Jan 28, 2022 12:22 PM
Iblamemyparentstoo
144203
1960
59
spittytrinkles
Pull yourselves up by your Bootstraps. /s
PersonalityFire
Ohhhhyeahhhhhhh
The more people that can be extorted for taxes the better. Obviously the system needs more bodies.
RideTheStimutacs
As if that kid will ever get rich enough for him to want to protect.
CorrectMostOfTheTime
Pro birth never pro life
FromTheBeyond
That kid needs to get some boots so he can pull himself up by the bootstraps
G0MeatCube
Gangsters of Potus??
KamikazeGerbil101
XIXXXVIVIII
Oh they'd get a brick
playingdead2022
Can we get some food stamps for people who really need them and not just people who refuse to work and continue to pop kids out
TheOneWhoWasLeft
The kids they popped out (against the will of everyone involved) need them. Really.
Also, isn't it sorta shameful how, in a country of absolute plenty, people still need to work in order to not deserve to be hungry?
[deleted]
DisgruntledFerret
Based on the overall republican platform... yeah. The GOP are fully onboard with taking away every government program that helps children.
ufoara
kakivara
Yeah. If they did then they would give that kid public health care for life and public higher education. But they block those.
ImGoingToGoFallAsleepOnABench
On the ground level? Probably not all of them. As far as pro-lifers with any real power, they truly don't care about kids post-birth.
I generally think everyone pro-birth is a worthless, vile asshole as a baseline; anything extra is just flavour.
Subsound
Definitely the ones in congress
...and those that stump/vote for those folks to get there.
Like what?
Paggles
Yes. They show it time and time again with the policies they support.
LastTalon
Actually, that's their job. To vote on behalf of their constituents. To speak for them.
Pro-lifers. I mean pro-birthers.
MKaiser
this is why I wish I could get away with punching these kinds of people and their supporters cause of their BS reasoning to push religion
ReallyNotSure
leonardodjik
Gnome fetish
bastafari
I need more please
IrrationalNumber
Source for original clip: https://youtu.be/PcRyjkYdDxM
DeanGulberri1
But he doesn't even need the horns!
ColonelCasual
God I'm so tired of seeing his face photoshopped onto everything.
MrChurch
That turd isn't that talented. His only talent is being a fuckknuckle that can Peter Piper the rest of the mouth-breathing fuckknuckles.
Beowylf
Fuckknuckle. Thank you, I have learned a glorious new word, today. :D
pfreis
I love it! But the hands are too big for realism
Dopplerfart
Ahha I laughed too hard at this
Immobilized
This drawing is wrong! Who here belives they would say sorry?
Sechran
To mock the pain of others? Sure they would.
CyborgScribe
Its probably a sneering obviously fake sorry
Mithi
They say it habituality. But they either don't mean it or don't even know what it means.
DanFendi
Most Republicans I know are polite. They apologize before dehumanizing and extorting you, because they feel super bad that you're in pain.
SecondSince
Now keep them poor, uneducated and afraid and they'll have a whole new generation of voters. :(
MissSiesta
...and soldiers, of course
dirtyscalychickentoes
Insurrectionist zombies first, then turn them into soldiers.
spudpicker
Or people too tired and beaten down to bother voting, which is just as good for Republicans.
OldSchoolNewRules
CommunCreator
I’d like a news tart.
So much this! People living paycheck to paycheck are also less likely to vote, and less people voting is a stated goal of the GOP.
Codyblues
Living paycheck to paycheck was a desperate sign of the times. Now it’s the norm.
Thekindofkindlyman
I get so much anxiety when my friends or family plans a trip. Like “wedding, have to go” but I have no extra money each month already
AimlessSavant
Poverty is voter suppression. Not allowing a holiday to vote is undemocratic and wrong.
ValamirCleaver
I agree with making it as easy as possible for ever legally qualified person to vote, but how does making election day a 1/
holiday make it easier for service & retail job employees to vote? I personally believe it would be better to have a federal law that 2/
allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked. Several states already allow this. 3/
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-18-states-with-all-mail-elections.aspx /4
Not offering subsidized time off for employee voting is arguably my outlook here - a mere holiday by itself isn't enough IMO.
Small ideas. Just anything other than the stupid we got rn.
A federal law that allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked would be better.
