In case you havnt seen this grouping with the outlines.

Jan 9, 2026 5:21 PM

She was murdered. No debate.

“Fucking bitch” -ice agent after killing her

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Murderer.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He was withdrawing his gun while she was still in reverse.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stupid miserable murdering dog shit pile of fucking cancer had his adress leaked so nobody do anything untoward with that information. Your on the honor system now....

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are going to protect the little moron and move him to another area and tell him to keep his head down and shut your mouth. He will get away with MURDER Trump and ICE Barbie will let it happen and not loose any sleep at all.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's clearly in front of the vehicle. /s

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the Jan 6th convicts were pardoned and called patriots. This woman murdered by idiots is called a terrorist by the white house. I miss facts, or at least an effort to cover up a lie better.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So while I agree this is murder, going frame by frame auditing a .2 second clip of time and expecting any human brain to be able to make decision in it is kind of silly. The fact is the car wasn't coming at him, he had time to draw his gun, which means he had time to simply step out of the way (because he did). Minnesota is not a stand your ground state, and you have a duty to retreat. Self defense is an affirmative offense. Dude should be charged with murder, and let him make his case in court.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

even if he thought she was headed right toward him (looking at the footage I can see how might've thought that) he could've easily just stepped out of the way a couple feet to his right.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also, shooting a driver doesn't make the car stop. He killed her and the car kept on going. And who the fuck stands directly in front of a vehicle? You have her outnumbered, follow if she flees

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the first shot missed her. If it didn't he wouldn't have to shoot twice through the open window of the driver's side. Then shot 2 and shot 3 don't need to happen because he isn't in danger anymore. Either it happened because he's an idiot or *quick thinking* he realized he screwed up and killing her will make it go away :/.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Running from authority shouldnt carry a death sentence on the spot, whether from defiance, guilt. or fear.

Resisting arrest shouldnt carry a death sentence on the spot; most people will physically resist being restrained out of shock and indignation.

Disputing or arguing with authority shouldnt carry a death sentence on the spot.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's literally impossible to have taken any of those shots from in front of the vehicle.

8 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Where did you find this if I can ask?
I'm not doubting you at all just genuinely curious where I could find this sort of thing.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Honestly, just sketched it up myself. I wanted to see if it was even possible to take that shot from in front of the vehicle so I got a Honda pilot interior cutaway and drew a line from the headrest through roughly where the bullet hole seemed to be. Not exactly precision forensic science, but even just this seems pretty cut-n-dried.

8 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He pulled his gun before she started moving forward. End of story.

8 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This shit is why they want it to be illegal to film cops

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You had me at ICE

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

these people don`t care about reality, they decided the cop was right the second they read the news, stop giving them the benefit of the doubt, stop arguing with them, they will not change their minds, they are mentally dead. Make peace with the fact that they cannot be helped, stop trying to convince your abusers that they are doing a mistake, it will never work. They will only understand force, facts, consequences. Cut them off your life, stop treating them as your peers, they are not.

8 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You're not wrong, they don't care, and are only pretending to engage in debate to waste our time and amuse themselves, but realistically the only thing left to do after the talking stops is to start shooting. And I can't really fault people for not wanting to take that step, even if, by all appearances, we're already there.

Never stop talking, or at least never stop offering to talk.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this is false, sitting on the street would be enough to bring change, if people were truly united. all you would need to do is NOTHING and paralyze the country enough to be heard. how many businesses failed during the first few months of pandemic? I know you have been told your country is supernatural but you all underestimate how frail things truly are. Also when you go to protests stop getting in stupid fist fights with those animals, carry a rifle, thousands of kids died for that privilege.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Three shots, managed to get one through the windscreen.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Paramilitary execution squad.

8 months ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 3

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Surprisingly reasonable policy. I expect to see it axed soon and replaced with, "Just mag dump immediately. It won't stop the car, but taking one of Them down with you is more important."

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It literally says in point #2 "unless the vehicle is being operated in a way that threatens to cause death or serious injury". That's what MAGA is claiming she did.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And anyone with more than two neurons to rub together can see that wasn't what was happening. and in that SAME one, 'where no other reasonable means exists." He could have literally moved out of the way even more than he was. Don't give these fascist fuckwits any more ammo.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not giving them more ammo. I'm telling you what ammo they're using. That is the narrative. She "floored a 5,000lb SUV and he only had a millisecond to react".

