housing is a human right

Aug 8, 2021 1:37 AM

Neatish

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

We have a lot of transitional housing programs but druggies get kicked out. We need more free rehabs and mental health care.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I worked in DT Seattle for years on cap hill most of them is drug use and don't want help other than money

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I agree, but please tag your political posts.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 54

I stand with @Bullwinkele

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 16

You barely use tags in your tiny number of posts.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

I've heard people saying that Seattle has a drug problem disguised as a homeless problem.

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 8

What we have is a reputation for being a city with very few homeless deaths. Drugs are a part of that package.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im in Seattle and it's broken for sure here. Like we need major systemic change to be able to turn around at the point up here

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Seattle Govt: Best I can do is a hockey team

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Seattle liberal here. I'm curious to know what we're saying about homeless that's the same as what Trump says about immigrants. Examples?

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

I see the opposite. It's almost taboo to criticize the homeless for anything. People won't even say homeless anymore, it's "unhoused"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How self-righteous. Not all homeless are hapless victims of societal problems. There are a percentage who are criminals who choose to live/1

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

off the grid in order to jump bail, sell and use drugs, avoid familial responsibilities etc. That percentage can create big issues for a /2

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

community and present more than just inconvenience. Look at Venice if you want to observe the hard reality of attempting to help those who/3

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

refuse to accept help because it interferes with their substance abuse, exposes their criminal past or forces them to get help.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Seattle has a problem of passing measures for homelessness that take a year to start, then ending them because it hasn’t done anything yet

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There is a huge affordability problem but 30% of people on the street won't take housing because of drug use or mental health. Been shown 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that less than 1000 people are responsible for half the violence perpetrated the attacks, most of the rest is gang or drug crimes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those aren't liberals, those are hypocrites

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's odd how the bluest cities in the bluest states resemble the dystopian mega corporation future that scifi writes about

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I am a seattle liberal and I work with the unsheltered and low income folks and provide free veterinary services for their animals.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Thank you for being a good person.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is not true of everyone in this city. I see good things. I also see bad things. It’s not like we are Bellevue or Kirkland.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So do something about it instead of whining about how others can't solve the problem.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Thus whole mess is caused by taxloopholes for the wealthy, min wage not keeping up with inflation, and general assholery...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It is very naive to say that rich people cause homelessness. Grow up

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

I would if I didn't study economics. The amount of money funded through political campaigns alone could fix homelessness.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

it's more about fixing the drug and mental illness issues

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stress and depression are both often caused by poverty. If you have to work multiple jobs just to afford a place, you'd be looney too.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is a factor but its the sole factor

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The really sad thing about the Seattle homeless is that a lot are working poor who got priced out of their own city

5 years ago | Likes 217 Dislikes 6

U don't have to stay there, I don't understand if you get priced out just leave

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

1. With what money? 2. Fuck the people born and raised somewhere I guess 3. Do you understand how fucking stupid this comment is?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If you could afford to live there before you can afford to live somewhere else.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Spoken like a mother fucker who had never known want

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

U can want whatever the fuck you want dude, doesn't mean you deserve it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You do realize you don't have the right to live wherever you want right?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Visiting Seattle 5 years ago I was baffled by the amount of homeless ppl. You could see entire tent villages from atop the Columbia Center.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's way worse now

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Born in West Seattle, family had to move 9 times before I was 10 to find somewhere safe and affordable to live. Working hard af too

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

I feel sad for you. Come to Germany =)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Denver is the same. I had to delete my NextDoor account of all the sh!t people blaming the homeless for everything

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yes. Big liberal cities offer lots of amenities for homeless people, so many people move to these cities to be homeless.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The unspoken implication of the American Dream is that you are responsible for your socioeconomic status. If you're poor,it's your own fault

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know some homeless people just need help, but there are definitely others who make terrible choices and are suffering the consequences

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They talk about how dangerous the courthouse is, don't explain why except to vaguely mention there's a homeless encampment nearby.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I work next door to the courthouse. It’s not dangerous at all.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's my (apparently poorly made) point; it's fearmongering.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah. Sorry! :)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty funny that a courthouse that requires security screening & is crawling with police & sheriff’s is dangerous. It’s almost like police>

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Presence and patrols doesn’t actually prevent crime.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was getting more at the fearmongering, as well as the issues with policing homeless areas leads to creation of petty arrests.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's wild that THE most socialist nations in the world are all better places to live than the US, and they still think socialism is bad.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

