Reposting for awareness from Australia.

Apr 29, 2016 11:38 AM

Avrafrost

Views

78376

Likes

3378

Dislikes

347

Reposting for awareness from Australia.

This s**t is f**ked up here as well.

This would be awesome.. If politicians were barred from any other income or gifts for life.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I imagine getting the people who made those rules in the first place to change them isnt going to be easy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The few US politicians who aren't already millionaires rely on that salary. Cut it, and you'll *only* have the millionaires left.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So get into politics, kids.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

450.000 for life...then if they live like 40 years would be 11.250 a year?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God forbid we compensate people with incredibly important jobs at a reasonable level to attract top talent.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No problem w paying people what they're worth… but debatable politicians are worth that much. Also, they don't deserve a life pension.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if people didn't become politicians for the money but, instead, became politicians for it's what they'd do best at?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And how many retired house speakers are there? Like 8? Not gonna make a difference.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This goes back to the ole "you vote them in" argument.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What is this, Australian politics on IMGUR?? YYAAAAAYYYYY!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because soldiers and congressman have the same level of responsibility...

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Both sit around all day doing fuck all?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Congressman try to get themselves raises.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Iif you pay them less, they will be more inclined to sell the future to the highest bidder, what we need is to block other sources of income

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bullshit and made up numbers *yawn

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

The average soldier makes 60k

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

last year when I was stationed in Germany, I was pulling in over 4k a month, as a single e-5

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an elisted personel i dont even make 22,000 a year.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not at all to argue that enlisted don't make enough, but does your enlistment cover all housing food medical etc?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a politicians job requires more talent than a soldiers, therefore they get paid more. ta-da!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean making sure the generator on an aircraft carrier might require more talent than thinking gay people are icky.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

well you know what i mean. a soldier vs. a law school graduate

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Pensioner" is a term used by British people, not Americans. So fuck off and concentrate on your own country's politics.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

this is australian

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh. Well. Okay. Now I look dumb. I'll take my downvotes like a man.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does this take into account the recent changes in pay because it looks like it does not

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This isn't facebook.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Why isn't it compared with the salary of an officer? A general is the highest military rank, compare to highest political position.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because a retired 4 star, equivalent to a PM roughly, with 40 years in gets 237,000$ Comparing junior enlisted to thePM is false equivalency

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A SITTING US president makes $400k a year, and most presidents donate all of it. Frankly, not much for having near-infinite responsibility.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 6

And after they're done being president they'll get close to that just for a speaking fee. Like for giving a 30 minute speech.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't do it for the money. They do it for the

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

This picture is older than the Internet. I'm guessing you found it on Facebook

10 years ago | Likes 190 Dislikes 8

Back when it was an actual book?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also soldiers definitely make more than 40k on average

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post is like my dick. It tends to pop up every now and then for no reason but I normally don't share it.

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 22

But do you pass it on?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Pass what on, the HIV?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Myspace.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alright, but how many people belong to each of those categories? I did the math once. If we paid every congressperson minimum wage, we (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

(2/2) would be able to give every soldier and every veteran a $0.04 raise in salary.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

A politician is better educated and more useful individually compared to your average soldier or pensioner.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

Yea. Idk what most of the 18 year olds out of highschool that are aimless and uneducated deserve huge salaries on top of socialist benefits.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Better educated sure. But useful is relative. Hard to convince me that most of the US Congress has been useful for the last decade or 2.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Try the the last ten decades.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Better educated doesn't exactly mean they are useful and/or good politicians.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Decades of experience is what justifies the high paycheck

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The point still stands that decades of XP still doesn't mean they're useful or excel at what they do for the common good-you see that right?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they were useless, you wouldn't have a country to live in.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh praise them for not selling our country to the highest bidder. Yay!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd have to argue on the idea that they are better educated...Some of these folks seem like they got into power through blow jobs alone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Funny how that happens when you are in cbarge of setting your own benifits and wages. At least in the US thats how it goes.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

This is where my mind always goes. If I voted on my own salary, I'm not sure I could resist the temptation either. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(2/2) That said, politicians don't make their money from their paychecks. They make their living off kickbacks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To be fair, they vote for salary for next term, so they might not even get it and voters can see if you voted to raise it

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To be fair, there is typically an 80% incombancy win rate. Moot point.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 1, 2016 1:39 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

If so, why do they keep increasing their own salaries? It looks bad, so if it was really meaning less they wouldn't do it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congresspeople do not vote on the salary for their own term. They can only raise it for future terms.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

With an 80ish percent incumbency win rate, this is a moot point

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

YEA WOW THE TOP POSITION IN THE COUNTRY PAYS BETTER THAN A SOLDIER, WHO KNEW

10 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 14

Upvoting all of you because I agree that 400k pension is ridiculous, same with US president, since you virtually HAVE to be rich to get it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LOL! GET YOUR PITCHFORKS! :D

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

4 Star American Generals with decades of experience can retire with 200k+retirement salaries,comparing the lowest employee to the highest...

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

4-Star Generals bust ass harder than possibly any other high political rank in the US. Slightly more meritocratic in the service.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Becoming President or PM is also difficult. My point is simple, you can't compare the lowliest employees of an org to the highest of another

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

As we can tell with Emperor Trump, money is more important in politics than it is in the military.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In my eyes you can but only for 1 reason. If your lowest employees are working full time and not being payed a living wage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Paying better is not the issue. It's that for life part. You can get voted in, suck at it, leave and get 400k a year forever

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Cough tony abbott cough

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So out of the ordinary! Australia must be terribly special.............