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dont parrot any of their lines or logic, don't give them ANYTHING. Period. End of story. It doesn't matter what they are saying at this point. Any acknowledgement of anything they say is helping them.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yet we see in the videos it was not operated in a way that threatens to cause death or serious injury. And the shooter leaned in to get a good shot, he did not move away as one would if they were afraid of being hit. Anyone with a brain would know that if you shoot a driver of a vehicle coming towards you and kill them, it will continue on going in that direction until someone else stops it..

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As much as I hate what ICE has been doing, I will honesty say there is a debate and we should be prepared to hear it. The officer didn't have the benefit of our camera view to see which way the wheels were turned. From his perspective it may well have appeared that the car was lurching forward -- at him. Plenty of discussion to be had about why he shot instead of stepping aside, why he placed himself in front of a moving vehicle, etc. Unfortunately ICE is being used to provoke this shit.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Does your mama know you would have shot the pregnant Mary in the face?

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just trying to look at things with clear eyes. Videos emerging subsequent to my post seem to support that from the officer's perspective he was being rammed. If acknowledging that makes me a murderer in your eyes, then that's on you my friend. Sorry for spoiling your brandy and cigars.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is no debate. ICE cannot perform traffic stops like this. ICE guidelines also state that you cannot fire upon a vehicle like this. Plus, the video is clear as day.

Kindly fuck off.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I've shockingly not really seen many people make this point, but it doesn't even matter where he was standing, even if it was in the dead center of the front of the car, and her wheels were straight, and she was flooring it... the correct course of action STILL ISN'T TO SHOOT HER. Why? because bullets don't stop cars, he wasn't aiming for the fucking break pedal. How would killing the driver help you survive in any possible way?????

8 months ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 3

A better choice would have been to shoot the engine block, but that still wouldn't stop the car on a dime. Physics yo

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are killing people for having the temerity to deny them. Its 100% ego

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He shoots here in the face BEFORE there is any forward motion of the vehicle. Literally waits for her to put it in Drive, then immediately fires.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think an honest argument would have been like PREVENTING IMMEDIATE and future harm, like the Waukesha Christmas Parade murders. Shooting him at the beginning of his multi minute murder spree https://www.npr.org/2022/11/16/1137329530/judge-sentences-man-to-life-in-prison-for-waukesha-christmas-parade-attack or even the Nice France one in like 2015 where some 100 people died in sixty seconds from one guy using a rental truck as a weapon... but like this isn't that ya know not from what I see

8 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Sadly there's enough of a doubt that he could have been in fear for his life that he won't get convicted in criminal court. MAYBE civil. Fucker.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that was Kristi Noem's statement, that he did it because he thought there was a threat to the other agents.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The more I see this the more I'm convinced he intentionally stepped out in front of the car hoping he could use a bad move by the driver as justification to shoot in "self defense." You will never be able to make me believe that someone not planning on shooting someone was so quick to assess a situation, come to the conclusion there was a threat of grave danger to yourself, move to unholster your weapon, take aim and fire THREE rounds. He couldn't wait to shoot someone.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

DHS apparently has had a consistent enough problem with agents doing that on purpose just to shoot out of frustration that they issued policy against it:

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's as clear as day. Some people just can not be objective.

8 months ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 3

But Team Trump says “black is white”….

8 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That wasn't shot 1. He was in front of the car.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 26

Good jobt being a prime example of what they said

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Videos Contradict Trump Administration Account of ICE Shooting in Minneapolis - The New York Times https://share.google/nRYugFKGjVLCNGaiQ

Ok I'll eat crow, this shows a slower footage than what I saw.

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Please go find an confederate grave and go bury yourself with your family so we don't have to waste a bullet.

8 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I've said it before, this place is as bad as Twitter. You're swimming in a confirmation bubble and jist looking for likes. Also, I've voted blue my entire life and support action to stop these guys. But I watched the video, he wasn't at that spot when his weapon discharged.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Can quibble over the outline but he was not in danger for shot 1 and certainly not for shot two and three. Really the bottom line.

