If you want to be patriotic, you should be patriotic in every aspect.

Feb 11, 2017 11:05 PM

TheSexyMexi

Views

397579

Likes

13750

Dislikes

699

This dude gets it

Not all baby boomers r douches

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 14

Certainly not all, as we each interact with positive examples everywhere. It's just a depressingly large percentage that aren't.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why be reasonable, when you can enforce your morals on others?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 6

and that's why I'm pro slavery. I'd never own slaves.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Teens should have sex education and education on pregnancy and how a fetus develops, as well as what happens to the female body.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Time to scroll down to the bad comments

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 7

You mean the good ones.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People are going to get abortions. The choice is between legal and safe or illegal and dangerous.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

If women don't have access to safe abortion, we leave them in the hands of dangerous quacks. Source: we've tried this before.

9 years ago | Likes 267 Dislikes 22

I find your comment to be logical.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The movie If These Walls Could Talk deals with that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Take away someone's freedom? Prepare to have your own freedoms taken away. Erosion of freedoms starts with the first step.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Who downvoted this. Ew.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah but my coat-hanger business is going to do gangbusters

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I wonder how many fewer cases of "accidents resulting in fetal injury/abortion" there have been since abortion became easier.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

And I'm serious. Coat hanger and stair jokes didn't just come out of nowhere

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Gets me when people are prolife & anti-arbotion, just shows they don't care about reducing abortion,they jst want to 'punish' people for sex

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

Pretty sure being pro-life means they want to reduce abortions. Hey let's create a life than kill it! (you talk about punishment). smh

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

perhaps some of them, I know kind and loving sincere prolife people

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but they end at giving a shit after the kid is born in too large a portion. If they care these same people wouldn't be pushing hard

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

To get rid of much needed social programs left and right that help families stay afloat when rough times hit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yep, force teens to carry pregnancy, then don't give a shit what happens to unemployed teen and her new baby.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Force teens to take responsibility for their actions. Oh Nos! They may grow some integrity!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Yeah I don't think forcing a teen into the role of parent is a smart idea. Most of the time they aren't mature enough and the kid will be 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lifelong burden. I'd rather they finish school and get their life decently together before a baby shows up. Much better for both. 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sam reason I defend Muslims. Personally I think all religion is kind of stupid. But even more, fuck favoring one over another.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

Surprised to see this down voted.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Why? There is only one global religion who's majority believe in stoning women, female circumcision, and killing infidels to enter heaven.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So you defend them all then? Otherwise, you kinda just contradicted yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am also against favoring muslims over christians, my country is currently not doing that on a large scale.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it - Voltaire

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unwanted and neglected children are more likely to grow up and commit crime than loved children. The pill has cut crime. Choice saves lives.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep. Most are JUST pro-birth, not pro-life. They don't care about the kids quality of life at all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I just think the argument is so laser-focused, in the weeds, and people need to step back and take a look at the bigger picture.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The road to fewer abortions starts with realistic and comprehensive sex ed, something conservative America is scared to death of.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 5

"Kids shouldn't be having sex, so they don't need to be taught about it!"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Some are like that, but I wouldn't lump them all together.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Kids shouldn't be having sex, so they don't need to be taught about it!"

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

And yet "Kids shouldn't have unsupervised access to guns, so they don't need to be taught gun safety" doesn't strike a chord with them.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

America makes so little sense as to be effectively none, and this is from someone who lives there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not true. I'm conservative & in favor of birth control, vasectomies/tubal ligation, & encouraging people to keep their pants on sometimes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The idea of not being prochoice is bizarre to me, as if there are women out there getting off on killing their babies. abortion is not fun.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why is it so hard for women if it isn't a human life though? If the argument is that it's "just cells" why is is such an emotional process

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Because we women are kind of wired for it, it's kept our species alive. We typically are more emotional and sentimental.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But the point is it's not just tissue. Women don't have the same emotional strain with getting a cyst or mole removed

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry, I cant help you understand the concept. It just is what it is, that's how women are.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, the answer is because it isn't just cells. It's a human fetus. People who support abortion just don't want to acknowledge that fact

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, the answer is because it isn't just cells. It's a human fetus. People who support abortion just don't want to acknowledge that fact

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

While I 100% agree with the sentiment, I'd like to say that this has nothing to do with patriotism.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

It does if you understand how the constitution works.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 19

It has nothing to do with patriotism or nationalism of any kind. It doesn't matter where you are from, freedom isn't just an American ideaI

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Another person's decisions are none of my business" has nothing to do with the US Constitution. And I'm not from the US, btw.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

As a photographer... i didnt notice what the sign said... all i noticed was the power pole coming out of his head.. :-/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think it is strange to even have to discuss about this. Again one of those things where the US differs to the rest of the western world

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's my choice to have OR not to have an abortion. I'll never have one. But I make that decision, no one else.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

I'm pro choice because of this logic...I'm a dude and can't imagine an alien bursting out of my sto-...er...baby being born.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

I am pro-abortion. Pro-choice is just double talk to veil the main object of discussion: abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

I'm a guy, but these people getting up in somebody else's business, thinking their being super moral and savior of babies. pisses me off.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Ironic that you come off sounding moral and superior, and that pisses me off!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't believe in killing the homeless, the poor, or the genetically 'inferior'. I aplly that same logic to a 'fetus'. I vote accordingly

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You'll notice the side that is against abortion is the same side that doesn't give a shit what happens to the fetus after its born.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

There's a few local charities in my area that are homes for women who choose to keep their child and need help. I helped remodel one.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They prefer the term "Pro-Choice" because they're not pushing for people to have abortions. They're pushing for people to have the option.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Legal, Safe, and Rare

9 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 17

Like a good steak?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Dem policies have brought abortion to its lowest rate in decades. Bush's global gag increased abortion rates in communities receiving US aid

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What's it like to be a country

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess that's one goal to strive for

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Santos for America!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about legal, safe, and none of your business?

