Space Facts

Mar 28, 2013 8:26 PM

DominoDots

Views

43331

Likes

4452

Dislikes

32

If I have time I will make one for biology.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The moon landings one was absolutely mind-blowing

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Basically, if we ever figure out faster than light travel, we could technically watch the moon landing happening.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I fucking love astronomy.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

TIL, space gets drunk.

13 years ago | Likes 363 Dislikes 4

They forget to mention the part where that whole thing tastes like cherries and smells like strawberries.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It probably had a look at earth, thought "Oh shit, did I make those?" and got itself a nice, cool cloud of alcohol to forget about it.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*is* drunk :P

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am drunk. Am I space?

13 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

13 years ago (deleted Dec 25, 2015 6:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Haha I only know a few people that don't get that reference. I know a lot of nerds.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am blacked out. Am I hole?

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Yes, now we are a family again.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, you're still 90% star. Keep drinking.

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I...hmm. I don't think stars are space. They are...um stars.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But space is alcohol. You occupy space. You occupy alcohol? You are space. You are alcohol.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, this has gotta be said. How can space "smell" like anything? They're mean their crafts, right? :S

13 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

13 years ago (deleted Jan 23, 2016 4:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh, and for the ones who love the burning ice: It's Gliese 436 b.

13 years ago | Likes 272 Dislikes 0

thanks! that was the most facinating one for me =)

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thanks! that one was the most interesting for me =)

13 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Can the sofas there read?

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That blew my mind, its incredible!

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So how exactly did they get that picture of Earth from so far away?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks. The only one who really caught my attention. Especially a curiosity since I just finished Anathem by Neal Stephenson.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We can put it on our chips!

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

thanks! wikipedia http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_436_b

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This is america, dipshit, wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_436_b

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

You're a wonderful person.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I wasn't sure how I was going to find that one.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

When in doubt, Google the obvious question. I typed "exoplanet covered in burning ice" and boom, Gliese 436 b.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had my doubts that that would work, but I guess I underestimated Google. Oops.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LEARNING. +1

13 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

This is all lies. If it were true, where is God?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

A mirror placed 22 light years away would only catch light leaving earth in 1991.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yes but being a mirror it reflects it back at us, adding another 22 years to the trip. making 44 in total.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I call BS on some of these... like the static one, static is caused by the amplification of nothing on the frequency wave, a static signal

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

fuck yeah science

13 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Wait, wait, wait, hold everything... So there's a cloud of alcohol out there in the universe and we haven't even TRIED to go there?! C'mon!

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mind. Officially. Fucking Blown. Fully amazed by the Apollo landing fact.

13 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 3

i read it as fuck blown

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YES, that is the one that stuck out for me too! :D

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If there was a mirror 33 million light years away, you could watch the dinosaurs become extinct.

13 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's nice to see imgurians taking an interest in science! +1 to you my good man.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Your username, I like! :D

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Real time, muthafucka

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They've got one year. Scientists need to get on that asap.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When I read that, out loud I said WTF, and now I need to learn more about space time

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

same here. absolutely fascinating!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didnt know you could do that

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One of those is a little oddly worded. Andromeda is already visible without optics and it's certainly not gigantic.

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I also wondered about that one, because I've looked at Andromeda through a telescope, looked like a little white smudge.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it's more because you can only see the dense centre and not the full width of it with the naked eye.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

M31, the Andromeda galaxy, IS visible to the naked eye and at ca. 2.9 million ly away it's the farthest object you can see w the naked eye.

13 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Being in the Goldilocks zone is only one factor that puts you closer to being able to support life...

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is why I am an aerospace engineer. I want to go to other worlds.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Geez I'm so jealous lol

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Helium is also created in stars.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You're correct, but a huge abundance of it was created before the first stars were formed.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I just wanna find this later

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I link this on all astronomy posts. It is long but worth it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6w2M50_Xdk

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That was incredible, beautiful, and inspiring. Thank you for sharing it with us!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was just mindf*cked.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, as a guy with a Physics degree, I can tell you that Helium is definitely created in stars.

13 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

Yes Helium is created in stars a lot but the Big Bang did create some Helium.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The elements produced in the big bang were primarily Hydrogen (about 80%) and Helium (about 20%). There's basically no Helium in your body.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Was hoping someone else caught that. It's even named for the sun, because that's where we discovered it!

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

He He!

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I agree..also the alcohol cloud is closer to raspberry schnapps than beer since the type of alcohol the cloud has a raspberry scent

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ethyl formate to be exact

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm the best at space.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Define a neutron star

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SPAAAAAAAAAAACE.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Play it cool, play it cool... here come space cops...

