Raptor engines animation

Oct 25, 2020 6:19 AM

WorldOfEngineering

Views

98190

Likes

2266

Dislikes

30

https://instagram.com/kimitalvitie?igshid=81guoksbsuu4

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

our most impressive space dildo yet

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not the raptors I was expecting, but I'll take it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now this I can unzip too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's awesome, and when they're running, you won't be able to hear Elon's narcissistic bullshit!

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Clever Girl...

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I was expecting something jurassic park related

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 3

v

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dammit, how appropriate!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Replace them with brass instruments.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What effect does it produce to twist them around each other?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It induces roll

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rolling the vehicle around the long axis

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why is this not set to EDM?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When i grow up i wanna be a Raptor Engine

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is a weird goddamn fleshlight.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is one fancy fleshlight

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never realized how much I needed to fully and independently gimballed.

5 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 4

...is(?)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never realized how much i accidentally the whole word

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

am i having a stroke?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TORILLE!

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Menossa jo!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Piti oikein kattoo uudestaan että mikä tässä johtaa torille

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Don't cross the streams

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stop! I can only get so excited!

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That was strangely erotic.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why do I find this erotic?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sitting on the pad right now!

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Soon!

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

When?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Soon! TM

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Mid-November" or later. https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't see it on that list. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if it happened early November.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's a road closure booked for tuesday. That'll probably be the static fire. After that, it's good to go. So, launch in a week-ish?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In awe at the size of this lad. Absolute unit. (Photo courtesy of Austin Barnard on Twitter):

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And this is the *small bit* O.O

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And the rest of you. I mean, that's how vehicles work.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bet they've got the best tested kinematics model ever.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As an aircraft mechanic, this looks like a fucking nightmare

5 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 7

Flow aircraft mechanic, my first thought aswell

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What kind of low tech shit are you working on, the Wright Flyer?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sadly, that would be much easier. Modern aircraft are a fucking nightmare to work on. Over-engineered, under-designed.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a marine machinist, ditto.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Seems like an expensive point of failure

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Whatever you do, do NOT push THAT button while in flight."

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Basically every rocket engine does this. It works something like this:

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

My actuator also pivots on the thrust mount

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does seem a little odd to me that the thrust from the vector nozzles can overlap the fixed nozzles' edges. I guess the material takes it?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They don't run simultaneously. Inside is atmosphere nozzles, outside is vacuum nozzles.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sorry read that wrong, now I get what you mean.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Being that it’s a shuttle, that seems acceptable

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So you are the guy responsible for planes being delayed cause of a”light on the dash”.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The sea level engines only have to work about ~10 minutes per flight

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Word

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I immediately thought that. And you know, maintenance in space must be... fun.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You know, I doubt aircraft mechanics have to perform maintenance while airborne.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Important satellites like the Hubble and the ISS are the only things that get maintenance in space. Everything else comes back to Earth.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where would they carry the spare parts, tools, and consumables...also who would fix it? The stick wiggler?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's pretty much the same control setup the RS-25s on the Space Shuttle had.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a aircraft mechanic, you are un-qualified. You need a spacecraft mechanic for this dummy.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fuckin' rocket surgeons downvoting me. Get a sense of humor.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

TIL aircraft greasemonkeys DON'T like being told they cant touch something.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily true. A&P's get hired to work on spacecraft all the time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We found the engineer!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, I work for a living. As an A&P. Hence my statement.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guess you're not allowed to make jokes in your line of work. We make the parts you bolt on, and you wouldn't last a day in our shop.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How so? I get that it's complex to control, but the mechanics of it comes down to just 9 rams and 6 pivots.

