Sep 2, 2016 7:05 AM

Renowned1k90

Views

114237

Likes

3701

Dislikes

536

Nobody is saying he should be forced to stand. People fought so he'd have that choice, and everyone else the choice to criticize him for it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm a Vet- If sitting for the N.A. is the tool necessary to advance the dialogue on race,racism, and injustice in our nation, then so be it

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I like it when people do these types of things. I like ignorant people to be easily identifiable.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They fought for his right to sit AND for the right of the people to disagree with him sitting.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As a veteran, him or anyone making a peaceful protest utilizing their free speech (regardless of subject) is fine by me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Land of the free eh?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It is your right not to stand, but it is people's right to bitch about it too.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I bet these are the same people that say people shouldn't get so offended over things.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I can still think it's disrespectful

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reporter Voice: "Man has opinion. It may be different than yours. More at 11."

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I like how everyone is hung up on him 'standing or sitting'. That's not the issue. The issue is why he sat there. He thinks America sucks.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The part about black people getting shot in the back legally does kinda suck...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What's wrong with sitting during an anthem. I sit during The Imperial March all the time, noone cares.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Do you want to get Force choked? Because that's how you get Force choked.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You know. I feel like I've proved I'm American enough when I said the pledge of allegiance in school every day from K-9th.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love the U.S. but we have some serious Nationalism going on and it's fucked up.

10 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 20

Well we've had "WE'RE THE BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WOOHOO MURICA" shoved down our throats our whole lives so its not that surprising

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think it's a lack of that's the problem. It seems like it has become hip and cool to have contempt for the nation one resides in.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

National pride is fine. There is some straight up Fascism that's being exposed in this.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

He has the right to sit, I have the right to not like it. Freedom is awesome!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian, I don't mind your nationalism .. it's your presidential candidates I'm worried about.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Our presidential candidates (at least one of them) are a manifestation of our nationalism.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'd argue that it's a manifestation of ignorance and lack of proper education.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The US is a large, geographically & ethnically diverse country without a long shared history, monarch, or ethnic culture to unite around,1/2

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

national symbols (the flag, founding fathers, national anthem, etc.) tend to fill that role for Americans. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

"If black people want to see change, they should protest peacefully!" "BUT NOT LIKE THAT"

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 7

Any person has the right to protest how they want within the law, I have the right to protest how you protest.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

(1/2) And we can to criticize you for it, and you can criticize our criticism, and we can criticize your criticism of our criticism and

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(2/2) http://I.imgur.com/6D3XuS7.jpeg

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I love it, I wish I could give you more upvotes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that rifle the soldier on the left is holding makes no sense mechanically.

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 13

Magic.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Magazine is too far forward.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Wooden grease gun?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't you guys think you're overanalyzing this

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dude. It's a cartoon. It matters even less than this issue.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

the issue itself is overhyped and doesn't matter to me at all, so that is kind of a moot point.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Could be a submachinegun like the early Beretta: but the ejection port is too far back.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

exactly, it'd be ejecting round half a foot back from the magwell.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I always thought this was such a cool gun

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Iron and wood beats synthetics, they literally don't make 'em like they used to.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Def suppose to be a M1 Carbine but not a very good pic lol

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I figured it was some kind of M1/M3 hybrid that the artist hobbled together without getting any kind of source material to reference.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He ain't hurtin anybody. Could care less, and I'm a veteran.

10 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 22

I don't think you're a _dead_ veteran, maybe their opinion weighs more

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 18

Nah, dead veterans are usually only used when someone doesn't have real points to their argument. Unless its about the state of the VA.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

kinda my point but now i'm buried in bad reply graveyard and nothing mattress

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It happens

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same here. Got out a few months ago and I this doesn't bother me at all

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I'm a vegan.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

It's like saying my thought and prayers are with blablabla. It doesn't help but I guess everyone expects you to do it. I definitely will 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

remember tragic events and everything but I am not going to do stupid shit just because other people expect me to.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, they did die for his right to make that choice. But that doesn't make it less disrespectful.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was just practicing sitting the bench for when the season starts.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

Brutal. +1

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People saying he has to stand makes no sense to me because that means we all have to mindlessly swear allegiance which isn't free speech

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Nobody is forcing you but we can judge you if you choose to be disrespectful.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And americans say america is the freest country in the world...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's easier for people to profess righteous indignation than take CK's point and admit that something in America is deeply wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Something in America is deeply wrong but it won't get fixed by sitter on your ass.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It gets people talking about it, right? Also, he just donated (or will) 1million dollars to various community groups.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He is doing it literally and in doing it, as an NFL player, he has sent more of a message than someone throwing rocks at police.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You win

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Honestly I'm surprised people noticed and immediately took offense before knowing what was going on. Then he was like "social issues blah."

