SirLieutenantSloth
118265
2148
88
Good Guy Professor.
Using part of the lecture time to talk about an important topic, to inform those who knew nothing about it.
Nov 24, 2017 3:56 PM
SirLieutenantSloth
118265
2148
88
Using part of the lecture time to talk about an important topic, to inform those who knew nothing about it.
yourcreepyunclefriendly
Doesn't look like many people showed up to listen, lol
Viper3232
The auditorium may be larger than the class that it was scheduled for. I had a class of 800 in a room seating 1300
WheesnawButtons
"Net neutrality means *that..."
VodkaReindeer
Don't stop there. The whole bullet point is a disaster.
LapisSea
Alexhn1
Alexhn1
otterintheflightdeck
is this at UWO? i swear it looks identical to a room i’ve had class in
Austin2198
North campus building?
dragonnu
Didn't realize soo many UWO people were on here.
otterintheflightdeck
Honestly wouldn't have thought most people at UWO would use imgur
dragonnu
Yeah, looking at the people that go here I wouldn't think anyone besides the eng/compsci students would spend time on imgur/reddit.
otterintheflightdeck
and then there’s me in SSC haha
indigogogogo
It always surprises me when I talk to people who have no clue this is even happening. Why aren't there more news stories about it?
DrShrinker
We already pay for tiered speeds. NN is more about control of info, how its treated, and who is allowed to block what.
[deleted]
[deleted]
SirLieutenantSloth
He was playing Bloons tower defense, he only got to round 83 then failed.. yeah he should fail
TheInternetNeedsMoreCats
It's not a controversy, it's the every man's world vs a handful of assholes. I've never seen such bi partisan unity honestly.
Dyslexicbirch
And i bet no one even paid attention
KNIVESY
It's not controversial. 99% of the US population agrees.
icanbench350lbs
Nobody notices the imgur on laptop?
nevergoingtogiveyouupnevergoingtoletyoudown
Too bad its kinda waaaaaaaay too late to be making people aware of the problem.
SirLieutenantSloth
Most Canadians aren't that aware, and it's never too late because most likely America will have to fight to get net neutrality back
nanyatenyaa
The grammar tells me the students need a refund.
nanyatenyaa
The meaning of each bullet point is ambiguous due to use poor usage of English. The same ambiguous language ISPs use.
rezpawner
"Complex and controversial"? No it fucking isn't. Greedy motherfuckers want more money, and fuck you over. Super simple stuff.
GooberMonster
Nothing that's simple when routers and switches are envolved.
Pimo117
Ay, I'm doing a speech on Tuesday about this. Glad to do my part too.
Danowar1990
Oh sure, HE gets to use Wikipedia as a source
woollyeyes
Exactly what I was thinking.
PlightHopper
Derptator
I wish we could favorite comments
HumansArePrettyNeat
Things are starting to change. Even as I was finishing University in 2010 you could include it as long as you'd vetted the sources it used.
HumansArePrettyNeat
But you needed to include a permanent link to that iteration of the page rather than the "latest release" link and only with some profs.
TwoSeamer
I get why it's controversial as a source (anonymity?), but don't get how it's that much worse than the yokels being cited in my grad class
aragornd2
I started school after a 13 year hiatus, and almost had an aneurysm to see there is an MLA guide for citing tweets.
[deleted]
[deleted]
IWentToImgurAndAllIGotWasThisShittyUsername
Thank you for this
WheesnawButtons
What was it?!
IWentToImgurAndAllIGotWasThisShittyUsername
Big long black dildo going in and out Pai's punchable face.
Gunthex
Up you go
imshibagel
I'm slightly uncomfortable but whatever my pants are coming off anyway
Biscuitwaflle69
Why the hell remove it if you got positive reactions
DrBinkleton
Based on what it was I think maybe the Imgur moderators removed it?
Cyanide2817
What did it say?
Gunthex
It was a gif of FCC head standing in front of a Nazi march deepthroating a veiny penis.
thrownawayasianguy
I mean maybe toss in a nsfw warning?
SirLieutenantSloth
As much of a legend that would make him, sadly no
AFuckingKangaroo
What the was it?
clh101
Dot
AFuckingKangaroo
Wtf, where'd that the come from?
DenimmChicken
Did something ACTUALLY get deleted here?
theredpacmanghost
I second this query
SirLieutenantSloth
I picture of a couple dicks
RawSuger
controversy? making it easier to charge people is going to be great for people charging,ok for those w cash to spare, shit for everyone else
OrangeFlavours
It is controversial. There's countries without net neutrality, it's not automatically horrible. The biggest argument is "The corps will 1/2
SirLieutenantSloth
Some shit-heads with money vs everyone else... I mean..
Sinsilver
Who would win: 300 million normal American citizens, or some spendy bois?
SirLieutenantSloth
You want the real answer or the one we want to happen
TristanVIII
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer, just the way these assholes like it.
RawSuger
KalaKat
There are also those people that are stupidly misinformed
rando84
Buy a couple grand worth of shares in companies you hate but must deal with (airlines, comcast, etc.)--that way you have some, limited 1/2
rando84
voice over their governance, but more importantly, you will know that as you're being screwed you're also benefiting from that screwing. 2/2
pareidoliaperson
Everyone else IS everyone else! Also more salary doesn't you want to spend more (you can) but they want equality as well.
RawSuger
if you can pay extra for better access that's in the interest of upper middle class. if against it they're either cheap or not assholes
prophet002
How are you people so oblivious.
realskramz
welcome to capitalism
DenimmChicken
Yeah capitalism 2.0
RawSuger
this current version of capitalism*
OrangeFlavours
2/2 fuck us over! The isp's will fuck us over!" Like the 'they'll charge us for netflix' doesn't happen in places without NN...
RawSuger
the only reason to have it is to be able to charge people for things you cant currently charge them for. if corps are pushing for it...
OrangeFlavours
Or, or, other people actually want it and it's being pushed because people have differing opinions from you. Like donald trump is president.
OrangeFlavours
Any of the 'reasonable internet people' didn't want donald trump elected, but it happened, because the internet isn't everything.
MileHighLivin
I feel like the controversy is that neutrality is only 7 years old, and we never had These internet packages that everyone's worried about.
CatWithHands
No. Net Neutrality has been the standard since creation. The NAME Net neutrality is new, created when someone tried to get rid of it.
MileHighLivin
https://nyti.ms/1DWSOsM it's even more recent than I thought.
MileHighLivin
"Until 2015, there were no clear legal protections requiring net neutrality"
Youareobscure
There were still protections. Prior to 2015 ISP's were regulated inder title 1, but Verizon sued them claiming title 1 didn't apply and won.
CatWithHands
Correct. Because people understood that keeping the net neutral was best.