This would void the need for dedicated time-off explicitly for voting.
Exactly, it would remove potential employer & local election board capriciousness from the equation.
BootsDusty
LochNessMister
USA, USA, USA!!!
grimnorseman
Oh poor me that live in a socialist hellhole called Norway. Imagine those lucky enough to live in "greatest" nation in the world, m'urica..
Aremic
Hahahah... hah... ha... we know. Trust me. We know. Or at least, about half of us do. Me? I want to leave. This place is a hellhole.
TheReelOldGreg
So when a woman is pregnant, we refer to the entity as a baby. Because women dont give birth to dogs, cats or birds. Heres my question. 1/
laughytaughy
THIS FOOL IS AN ANTI-VAXXER TOO LOLOLOLOL
ThisIsMyDogLily
ANSWER: NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS
darkstarmc
So a human can't get pregnant with a human fetus but can get pregnant with a baby cat? Weird.
RandomnessSlayer
Incoming loaded rhetorical question with an extremely obvious answer given the convoluted premise (and isn't even phrased as a question)
Why is it loaded? If you agree with abortion, you think its okay to kill a baby in the womb. Thats just the truth, if you feel bad, thats u.
nesurame
Wven if it was a fully developed baby, why should a baby matter more than the person forced to carry it?
Eldibs
They aren't a baby until birth is viable, dipshit. They're a fetus. Take your faulty premises and fuck off.
It's loaded in the literal sense that it's an ideologically based question. You're saying "you're wrong if you don't agree with me"
I haven't stated my opinion, at least on this post, and I don't need to. You've made your point and are just bashing people who disagree>
2/ "it is okay to kill a baby in the womb when ____" if you gave any other answer than "never" you dont value life.
ztygs
Is abortion okay if a 13 year old girl who becomes pregnant through rape and will possibly die giving birth or not? If not, why not?
AbsolutelyNotBacon
"is it ok to kill a baby in the womb" yes. No "if" needed. Just go for it lol.
I appreciate your scorched earth method of debate, because there's no way OP is arguing in good faith.
Rape, incest and danger to mother or unviable fetus. All perfectly valid reasons and also, most importantly, NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS
idiotcube
I don't value non-sentient life, no. A fetus is a clump of cells that doesn't feel pain, suffer, or even know it's dying. It's like a plant.
Sh4dowWalker96
Oh my god, just do the world a favor and shut the fuck up already.
Mediocreclient
plot twist: im for whatever gets the housing imbalance fixed. since boomys are determined to go NIMBY, no choice but to drain demand pool.
UmHowAboutAnonymous
How about when the fetus will kill both child and bother before birth? How about if the mother was raped? I can go on with more examples
PhurbuMukpodom
Um, when it’s the Antichrist? Duh!
Haha this acctually did make me laugh. Good one
lostCommunityCat
Wether or not it's a life or a baby is immaterial: no one else in our society is required by law to sacrifice themselves for another.
Baby's die everyday for lack of organ transplants. Should we make it illegal to refuse?
Give the government an inch and they will take a mile. The precedent set by casting down Roe v Wade will end badly for all not just women.
What disapoints me is that you view life as immaterial. Your alive right? You must have had a mom? Ehat if she threw you away
Yeah we should but only if you have voted against abortion. If you are willing to sacrifice a life for the unborn, let it be your own.
MorrighanWolf
You don't value life since unviable pregnancies kill both you fecking eejit.
So your assuming you know the future of their life? Your justifying killing a person because its inconvinient in your eyes.
FreezoQ
Imagine not understanding something as basic as "unviable pregnancy"
nicilaskin
it means the fetus ( not baby by the way ) is incomparable to life ... meaning it will either die in the womb or just after birth
Imagine actually being this stupid and ignorant.
Are you American? Just wondering why your English speaking skills are so bad.
RoninOni
It’s not a person yet moron.
No moron unviable pregnancy, means that it physically won't work due to health complications that will kill one or both. Shite off.
DocWats
We say baby because it's easier than "non sentient clump of cells within the mother." The difference is that I don't consider the entity
alive. So how can one kill which isn't alive. Hell the Bible doesn't even consider it alive, or has a soul, until first breath (Gen 2:7).
