Martin Luther King

Sep 22, 2016 11:54 PM

PoliticalDragon

Views

95726

Likes

3490

Dislikes

442

Martin Luther King

Imgur sure does love what it imagines MLK was like. http://imgur.com/lwmHPoy

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Was killed for his efforts.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Remember, everyone, according to this site, obstructing traffic is terrorism, therefore MLK was a terrorist.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Fuck off OP

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

... dead at 39.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

They cut him open and determined he had the heart of somebody over 60. They said the years of stress were taking its toll on his body.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Got shot anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

Assassinated. There's a bunch of peaceful protest Natives being pepper sprayed and attacked by dogs in ND. Interesting parallel.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Peaceful protest = Media blackout. http://fair.org/home/dakota-access-blackout-continues-on-abc-nbc-news/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because the fallout after Kaepernick's protest wasn't a widely covered story.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh come on, I didn't say that. But bigger disruptions get more coverage, for better or worse.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MLK never had legitimate protests while others rioted for personal gain and his opponents used the rioters to discredit him and his ideals.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

wow, that sure sounds familiar. Can't quite put my finger on it though. It'll come to me eventually.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Well, you just let me know when the next BLM leader says something akin to "we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

People in the 60s still thought he was promoting looting, rioting, and violence.

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 5

OK.... but kneeling isn't allowed either, apparently.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Remember guys. You don't actually have to know black history, you get to preach to black people as ignorantly as you want.

10 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 12

.. and facts, evidence, statistics and (in today's world) video footage mean nothing

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

1/2 They said exactly the same things about MLK during his day that anti BLM people say about BLM today. Including that he was just

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

pretending to be non-violent, that he was stoking racial hatred and profiting from it, that he got people angry at innocents, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yall don't give a fuck about MLK. Just want people who are oppressed to voice their outrage in a way that's palatable to you. Dont bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

"Stop intruding on my fantasy that the world works the way I was taught it does!"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Back in his day many said that he should stop doing what he was doing because it would further separate the country. Like you guys.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

This is an extremely white-washed version of history, and ignores a lot of the violence that did happen.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

2) of a concept today to comprehend. It's right there in the "I have a dream" speech, too.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

It's not white-washed. MLK constantly spoke out against riots and condemned the actions of members of his own race. It just seems to alien

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

This is idiotic. His era had insane violent riots. Sure he didn't act in such a way but to call the entire movement peaceful is foolish

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

It's not idiotic. MLK constantly spoke out against riots. "we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds." Ring a bell? From "I have a dream"? No?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

"Riots are the language of the unheard" - Who could have possibly said that?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same man who condemned them and said "we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You've misunderstood the context if you're thinking he was saying riots were an acceptable response or an effective one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, he's not saying that, what he's saying is when people have no other course of action to express their frustration, they turn to rioting.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but, he's saying violence and anger do not create solutions. And that rioting will not create an effective response.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, either way the riots happened. It in no way matters if mlk jr was against riots

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It very much does. There's no great person representing the cause. It needs one, quickly.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're making the assumption that MLKs calmness made the change happen. That's not an assumption you can just make. The riots certainly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm not making any assumption, I am pointing out the lack of a leaders. Leaders condemn and apologize for the negative actions of their own

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Helped bring the issue to the forefront. For years calm people have talked about racism and nothing has changed. Riots get talks started

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2) people while simultaneously explaining the circumstances that lead to their happening. We don't have that now, and we need it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Martin Luther King was also arrested countless times and oh, assassinated for his beliefs.

10 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 5

I don't understand your point. That's the price of change. And he full well expected it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Obamas motto is change and he isn't dead

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't say he's made much change at all when it comes to racism and racial inequality.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By the US government no less

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

"But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 200 Dislikes 7

"A riot is the language of the unheard"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Just so people know this is MLK quote

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. " 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 6

Constantly broke the law with his protests. Got arrested all the time. Was hated during his life for those protests.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of course he was hated. That's beside the point. Anybody that speaks out against injustice is going to be "hated."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not at all beside the point. BLM and MLK are hated for the exact same reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Insofar as they are questioning the status quo. Yes they are.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It remains to be seen if BLM is actually dedicated to non-violence. The ambush murders call that into question.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last I checked those weren't associated with BLM whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People back then claimed he promoted violence and rioting, they also deflected with "What about crime in the black community?"

10 years ago | Likes 254 Dislikes 11

Yeah but they were wrong. Now they're right.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

10 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 4

I didn't expect so many upvotes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So... BLM = MLK!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Can't remember MLK's protests ever screaming "WHAT DO WE WANT? DEAD COPS!"