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 23, 2017 12:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I honestly would have just guessed he was focusing on the game tbh.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm upset that he sat AND because he chose a stupid reason to protest.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 23, 2017 12:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He says he won't support a country who treats blacks so poor.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

His reason for not standing is being criticized, not whether he should have the right.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 11

Not from everything I've seen, it's pretty set on him sitting is disrespecting veterans.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

He stood up during the 3rd/4th quarter when someone was singing God Bless America. He has an issue with the country/cops, not veterans. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People incorrectly labeled him as attacking vets when that isn't what his point was at all,even when he talked about his reasons for sitting

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have not seen a single comment about him disrespecting vets. It has to do with his BS "blacks are so oppressed" narrative.Were tired of it

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Maybe you should go read the SF police department's racist emails and treatment of blacks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah,veterans are precious,exept if they need healthcare,then they are fucked...

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

I know people who bring up veterans like this, also one or two voted for congress people that voted against veteran health bills.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The left his trying to deflect and make it seem like all dissent is mindless patriotism. It's the anti-american values they push.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What does anti-american exactly mean ?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

anti-corporate interests,like minimum wage increases,enviormental regulation,tax increases for corporations

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it is because he wants to push the BLM "blacks are so oppressed narrative" and people are tired of that BS.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Just because you don't personally see it happening doesn't make it BS. There are still instances where minorities are unfairly targeted.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There instances of that for everyone because of quotas. As far as proportions go it is due to criminality.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*kicks the door down* NOT AS BRAVE AS THESE SOLDIERS!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's also an argument that perhaps the anthem is a little overplayed and could be used a little less frequently to have more meaning.

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 11

COMMIE BASTARD. ANTHEM MUST BE PLAYED 24/7 AT THE START AND MIDDLE AND END OF EVERYTHING AND FLAGS EVERYWHERE FOR MAXIMUM PATRIOTISM

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/9193480_f520.jpg like that aaaaaawwwwwh sheeeeet bruh

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Fuckin' brilliant <3 :P

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I like your point. I believe an anthem should only be used before international sports events but I guess that opinion will be unpopular.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Hundreds of people from across the nation have been protesting to preserve the nations largest fresh water source from a foreign 1/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

companie's effort in creating a pipeline and is ignored by the general public and mainstream media. A guy and someone on his team 2/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Express their right to protest by not standing during the national anthem and it's on top news articles across the nation.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

On one hand Americans think that their government is constantly betraying them on the other they attack anyone that doesn't worship USA too.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 15

These two things aren't conflicting but your sentence is set up to make them seem like they are

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

I love my country but hate my government.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What do you love then exactly? The people? The landscape? The animals? The architecture? USA IS the state. That is why nationalism is BS

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Good question, I'll have to think about that.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was pretty ironic when I was forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance in school, on penalty of suspension.

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 6

That always pissed me off so much. Pretty much the main, if not only, reason I will never rise for the pledge.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I don't mind rising, to show respect for those who do like the pledge. But I won't say it. But that's just me. Play it as you feel it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well that's illegal. Supreme Court ruled it a violation of the First amendment looking ago.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I once got straight up screamed at by a teacher for not standing. the second everyone stood up I turned to face the flag and took my hat off

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You could wear hats in school?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

it was the first class of the day and my teacher was laid back as hell, let us chill in the caf on that particular day, so I still had it on

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You only got away with a hat at my school if it was camo or had the confederate flag on it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

...how old are you? This was settled a long time ago

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

66. But I could just about write a book relating incidents in which authority figures didn't care about law when dealing with children.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah, that sounds about right. Local bureaucracies are slow to keep up, especially when there are culture war points to win.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They often win when they threaten children with further punishments when those children demand their rights under the law.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's because they're full of crap.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, some schools break the law because they intimidate kids and parents don't know about the 1943 Barnette case

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They're risking federal funding money if they get caught breaking the law like that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They sure are! Some administrators haven't gotten the memo or just don't care, though

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What? Did the SCOTUS rule on that i missed.There was a few kids in my elementary school that didn't stand for the pledge, in the 1980's 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It was in the 1940's when they ruled it was a violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments to force participation.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd be pissed at anyone who wouldn't, but still an oath given under duress really doesn't mean anything. It shouldn't be asked.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah,we had to sing the romanian national anthem in a school for hungarian minorties ,while the mayor blamed everything on hungarians...

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I remember a special school assembly called in HS so the principal could explain to the students why black people shouldn't eat crabs

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

?technically the bible forbids eating seefood without fins and scales.What reason did he give?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She said that since crabs ate the bodies of slaves who died and were thrown off of slave ships, it would be like cannibalism

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't crabs eat just about anybody they can find? Regardless of race?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kmm,so was this in Texas or Florida?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You don't have to say the pledge. I am a high school teacher and I never stand for the pledge myself. My students get to choose.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He has the right to sit during the anthem, free from punishment by government. His employers are free to punish him and fans can stay away.

