Natural vs Good

Jun 9, 2017 8:40 PM

Thingamajiggly

Views

77492

Likes

2588

Dislikes

47

what is common for the spider is chaos for the fly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Case and point: A lot of rape going on in the animal kingdom.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One bite should do it, if it is any consolation.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since it's in most cases objectively natural to be thus eaten, your next problem is to provide a sound argument that it's objectively bad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

All these downvotes, but nobody catching that it was sort of a joke about a philosophical question.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's 'good' too! ... when it happens to people I hate

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My usual example is smallpox

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Today someone recommended Bear spray, while another said it was just human hot sauce.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not if those berries you picked, which are a shade of white and may be poisonous, kill you first. Nature!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Having dog is both natural and good and fair bear detectors

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Natural" is a set that includes everything, "good" is a set that includes nothing

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Of course you are right when dealing with absolutes. I just say that our human minds were meant for good. Even relative good has value to me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hurricanes are also natural, good luck eating one of those.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bears don't normally kill and eat people. Everybody I know who was attacked by a bear is still alive.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Odd, I dont know a single person who has survived a bear attack.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about all the people you never met because they were killed and eaten by a bear?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's good for the bear

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The gap under the bears head looks like a large man is led on the ground looking up at the bear

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Indeed it does

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do bears even eat people though? I thought they just beat them to death for stepping on their property.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ARSENIC IS PERFECTLY NATURAL

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That "into the Wild" dude died a natural death...essentially a suicide of stupidity, but natural af

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Wait, what? Someone filming wildlife survival actually died from lack of prep? 'Recently' at that?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His whole point was to be underprepared. He found out why that's not really reasonable.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A lesson you can only learn once. Whoops.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Main two mistakes being: not bothering to look up changes in river depth and volume, and purposely ditching his map

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Arrogance is a hell of a drug.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"natural" means nothing, humans aren't above nature.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Truth

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sam Harris is great. Read some of his books...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

His podcast is excellent as well.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The podcast is very nice, most people that dislike Sam either think he's boring or haven't listened to him themselves.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Whateva! I do what I want!" - Grizzly Man

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The Werner Hertzog documentary? Yeah, that guy was stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chased a bear with a hachet once. Did not die......should have. All over taking a damned picture

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It also seems VERY natural too me to stay the flip away from bear territory

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I live in bear country, not an option for me.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an Alaskan resident, our territories kind of overlap...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 10, 2017 2:54 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That depends on if you and the bear share a natural habitat.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

No i think the bear is going to maul you in just about any habitat

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah but if a bear mauls you in a cathedral it's it's not very natural

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The bear doesn't know it's in a cathedral. The bear doesn't even know what a cathedral is

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I meant Colosseum. But still, chickens don't know they are in a meat farm, but it's still not natural

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well you've got me there, that's actually pretty bulletproof

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same goes for "Organic." Arsenic is organic.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

Actually elemental Arsenic is prohibited by USDA ยง205.602 - Nonsynthetic substances prohibited for use in organic crop production. I lied.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, organs. v

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And dihydrogen monoxide. Or so I've been told.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I only eat gluten free arsenic though

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But is it free range?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Uhh, actually organic means carbon based. So no, As is not organic. Nice try, though.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

From a dietary standpoint (which is clearly what was intended) that's incorrect.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ricin is organic

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, I could say "my cock is organic" and be accurate while making the same point?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meth is organic

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's literally false.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

From a dietary standpoint, no. Organic rice contains arsenic.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"organic" means "a carbon-based compound sourced from a living organism". Last I checked, Arsenic wasn't that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sam Harris, +1

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 5

Listening to him and Sarah Haider talking right now.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sam Harris, the Neil DT of philosophy. Kind of an asshole and doesn't quite understand the point of what he's doing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Rofl

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I pure straight hate Sam Harris, but damn do I respect him

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

I think the pivotal point would be, do you support free speech, without qualifiers. Sam's a free speech warrior, and for that he's respected

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why do you hate him? Is it the whole objective morality thing?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Apparently the benefit of the doubt was poorly issued

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So my original suspicion was that you were an Affleck clone and didn't have anything better as ammunition than that kind of shit. /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's the unconstrained apologia for racism thing.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Uh... what?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He's consistently hawkish about bombing the shit out of countries full of brown people just because he thinks Islam causes terrorism

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Every time I see someone say they hate Harris, their reason is almost always based on a flat out lie. You're no different.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Harris is on record with tying religious belief to terrorism, and he has absolutely zero qualms about tying Islam directly to it. Both>>

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 10, 2019 12:02 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He professes equal treatment, then treats practitioners of Islam as a monolith. It's classic xenophobia.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2