Handheld X-Ray

Feb 3, 2025 2:05 PM

DOcelot1

Views

33954

Likes

675

Dislikes

12

This reminds me of the foot-cancer machine. Using once or twice was fine, but the sales people operating it all got cancer.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cool let's point that on anything that we care for!!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

My wife has been working with digital x-rays in a dental lab for 15 years now

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Congratulations! You no longer need a vasectomy!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You get cancer... and you get cancer... and you get cancer! Everybody gets cancer!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My dentist used a handheld one on my face

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cover your balls with some lead son!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This could change everything

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

portable X-ray has been around for a while - handheld guns are used a lot in dental practice

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was waiting for dickbutt on the screen.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, zoos have similar devices so I’m not impressed

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Meh, my dentist has had a smaller, more portable unit for YEARS.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The one dude backed up because he's always been there for testing, so he only has a couple lil swimmers left.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope they used a different person for the x ray demonstration. Nope! Same guy same leg all day during that convention 100 times a day.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any level of radiation has the potential to be harmful

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The shoe fitting fluoroscope was a common fixture in shoe stores during the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. There are reasons they weren't used after.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Thankfully these use a tube source rather than solid nuclear material, so only radiate while the button is pressed. But still... eek

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feels like they're stealing this from William Osmon of YouTube fame... Or infamy.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah we already do this in equine field medicine and such.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vets have had these for decades. It is kind of hard to get a cow or horse to an Xray room.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah, yes, no crotch protection.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

This is how the X-Men universe mutants get their start.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My balls are shielded by microplastics

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh. It's legit. I thought the image was gonna load up and show a massive dong alongside his knee.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This gif is ripe for comedic edits.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Radiologist here. Fuck everyone in this gif. Radiation is not a toy and should not be treated as one, not to mention the failures for technique.

2 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

The modern Fluoroscope…..

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Fuck everyone..." yep, definitely a radiologist.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Really dumb how literally no one is wearing lead and they’re showing it at a trade show

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This isn't about it being hand held. Those have been around for ages. It's probably new because it seems to be low radiation (at least I hope it is...)

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Yeah, my son's dentist has been doing hand held for over 5 years.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I think it’s about being handheld, battery-powered, and wireless.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. Portable units have been around for decades (the large animal vets I know use them for horses frequently).

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago my vet bought a wireless battery operated one that was at least 5 years old and used. This isn't new.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So how's the radiation dosage on that?

2 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 6

Yes.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Slowly back off and you'll be fine as the ceo.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I assume it’s using a scanning beam rather than a flooding flash, so my inferred assumption is that it’s pretty safe.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Correct use of ‘inferred’ in the wild. +1

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 2

Best response

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You can see the guy promoting it running far away, sooo

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the concept with all radiation dose and treatments in the medical industry is "as low as reasonably achievable" ALARA. this means that any reasonable steps to reduce exposure are taken. radiation exposure is also cumulative and so it matters much more to the guy who's close to this for hours at a time vs the guy who is only there for a few seconds.

now, ALARA *probably* doesn't include giving people X-rays on a trade show floor for the lulz so take from that what you will.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm told the new digital x-rays are super low and at the dentist, the lead cape is totally unnecessary now

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

I like how the cold lead underpants feel on my skin.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I accidentally kept my work dosimeter in my hoodie pocket during a dental x-ray a few years ago. Turned into kind of a big deal at work, but ultimately the dosimeter came back with zero dose. So there's some anecdotal proof for you.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The lead cape is there to protect you against the normal radiation of the machine, but also there to protect you if the machine is unknowingly putting out more radiation than its supposed to. Our physicists tell us to wear it even though our machines are low dose

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But i like the lead cape.