Not that I think that a religious text should be governing over a woman's autonomy, just many that are pro-birth tend to cite their book.
CounterQuestions: Is it ok to neglect a child that was born? Is it ok for that child to live in poverty? Is it ok not to support that child?
This "pro-life without exception" is so contrived; people stop giving a shit once these kids are born and it's so myopic and hypocritical
BearsDontCare
So if the mother will die along with the baby, they shouldnt abort, and both should die. Got it
Or even better, when the baby is a product of incest after the father rapes his daughter at the age of 11.
Or even better, when the baby is born without a brain. Better not abort, that's cruel, even though its already dead! I love this game
PiggyWobbles
what a bulletproof argument. What if we rephrase it as "it is okay for the government to force women to become baby factories against their>
< will". No. Duh. Obviously not, why would you want some draconian authoritarian state forcing medical decisions based on religion?
Let me ask you this. Have you ever met a woman who had a child and said," Man i sure wish i got that abortion?"
Yes.
Trelis
Yes. Friend had fetus showing possible health issues. Family basically coerced her to having it. Now baby has health issues.
No my friends live in the first world and have access to family planning, so they don't have children they are unwilling or unready for
Also i dont encourage the taking of free will and I dont support a government that does. And your a liar if you think thats what ive said.
You literally said that abortion is never justified. That means you don't care about a woman's free will once she becomes pregnant.
It is what youve said though
Blutsaugher
Doesn't matter what we call it, but what it is. Discussing semantics has to be the stupidest way to argue about anything. Not helpful.
SauteThoseOnionsYouSickBastard
It is okay to kill a baby when it's not a baby yet, but some cells playing "let's multiplicate!" in a body they're not welcomed to.
spittytrinkles
Pull yourselves up by your Bootstraps. /s
PersonalityFire
Ohhhhyeahhhhhhh
The more people that can be extorted for taxes the better. Obviously the system needs more bodies.
RideTheStimutacs
As if that kid will ever get rich enough for him to want to protect.
CorrectMostOfTheTime
Pro birth never pro life
FromTheBeyond
That kid needs to get some boots so he can pull himself up by the bootstraps
G0MeatCube
Gangsters of Potus??
KamikazeGerbil101
XIXXXVIVIII
Oh they'd get a brick
playingdead2022
Can we get some food stamps for people who really need them and not just people who refuse to work and continue to pop kids out
TheOneWhoWasLeft
The kids they popped out (against the will of everyone involved) need them. Really.
TheOneWhoWasLeft
Also, isn't it sorta shameful how, in a country of absolute plenty, people still need to work in order to not deserve to be hungry?
[deleted]
[deleted]
DisgruntledFerret
Based on the overall republican platform... yeah. The GOP are fully onboard with taking away every government program that helps children.
ufoara
kakivara
Yeah. If they did then they would give that kid public health care for life and public higher education. But they block those.
ImGoingToGoFallAsleepOnABench
On the ground level? Probably not all of them. As far as pro-lifers with any real power, they truly don't care about kids post-birth.
XIXXXVIVIII
I generally think everyone pro-birth is a worthless, vile asshole as a baseline; anything extra is just flavour.
Subsound
Definitely the ones in congress
[deleted]
[deleted]
Subsound
...and those that stump/vote for those folks to get there.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Subsound
Like what?
Paggles
Yes. They show it time and time again with the policies they support.
[deleted]
[deleted]
LastTalon
Actually, that's their job. To vote on behalf of their constituents. To speak for them.
Paggles
Pro-lifers. I mean pro-birthers.
MKaiser
this is why I wish I could get away with punching these kinds of people and their supporters cause of their BS reasoning to push religion
ReallyNotSure
leonardodjik
Gnome fetish
bastafari
I need more please
IrrationalNumber
Source for original clip: https://youtu.be/PcRyjkYdDxM
DeanGulberri1
But he doesn't even need the horns!
ColonelCasual
God I'm so tired of seeing his face photoshopped onto everything.
MrChurch
That turd isn't that talented. His only talent is being a fuckknuckle that can Peter Piper the rest of the mouth-breathing fuckknuckles.
Beowylf
Fuckknuckle. Thank you, I have learned a glorious new word, today. :D
pfreis
I love it! But the hands are too big for realism
Dopplerfart
Ahha I laughed too hard at this
Immobilized
This drawing is wrong! Who here belives they would say sorry?
