BlackOtter64
155717
3777
107
https://i.imgur.com/e2B7Ynb.jpg worth a shot :p
Dec 30, 2017 3:57 PM
BlackOtter64
155717
3777
107
https://i.imgur.com/e2B7Ynb.jpg worth a shot :p
Rathal0n
Investigate 3/11
Isaypoopythingsbecausemostofyouannoyme
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Any site that has to add “truth” in it is completely full of shit.
Kitakita
This twitter conversation is a planewreck
indified
jet fuel cant melt steel beams! but god can
lance4682
Enjoy your brave new world
wormfood
I have a friend whose job involves assessing the structural integrity of steel beams after warehouse fires. Spoiler: they can be compromised
BigTex1
dominoexcavator
leoszliard
Nice try, getting folks off your case for brexit, Boris Johnson. We can see the thumbnail.
Sixinchnipz
So many commenters need to back to basic physics class.
Sauroctonus
Jet fuel might not melt steel beams, but crashing hundreds of tons of plane into a building, the resulting inferno weakens it significantly.
SQYDS
Frankie Boyle +1
iamtheonewhobones
Never understood that argument. It's not like the towers melted wicked witch style...
ShowMeYourButtonhole
Yeah. But then how do you explain all the crisis actors? Hmmmm.
Leithoa
Yeah that guy doing a swan dive from the 100th story crops up everywhere. What a fraud. /s
ermo75
Nor did a plane fly in Building 7.
IwentLookingForWhatTheBiggestIdiotHasToSayAndHereYouAre
what's that? people on facebook are stupid?
NorwegianWoody
DarkUranium
SuckAnElf
I didn’t melt it but I sure as fuck warped it when I burned the wrong kind of wood in my wood stove. Manzanita, in case anyone was curious.
Drawstencil
3 towers collapsed that day.
UnemployedInGreenland
Talked to an elevator engineer recently who said the towers were doomed from moment of impact as all the elevator counterweights (1/)
UnemployedInGreenland
for both towers were on the roof. They had no chance to stand up to the stress. (2/2)
Strict666
I love Frankie !
IReactToCommentsInMemesAndGifs
FTW
CommentsAreDumb
PeeterGrant
Insanity has a face.
alexjonesisagayfrog
Ex-fucking-cuse you mate. I'm going to need this gif
StandardDeviant
I'm sorry, sir, I'm going to need to confiscate that meme for evidence. You'll get a receipt. Have a nice day.
casper1666
Prince Rupert Drops. can be shot with a gun. no damage, bullet fragments. smack the tiny end, whole thing shatters...
Djones06236
Steel fuel can't melt jet beams.
RoloTonyBrown
Pshhh... this guy still believes in airplanes?
TommyWa
Yeah. Some people think metal can fly. But when I throw a frying pan into the air it just falls back down!
Paddychu
Pshh... you believe in gravity? You're part of the problem.
shouldbestudying
Roses are red, 4+3 is 7,
blueKD
-George Bush did 9/11
Baldylox81
A bird in the Bush.. ????
sweawg1337
.
scottsinflavortown
Jusmar
Qwick maths
TheArkaneFennec
*mafs
GreggWilding
BOOM BOOM POW
Jusmar
Thank you
FatStarlord
You're a class act, @Jusmar
rednecksciencegeek
If you leave the ash bin door open on most wood stoves, it lets in enough oxygen so the ash grate will deform and the stove can crack.
WuTangoReinhardtUnchained
But that's cast iron. Big difference
rednecksciencegeek
Some are, but the steel ones warp + crack too. Charcoal can be used for forging steel.
irlborat
I feel as an engineer who deals with flamming fule and metal alot I can answer this question. No it won't melt steel beams.../1
irlborat
...It will cause them to warp eliminating the structural integrity of the tower causing it to collapse in on itself
mehlec
Frankie has a way of getting to the bottom of it.
ShouldersDeepInAHorse
The worst burn I've ever heard was his "Wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire" routine.
ShouldersDeepInAHorse
"I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. Infact, if I'd been drinking heavily all day and I really needed a piss, and I had to queue- 1/3
ShouldersDeepInAHorse
"To get into the bathroom and when i got there he was on fire in the toilet bowl, i'd piss in the sink. The only fluid I would give him- 2/3
ShouldersDeepInAHorse
"Is I'd wank on him in a burns ward if I had aids. "OPEN YOUR MOUTH, OPEN YOUR BURNING MOUTH." ." 3/3
shirtpants12
5P4C3M4N
Ok is that guys a retard jet fuel burns hotter than wood enough to weaken the steel that holds up the towers and something 1/2
5P4C3M4N
Mabye a plane that weighs many tons slamming into a tower weakened it quite a lot too
solaslunas
nooo the planes were only made of fire. there was no structural damage at all. fukin wizards n shit
JustYourTypicalBlueCollarWageSlaveWaitingForDeath
Everyone’s an engineer with a keyboard these days.
botlaw
DAE le STEM!?!?!
NotAnIroningBoard
"Mechanical keyboard"
Notcreativeenoughforthisbutohwellwhocares
Bearhugger70
Keyboard Mech-warrior.
DavidBrooker
When I was in grad school (in engineering), AE for 9/11 Truth had a talk in my city. The engineering students society organized the 1/2
DavidBrooker
block purchase of a huge number of tickets that they gave to faculty and grad students to fact-check them the entire time. 2/2
cominginhot
they fact checked building 7 too?
azgrak
There is a difference between melting and annealing. The latter occurring at jet fuel burning temps. I.e. steel gets soft when hot.
Sixinchnipz
Look at all the retards XD
screamingshits
and the 15 miles worth of elevator shafts that allowed the heat and fire to spread rapidly
Junktrunkjunkie
are we not going to discuss that this guy is suggesting wood might melt under some circumstances?