2 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

The OG weighted blanket

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

UHC refuses to cover the lead cape charge.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I had gone for an appointment after work, already tired, it was so warm and cozy in the office and then the lead cape made me fall asleep during the x-ray, lol.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I occasionally fall asleep when getting my teeth cleaned

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But the weighted blanket is my favorite part.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Is it safe?" "Yes of course" *takes 7 steps back..*

2 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 5

tbf I'm sure the demo folks are around this thing going of dozens of times a day. It could be safe to use a handful of times, but I wouldn't want to be exposed to it 5,000x a year.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yeah, take a look at the fingers of xray techs. Even with all the protective gear, constant exposure and slippage does damage

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yes, because even if it is perfectly safe to use (or be scanned) once or twice, standing all day near when it is working is completely different thing

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Same thing with horticultural pesticides and herbicides; sure, use the hose in your flipflops, but keep that crap away from me cause repeated contact is just no good

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude should request a lead lined suit.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

why do you think he does not wear one?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those pants are far too tight.

And because of the way he runs and hides from the lazy beams.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh. Clearly the radiation is low enough that there doesn't seem to be any concern about using it at what looks like a trade show...
a little searching say that modern handheld machines are 2-3 microsieverts because of things like beam forming and digital capture compared to the older, larger analog x-ray machines you might see on TV or think of, which are 10-22 microsieverts.
Friggin' SCIENCE, Yo!

2 years ago | Likes 373 Dislikes 3

looks like CES...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it safe for balls?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Xray Tec and Xray safety professional here, who worked a lot on modern new mobile devices: is it enough radiation to go through your bones, it is enough to hurt your cells in your reproductive system, And other sensitive material. That’s where you get cancer first.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats how Superballs are made!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh thank God

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The difference doesn't seem THAT big. Quite significant (like six times lower), but doesn't feel like it goes from "quite dangerous" to "super safe".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last time I checked, some MRI prototypes could work using the Earth's magnetic field, using a lot of AI to filter the resulting mess of data.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

As he backs up as far as possible

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

He might be the sales person, one x-ray not so bad, +50 x-rays a day not so so great.

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Yeah, as Andersen81 says, cumulative exposure can be a problem.
Five minutes of sunlight, no problem. Five hours could give you a sunburn, even if done in chunks of five minutes across a day.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cries in NZ /AU ozone hole. Burn time is 15 min today

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For scale: 2-3 microsieverts = 20-30 bananas.

2 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

So banana for scale?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So one x ray is 100-220 bananas? That doesn't seem like much

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Do people in banana packing plants get cancer?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

at least 1 in 3 do

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that the statistic dude holy fuck

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's the statistic for the general population.
so... sort of?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Bananab

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to update @UnitConversionBot

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

I found them, the one giving all of our jobs to AI.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

on a person? no issue, same as any other x-ray. for the person holding it...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Last time I had my teeth x-rayed, the dental tech used a handheld x-ray and didn't leave the room. The beam was so focused and the radiation so low, the tech was basically in no danger of exposure.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If those numbers are correct, then it is not like any other x-ray. 10 of those scans would be like any other x-ray.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When I am working the xray lab, I take about 100 pictures per day. That shit would still ad up throughout a year, let alone a whole career

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

exactly this, dosage ads up, the person doing the demo should be wearing protective gear.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Implying a standard x ray at a convention is dangerous isn't completely accurate though. Unless someone was there who had previously been exposed a bunch.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last time I had my teeth x-rayed, the dental tech used a handheld x-ray and didn't leave the room. The beam was so focused and the radiation so low, the tech was basically in no danger of exposure.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Makes sense. That goes through your head so it better be low…

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I’m a dental hygienist. Love using the x-ray gun. Absolutely minimal exposure. ADA doesn’t even require us to use the lead shield over the torso anymore. I still do, takes too long to explain to each patient and why the hell not have redundancy exposure reduction anyway? Was actually in radiography school before hygiene so I learned a lot about general x-rays as well. Anyway, x-ray gun is fun

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Any idea how much radiation actually goes through that?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3.6 roentgen. Not great but not terrible

2 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 4

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

my golf group use 3.6 for a shot that ends up ok but isn't what we were trying for

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

sick, yes, but that's _no_ radiation sickness!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0