8 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Geometry begs to differ with you, bud. Pic credit: someone else here on ingur

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was only one bullet hole in the windshield, and it was in the very bottom right corner. That means only the first shot came in through the windshield and it was on the side. The next two shots went through the open driver’s side window. It is clear, none of the three shots were fired from the front of the vehicle.

Photo of windshield in this article:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/minneapolis-ice-shooting-live-updates-tensions-flare-minneapolis/?id=129018634

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Try watching it again, he wasn't in front of it when he fired the first shot

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yep he took a step to his right, then fired into the windshield. Then took another step and fired into the open drivers window at point blank.
He was in the clear and safe when he chose to fire.
He chose murder when he kept firing.
The others became accessories when they blocked any medical assistance.
Every single ICE officer present can be charged as if they pulled the trigger.

8 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

What's the latest? I don't watch the news. Is the murderer getting charged? Is he still working?

8 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Look, you either need to start watching the news in some fashion or quit asking whats happening.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

Probably up for the presidential medal of freedom.

8 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And even if ICE agent Johnathan Ross was arrested, charged, convinced and jailed Trump would only pardon him sending him back to ICE to kill more.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last I heard was that the FBI is actively impeding the investigation so the Minnesota State Police threw their hands up and were like "whelp, never mind". The Minneapolis prosecutor is known as a hardass when it comes to going after police who commit crimes so I expect charges to come locally at some point.

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Last I heard the prosecutor's office was requesting the public to send their videos directly to them

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The vp has announced he will pardon the shooter.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Cool, I'll unpardon him. That has 100% of the same effect as Vance pardoning someone.

8 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Way to early.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if anything happens, full pardon by Trump or a future GOP Nazi Prez

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don’t know if he’s currently still working, but the FBI hijacked the investigation, which started as a normal joint investigation with state authorities, and are apparently refusing to share evidence with the state. So our federal government completed has his back. If he’s not currently working, he’ll be back to it soon enough. Oh, and apparently he’s a firearms instructor of some sort for ICE. So that’s fun.

8 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

"Everyone's body cams were off for some reason, especially the ones we erased"

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't see how they can get around the fact that it was Minnesota law that was broken and as we know the President has no pardon authority for state crimes. It would seem to me that MN can investigate, charge and insist on him being extradited if ICE moves him out of state.

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They’re not sharing info because trump can’t pardon state charges.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That Gestapo agent is going to spend the rest of his life in prison. It might take a couple of years for the Nazis to let him go, but it will happen.

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Naw. He'll be pardoned before anything can remotely happen legally. Then put in charge of some new dipshit agency the fuhrur starts.

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

He can’t be pardoned by President Kiddie Fucker for State crimes.

8 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The FBI has already seized the case, it involved a "federal employee"

The WH will give approximately zero shits what MN has to say about it.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

There are no rules they can't ignore or try to break https://coloradonewsline.com/2025/12/12/trump-tina-peters-pardon/

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No, he will walk out to his car some morning and get hes head blown off. Thats as close to justice as it is possible to get here now.

8 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

You're being admirably optimistic.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I just hope they string up his corpse as a warning to other ICE agents. You know, as a courtesy.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Extremely relevant, WARNING this vid of the ICE asshole's perspective lined up with the widely scene video. And yes, he did not have a body cam he recorded on his fucking phone and then released it to alt-right sites https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTTPCO6iTxl/?igsh=MTRuYTRlaXRqYW1zMQ==

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Honestly, even if she ran over his foot, and broke his leg, I still don't think she should have been shot in the face.

8 months ago | Likes 509 Dislikes 6

Does anyone have a good picture of Jonathan Ross's face?

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It would have to be a much more massive vehicle or a weird twisting situation to break his foot. I've rolled Detroit steel over my own dumb foot and it was barely uncomfortable.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yup. Think about what charges actually carry the possibility of a death sentence, and then some members of the police use it for jaywalking.

