Who needs a Bridge?

Apr 3, 2018 9:46 AM

Maximus0752

Views

138876

Likes

1808

Dislikes

36

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Engineerrrs !

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tank don't care. Tank got places to be and things to shoot.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russia? Russia... Don't need no stinking bridges

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Holy shit the balls on those guys. Can you even imagine the bumpy ass ride that could jar you into the water

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 3

When the game doesn't want you bringing your vehicle into the next area but you're not giving up that easily.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What are you talking about? That is a bridge.

8 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 4

It's a beautiful mother bridge. They should stop with the negative waves.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everyone makes jokes about balls of steel, but for real though, capsizing a tank would mean death for sure.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's why when you blow the bridge up, supporting structure has to be destroyed.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Do not blow up bridges you will end up being charged with a hate crime later on in life.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Any tank that weighs more than 15 tons

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Either succeed or go to gulag.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Glad to see your posts are getting some traction, OP

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Bridges? We don't need no stinkin' bridges!"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tank tracks are basically just mini roads. They make a path for the tank to drive over.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You see comrade, tank don't need bridge to cross river

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

*Ivan

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably many people.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

solid posts!

8 years ago | Likes 703 Dislikes 4

This will be underappreciated

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

More like solid post!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Cromwell for the win

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ehhh, no. Not even close my friend :)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We are safe, the stream will protect us! Oh shit run!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you don't read the ad disclaimer: v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hit it with a hammer a couple of times, fill the tank with vodka and it'll... Wait, that's an American tank, isn't it? 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hit it with a wrench, scrub off some rust, fill the tank with Whiskey and it'll probably start again. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing stop Rodina

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Props to these guys and their steel balls!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta love the Soviet BT-5 propaganda films ????

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The hull shape is that of a BT-7. I could be wrong, but BT-5s have slopes either side of the hatch, where BT-7s are flatter and broader.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definitely a version of the BT-7. What model year I can’t tell.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Given the turret shape, I'd say 1935. 1937 model already has a somewhat conical shape.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If what you say is true than I’d agree. I can never remember if it’s the model 37 or 7M that has the sleek sloped turret.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tank Encyclo says all of them. 37 is the turret, 38 is new sights, 39 has a floor hatch, and 7M finally introduces the Kharkiv model V-2.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OWMYKIDNEYS!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

LEROY JENKINS!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tank goodness!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then again tanks were specifically invented to be able to cross trenches. This is basically just ten trenches one after the other.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh, no. Tanks were made specifically to completely avoid trench warfare. They didn't care about rifle armed combatants in holes - their

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

armor negated those weapons and traversed whatever terrain that blocked them from their opponent's rear area.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What...what do you think I meant by "crossing trenches"?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Crossing trenches.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Balls of steel. Had that fallen over they would have likely drowned...

8 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 13

I assume before crossing, one soldier got off the tank and forcefully banged the posts with his fist to make sure they are good.

8 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 1

Or worst, been demoted.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If they were smart they would have opened the hatch before trying it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's called confidence. And he clearly didn't need to :)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s the motivation not to fall. The tank made it through by sheer willpower of the driver.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Actually is is pretty much driving on an estacade. Standard exercise for tankers.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not much. The river is shallow, even if the whole tank goes underwater, he (there is hardly anyone but driver inside) would swim out.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The drivers hatch on a BT is quite large and fairly easy to open. The bigger danger is him smacking his head on it on impact.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They open outwards, He couldn't open it if the tank was too deep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But then the other hatch is there to use...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That isn't how water works.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, doesn't look terribly deep. They probably could've just forded had the banks not been so steep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, beats getting killed by a fire caused by a mechanical failure, getting shot by the command vehicle for moving too slowly, or getting

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

taken out by the Germans.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

BS I saw the first episode of The walking dead, all tanks have an emergency exit hatch underneath

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not all surprisingly, but definitely most. Although here they could probably just get out at the top anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those hatches, even when they are there, are really small and you don't want to have to get out of them in a hurry.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The BT, a rocket with optional treads. Seriously, 14t and 500 horsepower with more torque than you can poke a stick at.

8 years ago | Likes 237 Dislikes 2

I can poke my stick at any amount of torque

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

go try to poke the NASA crawler with a stick. i dare ya

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Only in soviet russia. Russians nowadays are hardcore, but not that hardcore

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, a rocket compared to other armored vehicles anyway...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno man. I can poke a mean stick.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally, in this case.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And was replaced as fast as humanly possible when exposed to combat, less than the rate that it was destroyed, unfortunately.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Itty bitty spud launcher

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 4

Until the Finns captured them and put 114 mm howitzers onto them.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

For an early war/pre war light tank I imagine the 45mm it was equipped with was fine. Interwar tanks were thinly armoured garbage.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Seeing as the competition of the time was British 2Pndr (40mm) or German 37mm, 45mm calibre isn't bad. Though that's obviously not everythin

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Soviet union started out with a German 37, so it pretty much is better, from what I remember. Also makes for a bigger HE round.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it was actually capable of utilizing a remotely capable APHE shell so thats a plus over smaller shells

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also comes in version with two torpedoes. http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/RT_RBT-5_01.jpg

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Those some nice titties

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Such a shame Wargaming said "No Rockets!" all those years ago. :(

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

War thunder has them tho

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeeees, but a) then I'd have to play fucking War Thunder. b) Only on a gamble, in this case, and for money in general.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

i just want multi turrets. i can live without rockets and ATGM's and whatnot. but maybe the lee wouldnt be such piss if the 37mm wasnt >

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just a liability. and maybe the B1 could be useful outside of being top tier if it had a derp in the hull

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, though most MT's would still suffer.. Look on the bright side: They tested a multi-turret system last Halloween. 'twas fun.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0