MisterLemons
And, you know, a literal skyscraper sitting on top of hot metal a plane just crashed into at 500mph.
ObsceneTentacularInsertions
Then it immediately disintegrates so uniformly that two buildings collapse without leaning at all.
aqueueforyou
Here's what the "annealed" steel explanation fails: that would't have produced a purely vertical freefall. There'd be twisting and bending..
mtimothy
Exactly. Or at least "pancaking". Where damaged floor collapses on floor below it, then below it, etc. Until it leans and collapses.
Andrewleedragon
Well the WTC like many building in new York are designed to fall straight down so it dosnt kill everyone it would fall on.
ISayFuckAllTheTime
I always just tell people that boiling water can't melt spaghetti noodles, but they're not gonna hold anything up after boiling.
tracereading
Also jet fuel burns a lot hotter than wood.
mtimothy
Yeah, but not for long. Fuel burns up rapidly. Not long enough to weaken steel. Especially from the bottom of the structure.
jinbee
My 1st steel wood burner sagged under the heat, it was made from a fairly chunky gas bottle too.
NordicusMaximus
I left my Weber grill on full for almost 2 hours at 800+ degrees one night, came out, it was glowing orange, the sides melted and deformed.
lumberjackhard
Also a big plane flew into it real fast like
ThisOneTimeInZelda
How many fasts though? Buildings should be able to sustain like 4 fasts.
Abbeel
This is my favorite part. Like there would be no damage at all if a plane would no fuel crashed into the tower.
macthelost
Yeah, my favorite part is where the engineers said they were designed to by hit by that exact plane and be fine. Don’t let facts bug you tho
lumberjackhard
I know right? Buildings are built strong enough to survive the downward force of gravity, not side on high speed plane collisions.
macthelost
Actually they were designed exactly for that. They did an interview with the designer and architect.
IHateyouIfyouremoreattractivethanme
God you guys are dumb, we've been over this already, steel beams can't melt jet fuel, how could a solid melt a liquid, Dumbos?
AsABiologistWhoIsNotFunAtParties
[Honest question, not trying to be a conspiracy theorist, please don't crucify me] Isn't the explosion on impact most of the jet fuel? (1)
AsABiologistWhoIsNotFunAtParties
(2/2)like it's not like there was an intact reservoir of fuel to sit there and burn for any length of time to produce that heat.
mtimothy
(1)Right. One of the reasons the "jet fuel" being thrown around like it's magic is bs. Not only would it not melt steel but fuel
mtimothy
(2)Fuel is an accelerant. Meaning burns hot but burns rapidly. It'd be expended in minutes.
Stillirrelevant
Things don’t burn at specific temperatures. They just produce a certain amount of heat. If you isolate it more, it will be hotter.
Stillirrelevant
If you could insulate well enough you could melt tungsten with candles.
ImKimJongUnAndEverythingIsFine
Also people don’t consider that there’s more than just jet fuel burning. Like all of the office furniture, insulation, etc, etc.
TheTittyLicker
And the massive amount of paper....
WalterJKovacs
Plus that stuff they use for chem trails. That shit really burns at high temps.
tracereading
Not to mention thousands of tons of crap being held up by weakened steel...
DoctorJohnWatson
I don't agree with them, however office furniture and insulation don't burn very hot so have no impact in the debate
Andrewleedragon
Coal/wood doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel either but if I put it in a forge with a chimney it will. The WTC was turned into a forge.
kt88shub
Yes! the fire was on a large enough scale to cause the entire building to turn into a chimney. You can melt steel with burning wood.
AsABiologistWhoIsNotFunAtParties
I think the typical answer to that is that those materials can't burn at high enough temps to melt steel. Historically a fire has never (1)
AsABiologistWhoIsNotFunAtParties
(2/2)caused a steel building to collapse like WTC which is part of why so many questions are asked.
5P4C3M4N
http://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/buffalo/news/2015/04/20/north-tonawanda-fire a marina warehouse that burned down made of steel and the 1/2
5P4C3M4N
2/2 frame of it is alll bent and collapsed as you can see and this fire didn’t even have jet fuel in it
StrayPrussia
Yeah but how many of those fires involved the momentum of a plane?
AsABiologistWhoIsNotFunAtParties
Frankly the buildings are designed to easily withstand that. The construction manager for WTC said this:
?1
mtimothy
Right, but jet fuel would be an accelerant. Meaning it burns really hot but would also burn fast. Not long enough to weaken steel.
KiwiStag
Say 10,000 gallons of fuel was left onboard and it has multiple tanks. Not all would burn at once. Shock impact may crack/weaken beams too.
mtimothy
Right. Just like the impact and jet fuel did for building 7?
SluntBiggums
It was the chemtrail mind control agents. That stuff burns at 20,000,000,000° everyone that knows the truth knows that.
screamingshits
you have to take into account also the way the elevator shafts were designed in those buildings. 15 miles worth of shafts that allowed 1/?
screamingshits
heat and fire to be transported very quickly all over the building
mtimothy
Heat and fire that's not hot enough to weaken steel, sure.
Radix865
Yeah, it's almost as if they flew into fully staffed office buildings with office supplies, interior decorations and people.
macthelost
Make up your mind, either office furniture can melt 100, foot thick structural steel columns, or jet fuel can magically burn forever.
mtimothy
And? Office supplies don't burn hot enough to weaken the integrity of steel.
Radix865
It's almost like two jet planes full of jet fuel flew into those office supplies.
mtimothy
Again, they were built to withstand plane impacts and jet fuel burns at 1200 degrees. Steel won't weaken till like 1500.
mtimothy
People gotta quit saying jet fuel like it's magic. It wouldn't cause a building to collapse from the bottom at free fall speed.