This is the seperation we need

Oct 12, 2020 5:49 AM

Bonchoman

Views

117306

Likes

2463

Dislikes

130

plus, we've seen/see what happens to states with meddling religious institutions. hint, it's not good for anyone

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They didn't though. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Separation discussions are to late, I mean how long did we talk about abortion. This is in fact a religious lobbying since the beginning.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Implemented. I don't think they invented the concept.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do not understand how some folks just have to interject their BS into others lives. Keep thy religion to thyself bible thumpers, we’re good.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

I'd love to live in a world where "antiracists" advocating for segregation and discrimination didn't inject their bs in my life.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Because slave owners and racists like yourself are abusing other people. That is evil.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The religious right don't believe in Freedom of Religion. It's just a Bad Faith argument to push their beliefs.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

So all the other faiths that exist - Christians want ALL OF THEM GONE TOO? What about the Zoroastrians? Them, too? Such a stupid remark.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

... Have you heard the thing they say about Catholics? And they're actually Christian as well.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Judeo-Christian Nationalists********

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Flynn solicited Russia for a veto vote involving the "nationalists" of Israel's settlement's that had....you guessed it

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Financial backings/interests by Kushner/Trump's bankruptcy attorney....so yes. Flynn committed treason to put bible above state. MAGA!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But hey- its prolly viewed by 90% of the world what I said was anti-Semitic, when in reality, democrats are demonic pedophiles who eat kids.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is just a classic anti-Semitic trope being used by the right on the left now. For shame not knowing historic anti-Semitism ;/

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So to those who got this deep- please a solid watch about the racist soccer team that renamed themselves after Donald Trump, in Jerusalem.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just had this conversation yesterday :"if you don't want Sharia law, you can't have Christian law. All or nothing." They had no response.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

AMEN! s/

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dot

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sep of church and st isnt in the constitution. Freedom of religion and to practice is. Sep of church and st was the federalist papers.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Doesn't make it any less of a great idea.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Right... but it cant be raised as though it is a constitutional issue. Just like Washington speaking against parties.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If the other 27 amendments can be done, this can, too.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Honestly due to the high level of partisanship and the activation of the religious right in the 80s its really unlikely to have the support

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Give it a couple decades, we'll get there:

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But it doesn’t make it *constitutional*, as you assholes love to think, for Christ’s sake.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Neither was the woman's vote at one point, but we fixed that.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The difference here, for those in the slow seats, is that one was already in the Constitution and the other was added.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If separation of church and state is already in the constitution, could you point it out? The 1st amendment only guarantees freedom of r.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surely that went out the window once 'In God We Trust' was printed on the dollar bill?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s why it irks me so much when republicans (primarily) r always bring up religion, like no that’s not how this works.leave ur bible @ ?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"invented"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freedom from religion is just as important as freedom of religion. The old "keep it to yourself" rule.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Oooh ... maybe you can write that into the Constitution for us!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We used to have that as an understanding. Then something happened.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They included this because of the "Act of Quebec" that gave French subject of the king of England the right to keep their language and....

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

religion. Until then, everyone who want to live in a colony of the British Empire, had to surender their language and religion to ...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

speak English and become a Anglican Church devotees. Many newcomers in America we're from other countries.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The logic is pretty straight forward IMHO. Rational argumentation is hard as it is. Rational arguments don't work with "believers"....

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So, instead of trying to climb a steep hill, just say you're a man of God and the people who've submitted to God will let you govern them

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For the millionth time, this is NOT what separation of church and state means, and if you had actually looked into it, you would know that.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

You religious extremist are so weak you demand control of everyone because you cannot control yourselves. We deserve freedom from your hate.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Wrong on all counts (including being a religious extremist.) but WOW the loving tolerance of the left is stunning!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Right wingers are the greatest terrorists in American history.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My God, thank you! It’s the one issue that reveals the total ignorance of this country and its foundational docs more than any other. GRRR

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually, that's exactly what it means, because otherwise you have state-sponsored religion, which is what the founders were escaping from.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

https://www.churchofsatan.com/ These guys can help. Being serious BTW

6 years ago | Likes 176 Dislikes 15

Hail Satan!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a member, can confirm. Lots of good people doing good things and making the world better for it.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Oh Gilfoyle

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What about https://thesatanictemple.com/ ?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well some of us still think the old gods are the coolest not this new confusing one that contradicts himself throughout his own book.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, those Greek and Roman gods for completely linear and logical. Your ignorance is showing.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which old gods? If it's Norse, you're shit out of luck as the only sources were written by christians after the faith was dead.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nope I'm from uk so the true celtic gods. Not the norse gods originally from another country

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) The great Britain was Christianized earlier than Scandinavia, 7th century, and our earliest sources are from the 11th century.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) There wasn't a single celtic pantheon, even in the british isles. There are substantial differences between the Brythonic and Gaelic.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Um no read a few books about the old gods from before Christians some written poems from earlier than 11th century were found