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 39

So you were alive back then?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

No, those were Malcom X supporters. Which, incidentally, helped MLK a lot because he seemed like the peaceful alternative.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

...I think we're missing a "peaceful alternative" in today's day and age, then.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Looks at the sources* Hm... Not super credible, but hey, it's whatever.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I guess they never shouted anything like "pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon," either?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Except at that time the FBI had and entire program built up to take him down. Not to mention the Black Panther assassination.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

And yet they still didn't call for those things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Neither did BLM. Stop making shit up.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well they weren't protesting police state terrorism back then.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 17

So they screamed "WHAT DO WE WANT? DEAD WHITES!"? I don't remember hearing that in Humanities.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

Pretty sure some black person somewhere shouted that within the context of segregation.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Brit, police state terrorism?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Some cops are fucking cunts. No one really bothers to think about this, because when you think you're the victim and go off righting 3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

be shot by cops, because they're more likely to commit crime (Because poverty) this is mischaracterized generally as *~evil cops~* because 2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

US police kill 1000+ people/year. True, some deserve it. However, some are innocent of any crime, and/or unarmed, and some are children. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2/2 However, police LITERALLY terrorize 100k+ of innocent, law-abiding black people/year through racial profiling, excess force, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lots of people in the US are shot. Several of them by cops. Percapita, black people are more likely to commit crime (because poverty) and 1

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

percieved wrongs, you get endorphine rushes and other "victims" bolster your confirmation bias. Which has lead to a whole heap of shit. 4

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So, just to confirm, you are saying there is no police state terrorism but a bunch of people don't understand statistics and got all pissy?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So they got rights, but the culture of ignorance never changed or went away???

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

*whoooosh

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm not from America so I'm just trying to understand

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Black people in America don't suffer from racism because they're ignorant, it's because we're all racist.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wasn't saying justthe Blacks are ignorant btw. I was saying the culture of ignorance, meaning two-way ignorance between whites and blacks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Another ignorant post on MLK Jr. with the point of shaming black people? I'll see you on the front page!

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 15

this website is ridiculous.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Seems to me it's shaming people who loot things, burn things, or attack things.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

I'm not saying RIOT=GOOD CHANGE. I'm stressing to acknowledge WHY these happen in the fucking first place.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But they themselves say why it happens. It's not like they're muted. Why's it your job to step in and "acknowledge" it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Listen, moron. If you actually KNEW ANYTHING about MLK Jr, you'd know what he'd have to say about riots.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I thought we were talking about the reason OP made a post using MLK?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But I'm not a self-important racist who WANTS black people to be persecuted so I can heroically come to their defense, so what do I know?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

The civil rights movement wasn't all peacewalks and chanting, and it doesn't change that they got beaten for not being violent anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Is anyone saying otherwise?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

If you actually KNEW anything about history, you'd know that these riots usually come along when people reach the boiling point of what

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

they're willing to put up with.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's odd how that boiling point fluctuates so darn much.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

But does it matter? Most of the people here are just like you. You don't have to know anything about black people, but you do know that

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

What is it you think I need to know about black people?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"blacks just love to play the victim" or some inane shit. Whatever peaceful protests happen go ignored by you, and then when a riot does

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I wasn't aware that they were directing their protests at me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

eventually happen, that's when you show up so you can go on about how it's just a black scheme to steal, rob and pillage.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I actually show up to go on about how people are stealing, robbing, and pillaging, and they should really stop. But keep shouting "BLACK".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's morons like yourself that decide to use MLK Jr. as a bludgeon to shame black people without even knowing his history.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Uh oh, there he goes again. Make sure to say it nice and loud that we're shaming BLACK PEOPLE. You won't convince yourself, otherwise.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

TIL you think all blacks are violent savages unable to stop themselves from looting stores and burning buildings. 0100 is totes racist tho.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was still gunned down by a white dude. Nice argument though.

