Does it look like I know what a jay peg is?

Oct 2, 2014 10:15 AM

mniip

Views

345266

Likes

6299

Dislikes

75

Bitmap is exact data, but not compressed, png is also lossless, but compressed and much smaller, making it better in everything.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

DO NOT use red and green to distinguish stuff. /Colorblind

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WebM ftw.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Meh, Firefox's supported animated PNGs for ages and other browsers have been just too lazy to implement that.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I save files as jpegs all the time in paint when i need to reduce file size. The image quality is actually a lot better than portrayed here

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is what I teach people. JPEG for photos. PNG for text. GIF for animated boobs.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I do what I want. http://imgur.com/pAmkEoj

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pffff "do not use it for text" ... If you keep the quality setting on high or very high it's absolutely fine

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With a bloated filesize.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

JPEG for photography, PNG for everything else, simple as that.

12 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Also, learn to recognize jpeg artifacts so that when you see a photo of a sign you don't say "I see PIXELS, therefore this is shopped."

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a graphic designer, +1

12 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 3

Same here :)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

+1 for DiCaprio?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'd like to forward this to my boss, but Dickbutt.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I swear 95% of people on here claim to be graphic designers lol.

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I believe it. Graphic designers spend like 95% of their time browsing the web, so it makes sense for them to find their way here.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As an ex graphic designer who works with graphic designers, I can vouch this is true.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Can you email me a copy of your logo in a vector, like a .pdf?" *receives .pdf, embedded .jpg*

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

"But I saved it as a .pdf, what's the problem?"

12 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm a printer and when we get customers like that we invoke the "shit in, shit out" rule.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I should clarify that I work as a printer. I'm not an Epson stylus or anything.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Which company were you made by? Canon? Xerox?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every. Single. Time.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Can I get your logo?" Goddamn .docx file.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've recreated so many logos from just pure shit. Seriously considering starting a business just doing that since I'm a master now.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know that feel

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone doing art production intended for print, my initial reaction was "when to use one: never, when to not use one: always."

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

+1 for dickbutt.

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

My rule is jpeg for photos, png for my digital art.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is it ironic that the .jpeg quality image is, in fact, a .gif?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a not-graphic designer, +1

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

+1 for the human race

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ITS PRONOUNCED GEE PEG, JUST ASK THE GUY THAT INVENTED GIF

12 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Nope. It will always be GIF, not JIF to me.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NO IT ISNT ITS PRONOUNGKRHIAFJGSOKOFKJIEWUIAJFKLVGKLHKAOJKOAWEAAARRGGGHHH

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Pee Ehn Guy (french pronunciation). (It's actually pronounced ping.)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great, now we're going to get a bunch of screen shots of jpegs converted to pngs.

12 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

That'll take a bit longer to load but at least will give use better quality images :) It works, it's science.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But... that would reduce the quality :( Going from lossy format to another lossy format. You can't regain lost information :((

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Next step, using APNG instead of GIFs!

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes now I do!

12 years ago | Likes 322 Dislikes 4

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I finally get this. I know not proud

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one that notices the high quality DiCaprio image, supposedly fucked up when converted to jpeg, is also a jpeg?

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Jpegception

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was the whole point. Quality went from high to low to show what happens.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It gets messed up when saved as a low-quality jpeg (50% down to 1% in the gif). The high quality image is a 91% quality jpeg, which works...

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...pretty well for reducing the filesize of photos without losing too much detail.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@usepngnotjpeg

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you, I would have missed this otherwise :)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Personally, I prefer PNG for everything unless size is an issue, but this being 2014 I think we can all afford to use 5-6MB images.

12 years ago | Likes 483 Dislikes 12

Deliver jpg thumbnails by default and serve png originals asynchronously later.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i predict in 2084, average image size will be 200mb

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mobile users hate him!

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being vector based, PNGs are perfect for images with just lines and geometric shapes, perfect quality and low filesize. Just don't use (1/2)

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

them for photos, that's the exact opposite they were designed for. Great for GUI screenshots, diagrams, and simple designs though. (2/2)

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

My 400MB signature disagrees.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

PNG is not vector based, it's a bitmap. Just like GIF and (unsurprisingly) BMP.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My thoughts.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell that to my mobile internet, some pages take ages to load because they have huge images on the desktop site and no mobile version...

12 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 2

It's fine, just get 4G.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

then turn up compression JUST a little bit and you still get better results

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, that sucks. I meant more for personal use, or in situations where it's necessary. Few things anger me as much as screenshots of 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

a game supposed to showcase the graphical fidelity, in crystal-clear 75% compression jay peg.

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

It's like all those graphics comparison videos on Youtube, their compression SUCKS (also, they're capped at 30Hz, so you can't get a good(1)

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

impression of how they look in motion) (2)

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They could covert a 60fps video to 30 and make it so it plays at regular speed when choosing 2x speed on the html5 player, but it 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I made a world for a campaign using a fractal mapper. It was 200 mb as a png. Able to compress and keep good enough quality to 6 mb jpeg.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It really depends. On a website like imgur, every image being 5-6MB would completely shut it down due to OUTGOING bandwidth limitation.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just use https://tinypng.com/ to optimise and you'll see how much reduction in size you can get with little to no loss of quality

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since it uses indexed colors, it's better suited for pictures, which can be saved as jpg anyway. For CG images, it doesn't work that well.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meh, it works well for web based optimisation imo

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not so in emails I'm afraid :( As small as possible for our mobile friends ;D

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I compared them all in PowerPoint and .PNG was best, JPG was too noisy, and device-independent bitmap was very good with high compression

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I design 8k+ textures for my upcoming mod for KSP and I must say that JPEGs suddenly become a whole lot more performance worthy.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

8K Kerbal textures? *came*. Skybox included?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/a/EjqP0

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Using PNG for photographs is just jerking off. If your jpg has noticeable artifacts then use higher quality settings when creating them.

