The Simpsons don’t have hair. They’re just horribly deformed from living so close to a nuclear power plant

Dec 15, 2017 7:59 AM

Honorius

Views

139572

Likes

2390

Dislikes

87

I watch family guy anyway

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

There is less ambient radiation right outside of a running reactor than there is anywhere outside.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And some how they have 5 bones for fingers but only 4 with skin

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why does Lisa's skeleton have 5 fingers on her left hand?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Didn't Bart have a smooth head as a result of a bad hair cut at the end of his music video (yes, music video) "Deep Deep Trouble?"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Giving birth to those must have been fun.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those transparant feet tho

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Let’s face it. They’re not great parents.”

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ghouls

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their all mutants from all the chemicals spilled in the water, and waste on land. That's why their skin is yellow....lol

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is called Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva and it is a real thing.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2001 called, they want their news back.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Marge has hair.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so has homer

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you, Now I dont have to post it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about Homer?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean they do live right next door to the nucleon plant

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The irony is that barring a major accident, you actually get exposed to more radiation from a coal plant than from a nuclear plant.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

we knew that..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey! I work at a nuclear power plant and take offense to this. Not only did my third kid come out alive, but it's got 3 arms just like us.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

That isn't real bart, the real bart has 9 spikes of hair!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or it's bone cancer.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, Marge was supposed to have bunny ears, so

8 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 2

Marge is Louise all grown up?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Indeed. It is fun that in the original arcade game, if she gets an electric shock you see those bunny ears.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Source?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The original Simpson’s arcade game

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Apparently she also has Lisa's and Bart's heads as boneboobs o_o

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Originally, she had ears. My Life In Hell. Matt Groening's comic strip. Pre-Tracy Ullman Show.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

OR- it’s a cartoon.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 21

LIAR!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Nonsense

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why does Lisa have four fingers and a thumb?

8 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 2

they all have that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 30

huh... no? The only one is god.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oh my god

8 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 0

She's God obviously. Duh.

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy... yeah?!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I smell a conspiracy

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They made a mistake colouring - it's supposed to be green (blade of grass)

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

They all do?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 63

Actually they don't,they all have four fingers and the only one with five fingers is god.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Huh. I thought they all had four and a thumb

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They all usually have 3 fingers and a thumb apart from God when he appears - he has the correct digits.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Didn’t know that. Knew about God (Jesus too I think) but I thought they had four fingers and a thumb.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuclear power is the safest form of power generation. Its downfall is its reputation. http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/89162_5_.gif

8 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 23

I don't know. Places like Fukushima and Chernobyl will leave many people sick with various forms of cancers for decades to come...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a design engineer at a Nuclear Power Plant, if you guys want any objective questions answered.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It starts...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nah, it's just Mr. Burns who dumps the waste unsafely.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People played too much Fallout :P

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Shhhh, we can’t bring science into this. It ruins the fan theory. v

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 6

Fan theory is fine. He's saying nuclear power is safe. And it is. He isn't saying Springfield's Chernobyl plant with Homer is safe.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Good point

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still don't understand how it is "safe." We have to store the waste in indestructable drums underground for 100+ years. Out of site >

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of mind i guess.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Burying it under a mountain seemed like a good idea, but the Senate Majority Leader for a long time was from the state with the Mountain.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's obvious that you haven't seen Monty Burns power plant.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah it's really unfortunate considering how clean and reliable the energy is

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How have wind and solar killed people?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

every industry has risks. Pressure vessels, heights, suspended loads, high energy piping, high voltage, all of these things kill people.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Installation/ maintenance can come with high risk. Theres a very famous image of workers standing on a wind turbine just before dying. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait, clean coal has been lying all along?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My ? is: is it safer or is that number smaller because it's less used vs the others? If there were as many plants as coal, what would it be

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

All aircraft carriers and submarines in the Navy are powered by nuclear reactors. There has never been a nuclear accident. They are safe.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Its per KWH, so its deaths aggregated down to the average amount per unit produced.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So number of plants in use doesn't effect that average? Just general curiosity - not trying to be a dick. Averages and math throws me

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More reactors would sway the average slightly one way or the other but not by much. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Averages scale up/down as data is added, depends how much data. If we double our nuclear usage the value could half/ it could double. 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is safer in terms of industrial accidents. We have had engineers go to prison for not doing equipment inspections the right way.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's normalized against the amount of energy produced - so it's safer regardless of how much it's used. Now, if it were used more, there 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3 but planes crash a *lot* less often than cars, which is why it's still safer

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 would be more accidents, but the ratio would probably more or less be consistent. When a plane crashes, it's horrible and everyone dies,

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The Oil industries biggest terror is nuclear power and everyone switching to electric. It's almost free.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Actually we (nuclear power) lost the lowest cost provider status when natural gas prices bottomed out. We employ ALOT of engineers (5x as...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Natural gas has had a pretty volatile price history, and will probably increase in the future with all the new plants and export plans.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A design engineer for a nuclear power plant should not use ALOT. *A LOT.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 Things about that: 1) I are an enjinear. I math Gud. 2) I had a spelling book in Mrs. Bandon's 3rd grade class that had "alot" as a word.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Its not a word that I've ever seen again, I've tried to find that book for years.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Natural Gas is not bad, but in many states they still use trash or even OIL! Then pass the costs onto us by doubling our power bill.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd recommend reducing regulations to allow for the construction of new nuclear, but that's just me.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

many as fossil plants) and most of our money walks out on two feet. our fuel costs are almost nothing.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah there’s only been 3 major Accidents. But nuclear accidents end up leaving entire areas evacuated for decades.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

2 accidents worth talking about. 3 Mile Island is the accident equivalent of a burp.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 mile island was completely contained within the facility. That was on American soil, and not hit by a tsunami or bad management.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Technically fukashima was 2 natural disasters that were immensely powerful...but that's just me

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Which gives the area to nature and wildlife is doing great there. While the area taken up by wind and solar to produce same amount of energy

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

is orders of magnitude larger. The hydro also demands quite lot of space which is made totally unusable and when it goes wrong the death

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

toll is huge. Burning in the other hand is making the whole planet unsuitable for human civilization...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yea, there's not a whole lot of good solutions. Lithium mining is devastating but really necessary for solar and wind to store energy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fukushima and chernobyl were both from not using the safety measures that were put in place.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Fukushima got rocked by an earthquake.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they also had safety measures in place, but they were not allowed to use them because the mayor of the town said no.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Statistically, the technology is going to be used wrong at some point so it's not unreasonable to mention fukushima and chernobyl.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It wasn't that it was used wrong. Chernobyl shut all off, fukushima weren't allowed to turn them on by order of the mayor

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fukushima is safe to live in again, fear keeps people out. Chernobyl was a "one off".

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

so far and that's typing as someone who lives near nuclear power stations

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Chernobyl is an example of *both* shitty, decrepit Soviet-era tech, AND a worst case scenario of cascading effects. An outlier of outliers.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Tech was fine.It was mostly the shitty management.Every1 was afraid to admit the problem so they tried to "silence" it until it was too late

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's not really any context for that graph, is there not a proper study to go with it? Also nuclear power while better than fossil 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

fuels is not a proper long term power source. We only have a limited amount of Uranium on our planet so in the end if we want to 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

survive long as a species we need to become a renewable species as a whole not just burn every resource one by one until there's nothing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4/4 Also Nuclear power has terrible waste products that can't be disposed of very well, which would only get worse with more use.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The sheer volume of waste & danger of that waste are minuscule compared to virtually any other industry's toxic waste--it's a problem, but 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0