But there's a multi-billion dollar light rail expansion that's almost done. So they've got that going for them.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah. Can't wait to see no one riding it. "But it'll be great for hockey games!" I for one was happy when sports left Seattle.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah. So? The light rail is good for many, many thousands of people and the environment. It’s a net positive and we can still help homeless

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I run a business in Pioneer Square. There are so many resources available. They are not victims without options.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There's 22 empty homes per homeless person. Funny, that.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Lol yea just put them in houses,right?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Yeah.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I love the fact that people in America don’t know we already tried that, read about The Great Society.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A good chunk of the homeless problem is drug abuse and mental illness you cant fix that by throwing them in a house

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I live here. Some people move here to be homeless because it’s a relatively good place to be homeless.

5 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

I’ve been traveling to Seattle for business for about seven years now. It’s gets worse and worse every time I go.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Homeless services cost more. Increase property tax. Create more homeless. They cost more. So then they tax more . It’s brutal cycle

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Even November to March?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. Because we have a lot of programs, and drugs are pretty much legal.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The west coast is very mild compared to the east coast. Seattle may get 2 days of snow in the winter. And with enough layers of clothes>>

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And an outer layer of gortex plus a tent it’s livable. It rains but mostly it’s gray.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m not sure if this is true or not, but I can say that every city I’ve lived in has said this about their homeless people.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Complete bullshit I have a business I work with the city daily. We have programs we have help. We have housing. It’s mental and drugs 1/

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

If the city and is the locals spend months trying to get people help get them to go in the programs. Ci habitats and all we get back 2/

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Is a growing radius of destruction to our properties daily cleaning. Spit on. What can we do? No program works if people don’t use it

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

the problem needs to be addressed long before people hit skid row

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It needs to be solved on a national level. If 1 city did it alone that'd make homeless flock there from all over the country, they wouldn't

5 years ago | Likes 585 Dislikes 20

Welcome to California. Most homeless are not from here. But here because the the state allocated billions to help homelessness. Fun times

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

May be the weather also makes it easier to be homeless in California

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Aug 9, 2021 12:40 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I absolutely do not trust the federal government to run this system properly

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's literally the reason the west coast has homelessness problems. The little we do is still better than most plus better weather.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The only solution is housing as a human right and we cant even get fucking health care.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 3

I mean ideally yes, but... the country has no problems ignoring other human rights.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because land doesn’t grow on trees. Services you can and should socialize….Housing… that gets real complicated- sincerely, a Seattle liberal

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

K

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If we had housing density similar to Hong Kong, all Americans would fit into indiana, with half a state to spare. Land isn't the issue.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No it doesn't

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This country can’t do anything nationally if it’s just for some stupid thing like “the common good”

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

This country can’t really do anything nationally regardless, greater good or not, it’s one of the downsides of the federal system.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fwiw, that's precisely why the West Coast has so many homeless. People end up their because they have resources. Plus, a 9th circuit ruling

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

makes it illegal to arrest people from sleeping in public, so they can stay in the streets near said services rather than in the forests.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can the homeless really afford to travel? I'm genuinely curious. I know bus tickets ain't expensive, but *shrug*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hitchhiking, walking, using public transport without a ticket etc etc. Doesn’t mean they are traveling across country.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

In many places they'll give homeless people free one-way bus tickets to another city. Makes it someone else's problem.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

This is what happened to Oregon. They do a lot more for the homeless but they can't do enough to help ALL of the ones that keep coming in

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

This, but extended to a global scale. Immigration is a symptom of an unbalanced World.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Assuming homeless people have to money to reach said city.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

stop asking the government to solve problems it's intentionally creating

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

...isn't that the same as asking them to stop creating the problem?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

no I'm implying that you should work outside the government to solve issues

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Valuable, sometimes. But some problems demand enforcement of the solution, and so long as government maintains a monopoly on enforcement...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Have you ever seen the South Park episode where all the homeless move to California? That shit was in 2007 and its only gotten worse here

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Yep. Great combo. Raise taxes to kick out the successful people and make it good for the homeless. Great plan they got there.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It’s gotten worse Everywhere

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

SoCal has the best year round weather, so its easier to be homeless here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SoCal especially. It has gotten really bad in Santa Monica. It’s sad to see so many people and yet no one can address it well.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I lived in LA for 2 years from 2010-2012, it was bad then, but watching videos now about it makes me not want to visit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree (especially San Diego with the good weather too), but Bay Area especially SF and Oakland has a ton too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agree. SoCal looked more but you are right NorCal is same.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but it's so expensive. It would take 1/4-1/2 of the Military budget for a year to end homelessness. And hunger. And public education.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yeah but then how can we run all 800 military bases around the world?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And possibly universal healthcare.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

For reference half of the 2022 US military budget is 358 billion.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's fucking disgraceful. I get the need for defense but that's an abhorrent number.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

More than the next 9 countries combined, last I checked.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait till you see how much more we Americans spend on Healthcare and how much more colleges charge for a degree!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have the resources to take care of them all. Needs a national effort.