12 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 3

Yeah, I meant for computer generated images.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, if it's sooper graphix or text use a damn PNG to create the image.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The worst is scans. Like I need to see every fiber of the paper on your sketch in perfect clarity...

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I love PNG too but I ran into problems doing Google Map Overlays. Extreme high res gives crazy file sizes and IE just gives up.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For photos JPEG is a far better idea, specially with slow internets (or big photos; imagine 8 megapixels of barely compressed data!)

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

12 years ago (deleted Dec 13, 2022 7:25 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Once I learned that artifacts were something outside of Indiana Jones, I ditched M$ paint and jumped to GIMP and PNG for everything

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Paint.NET is my personal favorite. Gimp feels weird to me.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I J-peg on the first date

12 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

You must like it rough around the edges.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Slut.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

First half, +1, Last half, No way. Jpeg 80+ is just fine for any type of graphic. No reason to whip out PNG for small, flat graphics.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Here is the png image saved at 100% quality jpeg. Takes up more space but doesn't look any different.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

B-but...the transparency!

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay, okay, I admit: PNG is the only option when you want any type of transparency. You can't beat 256 levels ... mmm that alpha channel!

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would love to see similar explanations for gif, png, bmp, etc.

12 years ago | Likes 1177 Dislikes 2

None of those do anything similar to what JPEG does. Usually the results are lossless, but worst case, they reduce the color pallette.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Use PNG for everything. It is a lossless compression. That means when uncompressed it looks EXACTLY like the uncompressed bitmap.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIFF too please

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

explanation.png

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The most easy rule is, always use png unless it's animated (most people don't have any of the 2 diff animated png versions) then use gif. :)

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

SVG: ideal for graphs and charts; although it's not a raster (pixel-based) image format. You could zoom in infinitely without quality loss.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's also a pain in the ass to write. Source: I wrote my logo in SVG. Still can't defend that decision.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

gif explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blSzwPcL5Dw

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You, sir, are my hero.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Png is virtually loss-less, best used on images with a lot of straight lines or solid colors. Extremely size-efficient when used right.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

PNG uses a series of chunks. The pixel values are in the IDAT chunk. It is compressed using inflate/deflate which is lossless.

12 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Also, PNG uses 8-bit transparency, that is, an entire channel with 256 levels of opacity data. JPG has none, GIF has binary transparency 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2/2 which means one color (out of the 256 available-GIF is 8-bit while Jpeg is 24-bit) is designated as 100% transparent wherever it appears

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You may have heard of MNG which was the original attempt at animated PNG, but now there is animated PNG called "animated PNG"

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gif - only worthwhile for animated images, if it's not an animated image and not suitable for jpg, use png instead.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Png - best for for small items, text (if html, text shouldn't be on the img, should be html markup), and when transparency is needed.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bmp - not really useful for anything. File size is too large and high quality settings on jpg will still be smaller while looking identical.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I need a link to further pictured examples please computer scientists

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

don't forget about .tiff

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i consider doing this

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bitmap is exact data, but not compressed, png is also lossless, but compressed and much smaller, making it better in everything.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In short, gif was a smaller jpg, less quality, but animated gifs have kept it around. BMP was supplanted by PNG.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

I actually meant more of this sort of presentation. I found it interesting.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's an amazing explanation that combines incorrectness and incompleteness in a well-balanced manner.

12 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Well I did say "in short"

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Maybe, but it's almost completely false.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Use PNG for when you shouldn't use JPG. Use TIFF for when you're somewhere between RAW, PSD and JPEG.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bitmap is exact pixel data, sometimes using a color pallet to reduce the file size. PNG defines solid-color areas with math.

12 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

1/2 Just an extra tidbit, the color pallet is called a lookup table. Each pixel will reference the table instead of holding a color. This

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2/2 saves memory as instead of storing say, 4 bytes for each pixel, you can store 1 byte referencing the correct 4 bytes in the table.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

GIF: don't use it for anything except animations. BMP: don't use it ever; use PNG instead. PNG: use it for charts but not for photos.

12 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

GIF works really well with still line-art, too.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

PNG is good for that

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

^ This is the most accurate answer I have found.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So what should I use for photos?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

JPEG.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, if you're editing a photo maybe you want to temporarily save it in a lossless format such as PNG or photoshop/gimp; otherwise JPEG.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

JPEG

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but jpeg bad

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

JPEG good. High compression bad

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

GIF? Really? Isn't that one self explanatory?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Etc. is short for et cetera, a Latin expression meaning "and other things" or "and so on". Yes, I am really funny ;)

12 years ago | Likes 323 Dislikes 7

etc is also ericsson texture compression, a texture compression scheme that's part of OpenGL ES.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

"It means "and the rest"" -Anna Leonowens, King and I

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, as in: "I would love to see similar explanations for gif, png, bmp, and other imagey things."

12 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 5

Oh, he knows ;)

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

...I just saw what he did there. >.>

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeeeeeup.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dad?

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

you win.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really like this comment.

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Latin is fun

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0