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

tbf many people who opt to have abortions would probably prefer to have never been pregnant in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

and many who DID want to be pregnant probably aren't glad that they need one (like if there are dangerous complications with the pregnancy)

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

The first step to that being... PROPER SEX ED AND ACCESS TO A VARIETY OF BIRTH CONTROL METHODS!

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

I would upvote multiple times if I could! This was one of the biggest downfalls in my educational system, imo.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 13, 2017 1:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

What if I'm pro abortion and pro eugenics?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

yup! pro-choice lets everyone decide themselves. pro-life imposes some people's beliefs onto other people's lives. in sum, fuck outta here

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 37

Can you not see the hypocrisy in your statement.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

pro-choice allows pro-lifers to live THEIR own lives their way. pro-life imposes pro-life onto everyone. yes one's clearly more accomodating

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pro-choice is no different. It's the imposing worldview that those who believe aborting a fetus is murder should get over it and shutup.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 28

OMFG, mind your own business. Who put you in charge of saving fetuses?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Now. baby steps (no pun intended) which group's IMPOSING is actually IMPOSING?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone's

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No, it's not Imposing. You can get as upset at somebody having an abortion as you want. No need to shut up.Just don't take away their choice

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

If you believe that abortion is murder and you don't like murder, then yes, taking away their choice would be the logical conclusion to make

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 19

ARE YOU FUCKING JESUS? Who made you protector of fetuses? OMG fuck the fuck off.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Nice argument. Furthermore I never stated that I believe abortion is murder. Just trying to make you see from another point of view.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

pro-choice doesn't force people NOT to have abortions, it allows for both options. why should anyone but the mother get to decide?

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

How about the father and the unborn child? Even if it's her body, their are others that are involved.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

father can discuss with the mother but it's ultimately her choice. unborn children are not alive and do not have a say

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, to a person who believes abortion is murder, that would be like asking why anyone bit the murderer should decide

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

there's all sorts of affirmative defenses to murder (e.g. self-defense), if the baby's gonna have a shitty life maybe it's acceptable murder

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Safe havens. Hospital will take the child and adopt. Child will be fine. More than likely better than with the parent that chose to walk..

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Because it isn't murder. That person is wrong. That's like saying not being an organ donor is murder.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Who are you to decide from halfway across the country for somebody you don't even know. Who made you Jesus, protector of fetuses?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Apply that argumwnt to the Boston Bombings or any other injustice in the world. "Who made you protector of X?"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So essentially, your beliefs > their beliefs. Worldviews are all imperialistic. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

It's amazing that common sense sounds awesome. Oh wait no mythical sky fairy involved.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

gb2 r/atheism

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

many lifers forget that choosing life is 1 of the choices on the table for pro-choice movement. pro-choicers just want access to options.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Honestly as a mother by choice, motherhood is slavery and sacrifice and to some, torture. It's wrong to force that on someone that doesn't 1

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

want a child!And it's wrong to bring an unwanted child into the world!It's not pro-life it's pro-suffering for some.What kind of life is it?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Choose condoms.

9 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 45

But it doesn't feel the same

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 27

I know someone who got pregnant on the pill while using condoms. Unfortunately nothing is 100% effective and that is extremely ->

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Common knowledge at this point.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Your username doesnt make me trust you

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Choose sex ed and reasonable access to contraception. Just because someone has a condom doesn't mean they know how to use it properly!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They're not 100% effective. If used correctly, they're about 97%. If not used correctly, they can break, coke off, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

That's true, and many people don't know how to use them all that way. It helps to use them together with another method.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*come off (stupid phone)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Come now, your phone is simply autocorrecting to your most used words. ;)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But it doesn't feel the same

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 32

There's a lot of other options that do, for him and her.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 16, 2017 5:33 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why do I have to julienne my nuts, why can't I just lop then off?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I never want to read the phrase "chop your balls up" again. I'm just picturing someone going at them with a meat cleaver. Uggh...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Someone if triggered

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm...I'm sorry?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rape, incest, teen pregnancy, non-viable fetuses, severe birth defects, risk to mother's life and on and on. These are just a few reasons...

