Frequency Interference Patterns

Oct 21, 2017 9:50 AM

Ishvari

Views

207914

Likes

5140

Dislikes

72

The longer you watch it the cooler it gets

Dear god I am hungover

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bet when Leonardo Davinci made his first .gif he was fucken stoked.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

good

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a fan

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don’t know what this means but I like it!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You shouldn't swing your anal beads

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I kinda like this a lot

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

I'm mildly raving about it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Perhaps

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So many dots my sharigan can't keep up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Syzygy!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Major alignments 1, 5, 4, 3, 2, and repeat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When it comes down to it all math

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was hoping it would make a swastika

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 14

It did at one point

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Me rechecking

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Curious Newb Here. Does anyone know what kind of software is used to make animations like this? Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, I'm late for work now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1,5,4,3,5,2,5,3,4,5,repeat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nyquist had something to say about this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amazing that they seem to move in different patterns.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG MY BRAIN IS HAVING A SIEZURE AHHHHH!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not all dots move with the same speed. Or is it just me? It seems to me like the dot inside the octagon for example moves faster.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think their speeds are different too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definitely. Watch the part when all of them are at the bottom.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1- Of course, or else they would move along nicely when they're at the bottom. OP had a reason to pick different speeds tho: they'd need to

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2- keep moving till every dot made an exact multiple of a round-trip. That would have to be a multiple of 15, 13, 11, and 7, among others.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3- Since 7, 11, and 13 are primes, their product 1001 is the least common multiple. To be a multiple of 8, 9 and 15, it would have to be a

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4- multiple of 360, too. That means 1 gif loop = 360360 edges traveled or 120120 triangle round-trips. TL;DR: huge gif is huge.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The middle dots travel more than twice as fast as the outmost dot. Only pairs of dots turn corners at the same time: 3&14, 4&13, 5&12 etc.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't tell for sure, but all the dots are moving at the same velocity, right? (I know it looks like the inner ones are faster, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but I thinks that's an optical illusion). 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All the sides are the same length, whether triangle or the 15-sider. So the dots are moving at different speeds.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually I think yore right. I just "timed" it by tapping my finger each time they turned and the cadence was quicker with the inside ones.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God damn maths baby!!

9 years ago | Likes 316 Dislikes 4

I'm bad at maths, but watching this come together and fall apart is relaxing, like ebb and flow... I don't have to understand it to like it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly, fractals in nature, couldn't understand it for the life of me but I know it makes beauty.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Were you born a maths baby?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's crazy how maths do that.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Fuck math

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 20

Please use protection. Everyone is at risk of Standard Deviations.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I best comment here. Hahaha!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck you

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Fuck me

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fuck everybody

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You dense matherfucker

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Seems it would be better if the dots were traveling the same speed. They not - best seen when a line of them travels the bottom parallels.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

At same speed it would take 360360 rounds for all dots to realign. We would have to watch for 29.2 days to see this happen...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll take your word on the numbers. If they're not going the same speed anyway, why not make all the loops round? Pick one thing to vary.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good point! Round loops would give a similar impression. But it would be too easy to realize they don't move at the same speed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could be wrong, but i think they are. I think the difference in velocity is an optical illusion. I could be wrong though.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Watch the outermost and second, they're really off

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually I think yore right. I just "timed" it by tapping my finger each time they turned and the cadence was quicker with the inside ones.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On a related note (pun intended) http://whitneymusicbox.org/ with sound.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

I was just thinking to myself if there was a way to realize this with sound. Thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Our kids loved it. The woman who ran the nurture room at the local primary school used it for some of the more autistic kids.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freaky stuff.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can someone explain why the shapes are closer together at the top?

