Picolitre dispensing

Oct 23, 2025 2:53 PM

DOcelot1

Views

22269

Likes

588

Dislikes

11

How dafuq?

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This accuracy has been around for a while in the industrial print business. Impressive still.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure this is how the thousands of DNA sequences I order get made

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Couldn't find details, but it probably uses Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 or PZT as piezoelectric material

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had things like these at a old lab, HP also made a nanolitre dispenser using their inkjet printer heads.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 months ago (deleted Nov 15, 2025 10:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Extremely

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Anyone have the link to purchase this device or link to the manufacturing company?

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of cyan, system failure.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If anyone knows, I’d like to know what company makes this instrument

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

M2-Automation - https://www.youtube.com/@M2TechChannel

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally, a device to put the correct amount of orange juice in mimosas

11 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is a fabulous advertisement.

11 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Indeed. I now recognize that I need this product to satisfy all my microscopic droplet needs around the house.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What is the point of this?

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta make it do Bad Apple frame-by-frame. (Not like those folks who tried to run Doom on bacteria. https://www.popsci.com/science/doom-e-coli-cells/ )

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Concept. Medical tattoos that release medication over time. When your tat's gone, it's time for a re-fil

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With these volumes and drop sizes, wouldn’t cohesion, static electricity and rapid evaporation become major issues?

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Presumably the instrument probably works in a compartment that is cooled and well grounded to prevent things like that. Equipment this precise should have things like that accounted for because you're right, they would absolutely cause issues if not factored into the design and usage of it.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like Dr.Mario.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wonder how it would do painting mini's ? put the mini on a 360 gyro gimbal. turn it into a paint cnc

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn that's impressive!

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Will this help in 3d printing?

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so - an inkjet printer without the casing around it.

11 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

So a) dont disparage inkjet printing, it was one of the major technological innovations of the late 20th century b) this level of precision is orders of magnitude more advanced

11 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

This seems focused on the volume, not the size of the droplets. So may well share some tech, but could also be very different.

11 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The one is a function of the other.

And don't knock it. Inkjet printers are actually a pretty remarkable piece of technology and the concept finds a lot of uses elsewhere.

The economics of it as targeted at home users are completely crazy, but that's not really the same thing.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Piezoelectric actuators are amazing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GbrgwghUbM

11 months ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

We use them for motion control in test systems at work. You can get linear motion piezo stages that will easily make sub-micron motions. Expensive piezo stages can even achieve sub-nanometer motion. For reference, a human hair is ~90,000 nm wide. A water molecule is about 1.5 nm across. So these stages can make an incremental move that is smaller than a water molecule. It's hard to even fathom because the scale is so incomprehensibly small.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow. I understood none of that, but sounds interesting! Go science !

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's really impressive, I bet it's an ultrasonic technology

11 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Acoustic liquid handlers don't look like this. They use water to conduct ultrasound so it's more like a weird water fountain in a box. Look up Beckman Echo.

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Some are, some are positive displacement. Look up automated liquid handling technology

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Company I work for used to make a pneumatic femtoliter dispenser. Would be used with a glass capillary similar to what is shown. Used a negative balance pressure when not dispensing to prevent capillary action. Technically not automated like this but it wouldn't have been too hard to bolt it on to one of our automated systems. Discontinued it the other year without replacement for no discernible reason beyond the product manager not wanting to source a new regulator (a supplier went under).

11 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

but does it sonic wood

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I believe it's based on piezos, which tend to be a step or two above ultrasonics in terms of achievable accuracy/resolution.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did someone have to gather the Chaos Emeralds first?

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Okay sounds and looks like AI. WTF would someone need droplets this small from the same source? Asking an immunologist or someone in chemistry for a real world need.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Companies are working on manufacturing TV displays using inkjet printing technology. This would improve the precision.

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks don't know why I get a thumbs down for asking a question. A lot of things these days with AI have a fake sounding voice like that.

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that how they make LSD dots?

11 months ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 1

Shots for dots?

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

11 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It will be

11 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

You dont need that kind of precision for that

11 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My very first thought

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For those into picodosing, sure.

11 months ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

Priceless

11 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

No, it’s about $3.50

11 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Aw, nar tree fity!

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. Currently the technique called 'volumetric liquid dosing' is used. The LSD is diluted into a liquid solution, then distributed onto whatever the carrier material is. It allows the 'chemists' to deal with a solution rather than trying to handle microscopic amounts accurately.
It's generally pretty effective at preventing unreliable potency, but this looks way better.

11 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Hence the blotter paper. There is a dry process as well, which, back in the day, was considered superior in terms of quality.

11 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Interesting. I wasn't aware of that.

11 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you’re old enough to remember these,

They were dry process. Powder sandwiched between two thin pieces of rice paper, not blotter. Though how you’d mill the stuff fine enough without disappearing into a permanent kaleidoscope fog escapes me.

11 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'll be dipped. That's elegant.

11 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0