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

why someone might choose abortion. But even if you disregard all those possible problems, we have a right to body autonomy which means that

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

no one can force you do something with your body you don't choose to. If we lose that then what's next? Forced medications?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Let's just add gender selective, not severe birth defects, such as downs, blindness, deafness and so on to that list please.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry, please elaborate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's legal, its legal. Let's stop being manipulative, sometimes a mom just doesn't want another girl/boy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the UK it's illegal for gender to be a reason. (Not sure about US sorry). DS is a difficult one bc its severity can differ so much.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sometimes a family doesn't want to deal with Down's syndrome, or other not severe birth "defects" is it shitty? Yeah, but let's not pretend

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't see anything wrong with that n

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't see anything wrong with that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try telling that to your rapist...

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

The same side that doesn't want abortion also wants to cut back on sex ed and limit access to birth control soooooooooo

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 9

Access to birth control? Go to store. Buy condoms. The end.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's absolutely right. They think it's immoral & only teaching kids to have more sex.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think you can generalize that to every single person who is pro life.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

aaaaaaaaaaad hominem

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Ad hominem attacks the person, at best you could call this a strawman. Might want to actually know what neckbeardy words mean before you use

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

My mistake doesn't diminish his non-argument. you insulting me doesn't make him any more right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

His argument really isn't wrong. Republicans, the "Pro-Life" party constantly attempt to remove access to contraception and sex ed

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't think you can generalize that to every single person who is pro life.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 17

Didn't generalize. Said "side" not "those people". And they are right, that side is generally against bc, religious, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Not how it came off to me at all, but mkay.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

I'm not that side, none of us are arguing about anything other than abortion. I don't give a rats ass what one side thinks about something 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

completely unrelated to what is being discussed just because you associate two unrelated beliefs with each other.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Just so you know majority of the right believes these things because they believe in personal accountability and responsibility.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Choose pull out as early as possible.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

We need better sex education in our schools, which people are also against for some odd reason.

9 years ago | Likes 232 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 14, 2017 5:27 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

George Carlin said it best: Pro-Life is Anti-Women, and once you're out of the womb, you can go fuck yourself for all they care.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

That odd reason is America's version of religious extremism

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

It's worse than that, even as church attendance has fallen there's still massive resistance, the common motive is ignorance.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I don't understand this at all

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Having grown up in the Church, I understand the mentality. Sex outside of marriage is a sin, safe abortions, sex ed, and birth control 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

will encourage the sin, as a Christian you have to fight against sin at all costs. Not that I agree, but I understand how they're thinking.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But that religion should not be governing what is taught in our public schools.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True. But morals probably should, and when your religion guides your morals, it's hard (if not impossible) to separate that two.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Love the "teach abstinence and ignore everything" else idea. Its like an ignorance is bliss mentality

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

People think sex education is "what sex position is best" really it's learning difference between conception and implantation.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The public have reached a point of being so poorly educated about sex they don't even know what sex-ed would cover.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

this is one of the saddest things.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

YES. you can be socially pro choice but personally prolife.

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 33

No you can't. The pro life cornerstone is that abortion is murder. That's like saying, "I won't murder, but you do what you want!" lmao

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 12

You certainly can. You can respect other people's wishes/choices while having your own thoughts on the matter. You can understand why other

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Other people want to have an abortion, but you don't have to agree with their choices or make it known. It's a matter of opinion.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not sure why you're getting downvoted for this. You can't say you're prolife if you believe abortion is acceptable in certain situations.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

As a pro choice person I think the people that claim and publically advertise they are pro-lifers but then concede to the the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Certain acceptable exceptions are cowards. These people who are caving to the BS stigmas perpetuated by their peer groups.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

'under certain conditions argument' are either cowards , or at best blissfully ignorant.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, and I agree. I think a great many people who call themselves prolife are actually prochoice in the end.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but can you be social and still pro-abortion?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've never thought of it that way.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

A pro life cornerstone is that abortion is murder. If you think other people are allowed to murder but you won't.. that's a bit silly.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

"I wouldn't get an abortion but you can" is still pro-choice.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

I essentially said the same thing and got downvoted for showing the logic behind why you can't be both, lmao. Oh well, you get it!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly. It's weird that it's so difficult to grasp. 2nd Amendment: Seems to say that you *can* own a gun, but it's not mandatory. You can

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

hate guns yourself, and not own one, but still support the right of people to *choose* to own one. That's pro-choice, end of story.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On the flip side: i am pro choice, and I can sympathize with people that are pro life. If really believe a fetus is the same thing as a baby

9 years ago | Likes 231 Dislikes 47

It's absurd because there is no national consensus on infant metaphysics. So until then (i.e. never), I think we should be libertarian.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is why it's hard to debate. So many people don't get it. It's not about choosing, it's about murder- if you believe it's a baby 1/

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 12

If you don't believe it's a baby then it's about choice right? How can you debate the topic with such a fundamental difference in definition

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

Well they aren't equal... If I throw a baby and a test tube baby at you but you can only catch one, which would you pick?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 20

Why aren't they equal? Because of age? Makes no sense to me.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

Miscarriages run high in my family - every female relative who has tried to become pregnant has had at least one, most have had upwards 1/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Agreed, no good answer until that is clearly defined. But banning abortions that are medically necessary is a bad idea regardless.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think the idea that pro life is for the banning of abortions that are medically necessary is a misconception. It's more about using 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As a form a birth control which is essentially what people are doing when it isn't medically necessary

