unwaver
3348
246
26
Additionally
The people on here in support of CSAM are deplorable cowards that I wish I could meet face to face. :)
petonious
These should not be house resolutions. What crap. The founding fathers would have dickslapped these fucktards to death.
lovehandlesmessiah
#2 So we discovered the Fetterman’s in Texas and Florida.
How many other “Democrat” Reps and Senators in Congress are just sleeper agents for the Right?
CraftyGiant
Water is life, disbar them all.
DeadWhiteMale
Judge Kurt Englehardt implies that the government can kill citizens at will.
00110001001110010011100000110100
"You're welcome" - please vote for me again
rfn99
It probably doesn't protect citizens from breathing polluted air (like second hand cigarette smoke and car exhaust). Remember that the Constitution was written water pollution wasn't much of an issue.
StephenDaniels
#1, Of course the Constitution provides a solution to all governmental wrong doing. It's voting the bums out of office.
TheNoggle
its worth noting on the AI CSAM ruling that is only applicable to the possession, as there isn't a victim. The other charges all go through as they should, but the wording of requiring there to be a victim is what keeps that 2002 supreme court ruling from allowing that to go through. The judge expressed concern and urged the supreme court to update their 2002 ruling to accomodate such cases.
bourbonandbaddecisions
Suprised? The US was only one of two countries to vote against food being a basic human right https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/86770/why-did-the-us-and-israel-vote-against-making-food-a-human-right
CuddlyCynic
So what you're saying is we need to overthrow the government and write a new constitution? Okay.
NVGoddesscottage
Overthrow ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING CONNECTED TO TRUMP.
lovehandlesmessiah
The curious thing is the DSM VI will have a separate diagnostic for Trump because malignant narcissism is too broad and lacks sufficient horror if, say, one were elected president and started a war in Iran.
CraftyGiant
Clean water is in the constitution already it's filed under "Life"
ChewyTheWookie
#2 So no roads, schools, parks, fire stations, police, 8 hour work days or weekends off
Gargwill
Well none of that is socialism, but it is what they're trying to ban, yes.
marsilies
Yeah, anyone who signed that resolution doesn't understand what socialism actually is, if not in willful denial. It reminds me of this meme.
Fyffer
Not that I like the ruling, but I'm pretty sure drinking water isn't in there, sadly. Isn't that what the Clean Water Act was for?
NVGoddesscottage
Due process starts with informed consent. It’s not about the water, it was about due process. Had people been told, they could have taken other actions to prevent their babies and children from becoming intellectually disabled through lead poisoning. Trust me, that’s gonna cost a lot more in the long run than swapping out those pipes.
Fyffer
Not arguing that. Just feels like they used the wrong thing to base their argument on.
killdread
The 9th amendment is pretty clear that it's an illegal ruling. Also the 14th, as hiding poison in the water is depriving people of life.