10 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 9

So was Malcolm X...oh wait blacks killed him, nice argument though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 18

FBI dude

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Likely known ahead of time by the FBI. They were ran by some seriously paranoid racist fucks at the time.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

v

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's relevant to him changing the world... how?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 22

I guess the point is that people only want to change the world nowadays if they don't have to pay the price of being martyred for it?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I think there's still martyrs. Like that little girl, shot in the head. I guess they're just not for the specific change certain people want

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh I agree, my comment was mainly bitter sarcasm. Funny how they downvoted you and declined a response to your very fair question.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go watch Mississippi Burning if you think the civil rights era was peaceful. All realistic philosophies agree that power comes from violence

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 7

I have nothing of substance to add, I just wanted to point out I read that as "All realistic pedophiles" and was confused. Carry on sir.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

"Realistic" in the sense that they call themselves realists. Hannah Arendt makes a strong argument for violence actually destroying power.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I disagree. Lets fight about it. Just kidding, youre right my statement is too simplistic.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you disagree with the violence comment, youre some kind of hippy who should argue with Von Clausewitz.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

First rule of power: Whoever has the power makes the rules.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Its amazing who the internet turns up. +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And writes the history books

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty fed up with people thinking everything that happened in the 50s and 60s was king. Malcolm X, Huey Newton, Fred Hampton, Bobby

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Seal all did important work, some of it through violence

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Newton was murdered by a black supremacist drug dealer from a radical offshoot of New Panthers in Oakland. He was kicking ass.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The fbi poisoned and murdered Hampton

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tried to make it look like he'd od'd on sleeping pills and was shot by a member. They ended up trying to cull witnesses.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Makes me wonder about if the surviving members of the Move 9 in prison should be exonerated...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I met Ramona Africa once, John Africa's widow... her activism was a bit scaled back from the 80's move stuff but very interesting to hear.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

MLK though would not approve the folks who only want to complain about BLM and not police brutality against blacks. Quotes:

10 years ago | Likes 210 Dislikes 17

MLK constantly spoke out against riots and condemned their actions. Quote: well, read "I have a dream" - it's in there, too.,

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Thank you. Too often I see MLK trotted out to decry this behavior, and while he'd decry it, he'd remind us all of why it was happening.

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 5

"Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will." wow yep humbled

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ur right, reading ur link I feel he has been idealised/used. Never considered the appearance of acceptance as opposed to real acceptance

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I agree with you, but I feel part of the problem is now protests and riots are not focused on brutality, but rather any black death. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

Charlotte is not a case of race or brute as far as I can tell, at best, maybe a nervous overreaction. Better cases exist. This feels forced.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

most police violence happens to whites and if black people dont want police aroud then maybe they should work on their high crime rate

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 45

They do work on it. There are tons of urban groups trying to stop gang violence. You just never hear about it because no one thinks it's (1)

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

No they never heard about it because they don't care to know or listen. They don't care until something piques they're interest in outrage.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

newsworthy. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

and as the crime rate goes down *MAGICALLY* police fatalities go down with it. imagine that

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 19

Some of these shootings weren't because of crime, and some of the killings were because of Perry crimes (Eric Garner selling cigarettes)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

If you're going to use facts.... Use THE FACTS... He was ILLEGALLY selling cigs & RESISTING arrest. Not a reason to die..But he wasn't 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

I'm not sure what you're trying to say. you're first comment implied that they aren't trying, when they are.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

some might be but right now blacks account for almost 50% of all murders in the usa and they are only 13% of the population

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

*your, sorry.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even though it does not happen as often as the media wants you to believe?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Here's the problem: a lot of these cases are ambiguous. Not all, but a lot. There's no easy right or wrong to be seen with a careful eye.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I too remember when Martin Luther King Jr. was well respected when he was alive

10 years ago | Likes 666 Dislikes 21

War. War never changed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Interesting that is from the Birmingham, Alabama newspaper.

10 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 2

The sarcasm is strong with this one

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

After he was killed the D.C. riots burned 1200 buildings to the ground

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Look at what upset followers of that other non-violent guy, if you believe he actually existed, named Jesus did and do.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Damn, @TestAccount321. The 13th Amendment was put in place to keep you from owning @OP like that, you know.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

*Googles 13th amendment* Oh damn, that was pretty good!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I roll my eyes at people who gripe about black protests and riots, who all seem to believe they'd have respected MLK and-

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

-the Civil Rights Movement, were they alive or older at the time.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

THANK YOU SO MUCH. ARGH! I STUDIED THIS BS FOR 8 FUCKING YEARS AND PPL STILL BELIEVE THR FUCKING MEMES!

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

The police attacked him and his followers. Dogs - fire hoses

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How to make @OP look like an asshole with one easy trick!