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Until it's born, it's the mother's choice to responsibly choose whether it will be born.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

You missed the whole point of my post obviously.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

No I didn't.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Yes you did or you wouldn't have said that. A person who believes life begins at conception would simply say "that's murder". You can't 1/

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You did.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

so whats a miscarriage then, to you? ~20% of ALL pregnancies end this way. so h

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

a dead baby?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ive seen that it's actually higher 30-50 percent including undetected pregnancies. I see a distinction between embryo, fetus, and baby (1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Unfortunate. I consider it unfortunate.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

both sides have logical arguments, so ultimately it's about emotions rather than logic.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pro life only has a logical argument if you assign a fetus the same value as a conscious human.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and some people do. I don't, but I don't think doing so is insane.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My baby was born and died prematurely on my living room floor. When the hospital put pajamas on my baby for the short service, (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They didnt say they were sorry for the loss of my fetus.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My mom is hardcore pro-life, but she had one when she was a teen. In some cases I think it's a guilt thing

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

could be! but probably in most cases abortion in spite of pro life, not pro life because of having an abortion in most cases.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Do they believe people rode around on dinosaurs?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 31

Sadly, some of them totally do.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you not? Then explain the Flintstones. I'll wait.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

CHECKMATE ATHEIST.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I would guess most people who are pro life do not think humans rode on dinosaurs, but I won't say conclusively without a study ;)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Not sure. The 'pro-life' camp is a similar proportion of the population as the christian fundamentalist segment & they may be blind linked

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I wish people rode around on Dinosaurs....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://www.askideas.com/media/28/Men-Riding-Ostrich-Funny-Picture.jpg here you go. people riding dinosaurs. IRL.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If we did it would become mundane though. like we'd just prefer the convince of cars.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Pro-life supporter, I found my stance on the truth that we can all agree that a fetus would develop into a human being. This makes 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 42

I'm with ya, @J2wooly. You aren't solely being downvoted.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You forget! It COULD develop into a person. That's NOT a given.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And I could get killed by any number of things in the next second. The question remains. Should we have the power of life over an innocent?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

abortion either cruel (ending an innocent life, no matter how premature), or pointless (what other purpose does an abortion serve?) 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 41

Are you kidding! There are lots and LOTS of good purposes. And shit, we could debate for hours about the "premature" thing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I just aborted about 10,000,000 lives this morning then, might do it again here in a bit. Feels good, man.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Nah you just aborted your gametes, like half lives. You'd need to penetrate an ovum to create a life.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

You think the point of an abortion is ending a baby's life? O.o

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

Is there another purpose?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 35

The purpose is to prevent one more unwanted or inviable child. To keep the mother's health intact. To correct a wrong or undo a mistake. >

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Saving the mothers life is a Good one to start with.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

My semen can turn into a human, ergo masturbation is murder. Right?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Can it turn into life by itself?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, but a zygote can't either. It requires the womans body. So if i have the choice for masturbation the woman should have a choice too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, but a zygote can't either. It requires the womans body. So if i have the choice for masturbation the woman should have a choice too

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but bodily autonomy means an actual person ranks over a bundle of cells that will eventually be a person. Woman > fetus.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

How does the woman outrank the fetus? The fetus is just trying to secure its first right as a human. The right to life.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Because a featus is only the POTENTIAL of a human being. It's not a sure thing, regardless of when in the pregnancy it is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because a fetus will eventually be a person, it isn't a person yet. A woman is a person. Person > Potential for person

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

What I can not understand, however, is those who are pro life believing contraception should be banned. That's what LESSENS abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Yeah that's cooko-banana berries!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

that is not common, there are literally only like 2 states that have tried something like that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm talking about individuals. Or, have you really not seen the retaliating march against the women's march? Educate yourself. EWTN has em

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Source? Cause Google doesn't seem to know about it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Pro life person I do not believe this nor do I think this is a very common belief. However I do believe certain ones are bad due to 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Can you actually read? I said, 'THOSE WHO ARE'. I'm referring to those who do. It is extremely common. Not everything's about you, hon.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Due to their abortive nature.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Technically contraceptives can't have an abortive nature. That's labeled an abortifacient. Contraceptives prevent pregnancy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If women don't have access to safe abortion, we leave them in the hands of dangerous quacks. Source: we've tried this before.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

How could you sit by and let other people choose to kill them. I don't believe that but I would if that's how i was raised.

9 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 27

i mean were raised.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and the argument isn't 100% illogical.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

No, but it's kind of hard to believe that people believe that a bundle of cells is a baby. Pregnant right now at week 13 and just started

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

"animals don't have a life cycle, they are a life cycle" John Bonner, That bundle of cells is just as important a stage as and adult (1)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

If you look at it from the perspective of what must exist to ensure the continuation of the species. Sperm and eggs are also alive, and (2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Honestly even if a fetus were a baby, you can't legally force on person to risk their life for another. Even corpses get bodily autonomy.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 7

In the Roe vs Wade case it was determined that the states has a compelling interest to restrict choice to save life. Time is the only factor