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

The shapes may appear closer at the top because of the pointy-ness. For every point near a line there is another point far from a line. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 In reality, the nearness balances the "farness" and the average distance is the same for all figures. If the figures were circles, 3/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/2 they would be concentric and equidistant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the center point of each object is at the origo.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Think of a prism as the basis and the light it refracted shows us a rainbow. That rainbow has different colors that overlap. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's the best way I can think of to explain it. I'm no scientist, but I think I'm right. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It be that way sometimes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Center of each shape the same. Keeping one side the same. Each next shape has one more side, meaning a corner is added.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Maybe so the bottoms line up, but that still doesn’t explain the triangle being higher than the rest.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yeah, the sides of all figures are the same length, or the rythm of the dots wouldn't work. The v-offset is just to make it look pretty.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I didn't see the triangle until you said something. Now I can't not see it!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

https://imgur.com/7bRvwgw

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Thanks

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The bottom of the triangle and the square will be superimposed. The dot might not show up. Or something. I don't know, the triangle paid mor

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The black dots are moving the same distance before turning each corner. Every line is the same length.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If true, the dots would turn the corner simultaneously. They do not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

They literally do. Look again. The outer dots take longer to go round because they have more corners to go before they get back 'home'.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do travel the same distance, they are not going the same speed. You can see it at the bottom when they all travel together.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Correct. From the original artist (it seems): https://twitter.com/beesandbombs/status/870219153776549888

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong. They neither travel the same distance nor the same speed. They synchronize their frequency. That's all. See title. Still cute.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You better look again. Only pairs turn simultaneously. Count the corners of each ring. Count the rounds until they realign. Do the math.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for anyone wondering about the triangles top corner: https://imgur.com/7bRvwgw

9 years ago | Likes 574 Dislikes 5

Ooo. That is kind of interesting. Cool. Thanks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you, good sir

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you know that Pythagoras was so depressed by lack of respect for his work that alone in his home he found the hypote-noose.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did wonder. Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where’s the elder wand

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks for clearing that up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I need to start a “Explain it like I’m potato” subreddit

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ELIP

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But why

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

But why is this done in SolidWorks?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Last time this was posted i was doing a project in the background so it was already open. This my project: https://imgur.com/nn2O0fe

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why not... it's a CAD program perfectly capable of drawing shapes to demonstrate geometric drawings

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Weird. Would expect all corners to protrude from square perimeter.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

why would you expect that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't make sense because the point is that they all share a center point and have the same side length for each side

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How though, if they all have a side length of one unit?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Or instead I would expect all triangle corners to be within square perimeter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Could you explain it?

9 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 3

Standard equilateral triangle.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For this every side of every shape has to be one unit long and because of the way triangles work, one corner has to go above the square.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

If all corners of the triangle were in the square, the two circles would be offset and throw off the pattern. That’s my best guess.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Simple Explanation: The center of the triangle is at the center of the square.

9 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 0

Huh. neat.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

The circle that fills the triangle and the circle that fills the square both have the same mid-point

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of the shapes have the same side length. If the triangle's base sat on the square's base, it wouldn't poke out of the square. (1/3)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

But because there's a gap between the base of each shape (and especially because of the size chosen for the gap), the triangle sticks (2/3)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

out of the top of the square, just a little. It just so happens that none of the others stick out of their enclosing shape. (3/3)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Close. They didn't choose a gap size. It's the gap inherent in them all sharing a center point, and having the same side length... Carry on.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Huh. Quite right. Not sure how I missed that; circles in the diagram and all...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im sorry but do you have time to talk about autodesk fusion 360?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do YOU have time to talk about Fusion 360? I want to use it for mechanical modeling, but my world is Adobe. I don't know where to start!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And what I most value about is the easy way to go way back on design and change it. From distant memory, it wasn't so easy in SW.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just give it a try. You can use it free at least a year as hobbyist/enthusiast. Very versatile and easy to use. Great tips and tutorials.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just download and give it a go. envision your object looking at it from one face (2D sketch), then expand it into the 3D space (extrude).

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let me tell you how Onshape is better than Solidworks!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

onshape is terrible. i dunno who trains their sales reps, but they are the worst at trying to sell a product. F360 is always getting better

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a sysadmin, anything is better than Solidworks.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are certainly not wrong there!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0