8 months ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

his foot was so broken and he needed hospital so fast he jumped into his car after shooting a woman in the face 3 times and drow off before police or medics arrived (obv /s)

8 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

after walking 50' to check she was dead, then walking 50' back, THEN jumping into his car to get urgent care you mean.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...without a TRACE of a limp.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

surely just keeping up appearances, he was half-dead after all, the administration said

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bet he whacked himself on the hip to cause a bruise.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed 100%. Arrested, sure, but not shot in the face.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not even arrested. They could have EASILY just drove around her like the first car did.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I meant IF she drove over his foot.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He should not have been in front of the vehicle in the first place. If they are calling the vehicle a weapon, it's like walking in front of a potential suspect's drawn firearm. They put her in a no win situation where they told her to leave as they were trying to open her car door and then having another guy in front of her vehicle.

8 months ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 1

He wasn't even really in front of the vehicle. He was at an angle and the vehicle was swerving away.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There were three conflicting directions. One was telling her to get out of there. One was telling her to get out of the car. One was telling her to stay put. She followed the instructions of the officer closest to her. She was smiling and amicable four seconds before being shot. This reminds me so much of Daniel Shaver.

8 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Which is exactly why the use of force states that the officer has a duty to get the fuck out the way of a vehicle, if they are able to. He was able to, he just wasn't willing.

8 months ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

To add to this, a new threat is created when the driver of a moving vehicle is killed, evidenced by what happened immediately after.

8 months ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Thank fuck there wasnt anyone there because yeah, the car went full speed into the crash.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I've had a car stop with it's tire on my foot. (It was at a messy intersection and I was on my bicycle, ultimately kind of my fault). I felt pressure, but no pain and I was fine. And I was wearing sneakers, not boots. He's got no excuse, any threat to him was gone by the time he drew from his holster.

8 months ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

I've been hit by a car. Thrown 10 ft by it. I got up, yelled at the driver for not paying attention, caught my breath, got dude's information, then finished walking two more miles to get back to my in-laws' house with a 40 lb rucksack on my back. Granted, at the time this happened, I was 15 years younger than this dude, but I can't see any way that this guy was in anywhere near the level of danger they're acting like he was.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, but wouldn't you have liked to have a gun for everytime a car pulled too close to you to let them know you aren't messing around? *sarcasm*

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know your being sarcastic, but I mean...I have a ccw permit. But if I brandish my firearm for a trivial cause like a car rolling onto my fiot, I'd get charged with a crime.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

same. I ran over my own foot once trying to stop my stalled, smoking car from rolling down a hill. It was a stupid, in-the-moment decision, but the only consequence was a mild pleasant massage.

8 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I’m so glad to read these. My sister ran over my foot once and I felt nothing. Went to soccer practice that afternoon. Getting your foot run over doesn’t hurt…

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Murder

8 months ago | Likes 168 Dislikes 2

OK I'm faving this for later but it ain't gonna feel right having it in my gallery.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The lady running after the car at the end was her wife. She is later seen hugging the dead body from the drivers seat. There had been a dog in the car too.

8 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

So it was a LGBT+ couple? The Trump-fucks will have a great time with this…

8 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

They are already. Good had a child from a prior marriage and the boy’s father is also deceased. But yeah then she lived with her wife is seems

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

yyyyikes
is there more footage of anything before? I've heard of people using cars as weapons but in this clip it looks way more like trying to drive AWAY as opposed to drive IN

8 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Yeah... They have released what ross was recording.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He created an entirely new threat by killing the driver of a moving vehicle. What is someone had been in that white car?

8 months ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

He had another incident in June where he was dragged by a car. It seems like this officer likes to jump in front of vehicles with his firearm out.

8 months ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I saw that video, and he wasnt dragged. He held onto the car and hitched a ride as it took away, instead of letting go. What a fucking dumbass.

8 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

He also *tased* the driver, as the car was moving. Because he's a fucking moron.

8 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Hell, wasn't her kid in the car with her? Talk about fucking collateral damage. Goddamn dipshits.

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Her dog was in the car, not sure about a child.

8 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I might be wrong then. I thought I read there was a child in the vehicle but I maybe misremembering.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Everything I've read said that she had recently dropped her son off at school

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It’s ok, there’s so much disinformation everywhere, I think it’s important we help each other find factual info whenever we can!

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0