Sechran
To mock the pain of others? Sure they would.
CyborgScribe
Its probably a sneering obviously fake sorry
Mithi
They say it habituality. But they either don't mean it or don't even know what it means.
DanFendi
Most Republicans I know are polite. They apologize before dehumanizing and extorting you, because they feel super bad that you're in pain.
SecondSince
Now keep them poor, uneducated and afraid and they'll have a whole new generation of voters. :(
MissSiesta
...and soldiers, of course
dirtyscalychickentoes
Insurrectionist zombies first, then turn them into soldiers.
spudpicker
Or people too tired and beaten down to bother voting, which is just as good for Republicans.
ufoara
OldSchoolNewRules
CommunCreator
I’d like a news tart.
spudpicker
So much this! People living paycheck to paycheck are also less likely to vote, and less people voting is a stated goal of the GOP.
Codyblues
Living paycheck to paycheck was a desperate sign of the times. Now it’s the norm.
Thekindofkindlyman
I get so much anxiety when my friends or family plans a trip. Like “wedding, have to go” but I have no extra money each month already
AimlessSavant
Poverty is voter suppression. Not allowing a holiday to vote is undemocratic and wrong.
ValamirCleaver
I agree with making it as easy as possible for ever legally qualified person to vote, but how does making election day a 1/
ValamirCleaver
holiday make it easier for service & retail job employees to vote? I personally believe it would be better to have a federal law that 2/
ValamirCleaver
allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked. Several states already allow this. 3/
ValamirCleaver
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-18-states-with-all-mail-elections.aspx /4
ImGoingToGoFallAsleepOnABench
Not offering subsidized time off for employee voting is arguably my outlook here - a mere holiday by itself isn't enough IMO.
AimlessSavant
Small ideas. Just anything other than the stupid we got rn.
ValamirCleaver
A federal law that allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked would be better.
ImGoingToGoFallAsleepOnABench
This would void the need for dedicated time-off explicitly for voting.
ValamirCleaver
Exactly, it would remove potential employer & local election board capriciousness from the equation.
BootsDusty
LochNessMister
USA, USA, USA!!!
grimnorseman
Oh poor me that live in a socialist hellhole called Norway. Imagine those lucky enough to live in "greatest" nation in the world, m'urica..
Aremic
Hahahah... hah... ha... we know. Trust me. We know. Or at least, about half of us do. Me? I want to leave. This place is a hellhole.
TheReelOldGreg
So when a woman is pregnant, we refer to the entity as a baby. Because women dont give birth to dogs, cats or birds. Heres my question. 1/
laughytaughy
THIS FOOL IS AN ANTI-VAXXER TOO LOLOLOLOL
ThisIsMyDogLily
ANSWER: NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS
darkstarmc
So a human can't get pregnant with a human fetus but can get pregnant with a baby cat? Weird.
RandomnessSlayer
Incoming loaded rhetorical question with an extremely obvious answer given the convoluted premise (and isn't even phrased as a question)
TheReelOldGreg
Why is it loaded? If you agree with abortion, you think its okay to kill a baby in the womb. Thats just the truth, if you feel bad, thats u.
nesurame
Wven if it was a fully developed baby, why should a baby matter more than the person forced to carry it?
Eldibs
They aren't a baby until birth is viable, dipshit. They're a fetus. Take your faulty premises and fuck off.
RandomnessSlayer
It's loaded in the literal sense that it's an ideologically based question. You're saying "you're wrong if you don't agree with me"
RandomnessSlayer
I haven't stated my opinion, at least on this post, and I don't need to. You've made your point and are just bashing people who disagree>
TheReelOldGreg
2/ "it is okay to kill a baby in the womb when ____" if you gave any other answer than "never" you dont value life.
ztygs
Is abortion okay if a 13 year old girl who becomes pregnant through rape and will possibly die giving birth or not? If not, why not?
AbsolutelyNotBacon
"is it ok to kill a baby in the womb" yes. No "if" needed. Just go for it lol.
RideTheStimutacs
I appreciate your scorched earth method of debate, because there's no way OP is arguing in good faith.