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

After leaving it, 400k per year while retired

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is not the fact that the job pays better, but that each political position pays for life, regardless of if/when they leave work.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Said top positions are only as valuable as the people in them. Many of whom are worth shit. Unproductive liars getting in on social ties.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is retired prime minister a position?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

How dare you! I've been a professional retired prime minister all my life!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So if you lowered their salaries, you'd be able to pay 40,000 soldiers/pensioners about $20 more per year. Solid logic right there.

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 8

And also remove incentives for the best and most capable people to take the important jobs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Obviously not. It is still a good idea to think about where our values lie and how we distribute money.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And I believe in the army alone there are 300,000. So yeah...neat

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

yeah thats the same about in america... good luck changing shit

10 years ago | Likes 579 Dislikes 15

spain is more or less the same but 1/4 for the oensioners

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the thing is these people literally never stop working.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually the president gets paid less than the prime minister of Australia. By 50k.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats actually almost exactly the same

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right! If only they weren't in charge of deciding their own salaries and benefits...

10 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 3

THIS is the problem!

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

Fun fact, that is the reason they can't lower their pay, because they cant alter their pay, up or down.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually... Our congressman makes peanuts compared to their investment portfolio

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahaha look at the ones they get here in mexico, your politics look like wanna be/amateurs parasites next to this ones...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically the same in Sweden. But check out Norway their system on this particular matter is great

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Would absolutely love to hear how Norway is doing it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See my reply to bannaner

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thank you!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See my reply to bannaner

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How is it done there?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, I don't know the details right now. But their retired politicians and prime minister basically don't get a parachute or money 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What they have done is considered part of their civic duty and is expected of them without getting special treatment when it comes to money.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not entirely true. top positions have 2-4 times average salary, parliament 1,5 times or so, normal got a little above average

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also they can get afterpay for up to 1 year to reschool or find new job, and a small benefit to their pension.but still way better than most

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well... Not with that attitude!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, we tried and then Hillary bought the delegates. It doesn't matter.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or any attitude. Need money to fight money.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily. You can fight big money with votes. Place reps in a position that they can initiate sweeping changes in banking law.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For instance, they need to bring back Glass Steagall. Allowing commercial and investment banks to merge was a huge blunder.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't this election enough testament that without money your voice will go almost unnoticed, I don't disagree with you but how the fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe get off ingur and go in the streets, maybe then you will change something, I know that's a uncomfortable truth...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Ew, this is a civilized country, you can't just "go in the streets"...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's rich, making fun of a typo...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can't help it, some uf us are just not civilised enough to let it pas.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everybody thinks whining and posting on the internet will change anything. We have to act in the outernet people.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I saw LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD. I think the internet almost won there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because people post opinions doesn't mean they are deluded into believing their posts are all that's required to initiate change.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Should have worded that better, what I mean is a lot of people (at least in my city) feel/act that way.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except if you had a career in the military you are making quite a nice pension. If you full colonel or above I know you make serious money.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Current yearly pay in military for me isn't that impressive.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya, I was more talking about benefits and pension.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well you only have wait a mere 35 years for full retirement benifits

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My mother retired at 06 and still has to work. They've been depreciating the percent of active pay to retirement for more than a decade.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

50% of your salary and insurance for life j think

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So people seem to be confused. I'm not saying you have to be full colonel to make a living. I just know you have great retirement if you are

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HAHA you're acting like making full bird is a walk in the park

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Defiantly not if you read my other comments just that military can be a good job for those who make a career.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

assuming you make it to pension. many people don't, or in my case can't. BUT, I don't disagree that with a good head, you can do just ok.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And that's completely ok. I probably wouldn't make it far in the military, but have in my field.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya, it's like any career. Not everyone is going to make it same with any industry. Just because you show up doesn't make you ceo in 20 years

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you make full colonel. Yeah, that's pretty simple

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

My dad 24 years in the marines makes around $3300 thats with 100% disability as well. The new VA they built in FL is really good tho.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(A month)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but enlisted up to e6 makes enough to still qualify for food stamps

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

That's only factoring base pay. There's a lot more entitlements soldiers get based on location, duty, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

http://www.militaryfactory.com/military_pay_scale.asp I've heard plenty of people say they went for the military as it paid them MORE.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to mention a history of distinguished military service opens up other areas like law enforcement, security and arms industry.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very very true, my only point was the military is great If you spend 20-30 years in it.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Because quite a bit of the money is non-taxable and therefore doesn't count as "real" income in most circumstances

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you are deployed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is bullshit. Let's not forget the room, board, food and medical. It ain't CEO money but let's not act like its shitty money

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Actually no. Depending on where you are, it still is shitty money. While better than a lot, it's still not great. Just cuz the shit has

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Yeah there is a lot of in-kind benefits that are not accounted for. So yes on paper they don't make a lot but it is decent with benefits

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Corn in it doesn't make it any less shitty

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Plus housing allowance, plus food allowance, plus free medical/dental, free pension. As a married E-7, I made a pretax equivalent of $100k

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Married also make quite a bit more than single

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A single E-6 with only 8 years would clear an equivalent of about $75k living off base, or $47k with free board on base

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These numbers leave out all sorts of statistics and information. Taxes, population, additional income, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Plus soldiers are young and at the beginning of their careers, those others with high salaries are at the ends

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And what is a pensioner? That's pretty vague

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You also have politicians getting a pension that they worked for, granted some don't work much or there's too much gridlock in congress. 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Regardless its like working as a CEO and getting your retirement money. Sure there are employees that you could give the money to, but 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You earned it by leading a company and making decisions. It becomes rewaed for your work untill you're gone. Stick to the American dream 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Of "work for your earnings." Yes, there may be those that get a silver spoon, but that goes to show you how you can benefit your 4/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Future descendants by working hard and making an estate. You can even use that money to benefit others trying to work as hard as you. 5/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't expect to get a whole bunch of steps up a latter because the guy on the roof fell off. You're still on the ladder.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0