Liberal logic

Jul 28, 2016 9:11 AM

GeorgiaDawgs623

Views

59849

Likes

1501

Dislikes

494

Even though the DNC whistleblower was found dead, shot in the back at the entrance to his apartment?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

There is no evidence whatsoever that Seth Conrad was a whistleblower and was targeted.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Debating politics on Imgur feels like the Special Olympics.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Mental Gymnastics, if you will.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Conservative logic: Espionage is fine when it happens to the person I don't like. Even better when my candidate asks them to do it!

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Is no one going to acknowledge that this is the wrong use for this meme

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There are dozens of us...DOZENS

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: OP is Russian and paid to make Imgur talk about the DNC email issue.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Have you guys noticed it's only the anti-liberal political posts that reach the front page lately?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

More Anti-Hillary than anything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Read the title, my friend.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean I know that for this particular post. Just mean for what I've personally seen on the FP. More anti Hillary than anti liberal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guys, just because only 20 year olds wanted Bernie and he is out of the running doesn't mean you have to say everything is rigged.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate how imgur exposes to me to inner working of the minds of average people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

porque no los dos?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

False equivalence fallacy: Domestic force manipulating their primaries is not equivalent to a foreign power manipulating a national election

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Its sad people are OK with the whole DNC thing happening at all, regardless of which side of the aisle you are on you should be upset by it

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Hillary won the primary by millions of votes.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 13

even despite the ever mounting evidence, they defend with vigor. You gotta love a dem and their obscene hero worship.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Even though there's evidence that it was rigged?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

There is no evidence of rigging or collusion http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The evidence was on Hillary's homebrew server. It has been wiped clean now.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Except nothing the DNC has been "exposed" of can be considered election tampering...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Trump, Putin, Erdogan. All who are living in that triangle are facing rough times.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

its a square because you forgot to add hillary

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I rather thought about a geographical triangle.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Except nothing the DNC has been "exposed" of can be considered election tampering...

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They hacked only the DNC, and wikileaks waited until before the convention to release them and even then staggered the release in an 1/

10 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 8

attempt to do the most damage. Add that with the release of the personal info of donors, and how can anyone not see that there's an agenda?

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 6

Well Clinton is apparently above indictment by the FBI and DOJ for obvious crimes, plus she hardly plays fair politically does she?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 22

Assange has a personal vendetta against HRC re: indictment, and has openly stated this, so it's no mystery

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh don't be paranoid. I'm SURE they'll just stop at hacking the DNC and not hack any other sensitive American sites. Those goofs!

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

Funny how those pesky hackers only targeted the DNC...

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

when did my dad start getting on imgur?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

May I point out: It's not our election, it's the DNC's election. Our election is in November.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

Very true. That does tend to get lost on a lot of people... However, if you are a member of that party, your voice was not equally heard.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It -is- your election:stage 1. Given the stranglehold on the electoral system the two parties have, their nominat's dictate who has a chance

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, but the DNC's election has effect on our country's election. Especially since we are for all intensive purposes only a 2 party system.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Oh, don't get me started on the system...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All intents and purposes, not all intensive purposes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Wow, I've been saying that wrong my whole life. I'm a little embarrassed, but thanks!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't be. I have made my share of mistakes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does anyone really think that the media didn't cover Bernie's positions enough? Even if it was to cover the horse race, his message got out.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

A Harvard study found that the media covered Sanders more and in a more positive light than Clinton. People have cognitive dissonance.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I'd be interested to know if that study included social media, where Bernie was trully lifted up. Imho, cable/TV media was a diff. story.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, is it surprising that DNC employees preferred a lifelong Dem over a guy who joined the party just long enough to run for president?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

FFS The DNC did not manipulate or rig anything, they favored someone when they were supposed to be impartial. Dicks, yes, but not illegal.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 16

"Manipulate" and "rig" do not imply illegal. The post's point is legitimate.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It wasn't rigged, and manipulate is dependent on the definition.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"drink blue pop not red pop red pop sucks red pop isnt christian! red pop is BAD for you its socialist!" "hey red pop had a fair chance!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Okay, so they were simply discussing strategies. No one on the DNC actually srutinized his Jewish faith IRL, di they?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hillary never attacked his Jewishness, no pro-Hillary campaign did either, nor did DWS. So no, they your statement is crap.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i pretty much agree but there is some evidence that they broke campaign finance laws

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nope. They skirted the line of a shitty system of laws, but nothing was "illegal"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i think after the email leaks last week people are gearing up to argue that it amounted to more than skirting the laws, but hey im no lawyer