ThisIsMyDogLily
Rape, incest and danger to mother or unviable fetus. All perfectly valid reasons and also, most importantly, NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS
idiotcube
I don't value non-sentient life, no. A fetus is a clump of cells that doesn't feel pain, suffer, or even know it's dying. It's like a plant.
Sh4dowWalker96
Oh my god, just do the world a favor and shut the fuck up already.
Mediocreclient
plot twist: im for whatever gets the housing imbalance fixed. since boomys are determined to go NIMBY, no choice but to drain demand pool.
UmHowAboutAnonymous
How about when the fetus will kill both child and bother before birth? How about if the mother was raped? I can go on with more examples
PhurbuMukpodom
Um, when it’s the Antichrist? Duh!
TheReelOldGreg
Haha this acctually did make me laugh. Good one
lostCommunityCat
Wether or not it's a life or a baby is immaterial: no one else in our society is required by law to sacrifice themselves for another.
lostCommunityCat
Baby's die everyday for lack of organ transplants. Should we make it illegal to refuse?
lostCommunityCat
Give the government an inch and they will take a mile. The precedent set by casting down Roe v Wade will end badly for all not just women.
TheReelOldGreg
What disapoints me is that you view life as immaterial. Your alive right? You must have had a mom? Ehat if she threw you away
ztygs
Yeah we should but only if you have voted against abortion. If you are willing to sacrifice a life for the unborn, let it be your own.
MorrighanWolf
You don't value life since unviable pregnancies kill both you fecking eejit.
TheReelOldGreg
So your assuming you know the future of their life? Your justifying killing a person because its inconvinient in your eyes.
FreezoQ
Imagine not understanding something as basic as "unviable pregnancy"
nicilaskin
it means the fetus ( not baby by the way ) is incomparable to life ... meaning it will either die in the womb or just after birth
laughytaughy
Imagine actually being this stupid and ignorant.
ztygs
Are you American? Just wondering why your English speaking skills are so bad.
RoninOni
It’s not a person yet moron.
MorrighanWolf
No moron unviable pregnancy, means that it physically won't work due to health complications that will kill one or both. Shite off.
DocWats
We say baby because it's easier than "non sentient clump of cells within the mother." The difference is that I don't consider the entity
DocWats
alive. So how can one kill which isn't alive. Hell the Bible doesn't even consider it alive, or has a soul, until first breath (Gen 2:7).
DocWats
Not that I think that a religious text should be governing over a woman's autonomy, just many that are pro-birth tend to cite their book.
RandomnessSlayer
CounterQuestions: Is it ok to neglect a child that was born? Is it ok for that child to live in poverty? Is it ok not to support that child?
RandomnessSlayer
This "pro-life without exception" is so contrived; people stop giving a shit once these kids are born and it's so myopic and hypocritical
BearsDontCare
So if the mother will die along with the baby, they shouldnt abort, and both should die. Got it
BearsDontCare
Or even better, when the baby is a product of incest after the father rapes his daughter at the age of 11.
BearsDontCare
Or even better, when the baby is born without a brain. Better not abort, that's cruel, even though its already dead! I love this game
PiggyWobbles
what a bulletproof argument. What if we rephrase it as "it is okay for the government to force women to become baby factories against their>
PiggyWobbles
< will". No. Duh. Obviously not, why would you want some draconian authoritarian state forcing medical decisions based on religion?
TheReelOldGreg
Let me ask you this. Have you ever met a woman who had a child and said," Man i sure wish i got that abortion?"
BearsDontCare
Yes.
Trelis
Yes. Friend had fetus showing possible health issues. Family basically coerced her to having it. Now baby has health issues.
PiggyWobbles
No my friends live in the first world and have access to family planning, so they don't have children they are unwilling or unready for
[deleted]
[deleted]
TheReelOldGreg
Also i dont encourage the taking of free will and I dont support a government that does. And your a liar if you think thats what ive said.
idiotcube
You literally said that abortion is never justified. That means you don't care about a woman's free will once she becomes pregnant.
BearsDontCare
It is what youve said though
Blutsaugher
Doesn't matter what we call it, but what it is. Discussing semantics has to be the stupidest way to argue about anything. Not helpful.
SauteThoseOnionsYouSickBastard
It is okay to kill a baby when it's not a baby yet, but some cells playing "let's multiplicate!" in a body they're not welcomed to.