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I have to say I'm kinda surprised he isn't drawn in a racial charicachure, implying nothing just find it interesting.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ooooo moded

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who said anything about respect?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

and of course for his efforts HE GOT SHOT.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

"Sometimes you need to sacrifice the body to make the play" -Vince Lombardi's retard cousin

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

My favorite speech of his is 'I've been to the mountaintop' his last speech before he was killed that kinda foreshadowed his own death

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My favorite speech of his is 'I've been to the mountaintop' his last speech before he was killed that kinda foreshadowed his own death

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

im uploading this pc here

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

never mind you should put it up,you found the pic

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

What does the writing say?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And even WITHOUT the media on his dick, he and his group remained peaceful and affected meaningful change. Kind of puts it in perspective.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 42

That's how BLM is today, despite the assholes rioting in their name.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I don't think you understood this comic

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

MLK Jr wasn't the entirety of the Civil Rights Movement. Various issues such as blacks willing to arm themselves played part as well.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

What if there were riots and looting during MLKs time too, were there?

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 3

As with any movement, particularly in a formative time, there are several groups under a blanket term. Some of these included-

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Civil Rights Movement" and "Feminism." During the 50s and 60s, both movements were vastly fragmented, due to various grievances in -

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-localized areas and culture. Oppression and discrimination (on any format) was addressed by local leaders in any way they saw fit to cause-

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-an upset within the community.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea. Malcolm X and friends really went the physical route instead of the symbolic.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

150+ in 1967 alone

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

well, they actually had legitimate grievances. So that tends to motivate people and gather support.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I've seen some ridiculous shit on imgur. But my heart weeps that you could be this ill-informed on the Civil Rights Movement.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 8

Yeah! Because this is America amirite?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perhaps they are not American. I don't know much American history so I didn't know this either.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

That's why there has been a push for international human rights museums and the education of international struggles and horrors.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Tons. He didn't start or lead them but they were happening all over.

10 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 0

I mean more specifically during his protests. Were there times when they incited violence like this cartoon suggests

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

If by incited violence you mean people were violent towards them for protesting, then yes.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

It's the same for BLM - They don't incite or participate in rioting, but they're blamed by ignorant fuckwads anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im pretty sure blm started a riot

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A riot is the language of the unheard. MLK. https://imgur.com/2n33Gi4

10 years ago | Likes 249 Dislikes 20

Modern day BLM riots are more stupid students that should know better

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Sure it's a language, and it translates "I'm desperate and angry so fuck innocent people and their things, it makes me feel better"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Completely out of context and deliberate twisting of his words.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Click the link, it's the whole quote. Not out of context.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

By any means necessary. -Malcom X

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 10

**Malcolm

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it is worth noting that this is a quote taken from his writings and his speeches concerning how blacks should defend against lynching

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

and other forms of violence against simply because they were black. malcolm X did not once lead violent protest.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Never equate MLK and M-X. They had 2 completely different visions for America, one of unity and one of two Americas, a white and black USA

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

that's actually yet another common misunderstanding. the two had a lot more in common than high school text books and public tv let on

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yes, but READ THE FIRST LINE. When put eloquently, like this, it could promote understanding. Today, however, I was told "You know

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

3) anecdotal, it's representative of the overall demeanor today. Instead of MLK's quote, we get "shit's fucked up, you don't know."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

2) absolutely nothing because you're not black and have never been around a black community." (which was wrong) - and while the quote is

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

That's taken out of context. Read the whole quote.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 19

I posted the whole quite. It isn't taken out of context.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The rest of the fucking context is right fucking there, you fucking spoon.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

I have read it, many times. It doesn't change the meaning of the last line whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Yes, it does. Context matters a LOT. He's not saying it's right, he's saying it's a wrong in response to a wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2) When you say it like this, you make it sound like a riot is acceptable and appropriate response to being unheard.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I didn't think that had been misunderstood, but I guess imgur isn't very good for these things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My favorite thing about Imgur is when the majority tells the minority how to properly protest.

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 9

My favorite thing is when attractive people post selfies for fapping to, but hey, we all come here for our own reasons. America.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

TIL demanding the people you don't like die en mass for your disdain for them = a protest. Guess Hitler wasn't so bad eh, Strawman?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

When did this ever happen?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

WHAT DO WE WANT? DEAD COPS! WHEN DO WE WANT THEM? NOW! PIGS IN A BLANKET, FRY 'EM LIKE BACON!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please debunk pigs in a blanket now, or any number of other instances of the demand for death by dip shits.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it how to properly protest or just not to destroy shit and hurt people?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 21

Just like they told Martin Luther King.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yea I saw the top comment too, it doesn't change the very real fact that people are getting hurt.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Yes. That's why they're protesting.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0