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither are "people"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i like your style, Kun

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're an adherent of realpolitik, it's even questionable if they were supposed to be impartial. HRC is a democrat, Sanders isn't. 1)

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

It's completely understandable they favoured a long-time party member over a recently joined outsider. Then again, if you're an adherent 2)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

of realpolitik, you wouldn't be a fan of Sanders even if you did agree with what he stands for. 3)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

As an adherent of realpolitik, you are correct on so many levels!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes, but they were both democratic candidates which, according to the party bylaws, requires the chairperson to exercise impartiality.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fair enough, but they didn't actively sabotage Sanders' campaign. They just didn't support him as their nominee, for good reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. None of what they discussed in the emails actually came into fruition save for the press activities, which happens all the time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is Trump the first Presidential Nominee to ask a foreign country to hack the US further? He also hopes Putin "likes" him

10 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 22

He's the 1st nominee to do many unexpected things. That's why the media loves to cover him, his random shtick brings in eyeballs & ad money.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If u want to widen that net to any nominee colluding w/ a foreign gov to affect the general election, then maybe Nixon but its not concrete

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You could include Reagan supposedly conspiring work Iran so they wouldn't release the hostages till after he beat Carter in the election

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

meh that's much more iffy. Iran likely would have released them if Carter had one also.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He didn't ask Russia to hack the US. He made a joke about them already having hacked the US and sharing with the FBI.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

He did. Then tried to takehttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/07/28/politics/donald-trump-russia-hacking-sarcastic/index.html

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and Putin hates the Democrats; pick your reason: exposing 2010 spy ring, opposing the invasion of UA etc

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Do we know if it's even legal for a candidate to call on another country to hack us? Should that be treason or something in that family?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

He asked a hostile foreign state to commit espionage against our state department. It's absolutely fucking treason. But lolTrump he's kiddin

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Where exactly did Trump ask Russia to hack the State Department? Didn't realize HRC's illegal server was in the State Department.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How the fuck else do you interpret "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing"?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

by fucking understanding her PRIVATE email server (which no longer exists) was NEVER at the STATE DEPARTMENT .

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah Russia is totally hostile. Just look at how they're bombing ISIS and helping the democratically elected leader of Syria. Damn commies.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

We have active sanctions against them for invading an ally. They also aren't doing anything against IS, theyre bombing the rebels we back.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should the US sanction itself for sending forces to Syria despite its government denying their help?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0YQ0B8 You can have this too. Sorry for the mobile link.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FYI: Trump and Manafort have been very low key running a pro-Soviet campaign for months pretending his statements are mistakes and goofs.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Things he has advocated for: Trump will give up NATO states to Russian invasion. Would recognize Crimea as a Russian state.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Con't: would end Russian sanctions from Crimea. Says Russia/KGB can't possibly be killing journalists.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Con't: Asked for Russian espionage against our State Department. Forced his party platform to prevent discussion on assistance to Ukraine.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He's been propped up by morons like Rubio/Ryan/Walker/McConnell who say "he's still learning" or "it was a joke". No the fuck it is not.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Putin outsources slave labor from North Korea. Trump probably wants to capitalize on that free labor.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Publicly. 100% definitely not privately.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I hope you're not pinning your vote on what you THINK the nominees are thinking privately vs what you KNOW they are saying publically

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I dont care why you vote for who you vote for and you shouldnt care either.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 31, 2016 5:58 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Because I am not going to change anyones minds and neither will you. If someone has decided who they are going to vote for, no matter what

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the reason, there is basically no chance that I am going to convince anyone otherwise. No point in caring and wasting my time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's troubling that a foreign body so easily hacked into secure servers. It is a matter of national security, higher risk than DNC emails.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

All her server had were emails about yoga and shit. And she wiped it with a cloth so thoroughly, that FBI can find nothing on it anymore.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Glad our nation only has the capacity to go after one wrong doing at a time. DNC gets a pass because Russian hackers!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

How do you figure?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You say Russian is true higher risk implying DNC should get a pass so we can chase the Russian line. Luckily the US has the capacity to 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ look into both. Both should be investigated.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@chefrein you implied that the DNC should get a pass, then you base your argument on your own implication. Of course they both should be 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last line of my original response was meant to be sarcastic. My bad if that didn't come across. Should have used quotes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

investigated. When you look to see what your highest priority is on your to do list, you don't simply chuck the rest of the list. Do you 2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People must be allergic to complexity. We SHOULD take in to consideration both the content of the emails AND the motives of the leakers.

