Imaginary numbers

Feb 21, 2021 7:30 PM

FP edit: Dudettes and dudes, relax. I'm well aware of some appliances of imaginary numbers. I just found this funny.
Just goes to show that mathematicians are convergent, right?

sometimes we all need a good cry

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

VAR.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But ... the imaginary numbers are a thing because they solve an existing problem. And then they started making sense on their own

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Like the "joke" so damn many say about, "if we evolved from apes, then why do chimps still exist?" It just shows your cringey ignorance.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is an unfortunate choice, although I think Gauss prefered the term lateral numbers which makes it seem like the live beside R

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're just the algebraic closure (polynomial roots) of reals, like negative numbers are the closure of positive numbers under subtraction.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Multiplicative inverse. I can’t math anymore

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's proof that mathematicians have a sense of humor. What's the opposite of "real"? "Imaginary."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The best 'lay' way to visualize the importance of imaginary numbers isn't a perfect analogy, but works well enough. Think of the >>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

relationship between kinetic and potential energy. It's easy to see something in motion as energetic, but harder to think of something >>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

up high as more energetic than something down low [book on a shelf, versus on the floor. . . or water above a dam, versus running down it]>>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

imaginary numbers is a way of accounting for the potential stored in equations, even while they're not doing anything obvious to the >>

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

particular system we are analyzing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All numbers are imaginary. It's just a description of a quantity.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those imaginary numbers turn out to be nothing but common dark matter.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The crying part is accurate.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The phone you used to upload this post used them

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was ist das ??

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just a stupid name. Call them funky numbers and there would be less confusion.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically we fucked around trying to use math to model things and found we couldn't model specific things, mostly periodic movement

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so we made numbers that allow us to model those things

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait until you find out about quaternions and octonions.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I want to down vote, but I can’t...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

also mathematicians don't know grammar, Its "i am imaginary" not "i is imaginary".

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Andnsilent letters

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

https://youtu.be/T647CGsuOVU A useful video

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That fucking dimensional shift when they pull the grid out of the paper and show the result. Oh my god that's well done.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats such a great video series!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's complex

5 years ago | Likes 474 Dislikes 2

i agrees.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I prefer complex than imaginary. Finally figured out it's a way to show the phase shift on the z axis

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I ℂ what you did there

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

How do I get set notation characters...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I usually just Google the char I want, and include “Unicode-8 or ANSII” in my search. Then copy the respective char. Eg ANSII complex symbol

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*meant ASCII, not ANSII

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I knew what you meant

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Came back for this one. Well done.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't be irrational

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

What can I say? I'm a radical dude.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Let’s not divide now

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I reciprocate this

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I doubt you can differentiate this

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Honestly you seem rather derivative.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My jokes are an integral part to this community!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you're so important how come you only have *checks profile* 158k points. Doesn't really add up if you ask me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't be a square. So negative.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

What happens if you divide by this? That's impossible. OK, we'll just call that "i"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

How do you say goodbye?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually they solve more problems than they create and ultimately lead to a more cohesive system of numbers, not to mention being vital to >

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

> several other fields such as electrical engineering and quantum physics.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And 3d rotations

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are more numbers between zero and three than there are numbers at all... strange but true.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Cantor taught us that some infinities are larger than other infinities.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are 'more' real numbers in any interval than there are integers

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, that's what they wanted to say

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imaginary numbers are very much genuine numbers, they're just poorly named. Nothing "imaginary" about them at all.

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

Please show me -1 apples.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just sent. There's still 1 apple, someone just owes it to you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. I also want it to be known that i=√(-1) is exactly the wrong way to teach them, yet everyone does it. i^2=-1 is much better.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

To be fair, by the time you're learning imaginary numbers, there shouldn't be a huge difference between the two

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They just sprung "i" on my teenager & a huge fight was had, that he couldn't write a capital I instead. Oh, math.....

