/section-132-penalties-for-violation-of-this-chapter

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The subtitles make zero percent sense.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're in a position that you can arrest me. you don't need to ask me nicely.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 22

I don't know what is going on here, or what the context is.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hey. sure I can help you. but would you mind waiting a moment while I google the laws on this? please wait right there.
if they want to advance while you've asked for space, I'm sure a lawyer can help. Just get on your phone and continue to ask them to please wait a minute. after that, its up to them to break the law.
if them breaking the law means nothing, then ya know only street smarts can save you now.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ACAB

2 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 16

More now than ever. Beware the police.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1312 yes

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Lawsuit!!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

He looks like he could use a cord order shower.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ACAP

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.... inspections for what?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Penis inspection day.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Free stuff they can stuff in their pockets.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

LOL, so many boot lickers in the comments hiding behind the law. Oh wow, they found a whole entire pound of weed? FUCKING HEROES! THE WAR ON DRUGS IS OVER!

..fucking morons

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

great evoluution of usa image for a 70 yo french dude like me beetween my youth, 10, 15.. after ww2 and today;A myth died, a part of me to.. So sad, dear american people..

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wow 90% of these subtitles are absolutely worthless.

2 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Just like the police.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Why? You voted FOR this. That's why.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

First off, fuck republicans like Giuliani, but I have bad news for you about democratic mayors in most major cities. They are some of the most corrupt fuckers around (Andre Dickens, Eric Adams, Jacob Frey, the guy in Chicago) and it really sucks that the people who look good in the mayoral elections always end up being so dishonest and corrupt.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, they just are regular americans. Check!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's NYC, pretty sure being corrupt af is a requirement to even run for mayor.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

like one that comes in mind, Rudy Giuliani

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://www.thecity.nyc/2024/06/03/video-nypd-cannabis-raid-adams-hochul/

2 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 0

well, I suppose this is why the Major was pardoned, idn't it? Just saying

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wow! NYC mayor wants invest tax dollars and man hours to make sure you’re not selling a legal plant so others can sell the legal plant.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, frankly as a Norwegian I'd feel safer going for a vacation in North-Korea, at least there a local law enforcement officer follows me around to make sure I don't get into this situation.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

(And even as a Norwegian I'd rather go to North Korea, they have some truly spectacular geology and I won't get shot in a traffic stop. Nor will I get put in a police car on a railroad track and get hit by a train)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Violated civil and constitutional rights over a mere pound of weed. And they probably weighed it in the container it was stored in. REALLY making the streets safer -_-

2 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

You mean a half pound of weed

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"pound" of "weed"

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, they must impound all 7 grams

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Definitely need to tag the entire eighth

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hope they don't forget to bag that stem of weed.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Please provide basic info like when and where, and a reliable news source if possible. It’s the difference between rage bait and something we can actually use.

2 years ago | Likes 303 Dislikes 12

https://www.thecity.nyc/2024/06/03/video-nypd-cannabis-raid-adams-hochul/

The regulatory inspection process was outlined in the 2021 state law legalizing cannabis use. A section of that law enshrines the right of individuals to refuse a regulatory inspection, though subjects them to a civil fine if they do so. Once a regulatory inspection is refused, then the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) or its board must request a court order, the law says.

The cops were out of line here

2 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 0

Since when do random inspections need 5 fucking cops going immediately into "We'll arrest you"? Should be an administrative worker with a single policeman escort and one outside on stand by feels like, this is mob shit man, even in proper context this comes off as wrong as hell.

2 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

Cops walk into every situation just waiting to threaten arrest to get what they want. Been that way for decades.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I count seven.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fucking thank you.

2 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 6

If it’s in America and they do not provide a search warrant then we don’t need to see much else. Also, very easy to find this article.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah it's also easy to post a source on this website

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

what when and where would make this ok?

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 45

NYker here. Basic info means we can follow up and make sure these Bad Cops are punished. We can complain to our Councilman, and organize our neighborhoods. Do you want ACTION or is this just "ragebait"?