10 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 10

Maybe the Russians don't want HRC f'n up the rest of the world like she did in the Middle East?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Thank you. The Russians were already proven to have stolen info, had the motive, and excellent tradecraft (though not perfect)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The fact that people can't consider both shows just how stupid people are.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

when it comes to international politics and intrigue, quid pro quo should always be the first matter looked into

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

its so fucking obviously a diversionary tactic. "oh shit, we got caught, we fucked now" "lol just blame the russians" "oh right, silly me".

10 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 40

A foreign rival interfering with our election for their benefit is not a "distraction". It is a sad day when Democrat v. Republican comes

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

before American v. Russian.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Man who receives daily Intel briefings advocated for cyber warfare against our state dept. on national tv. Fucking lib diversionary tactics.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The FBI is the one doing the investigation. Don't oversimplify it. Please let Imgur be shits & giggles.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

Didn't Romney get blasted for saying they're our greatest geopolitical foe?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Back when Obama wanted a reset. Well, now we know Russia never had an interest in that and are a rising threat to stability.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

But even then Romney was right. I seem to remember something about Ukraine in the news.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if I told you that it's possible for the emails to be completely damning AND for the Russians to leak them to serve their own interest?

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

That's the truth. Trump wants to befriend Russia to better fight ISIS and gain leverage to use against usurious Chinese trade practices. /1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Russia wants to befriend the US to settle the issue with the Ukraine and gain our intelligence sources to better deal with it's former /2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

satellites. On top of that improving its trade situation to shore up its economy. 3/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Well as long as we're all happy they're not fabricated, what does it matter? This "enemy of my enemy" bullshit is irrational.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What exactly were they caught doing? Liking Hillary better than Bernie?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ways to circumvent camp contr laws. Sending their interns to behave like bad trump supporters to make trump look bad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Redirecting joint DNC funds to Hillary, specifying that DNC support for her be kept secret, spitballing ways to anonymously slander Bernie

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

giving orders to "free media" and "free media" sending their stories to DNC before their editors.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok so 1. Bernie only joined the DNP to help his chance at presidency so some animosity should be expected 2. How did emails affect ur vote

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 18

Yeah like, he only joined after being booted from the Liberty Union Party for supporting the Iraq War

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

People conveniently ignore his weaknesses with key Democratic groups to push a narrative of "rigged" Was the primary unfair? Yes. Rigged? No

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The mass media disperses information to the masses. The sheer amount of coverage Hillary got due to the DNC favouring her could 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Cause her to win. Note the use of the word "could", I'm just hypothesizing, I don't have an inside link to all Americans' brains. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Bernie lost because he didn't reach out to any communities and relied primarily upon predominantly white 18-30 yr olds.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

And that's what they want you to believe

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That is not an intellectually serious belief.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Part of the reason he lost some of the earlier races was the common retelling that he would have no real chance against a Rep. candidate.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Later, it became clear that his following was in fact big enough to take on a the Rep. candidate. Too late for those who'd already voted.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In a country where whites are about 75% of the population, and the median age is 37, his appealing to em would have given a huge advantage.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I am not saying the system IS/ISN'T rigged. I was hypothesizing HOW the DNC emails could affect someone's vote because a commenter asked.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By the way, I wasn't even arguing whatever you countered. I initially stated, and still stand by, that media bias COULD help Clinton if 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except that the 18-30 demographic doesn't have a tendency to actually go out and vote.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmm. That's fair. I just checked their stats and it's honestly pathetic to see the people who have to live with the election consequences1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually the FBI that thinks the Russians are manipulating the election with illegal behavior.

10 years ago | Likes 375 Dislikes 24

Obviously the FBI thinks what ever they are told to think. If they possessed original thought HRC wud have been in prison months ago

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 17

True, but if you inserted anyone but NK, Russia, or China you'd be hailing them like Snowden, remember what he did was illegal too

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No the DNC is just a lying conniving extension of the Cl*nton coronation campaign. No conspiracy. They've even apologized for this shit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Yeah, the comment above you has CTR written all over it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we don't like it when foreign governmentd fuck with us. But it's ok for us to fuck with them

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Point? I hope they release them too. I want to see more on how shady the Hildebeast really is.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

Asking a foreign government to commit cybercrimes on our nation?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Nations are influenced by the help of other nations... like when the French sided with the colonists against Britain. New world, new help.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Ya, like Putin was just sitting there, waiting on permission from Donald Trump to hack a server that doesn't even exist anymore. Good call.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

It's espionage and quite frankly, treason. This is absurd that we even need to explain it

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But I thought there wasn't any classified info on those 30K "personal" emails? which is it?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I get you're trying to be sarcastic, but you accidentally hit the whole point the FBI made. Removing the emails alone didn't justify an 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

indictment- to be charged you need to have some direct, improper interaction with an agent from another country. That crucial last part is 2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NOPE. Explain how hacking a PRIVATE individual's email server is treason? The server was for emails about yoga & stuff, right?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd say the FBI got on that in record time... Almost like the guy in charge is upset that his party is the one that got hit...

