It's never ever been about compassion but control...

Jan 28, 2022 12:22 PM

Iblamemyparentstoo

Views

144203

Likes

1960

Dislikes

59

Pull yourselves up by your Bootstraps. /s

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The more people that can be extorted for taxes the better. Obviously the system needs more bodies.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

As if that kid will ever get rich enough for him to want to protect.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro birth never pro life

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That kid needs to get some boots so he can pull himself up by the bootstraps

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Gangsters of Potus??

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh they'd get a brick

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we get some food stamps for people who really need them and not just people who refuse to work and continue to pop kids out

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The kids they popped out (against the will of everyone involved) need them. Really.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, isn't it sorta shameful how, in a country of absolute plenty, people still need to work in order to not deserve to be hungry?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jan 28, 2022 7:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Based on the overall republican platform... yeah. The GOP are fully onboard with taking away every government program that helps children.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah. If they did then they would give that kid public health care for life and public higher education. But they block those.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

On the ground level? Probably not all of them. As far as pro-lifers with any real power, they truly don't care about kids post-birth.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I generally think everyone pro-birth is a worthless, vile asshole as a baseline; anything extra is just flavour.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Definitely the ones in congress

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jan 28, 2022 7:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

...and those that stump/vote for those folks to get there.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Feb 9, 2022 7:50 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Like what?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes. They show it time and time again with the policies they support.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jan 28, 2022 7:55 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Actually, that's their job. To vote on behalf of their constituents. To speak for them.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pro-lifers. I mean pro-birthers.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

this is why I wish I could get away with punching these kinds of people and their supporters cause of their BS reasoning to push religion

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 16

Gnome fetish

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I need more please

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Source for original clip: https://youtu.be/PcRyjkYdDxM

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

But he doesn't even need the horns!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

God I'm so tired of seeing his face photoshopped onto everything.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That turd isn't that talented. His only talent is being a fuckknuckle that can Peter Piper the rest of the mouth-breathing fuckknuckles.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Fuckknuckle. Thank you, I have learned a glorious new word, today. :D

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love it! But the hands are too big for realism

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Ahha I laughed too hard at this

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This drawing is wrong! Who here belives they would say sorry?

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

To mock the pain of others? Sure they would.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Its probably a sneering obviously fake sorry

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They say it habituality. But they either don't mean it or don't even know what it means.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Most Republicans I know are polite. They apologize before dehumanizing and extorting you, because they feel super bad that you're in pain.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now keep them poor, uneducated and afraid and they'll have a whole new generation of voters. :(

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 7

...and soldiers, of course

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Insurrectionist zombies first, then turn them into soldiers.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or people too tired and beaten down to bother voting, which is just as good for Republicans.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 3

I’d like a news tart.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So much this! People living paycheck to paycheck are also less likely to vote, and less people voting is a stated goal of the GOP.

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Living paycheck to paycheck was a desperate sign of the times. Now it’s the norm.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I get so much anxiety when my friends or family plans a trip. Like “wedding, have to go” but I have no extra money each month already

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Poverty is voter suppression. Not allowing a holiday to vote is undemocratic and wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I agree with making it as easy as possible for ever legally qualified person to vote, but how does making election day a 1/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

holiday make it easier for service & retail job employees to vote? I personally believe it would be better to have a federal law that 2/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked. Several states already allow this. 3/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not offering subsidized time off for employee voting is arguably my outlook here - a mere holiday by itself isn't enough IMO.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Small ideas. Just anything other than the stupid we got rn.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A federal law that allows any legally qualified voter to request an absentee ballot for any reason, no questions asked would be better.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This would void the need for dedicated time-off explicitly for voting.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Exactly, it would remove potential employer & local election board capriciousness from the equation.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 575 Dislikes 9

USA, USA, USA!!!

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh poor me that live in a socialist hellhole called Norway. Imagine those lucky enough to live in "greatest" nation in the world, m'urica..

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Hahahah... hah... ha... we know. Trust me. We know. Or at least, about half of us do. Me? I want to leave. This place is a hellhole.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So when a woman is pregnant, we refer to the entity as a baby. Because women dont give birth to dogs, cats or birds. Heres my question. 1/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 109

THIS FOOL IS AN ANTI-VAXXER TOO LOLOLOLOL

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ANSWER: NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

So a human can't get pregnant with a human fetus but can get pregnant with a baby cat? Weird.