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

thats not what hes saying. hes saying dont trust your own eyes and ears, maybe its something else. just ignore the injustice..not sure what your message is, because yeah obviously contact authorities if you have their names. dont post it here. and dont discredit this w such obvious bullshit. bootlicker.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Unsourced ragebait weakens us...and may be propaganda. These days, when info is so freely available, I distrust ANYONE who holds back details. It costs nothing to provide a link. You should distrust them, too. Even when they seem to be on your side.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

If this is a 10 year old video where the police involved have all been fired, there's less for me to be concerned about, and less for others in their community to take action about. If it's here and now, action should be taken, and I'd want some follow up.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

ok so then its ok if its 10 years old? what makes you think they'd be fired?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This video may be cut in some sort so viewers dont get all the information there is. Maybe the police did show him a warrant but it was cut out of the video. Who knows.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 13

so they showed him a warrant and didnt mention it when he asked for a warrant? that makes fuckall sense. im all for valid skepticism but unwarranted not so much. if you cant come up with a valid scenaria this is just bootlicking

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 17

Actually i dont care that much what seems to happen in america so.. yeah..

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Exactly it was never about valid skepticism , just a weak cowardly excuse to ignore injustice

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

It's not okay at best... but how are you going to make use of the video other than for inducing anger without it? Is there any partly mitigating context that people will use as a 'gotcha' if you try and use it even for that?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

kinda like vids of ever wrong/atrocity? if we cant stop them we should pretend they dont exist? wtf is your point

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Most of those have good details, context, and backing, making them useful for targetted action and protest, letting people know who precisely to get mad at, how you can take action, how we can reduce or prevent it in the future.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

they dont. when you see pics of bombed buildings in ukraine or gaza there usually isnt more context and ppl rarely ask because they know the context. yet when you see cops breaking the law suddenly hordes of bootlickers go well achhhchually...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2025 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Shameful to just show up and not carry the paperwork like a real professional admin.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Yeah, they can be searched for a regulatory purpose, not a criminal one. The shopkeeper can refuse the sudden inspection, but they are supposed to be fined, not arrested. Refusal to be searched requires a court order to be overridden. Any violation of their license results in civil charges, not criminal ones. So, your reply is misleading at best, and false at worst.

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Stop making balanced assessments with your "knowledge" and "facts"

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The irony that it's not balanced and it's false, because it's a cannabis shop in NYC where the inspection can be refused and a court order is needed if the inspection is refused.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wouldn’t that be ATF though? Not the sheriff?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

It would've been nice if the cops said that instead of threatening them, though. Maybe cite the specific law to prove to them that it is required to submit to inspection. Not saying it's not legally, just saying it was handled brutishly

2 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 2

Thugs don't care about due process. Biggest gang in the United States.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You used cops and nice in the same sentence. Was that intentional?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes because I also said would've been, as in, don't expect it to be

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cops generally don't know much about laws. They're taught the absolute basics in law and a lot more in how to drive and use violence. My cousin and uncle are both cops. I've had to explain to both of them some very basic constitutional law and I'm not even a lawyer.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep that's my point, if they had actually been trained it would take 5 minutes in the squad car to do a quick memorization of the law that they couldn't name... even lawyers can't cite everything off the top of their head, they refresh themselves before they go to court. Those cops should do the same. Or should be REQUIRED to do the same, i really mean

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah constitutional law is basically the process of appealing the convictions of people who were unlawfully arrested and sentenced, often years after they've been in jail. And the lawyers doing that work make nothing compared to corporate lawyers. That's a pretty fucked system as opposed to training cops so they don't make illegal arrests to begin with.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that there's no news link or anything else that's verified that'll give context is sus too. Rage bait and there're bites.

2 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2025 7:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

All valid points, but i’d love to see their attitude and demeanor in other legal administrative searches, especially when it’s of someone whiter.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

@Scar1203 so it tirns out it's a weed shop, and according to this article, there's a section of the law where shopkeepers can refuse the search (tho them they are automatically fined) OP shouldve had this in the post https://www.thecity.nyc/2024/06/03/video-nypd-cannabis-raid-adams-hochul/

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2025 7:05 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The shopkeeper should have been aware of the law, but those cops had every opportunity to de-escalate the situation and explain in clear and simple terms what the law requires, but instead they were rude, hostile, and then physically aggressive. Anyone with any socials skills would have been able to handle that shopkeeper very easily. There's a culture of bullying and brutality in law enforcement, and this video illustrates that.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Hey. Found the bootlicker!

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

You must love the taste of boots.

They could have told him what law they had the right to do the search under, but cops don’t need to know the law and they don’t need to tell the truth.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2025 9:07 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0