5 years ago | Likes 271 Dislikes 10

That's true for a lot. Imagine trying to build a national highway system these days.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and yet, mysteriously, building a massive free housing project in the middle of nowhere wouldn't work either. People like their communities

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most need meds to help but refuse. Family should take them or forced to take meds. I shouldn’t be forced to watch for human shit when I walk

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Medicine doesn't cure the issue, the system is broken. People are over medicated and misdiagnosed because the states rather keep them in a

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

system where these government funded entities can continue to caddle and ship people in and out over services for financial gain.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? My friend is schizophrenic and believes he doesn't need a help since he has a secret Swiss bank account and safe house somewhere

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to what happened to Seattle ?

5 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

And San Francisco

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

As a Seattleite who just just came back from a week in SF, we have it much worse up here. Can't say that Union Square was a smart area to

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Stay in, but there isn't anywhere downtown Seattle or surrounding neighborhoods that haven't been heavily affected by drugs, homelessness,

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Case in point just visit Eugene Oregon. It offers amenities to unhouse folk and people flock from all over putting a huge strain on programs

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Not to mention the states that literally bus their homeless across state lines to them

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Welcome to Califorina. Bussed in all day long

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Study a fucked up policy.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's no excuse. Social progress is a moral imperative. Of one city became a refuge so be it.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 25

Other districts will abuse the one that does this. They already ship homeless with one-way tickets, forcing them to agree to not come back.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

One city can’t be a refuge for a nations worth of economic victims. It will just collapse and be worse than before

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Only if they refuse to divert funding from fricolities and prestige projects.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I don't care how many prestige projects a single city is running; that budget won't cover a nation's worth of homeless.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That sounds good until you realize the funds to take care of 1,000 people would not cover 10,000 people if they all flocked there

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

So, "not in my city?"

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 29

More like "every city". I want my city to help, but I also know we can't be the only ones to do so, for the aforementioned 10n>n reason.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, it's "We want to help but do not have the resources to help everyone alone."

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol, you obviously haven't heard about Austins policy regarding the homeless. There are tent cities under every overpass

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

The entire west coast is like that too.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's not an excuse, it's a reason it's not feasible. Resources matter. It has to be done at a national level, a city can not do it alone.

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 4

Don't care. Positive change is positive change. Your rationale is a shoulder shrug that maintains the status quo. In other words, an excuse.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 26

You should care. Federal has far, far more resources than any singular city. Your ideals are not feasible, and only promote harm

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but it's not positive? We've burned a bunch of money, destroyed a city, and to what end?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Disagree. 100% solving the problem in ONE city would be absolutely devastating overall. As commenter above mentionas, it would inspire a...

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Mass migration to that city, and there would be LESS overall resources per person, to catastrophic effect. Doing good things is good. But...

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Hey can I have laser vision? I mean if we're living in a fantasy land I want it to be fun you know

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Is that adult supervision?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cool story, you let them live in YOUR house. Also a FEW people are rich AF, most everyone else is poor as dirt and barely getting by.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 26

I hope you adopt every single forced birth baby.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 19

Why? Im pro abortion, pro birth control, pro sex education.I am also pro-no blaming poor people for not doing enough house other poor people

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Maybe rich pricks building fucking space ships as a god damn hobby can pay some fucking taxes and we can use that to house people?!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

While I feel for a lot of those people; a lot of those people chose a life of hard drugs. That is not my fault.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

A lot of those people chose hard drugs to escape how shit their lives were, then ended up hooked, criminalized, and swept out of sight. JFC

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're a real goddamn peach, williams. Just a shining example of compassion and humanity. Scrolling through your comments has been a treat

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lol. I get some of your points. I do believe everyone deserves a fair shake. I just disagree with you on how that's accomplished.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Focus should be put on education and putting programs in place where people have the opportunity to choose success.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The folks most in line with your way of thinking are currently gutting our primary education programs. Congratulations. Muting you now.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If that is there and people still choose drugs/crime; that is their choice. My obligation stops there. It's definitely not there yet.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0