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

Incoming loaded rhetorical question with an extremely obvious answer given the convoluted premise (and isn't even phrased as a question)

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Why is it loaded? If you agree with abortion, you think its okay to kill a baby in the womb. Thats just the truth, if you feel bad, thats u.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

Wven if it was a fully developed baby, why should a baby matter more than the person forced to carry it?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They aren't a baby until birth is viable, dipshit. They're a fetus. Take your faulty premises and fuck off.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's loaded in the literal sense that it's an ideologically based question. You're saying "you're wrong if you don't agree with me"

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I haven't stated my opinion, at least on this post, and I don't need to. You've made your point and are just bashing people who disagree>

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2/ "it is okay to kill a baby in the womb when ____" if you gave any other answer than "never" you dont value life.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 119

Is abortion okay if a 13 year old girl who becomes pregnant through rape and will possibly die giving birth or not? If not, why not?

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

"is it ok to kill a baby in the womb" yes. No "if" needed. Just go for it lol.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I appreciate your scorched earth method of debate, because there's no way OP is arguing in good faith.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Rape, incest and danger to mother or unviable fetus. All perfectly valid reasons and also, most importantly, NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't value non-sentient life, no. A fetus is a clump of cells that doesn't feel pain, suffer, or even know it's dying. It's like a plant.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh my god, just do the world a favor and shut the fuck up already.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

plot twist: im for whatever gets the housing imbalance fixed. since boomys are determined to go NIMBY, no choice but to drain demand pool.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How about when the fetus will kill both child and bother before birth? How about if the mother was raped? I can go on with more examples

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Um, when it’s the Antichrist? Duh!

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Haha this acctually did make me laugh. Good one

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wether or not it's a life or a baby is immaterial: no one else in our society is required by law to sacrifice themselves for another.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Baby's die everyday for lack of organ transplants. Should we make it illegal to refuse?

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Give the government an inch and they will take a mile. The precedent set by casting down Roe v Wade will end badly for all not just women.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

What disapoints me is that you view life as immaterial. Your alive right? You must have had a mom? Ehat if she threw you away

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Yeah we should but only if you have voted against abortion. If you are willing to sacrifice a life for the unborn, let it be your own.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You don't value life since unviable pregnancies kill both you fecking eejit.

4 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

So your assuming you know the future of their life? Your justifying killing a person because its inconvinient in your eyes.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 30

Imagine not understanding something as basic as "unviable pregnancy"

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

it means the fetus ( not baby by the way ) is incomparable to life ... meaning it will either die in the womb or just after birth

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine actually being this stupid and ignorant.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you American? Just wondering why your English speaking skills are so bad.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It’s not a person yet moron.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No moron unviable pregnancy, means that it physically won't work due to health complications that will kill one or both. Shite off.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

We say baby because it's easier than "non sentient clump of cells within the mother." The difference is that I don't consider the entity

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

alive. So how can one kill which isn't alive. Hell the Bible doesn't even consider it alive, or has a soul, until first breath (Gen 2:7).

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Not that I think that a religious text should be governing over a woman's autonomy, just many that are pro-birth tend to cite their book.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

CounterQuestions: Is it ok to neglect a child that was born? Is it ok for that child to live in poverty? Is it ok not to support that child?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This "pro-life without exception" is so contrived; people stop giving a shit once these kids are born and it's so myopic and hypocritical

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So if the mother will die along with the baby, they shouldnt abort, and both should die. Got it

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Or even better, when the baby is a product of incest after the father rapes his daughter at the age of 11.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Or even better, when the baby is born without a brain. Better not abort, that's cruel, even though its already dead! I love this game

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

what a bulletproof argument. What if we rephrase it as "it is okay for the government to force women to become baby factories against their>

4 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

< will". No. Duh. Obviously not, why would you want some draconian authoritarian state forcing medical decisions based on religion?

4 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

Let me ask you this. Have you ever met a woman who had a child and said," Man i sure wish i got that abortion?"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 37

Yes.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes. Friend had fetus showing possible health issues. Family basically coerced her to having it. Now baby has health issues.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

No my friends live in the first world and have access to family planning, so they don't have children they are unwilling or unready for

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jan 28, 2022 4:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Also i dont encourage the taking of free will and I dont support a government that does. And your a liar if you think thats what ive said.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 33

You literally said that abortion is never justified. That means you don't care about a woman's free will once she becomes pregnant.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

It is what youve said though

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Doesn't matter what we call it, but what it is. Discussing semantics has to be the stupidest way to argue about anything. Not helpful.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is okay to kill a baby when it's not a baby yet, but some cells playing "let's multiplicate!" in a body they're not welcomed to.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0