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

Found the SpaceX engineer!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I'm not saying that *I* could do it, but I reckon with a raspberry pi, 9 servos and a 3d printer you could make a working model.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You can simplify it down to 9 rams/6 pivots, but that doesn't take into account the controls for the mechanism, the rigging required to 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

make everything work in a synchronized manner, and maintaining constant and reliable power, among other things. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Will be computer controlled and given who's in charge of jt and the money being spent id say it'll work like a dream

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

You do know that elongated muskrat isn't doing the engineering himself, right?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Given who's in charge hahahahahahahahahaaahahaha. Captain hyperloop? Dude. Dude. Be glad REAL engineers are designing these not rich idiots.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 13

If I rode in on a dildo I wouldn't need to be screwed, now would I?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just think about how bad its gonna be if one, just one of the pistons breaks

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have you seen the one Ted talk about drones where they demonstrate how they can algorithmically compensate for damage? I imagine something -

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Similar would be possible with this. Though I expect it'd involve a lot of spinning

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Moving parts are always a nightmare, one thing breaks and a lot of stuff has to come out not just what’s broke, and engineers 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If your username is from what I think it is, check this out! http://www.raven-armoury.co.uk/sonad.html

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only have to design something to be built once, it’s the mechanic that has to take it apart and fix it over and over.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Engineers and mechanics tend to hate each other

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hey, aren’t you damned? How’s hell, White Wolf?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you ever seen wing flaps?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Have you seen what wing flaps do in space? They look pretty.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My guess that's why it's just a secondary and not the main drive. Question is how is fuel getting delivered to them.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

The smaller cones are for use in an atmosphere while the big cones are for use in space. All are connected to Raptor engines though.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The small ones are the in-atmosphere optimized engines. The Large ones are the vacuum optimized ones. No idea about fuel, we'll say magic.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This video shows the fuel systems pretty well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PC47YrDtFs

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Both engines are "main engines". The smaller ones are atmosphere optimised. The bigger are vacuum optimised.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

no u

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tubes

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Kinda like the internet? Hope no one gets their big truck dumping in mine.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

https://blog.cloudflare.com/content/images/ted-stevens.jpg.scaled500.jpg for those that don't get the reference

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Possibly also pipes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably flexible ones so they don't snap off when the nozzle wiggles around like that

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You misspelled “porno”

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We be jammin

5 years ago | Likes 322 Dislikes 2

Throw that ass in a circle.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We jammin, we jammin, we jammin, we jammin

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Here's me hoping someone, with more talent than I, will put this to music

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We jammin till the end of the void

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why do they need to go crissy crossy?

5 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 0

For the roll program it looks like

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To spiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnn

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For when they need to bite the bullet in space...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roll control (spinning)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

probably dont, but it shows the range of articulation. but i know nothing about real spaceships

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I had just settled on twisty leg cross, but spell check gave me crispy crossy when I typed yours, which I think is the win.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To do a barrel roll!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cris-cross! Everybody clap your hands!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thrust vectoring to control roll, pitch and yaw.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oh, look at the rocket scientist over here

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spirals in the opposite direction of axial rotation to counter balance negative rotation.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To do the twist, duh

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is no atmosphere in space so wings don’t work. You need to push the craft into a spin.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

That's usually done bytiny seperate reaction control thruster.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Why not use a portion of the thrust, no additional fuel used than what you were already using.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's in space though. When launching through an atmosphere you need a lot more power to control spin, hence why they use the main engines

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yea byt the guy said "in space"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Starship's control surfaces are configured for re-entry and give little control authority on ascent, so the engines have to do it all

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To spin the craft

5 years ago | Likes 324 Dislikes 0

In hindsight, it was a mistake to hire those funpark engineers to write the requirement specs. Well thats spilled vomit under the bridge

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'll try spinning, that's a good trick!

5 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

Hold on R2

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure there are laterall thrusters for that purpose. Using the raptor engines would be wasteful for such a small adjustment.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about redundancy in the event of a failure to lateral thrust control? Or a loss of one (or two) of the three?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could isn't should. seems like they thought that was a good option in some situation. But I highly doubt it's the only method of roll.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree. If the capability is built as is shown, they'll definitely have a damn good reason for it. Gimbaling rocket motors like that is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good one, of course.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Because Chris Kross will make you... Jump! Jump!

5 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 1

DADDY MAC'LL MAKE YUH!

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

R O L L A U T H O R I T Y

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

DO A BARREL ROLL

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Barrel roll tech. Super advanced. You wouldn't understand.

5 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 3

Press B to use the bomb.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Bro @gordy77 is Slippy bro

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its a good trick

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0