10 years ago | Likes 667 Dislikes 34

You say "punish" like he did something worthy of punishment. He sat his ass down. He didn't run a dog-fighting ring or rape somebody.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

I said the same thing and got downvotes. Good for you mate

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't think the NFL has the right to punish him per the collective bargaining agreement. He's not breaking any rules or laws.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No, you are not beholden to your employer, unless it's stated in the contract of employment, they cannot reprimand you when they disagree.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

This is exactly the kind of thing you'll find in an NFL contract. Basically, the "embarrass us and you're history" clause.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Quite a few states have at will employment, anyone can be fired and or quit for any reason or even no reason.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's different from reprimand. Also pretty a fuckin despicable rule. Glad we don't have that where I'm from.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I think getting fired for not agreeing would be considered a reprimand lol

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well fair enough it's just a matter of terminology, I tend to think of a reprimand as an internal punishment. If you fire someone, it's 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 23, 2017 12:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

capture him and cut off the human horn

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This guy? https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Unicorn-MAN.jpg

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

aw man, beat me to it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequences

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

On what ground? What consequences? This whole issue is retarded.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which in turn also means I can say people are assholes for making this action have consequences

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why should he be facing consequences, i mean i think hes a little shit but isnt he using it to justify his probability of getting kicked

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You calling him a little shit are the consequences I'm talking about.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Who said he called him a shit for not standing up? You are pushing it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Thank you. So many idiots arguing over "Free speech," which it has nothing to do with. He's not gonna get arrested.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Point isn't whether he has a right, thats a given,Its whether he wants to be a douche. Being a douche isn't a right or has to be respected.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Just checking, is standing up (or in this case, sitting down) for something you believe in, being a douche?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They're free to criticize him for what he did, but not punish.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I like that everyone is playing this game. This cartoon is in of itself exercising the right to their opinion and belief in their statement.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Team already said its his right to sit if he wants

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Unless you work for the government, then they can punish you as your employer

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

As a 49er fan. Idgaf if he sits or stands. Just win the damn games and a fucking super bowl

10 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 15

As a fellow 49ers fan, I 100% agree! Can't let the Warriors or Giants have all the championship wins!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Lol Kaepernick sits all game anyway...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He'd have to get off the bench first

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

aka you want him off the team. The guy is a joke mentally, not invested in the team, and physically his arm is shot. Go Gabbert I guess

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I feel like this entire "issue" is equivalent to being angry at someone for not singing happy birthday to you

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 4

Can I be angry that nobody sings me happy birthday?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't have anyone to get angry at! Lucky me! Oh wait.... I made myself sad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meh. Football is all about tradition and superstition. People are even more vehement about their favorite teams than the elections.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can confirm have honestly not given a shit about presidentional election but i gove all shits to the raiders

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Build a big wall around NFL and make the NHL pay for it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More like build a wall and make thr eagles pay for it

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They have those rights, but it'd still be pathetic if that's how they reacted.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As a Canadian, what in the hell was he protesting, anyway?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well said. I disagree about his employer's right to punish. I would argue that his rights should not be infringed upon. Fans' choice yes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

he has a right to be a douche and people have a right to call him a douche.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

His employers shouldn't be free to punish him.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

and fans have the right to complain about his not standing and in turn not buy his shit. Alot of people dont understand this for some reason

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

And people have the right to consider the reason for your complaint invalid.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

I mean, you arent wrong about the right part, but thanks for still proving my point valid

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Don't the fans have the right to say whatever they'd like?

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I find this rather dumb, you know damn well they are demonizing him on an international level

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes they do.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, and the news has the right to over-report on it, doesn't mean either is healthy for society.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

If NFL gets any gov't funds, perks or special protections, those would hopefully be in jeopardy if they punished him.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

You mean like if they and every other NFL team got tax breaks and subsidies and other incentives to build their stadiums in certain cities?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, exactly. We can't be giving free money to organizations that suppress free speech.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm not saying we should execute him, but I also have the right to be annoyed and see it as a sign of disrespect.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 19

And people have the right to disagree with your view.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 23, 2017 12:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Saying he's wrong is valid. Saying what he's doing is "un-American" is just plain incorrect.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I don't think it's disrespectful to soldiers. In fact I feel the opposite. He's exercising his American right. The song espouses the "land..

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

..of the free," which he obviously doesn't agree with.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

How doesn't he agree with it?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because apparently the Blacks are still oppressed, despite the fact they have completely equal rights and laws that support them

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And i have the right to call you a whiny cunt who's self worth somehow depends on the number of brown kids your government is able to kill

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

"brown kids your government is able to kill" M8, first off all "brown kids"? Second of all the government's not "killing brown kids" what...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Whoa there mate, you should be pulling your head out of your ass before making such comments, they are a little muffled.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0