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What are they? I haven't heard of such sources being available and would be curious to read them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im an atheist but let’s be clear. This country was NOT EXPLICITLY founded with “Separation of Church and State” that was only described 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Freedom to practice ones religion without interference from governments or other churches was why most of the original settlers came.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure it wasn't because they were wanted for crimes in Europe? I know that's why some of my ancestors came to America.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sure they could have been criminals in europe. For practicing the wrong religion maybe?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In a letter the Thomas Jefferson wrote. The fundamentalists know this and it’s a frequent argument.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 14

why is it almost always pro-choice people that bring up religion? You almost never see pro-life people bring it up.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because they just have to reveal how little they understand, speaking from ignorance at every turn. So frustrating.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1) I’m pro choice 2) Louis C.K. had a great bit where he said if you’re anti-abortion it’s cause they see it as murdering babies, morality->

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

->being the issue over religion. So I see some validity in being anti-abortion but I agree it’s mostly a religious objection.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Don't forget people: the Bible condones abortion AND baby-murder in Hosea 9:11-17

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Current issue is "I know you morally abhor this but I'm gonna steal your wages to do it anyway".

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

abortion is against the natural law. we don't object to rape or fraud being against the law just because religions oppose them too.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And yet the Bible clearly condones abortion and baby-murder in Hosea 9:11-17 and there's nothing in the NT that condemns it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

6 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 1

As a church goer myself I 100% agree. It should come off of our money, pledge and courthouses too.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"A man can't marry a man because of my interpretation of Christianity" they tell the Christians who believe that God doesn't care.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I need the michealscottthankyou.gif

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This does not mean people of faith cannot work in government.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It does when they're telling people that they can't do things because it violates their own brand of religion.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Everybody working in government need to keep their slates clean, regarding both faith and finance

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed of course.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Seperation of Church and state- a solid reason why about the most racist football team in the world- who renamed themselves after Trump

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Andrew I will be borrowing this. Hope you don't mind.....

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Whole heartily agree can you explain to my mom, cause "if the government doesn't follow God then our nation will fall" is all I get also...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"if the government doesn't follow God then us Christians are under direct attack from Satan"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the hyper Christian white supremacists have 100% voter turnout.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Luckily, they're the minority despite being a very VOCAL one.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually it's both. Religion is to be protected from burdensome gov regulation/meddling AND gov is to be protected from religious laws

6 years ago | Likes 343 Dislikes 13

Actually it’s both, how? Constitutionally?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry, i don't quite grasp your phrasing there. can you rephrase so i'm not answering the wrong question?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The clause says that there shall be no state-run religion, and that the state will not infringe on the free exercise of religion.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don’t see your definitions in the clause at all? Maybe you can help me understand what you meant?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like catholic adoption agencies and the government funding them to adopt to LGBTQ couples. It did not end well. Gotta keep em separated.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm simplier terms someone once said it's freedom "from" not freedom "to". People want to do things to others but it is supposed to protect

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is the ideal version where both sides are playing the same game by the same rules.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

its almost like they need to be separated from each other. weird.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Religion is organized brainwashing machines and shouldn’t be protected. Spirituality of individuals should.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I'm not an overly religious person but i don't feel my views should trump theirs. Religious protections are a key part of freedom for them

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It’s what religious organizations want you to think. Societies will be free only when they’ll get rid of primitive superstitions.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't really disagree, i'm more logic/science person but at the same time there is value in the moral compass it provides but that aside>

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it is not a good thing to oppress the rights of people to believe as they desire regardless of which supernatural being they worship<

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's essentially what he said.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It seemed like he was only focusing on the later and not the former but i may have misread it

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No worries, just need to focus on his use of all caps. +1 For being civil on the internet.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough! Stay safe out there and please wear a mask! Same to you

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's nothing in the post that contradicts that

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

Ye, do people struggle that hard with reading and understanding? Comment makes it seem like that's not exactly what the OP says...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I might have misread it but it seemed like the post was supporting protections from and ignoring protections for religion

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Yea, but actually that’s exactly what OP said so lets try to remember that

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As long as the religion does no unconsensual harm to anyone, I'm cool with that.

6 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

If a religion asks for genital mutilation, get it done on consenting adults instead of babies, for example.

6 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

I'm with you on that one. I'm not an overly religious person but i'm certainly not anti-religious

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Problem is brainwashing, anyone willing to carve up their genitals for their cult is probably not mentally healthy

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. If they're only doing it to consenting adults, it is a big step up.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I agree. Consenting adults is one thing. Don't mutilate your infant. It's so disgusting.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we go under surgery to change our body outlook it's not crazy to do it for religion. Just make sure there's approval

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0