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Thiiiiiiiiings!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That Andromeda thing is false. You can see it with your naked eye, and it's smaller than the moon in the sky. #TheMoreYouKnow

13 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

Yes you are correct when I have seen Andromeda through a telescope before.

13 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I thought that was false, too. Think about it again.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it is true. Sort of. What you can see with your naked eye is only the central part. The big, colorful pictures that you find on (1/2)

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the internet are long exposures that bring out the outer parts that are to dim to see. (2/2)

13 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or out of the visible light spectrum.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I studied astronomy, this post made me more angry than it should have. Thank you for not being someone who believes anything on the internet

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You can see the middle areas of M31 with the naked eye, not the full extent of the spiral arms. #Indeed

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're sorely mistaken otter. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap061228.html

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmm. That link says you can, albeit not to the full extent. It appears the wordings of both mine and the original sentences are unclear.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 1% of static on a TV set applies to analog sets only. Digital sets don't display that kind of static. Lot of junk science in one post.

13 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Well, you don't see static on a digital tv since static is a function of an analogue signal . . . so it's technically true.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the first one is an inside joke for astronauts, but other than that what is the 'junk science' on here?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One example: the Andromeda galaxy IS visible to the naked eye. See http://www.space.com/15590-andromeda-galaxy-m31.html

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hooray science! The whole reason I created an Imgur account was for science.

13 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 3

Are you certain?

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

within a factor of (h-bar)/2

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"for science" haha. Double entendre meant or on accident?

13 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Haha no, I didn't even think of that.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So you could test and repeat hypotheses to create theories?!

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And thanks to your posts I'm leaning a little closer towards choosing astronomy/astrophysics as my career. (I'm currently working as a (1)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

web developer, while re-gaining patience for school and figuring out what I want to do. Trying to choose between neurobiology, (2)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

molecular biology, chemistry and astrophysics. The latter is winning.) (3)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(1) Well I am obviously biased, but I think it's a great choice! It definitely has a lot more math than the other choices, but if that

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2) bother you then I say go for it!

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not meth?

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Haha Heisenberg was a famous scientist, that's why Walter chose the name.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I thought you were being sarcastic about the science thing. Guess not.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

With regards to that, wouldn't "ProbablyNotHeisenberg" make more sense?

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clever. +1

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well in some ways yes, but its the "uncertainty" principle, not the "improbability" principle. I liked the play on words better :)

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, I was thinking along the lines that it is uncertain, so like saying it was certainly anything wouldn't fit.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SpacePorn... yum.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Given enough time, hydrogen begins to wonder where it came from and where it is going" Enough philosophy for another month.

13 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

so much yes. i wanna get a poster of that or something now

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and remember : the brain named itself

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I know, completely mind blowing!

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

isnt that just amazing? like...the most awe-inspiring, grandiose thing you could think of? I am hugging you now for no reason whatsoever :D

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think the most important ability of life is to think. Cats can think, rocks can't, or.. wait, can they? fuck! i'll start thinking tomorrow

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every time i see something about how fucking huuuuge the universe is i get an epic feeling in my stomach. Anyone else...?

13 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I do! :D

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it sort of like a "HNNNNNG" feeling? :)

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Actually, helium is created in stars. Also, new estimates suggest each star in the milky way has at least one planet, on average.

13 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The elements produced in the big bang were primarily Hydrogen (about 80%) and Helium (about 20%). There's basically no Helium in your body.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it was phrased badly; most helium is from the big bang, but some is made by stars. The only helium in your body is from radiation.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough. I was just trying to clarify the misleading statement.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically Hydrogen is created in stars, and by nuclear fusion, creates helium... science.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The point being that the "fact" about helium not being made in stars is false.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure hydrogen is made in stars, though. It was all made at the beginning of the universe or something. Not entirely sure.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahh, no, Hydrogen is primordial. Stars BURN Hydrogen.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hydrogen is compressed with more hydrogen to create a star. When the star begins fusion, then helium is created.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of the facts are questionable or subjective; like we can see the Andromeda galaxy with the naked eye already. And the earth crush one.

13 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Ah, thank you, that makes much more sense.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about seeing the landing in real time? 22 years? Thought it'd be more like 43 lightyears away to see it in real time.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

22 years there, 22 back. Legitish, but useless as there'd be too much loss and interference so we couldn't see it even with that mirror.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But light has been traveling away since that date, 44ish years ago... so we'd have to be 44 lightyears away.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No... if the magically lossless light hits a mirror 22 years ago and made the 22 year journey back(22+22=44) then it works.

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the one about compressing the earth is based on gravity equations.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but the largest size on those calculations is 9mm across, some dispute that it needs to be smaller. Marbles are usually over 1.3cm

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fair enough

13 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0