Reject the government before rejecting the party.

Sep 10, 2018 7:59 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

1477

Likes

84

Dislikes

36

Sounds a bit hack-ish

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Sep 25, 2018 3:36 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we're already past this point but we're too busy calling everything racist to notice.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Dont forget to vote on Tuesday, November 6, 2018... If you want HIM out!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But that's not what happened is it? That's what the Democrats are doing right now. Socialism and destroying the electorial college.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

When logic and proportion have fallen, softly dead, and the white knight is talking backwards, and the red queen's off with her head...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch - Ben Franklin. Well,that escalated quickly.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Wonder if it's because the US isn't a democracy

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Plutocratic oligarchy. The policy wishes of the average American have zero statistical weight on policy direction. Studies prove this.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

William F. Buckley (who called Trump a narcissist and demagogue) is probably turning in his grave at what his movement has become

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Buckley would literally, no exaggeration, shoot himself in the fucking face. But to be fair the modern GOP would be an unthinkable

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Embarrassment to anyone even 6 years ago.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

When you've already tossed civility and reality, this isn't too big a leap...

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 12

How have they tossed civility?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

I like that reality didn't come up in the objection

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Because it's out of the question. Go on, give an example

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

just think.... when was the last time they won the popular vote? 20 years? 30?

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

Just think, when was the last time Democrats complained about the system when they won?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

14 years ago

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

Yeah, Kerry was a Clinton like candidate. Competent, experienced and completely uninspiring.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Clinton was bad all around.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Then why is it the left that complains about how our election system works whenever it doesn't work out in their favor?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

As if the Right doesn't also bitch when things don't match what they want.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Sure, but shouldn't you be concerned about it regardless of who wins? Unless you're suggesting the left never circumvents democracy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am; I've never thought the EC nor most-popular is the best way to handle US elections. I'm far more in favor of some sort of Single /1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ Transferable Vote system than the one we have currently.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That works when you're trying to fill multiple positions at once, but really wouldn't work for heads of state (no nation use it for that)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also is this why the left was so happy to have the issue of gay marriage decided by appointed judges instead by popular vote of the people?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 15

I forgotten, when was hetero-marriage voted in?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

And therefore what? You're still more than happy to circumvent democratic systems when it works in your favor.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

Being a giraffe, I guess it's easier to get your head up your ass.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, I guess you've convinced me with your dazzling intellect, and wit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, since close to 70% approve now, up from 52% in 2014. Looks like the judges paid attention to the popular views.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, you would disagree with the assertion that the circumvention of democratic processes is a conservative mode of operation?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My assertion is that the ruling of marriage equality coincides with the popular opinion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So? It was being voted on state by state through majority vote, but in the end only 9 out of 325 million people's votes counted.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can talk about popular opinion all you want, still wasn't a democratic decision.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I didn't get to vote to allow corporations to be considered as people and contribute unlimited to campaigns, but here we are.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aww, are you upset that you aren't allowed to impose backwards morals on those who don't want to subscribe to them?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, but thank you for helping to illustrate that the circumvention of democracy isn't a conservative issue.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So denial of rights based on religiously based moralities codified into law ( which is unconstitutional BTW) should be decided by votes?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wouldn't be democratic if it wasn't would it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

New laws were not made by the court. Unconstutional laws were struck down and their prohibitions were instead explicltly made permitted.>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or laws that deprive the Equal Protection Under Law clauses also in the COTUS? These were happening. Every time they were challenged in a>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>State-level court, they fell based on unconstutionality of the laws. SCOTUS decided once and for all nation-wide. So yeah, your grievance>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0