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 32

Almost like it's their job...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, I agree with that. lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Foreign powers hacking U.S. organizations to influence our election is a big fucking deal and REALLY illegal.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Russian hackers tend not to hide ips because their government encourages the behaviour and won't extradite

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They also have their famous putinbots. People who get paid to blog and comment to make russia appear positive. It's an actual job.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They warned the DNC ahead of time, they knew it was coming, the DNC just didn't do anything

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Commey is a Republican, was appointed by a Republican, and until he didn't do what Republicans wanted was highly respected by Republicans.

10 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 4

Can't blame them. He rewrote the law in order to recommend no prosecution.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

Explanation or source? I didn't know the director of the FBI had the authority to write or change laws.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

To be more specific, he ignored that negligence was enough to charge by letting her off due to lack of intent.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

He said there wasn't a case of negligence because there was no intent. Neglect, by definition, does not require intent.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I was referring to the president, not the director of the FBI. :)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 29

In @gdex86's defense. I thought you were referring to Commey as well. Knowing that you meant Obama, your comment makes much more sense

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Tin foil hat trophy

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

So Russia wants Trump to be our president....fuck, I don't even know what to think about that. This election just keeps getting weirder.

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 5

If Russia invaded like red dawn style, then I'm gonna be guerrilla style killing some ruskies, their way of life is F'ed.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Agree with all, one more thing: Trump can be easily controlled through his narcissism. Putin is brilliant at that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HRC is more the psychopath kind of guy. Which makes her very hard to manipulate. Just Like Putin.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Russia just wants anything that destabilises the West. Same reason they have ties to pretty much every right wing extremist party in Europe.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

US election: Trump encourages Russia to find Clinton emails - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36907541

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

because trump wants to leave nato and that's good for putin who wants more "lebensraum".

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Trump and Putin, are kinda friends sorta. Putin I'd openly backing trump and trump says Putin is doing good work in Russia

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

https://goo.gl/BJtxdl Trump is Putin's useful idiot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump also "encouraged" Russia to continue hacking the DNC right?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Not at all. He was referring to Hillary's emails. Also, how can he encourage them to hack a server that doesn't exist anymore...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Who says it still doesn't exist? *adjusts tinfoil hat*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump has financial ties to Russia, loves Putin, and has suggested ignoring NATO. Plus he might destabilize the west.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Also, the Trump team's only amendment to the RNC platform was removing a clause about supporting anti-Russian Ukrainians. Really suspicious

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's cute. The Clinton foundation got paid by the Russians then suddenly the Russians were allowed to purchase a uranium mine in the US.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All while HRC was SOS of the USA. The deal had to be approved by the State Department. How convenient.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bernie lost the popular vote and says it wasn't rigged.

10 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 24

He probably would have lost without DNC manipulation but now there will always be that question.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

It's taken Clinton years and years to get her name out there. Bernie had 14 months. That's what it really boils down to.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

He's been a progressive politician for decades. What are you talking about?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but that doesn't mean his name was in national headlines for decades. He was largely unknown. Had he been more well known..

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm with you. He lost the popular vote precisely because her unfair lead with the media. TV's got more influence than people.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

He definitely started at he bottom of a hole and it's amazing to see what he was able to do despite that. Would be interesting to go back 1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ and see what would have happened if they started on a level playing field. I say this as a non-Sanders fan. (Trump/Hillary neither).

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A Harvard study found that altho media often ignored him early, by the time of primaries his coverage outpaced Clinton's & was more positive

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Irregardless of how much media he had gotten it's nearly impossible to sway a lot of voters after the HIV/AIDS outbreak. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which actually did a lot of good. Lets not forget that not everything she has done has been negative. She's done quite a bit of good.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

his unfair lead with the media was due to DNC collusion. thats part of the leak!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

There was no collusion, just DNC members saying unprofessional things. No evidence of collusion or DNC members acting against Sanders.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

they were discussing what stories to feed the media to undermine his campaign... where were you?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0