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too be fair, mathematic notation means a lot in the field. Capital I likely already exists and means something unrelated

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what I'd hoped to tell him, but I didn't know something exact. Variables being able to be whatever...til they're not. Its tough!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, there is a gigantic difference in mental framing. I frequent math.stackexchange and I see the damages nearly daily.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also i=√(-1), besides being noticeably more cumbersome, is just factually wrong without clarifications that you're not ready for at first.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/438 is what happens when you're lured into believing that complex square roots are a good idea.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also you might think, ok with have complex numbers x + yi, so why does it not just go on adding dimenstions forever? x + yi + zj... etc. But

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it turns out that it's easy to show that you never need more than real+imaginary parts interestingly. So no need for any thing MORE complex!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, at least to solve polynomials. Per The Fundamental Theory of Algebra.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quaternions (x+iy+jz+kw) are essential in computer graphics, as they describe rotations of 3d space like complex numbers describe the plane.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, it keeps going on, but the number of terms must be a power of 2. Because of course it must.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Umm... Quaternions say hi.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fine.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What would a better name for them be?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’ve heard “lateral” numbers used and that resonated with me.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't mean to be negative, but it's positively irrational how many sets of numbers pick up these sorts of names.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Irrational because they aren't ratios. Makes total sense.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Please explain this to my 12th grade Calculus teacher. She insisted 22/7 is an irrational number because 22/7 is pi.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How the fuck is she a math teacher?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just sad. I'm sorry.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They were so named by the mathematic conservatives at the time that didn't like them, kinda like how some Greeks were killed for...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Possessing the proof that the square root of 2 was irrational. The old guard always hates the new math of the youngins.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And the "big bang" was a derogative name implying an orgasm, and Edison invented the (AC) electric chair to try to show how dangerous AC was

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Monopoly was specifically designed as a terrible board game to show how bad capitalism is.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then a guy writes a story about how imaginary numbers are stupid, but writes it so trippy that everyone thinks it's about drugs.

5 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 0

Whats the story

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Sherlock Holmes

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

morning glory

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

What's the word

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Women but in British.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bird is the word

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bird.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alice in Wonderland. Here's a link to Steven Fry on QI talking about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okf2hb5ptbg&ab_channel=QI

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

big dot

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Just click the link and book mark it. You don't need to dot this for later.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

small .

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The weird thing is: not only aren't imaginary numbers breaking math, they actually make sense in parts of physics, too

5 years ago | Likes 232 Dislikes 0

@OP And nature. This meme is just ignorance, or someone who's never seen how fractals work.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's because the universe isn't actually modellable in mathematics without using some workarounds, which imaginary numbers are.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

More like basic grade-school arithmetic is a tiny sliver of math; the math that describes the Universe has far, far trickier things than i.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is a gross oversimplification, but imaginary numbers are just a different way of looking at the Cartesian (x-y) plane.

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Shut up, you aren't Sam Vimes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't start with me, Carcer. I know it's you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Woah woah woah that escalated quickly. Just a concerned citizen here.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How are imaginary numbers breaking math?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are not. That's what I said.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right. You could say .. I imagined it

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In electronics they are inductance.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

When you work backwards from Maxwell's equations to EE math, going from partial differentials to algebra, you see why. It's quite elegant.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Phase, right?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its a very natural way to deal with oscillations. If you really want your mind blown, look up quaternions. They naturally handle 3D rotation

5 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

I would look it up but im fairly certain I wont understand a thing

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Unit quaternions*

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The only reason I know about quaternions is from having to animate rotations. No normal person needs that in their live though.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Quaternions are why I never got into working on 3D physics engines. I can program lots of other things, but fuck that shit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thankfully with animation, I didn't have to be perfect. I could guess and shoot for "close enough"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm an Euler angle man myself, but quaternions are neat.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Enjoy your gimbal lock, neanderthal!

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Well I learned something new! That's what I get for being a physics knucklehead!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We game programmers adopted quaternions for orientation a few decades ago.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I tend to think that Math is just a tool that we invented to understand the functioning of the world. Real numbers are just as imaginary as/

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Arguably, most real numbers--specifically the irrational and non-computable majority of them--are less real than imaginary numbers!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

imaginary numbers. We happen to think of the number i as less real than, say, sqrt(2) because of the names we have to those numbers. /

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I also don't think that Math is a universal language that we can use to talk to aliens. They probably understand the universe by using /

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

a completely different language that we can't even comprehend because we're accustomed to our ways.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They would certainly use different math notation, and probably wildly different language, but the underlying math would be the same.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you for coming to my Ted talk. I wish you have a good day.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0