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Devils advocate: If the mother's life isn't in immediate risk she's just killing the fetus for her own convince. which I feel is justified.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Well, playing devils advocate: Giving birth whether naturally or via C-section is a higher risk to the womans life, than an abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The abortion is more dangerous for the fetus ;) though I agree with your point.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

abortion is murder, but an allowable murder that usually reduces overall suffering.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

So you would agree Pinochet killing commies is okay? It did prevent unnecessary suffering.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

no because commies can suffer. Embryos lacking nervous systems can't. not can brain dead people.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

In ancient Grease and Japan Infanticide was not stigmatized. Kinda funny how much culture influences "human morals"

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Greece*

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

oh shit ya.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The situation where the mother's life is in danger is the one case where virtually all pro-life folks agree that euthanizing the baby is OK.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Then you have to admit you're some form of pro choice. Real pro-lifers don't agree with this either. Ie the shit they pulled in Poland (1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"Real pro-lifers"? &#^$ that @&#$. I just want to save lives. But I'm not idealist enough to think that there'll always be a guaranteed 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Recently. Just because you say your pro choice doesn't mean you have to agree with abortion be used as birth control. You need to get 2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a pro-life person, yes. If they are human, then it is murder. The only question is when does life begin? Thanks for your calmness there.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 13

Not life, but sentience. A veal calf is more sentient than a 12-week-old fetus.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"A fetus is alive, it is a person! It can feel!" "The last steak you had lived a life with friends and love, and died so you could eat it."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thats not really the question. fetuses ARE alive, they have metabolic processes, but sperm and eggs and bacteria are also alive.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 5

This is true. I got downvoted for making that clarification last week. The question is about personhood.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

AKA ensoulment. The wikipedia article is decent at our historical understanfings.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. Sorry. Not enough characters. Human life is obviously what I meant. If it is a human life, then killing it is murder.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Murder is illegal though, abortion is not illegal, therefore cannot be murder

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My skin is alive, and also human.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I really do wonder when the lump of flesh actually becomes a person. At what point is the biological machine capable of supporting what 1/n

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actaully the fetus is always alive. The issue is when that fetus starts having some rights as an individual. If we say a fetus has the 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same rights as a person, then any animal that posses a similar neurological sistem deserves those rights. This is an utilitaristic p. o view

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I always view the question not as you're killing the fetus, but more the mother is choosing not to provide her body to the fetus. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

It just happens that the fetus can't survive without the mother. But so is the case with organ donation, and yet that is not mandatory (2)

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

But that doesn't work because the same criteria would apply to any physical dependant. You can't kill someone to avoid providing for them.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

But you can give them away. The fetus only dies because it can't survive outside the mom's body. Giving a kid to foster care doesn't kill it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But you aren't killing them. You can cause their death by avoiding providing for them. If your kid needs a kidney no one can force you.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

As someone who studied healthcare and human rights law. There's no answer to that question. Different experts give it different answers!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Should organ donation be mandatory?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I am a donor, but if somebody believes in the sanctity of their body, they should not be forced otherwise.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If someone believes in the sanctity of her body, how can she be forced by law to use her body to support the life of another?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So if you are dead it's ok to not use your body to support someone elses life, but not if you are alive?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Really it's when does sentience begin?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Well that's one way to look at it, but I believe stabbing a person in a coma is still murder, so sentience isn't the question for me.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Yeah but the person in a coma isn't reliant on your body to survive. An embryo/fetus is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well sperm are "alive" but even in strictly procreational sex almost all die senselessly.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Can a person in a coma think? Serious question, if they are brain dead they are "alive" but kinda not right? I've confused myself now...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Technically coma people have sentience. Those in a vegetive state don't.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

because it isn't your body.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

But it could be someone else's.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pro choice because I believe that when the ethical waters are dicy it's best to err on the side of personal responsibility not gov control

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If someone next to you got stabbed, wouldn't you do something about it? Not just go, "not my body"? You're not seeing the point. I am pro 1/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

choice, but if I actually saw a fetus as a person, I would consider abortion murder too, regardless of if it's in someone else.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Plenty of people would kill anyone trying to kill a 6 month old baby, they believe that trumps body rights. Both sides have logical argument

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I'm pro choice, but I'm not falling for the trap of thinking the opposition is all calloused yahoos spouting utter nonsense

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I wanted to be patriotic, but then we somehow elected an orange shitstain.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

Who's stopping you from being patriotic? Quit acting like a spoiled child.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just remember. A patriot loves their country. You can be a patriot without loving everything your government does. If you loved all they did

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

you'd be a nationalist and a nationalist isn't something you should ever be proud of being as it means you follow your gov even when they do

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

really bad things.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This. This is exactly why I'm pro choice. I personally would never choose abortion, but I'll never presume to tell you what you should do

9 years ago | Likes 3141 Dislikes 138

You can say the same thing about what they do with and how they raise their kid after it's born. Why is it ok to take an interest in 1/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

another human being that someone else is raising After they come out a vagina, but not before?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm definitely up for aborting some adults too.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

@justag33k what if the baby was killing 'said' female?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I suppose I would talk with her and the Dr and make a decision. I don't know what I would do to be honest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm actually pro abortion, we gotta slow this train down

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a British person, we only ever see the loony bin side of America. This is refreshing to see a Star Spangled man touting real freedoms.

