Honestly

Sep 29, 2022 4:11 PM

NoddingNabob

Views

66444

Likes

854

Dislikes

16

Source:
https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/29/politics/alito-supreme-court-kagan-roberts/index.html

Another snowflake meltdown

4 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 2

No - Going too far is lying under oath to the Senate and then overturning settled law for political reasons.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

He's a fucking idiot. Invents some legal justification to undo the last 100 years of rights of the people.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

100 years?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alito can eat a bag of dicks. Congratulations on destroying confidence in the S.C.

4 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

he's not just a misogynist, he'll also do everything he can to eviscerate the Civil Rights Act

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Impeach all Federalist Society hacks, from all levels. They should be considered illegitimate.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I really want to hear the following in confirmation hearings: "Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Federalist Society?"

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Illegitimate court says what?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why do oppressors always yell "But your criticism of me is so MEAN"

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well, the court was stuffed by a master of

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Just another butt-hurt snowflake

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Some people would say stripping the reproductive rights from millions of women crosses a line but hey.

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Stripping it from half of the entire American population. That's some Thanos-level evil right there.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Tell you what, Sammy. I'll stop questioning your integrity when you finally cultivate some integrity, a'ight?

4 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 2

I'm not questioning his integrity, I'm flat-out saying he has none.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

v

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'd have used a different finger to pantomime crying, but that's just me.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Doesn't help that 6 justices were appointed by Presidents who lost the majority vote, and the most radial three, without 60 senate votes.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

justice hate movement says what?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nobody is questioning your integrity, Sammy. We know how worthless it is. You've showed us quite thoroughly.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Question authority. Always.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Fuck him. And all of the other Christo-Facists.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Please check your voter registration at https://vote.org in time.

In a lot of states registering closes 30 days before election day.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This complaining from the evil twat means that the criticism is entirely correct.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's a nice constitution you got there... be a real shame if something happened to it. Alito, Trump, et al. Prosecute/impeach them all

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

See-even he doesn't know the value of 1A! Fn ?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea ... what evidence do you have the SCOTUS has become a group of religious zealots, bent on taking the US back to the dark ages

4 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 2

* gestures vaguely *

4 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

Ah fair point.

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

We're not questioning their integrity. We're stating factually that they have none.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Religious judge gets called out on letting religiousity creep into his legal rulings counter to the legal code, doesn't like it

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Still a government employee. Why would he think they'd be protected?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because as a republican he thinks public servants are supposed to serve the public up as opposed to serve the public.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Look, just because we trampled all over established precedents when we LITERALLY promised not to doesn't mean you can call us bad people!"

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

If they want to roll back precedent with constitutional literalism, might as well go all the way back to Marbury v Madison. The Constitution

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

does not grant the Supreme Court the power to decide the constitutionality of anything. They assumed it with this decision.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks 4 case. Read thru the Wikipedia entry. Complicated, but I think I got the gist of it. Good stuff to know.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 293 Dislikes 2

*chef kiss*

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The same Catholic Church responsible for countless wars, genocides, Inquisitions, rapes, child molestations, and cover-ups?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OH me undies, me undies

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Point. Match.

4 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

Game. !!!!

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

One of the best comebacks of our time.

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Billy Red. Ice cold!

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Tim Minchin made the same point slightly differently. https://youtu.be/vjJ_b8isMzc

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tim Minchin is always amazing and I need to remember him on RHM.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On point. Every time.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A Supreme Court Justice lying to Congress at his confirmation hearing crosses a more important line.

4 years ago | Likes 352 Dislikes 3

To say nothing of a sitting judge trying to shield his traitorous insurrectionist wife from investigation

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which one are you referring too ?

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

well that’s not just a more important line that’s AN ACTUAL LINE unlike the criticism thing which literally isn’t even a line

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, there's no way to prove that they didn't believe what they said at the time.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

They didn’t tell a lie. They just told not the truth.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You say that but a black person on trial for nothing will get that exact thing “proven” “easily” by “court” while, somehow, white is

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

invincible. “Darn, our system JUST CANT CATCH THEM!” while it devours orphans every day, so to speak

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They don't believe anything they say. Their "dearly held positions" are up to the highest bidder.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I have written so many letters to my representatives on this topic, I think we should test this in a court of law, I was lied to. No one 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is above the law, and did they lie to me, the people, congress under oath? Let the law decide.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya, there is, they destroyed roe.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if we COULD prove it. What then? FBI (executive branch) arrests a justice (judicial branch). We’re in a constitutional crisis and 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Few understand it.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, I believe if it was provable they lied at confirmation the path would be impeachment not arrest.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ImpeachmentHas no beyond a reasonable doubt standard like criminal law. They could easily be impeached right now, but there’s no will.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0