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 2

I promise there are more of us with opinions in the gray area than media would have you believe.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My skin burns when I see protestors outside UK clinics just recently. Like naw, that shit doesn't fly here fucko, nope.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's hard to shout over the crazies.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Fucking eh! Most have rational opinions with a few weird, extremely quirky ones. They're not as interesting for mass media though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Most of us Americans are indeed fairly reasonable people, but that doesn't sell papers or generate ratings.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a straw man argument though. Its not a case of removing someones ability to choose, its about whether or not abortion is "murder".

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 17

Your parents made a mistake. Take that as you will.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

Regardless of your stance, I'm sure both parties are against murder. One side just happens to think abortion is akin to murder. Discuss that

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

This

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 16

next on CNN, man set if fire for wearing American flag jacket and then fire stomped out by peaceful protest

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can I upvote this again?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Thank you. Exactly my stance as well.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

but if the belief is that this is a human being whose life is being ended, that doesn't apply.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

This is the kind of republican I try to be. I don't agree with abortion, or homosexuality. But I am a gun totin' this us America, 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The land of the free kind of American. So I don't give a shit what my beliefs are, I don't think the government should be able to tell us 2/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What we can and can't do. So I'll use my second amendment til the day I die, and if anyone tried to take rights away from women, LGBT 3/?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

minorities, or anyone else for that matter; you can be damn sure I'd be there to put a stop to it. We're free. End rant.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

+1 to this post and your comment exactly

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I figure it's a self-correcting problem. My startup business offering recreational abortions folded in 6 months.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Maybe you could branch out into recreational cancer surgery?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the libertarian party. Our policies are 'idgaf what you do' and our motto is 'get off our lawn'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it just pro choice for rhe mother, or does everyone involved in the abortion get to choose? (Doctor? Father?) ... just wondering

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amen'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't support abortion and think those that have one should get some non-abstinence sex ed classes but it's their choice, not mine.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YEEEEEEEES

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But was does the government have to pay for it? If anything it should be neutral on it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 18

Ditto

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never understood this "voting for something that tells you what to do", when essentially everything you vote for does exactly that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

This ignores the fact that it's difficult to draw the line between life and "non-life." And to dismiss the other side is ignorant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

This is me exactly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

EVERYONE presumes to tell others what they should (or shouldn't do); that's the imperialistic nature of a worldview, and everyone has a /1

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 24

worldview. Just by saying that others shouldn't tell others what they should do, you are making a self-defeating statement of imposition 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 23

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I don't think you're the only one befuddled lol. Nobody likes to think THEY'RE the ones imposing their views on others

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you're not doing that, right now?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you feel about slavery, by chance.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 23

Not telling people what to do with their own bodies has nothing to do with slavery. Where did you get that from?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

At a certain point you have to care what other people choose to do, especially when it interferes with the lives of others. Ex. Slavery

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

Abortion doesn't interfere with the lives of others. In fact, no one would know about an abortion if the woman who had one said nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I think being vivisected interferes with the life of the child.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, it is a part of slavery, but they're still off point

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Laws tell people what to do and what not to do all the time. They compel you to use your body to do things as well.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

I'm pro-choice, but imo having an "accident" is not a legit reason. Once people spread their legs,they expose their eggs. Sex-ed is crucial.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You're not pro-choice if you think a woman should be punished with a baby for daring to have sex.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Is this one of those "you're not as vegan as I am" things?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am pro-choice, since I think that the woman has the final say. The rest is just ethics. It's also not a punishment, it's a (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Natural consequence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm pro-choice, but the pro-life argument is they don't want you to have an abortion with their taxes or public money.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 26

I don't support corporate welfare but my tax dollars seem to go there. That argument is a moot point.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Well yes and it's your right to speak out so that your money doesn't go to corporate welfare. Whether it works depends on mobilization.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell no I don't want my money going to that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It doesn't and hasn't for decades, so I don't see your problem

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No, this is what you've convinced yourself of in an attempt to demonise those with alternate beliefs. A hallmark of the human condition

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You must have missed it but I am pro-choice. I'm not demonizing anyone I just understand the pro-life argument.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought pro life argument was they want no one to have an abortion, the having to pay for it just pissed them off.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Depends who your talking to. Many public conservatives say they don't have the right to stop abortion, they just don't want to help.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except abortions haven't been paid with public money for decades, and they're still getting uppity. So your point is wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's not true actually. Planned parenthood gets refunds from the Feds, and one thing they do is provide abortions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They get refunded for services rendered. Abortion is not one of the services they get paid by the government for though.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Civil conversation here. Is abortion the same as stopping the possibility of life happening?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes I'd say so. I am still pro-choice but killing a baby is essentially taking away the potential of the human they could be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I figure it's a self-correcting problem. My startup business offering recreational abortions folded in 6 months.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never? Not even if the fetus were dead?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part of what's missing from that argument tho is that some anti abortion ppl consider aborted foetuses to be children, so just saying (1)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

it's a personal choice is, to them, tantamount to saying "if u want to murder your own baby that's up to u." You can't blame them for (2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

not just accepting it as a personal issue when they see it in those terms. If you want to convince them abortion is really a personal (3)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

issue you have to convince them that a real human person isn't being killed in the process

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

From my experience they get pissed if you don't call it a baby, too. They think that's "dishonest".

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

EXACTLY!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. 100%.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 15

It took me a long time & some fertility drugs to have my kids, still pro choice because everyone should have the choice.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

But don't you dare fking assume my gender

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 18

wat

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Genuine Question: No one would argue that you shouldn't intervene if you saw someone's life being ended after birth, right? Why not before?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

It's none of your business.... except if you are the sperm contributor... THEN the woman gets to decide your business. Hmm, is that choice?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

To be clear, I think it's a complex issue with no simple answers, but I've never understood the "Mind your own business." rationale.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

And if you think the two are different, at what point exactly do they become different? I'm really asking, not trying to be a jerk.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

A logical line in the sand to me is when the fetus could survive and virtually no abortions happen after that point

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There's a very interesting RadioLab about that actually. It seems strange to allow technology to drive ethics though. Thanks for responding!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And would that effectively mean that once artificial wombs are a thing, no more abortions? Just thinking out loud here. Thanks for engaging.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the libertarian party. Our policies are 'idgaf what you do' and our motto is 'get off our lawn'

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. This is exactly why I'm pro choice. I personally would never choose to keep it, but I'll never presume to tell you what you should do.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

So you would have no problem with me doing meth? Or killing a dog? Or someone else?

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 115

Is the dog growing inside your body?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

IDGAF what you do to yourself. You could kill yourself for all I care and I wouldn't miss a beat.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Not the same

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Stop. Listen. Then speak. Or in this case read and type. You have a right to your body not some random dude, so no. You can't kill ppl

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

You just don't get it

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

PLEASE go do meth, lots and lots of it all at once.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

The first one = you do you. The others are fairly outlandish moots which are only equivalent if they're growing inside you..

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Meth, your choice. Dog, evil but your choice. Someone else, slightly less evil than dog but deal with the police...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Meth, your choice. Dog, evil but your choice. Someone else, slightly less evil than dog but deal with the police...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is the dog growing inside your body?

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 3

Right... Apples and oranges!

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Are apples and oranges growing inside your body?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Why can't fruit he compared?!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you support a woman's right to abort at any stage of pregnancy? It's still inside the body in the 3rd trimester.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Actually at that point it's just called a c-section.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No third trimester abortion is unwanted. Those only take place when going full term will kill the mother and there's little chance for 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the baby to survive anyway. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And I'm better off if my neighbor can go to a doctor to do this, rather than using a coathanger in an alley, because it's gonna be done,

9 years ago | Likes 510 Dislikes 18

Like I'd rather you not have to make that choice but I don't want you to be breaking the law or die because you did.

9 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 6

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

In addition I'd love if birth control was easier to get and easy to afford for everyone so less people have to consider this choice.

9 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 1

so, are you really saying that FREE birth control isn't affordable enough

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Bro i'm blowing like $18 a box on condoms, what birth control are you getting free?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Right! If somebody's belief defines a zygote as a human life, then why not ENCOURAGE the heathens to use condoms, to prevent the murder?

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

They should be made available for free everywhere. I would like if my taxes paid for that. To avoid diseases also.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

haha because stopping yourself from getting pregnant is murder as well OBVIOUSLY! :D

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

one way or another.

9 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 3

I'm gonna find ya

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I'm gonna getcha getcha getcha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is the same as voting on gay marriage. I might not want to marry a dude but why should I tell other dudes not to get married?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Let's not forget prostitution as well

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Let's not forget prostitution as well

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Right! Better to protect the rights of people working in this trade and give them all the supports of a citizen. Cause pimps'll pimp if let.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

true, outlawing abortions dosn't stop people getting them, it stops people dying from them

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

hahahahahahahah... He said "legal abortions keep people from dying"...hahahahahaha.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

Can someone please explain how a coat hanger is used for abortion?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

you probably dont just get up in there and fuck shit up.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are wrong, the sharp end of the coat hanger was used to rip open the placenta, causing the fluid to come out 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And spontaneously cause everything to start happening.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

or the opposite of spontaneously

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If it's a hanger made from one piece of wire, you uncoil the wire, then very dangerously use the hooked end to damage the cervix and then

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

well, you can figure out the rest. It's not a smart procedure, and generally would cause a horrifying complication, fatal or otherwise.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I think at that point due to injury would cause hemorrage and that would cause everything else to come out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks for telling me. I always thought you just kinda... hit em or something.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Same argument for gun control, I'm just gonna see a guy in a back alley to get one.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 5, 2017 3:11 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I thought your neighbors actions are none of your business

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

If you want to argue that my neighbor manufacturing fireworks in their basement has nothing to do with my security, you're wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing in society happens in a vacuum.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and there it is, my point exactly. Hope those words resound in your head all day

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I would hate to find the aborted flesh in the alley

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

What about the baby that was born and abandoned to die? That happens often in many countries.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I have a modest proposal...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Anyways if nothing is done those babies who survive are street beggars at 7 yrs old and criminals at 12. I'm referring to first hand observd

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you mean adoptive parents in US or Europe? Not nearly enough. Go ahead and arrange adoptions but I would rather distribute contraceptives

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. My body my choice, YOUR body is your choice.

9 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 32

I hate this argument because it comes off selfish. Its not just YOUR body anymore when your're pregnant. Its still your choice though

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 25, 2017 2:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

This is completely ridiculous, it's about having responsible sex that doesn't have abortion has a form of birth control.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The idea is that no one gets to live off my body without my consent. Hence, my body

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

you made your choice when you choose unprotected sex. Now your only choice is weather or not your baby will live or die at your hands.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

And if the condom breaks ? If it's rape ? If the girl has bad luck and the pill didn't work as intented ? Then what ?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Will you accept bringing into the world someone when you have absolutely no way to provide for him/her, guarantiing that he/she will have1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Look up the word "adoption"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Overwhelming difficulties to survive and have a good, decent life ? 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

So glad you feel that way. I assume you also would never go after Medicaid, Child Support or WIC right? After all, it was YOUR choice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But it is not your body because it has different DNA just because it is inside your doesn't mean it is you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

And man have I made some bad choices.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A separate body of DNA is not YOUR body. It's someone else's.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

A baby shares both parents dna

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one said it was. The body being referred to is the mother. Is not an object, an incubator, and is being treated as a thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not an object, a clump of cells, and the human fetus (baby) is being treated as a thing. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The mother made her choice when she chose to have sex. That's her choice to use her body. It's not the baby's fault.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except MY body is the one supporting that separate body. Your opinion does not change what I can legally do with MY body, or it's contents

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Same can be said about income. Can a parent say that its their income so they can choose to not feed their child?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, your opinion doesnt, change that the DNA is seperate. Just because something is legal doesn't mean your not an asshole for it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Not calling you an asshole directly fyi. Hard to do examples in 140

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It does if it's another person, and if you helped put it there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

What if the mother kills herself? The fetus also dies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Uh. No. Legally, I can have an abortion. Abortion is fully legal. Moral objections do NOT change legality.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Does that mean I don't have to help pay for someone else's choices?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What if you want to cut your arm off? Is it still your body and your choice?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Sure. Not sure why I would want to, but why would anyone want to stop me if I really just decided I didn't need that arm?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yep, there are people with body integrity identity disorder. You're not supposed to want to be disabled, and allowing a person to hurt 1/

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

themselves by cutting off an arm and a leg is seen as allowing someone mentally ill to hurt themselves. /2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are people who have done it. Mentally ill but there even was a documentary about such cases.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Finally i can persue my prostitution carrer

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 6

Prostitutes routinely use condoms. Male and female ones

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pursue*

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Actually, I'm all for legalizing that. For essentially the same reasons ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 3

So you can... stickemwiththepointyend? I'll see myself out

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I don't have the proper standard equipment, I would have to use prosthetic ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The problem with prostitution is that it's usually not their choice.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Human trafficking and drug manipulation are threats, but if prostitution was turned into a regulated industry, maybe it wouldn't be a prob.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But legalized prostitution would open an avenue to do so if they choose, and make it a legitimate career choice with a safer environment >

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

I don't know about other countries, but here in Denmark it is legal. However, it's illegal to make money off of someone else prostituting >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That wouldn't be the kind of prostitution made legal, though.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Look at Germany prostitution is legal there.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Legitimate question: how has it worked for them as a whole? What is the minimum age for the profession?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So.. I know this will be striken down... but, at what point does your body and that baby's body become separate?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 18, 2017 1:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's not a Derr, if I get in a car, am I a car now? It's still a baby with their own body. That's my opinion, and I was asking their opinion

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Third trimester, unless nits dying or killing the mother.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When they cut the umbilical cord.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. The argument is a complete non-sequitur. Nobody is saying that you can't choose to do something with your body. The moral dilemma

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

comes when people claim they have the right to end a life just because they created it. On top of that no one can agree when life begins

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most pro-abortion ppl, would say as soon as it leaves the womb. Because "my body my choice" and it is still in my body

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

If it is viable, it can be born early. Around 6 or 7 months.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, if we're gonna start calling pro choice people pro abortion, let's call pro life people anti choice. "I dictate what happens to you"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Actually the pro-abortion people do call pro-life, anti-coice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well CNN already did that when covering the March for life and said Anti Abortion instead of Pro Life

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That doesn't really work. Pro life doesn't mean "no choice". Adoption is a viable choice and fits into the pro life stance.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

When they cut the umbilical cord.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

People like to paint the other side as nuts, but that's what this really comes down to. Different DNA? Heartbeat? Pain reception? Birth?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

When the fetus is viable outside of the mothers body. That is my OPINION. I understand that not everyone agrees.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

That's absolutly the most stupid thing I've heard all day. No, all week

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

But it's my opinion so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is literally the biological answer. It's a parasite until then. Remove the emotions and you can see the facts.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You have never seen a baby born prematurely on your living room floor and die before you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think a fetus becomes viable outside of the womb at around 11 or 12 years old, any younger than that it will die without intervention

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's murder, regardless what anyone wants to call it. It's murder

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Except you can't murder a bunch of cells that can't draw breath.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Your definition of life probably isn't upheld by anathesiologists

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0