If you can't see the irony then I'm sorry

Jul 27, 2016 7:49 PM

donth8appreciat

Views

44513

Likes

1337

Dislikes

358

Saw this article today http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/07/27/caught-on-video-black-lives-matter-literally-orders-white-people-to-the-back-of-protest/

My guess is most members of BLM would tell you both are racist.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could already tell this was going to be stupid before the second image loaded.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 10

"Everything I know about racism I learned from other white people."

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 14

I'll bet you thought this meme actually meant something.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

becuase these two things are EXACTLY alike

10 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 44

Why else would she say that exact thing?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

A bus is a public amenity, and a protest is a means of expression.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ah ha hush that fuss Errbody move to the back of the bus Do you want to bump and slump with us We the type of people make the club get crunk

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What law made you go to the back of the crowd?. Thats right there isnt one.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Yeah, because It's about their movement and their lost children. White allies are happy to be in the back. Happy to support.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 22

No. It's all racist. The fact that BLM is a thing is racist! That woman is ignorant. End of story. ALL lives matter. Except terrorists.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The thing with "black lives matter" is that there is an implicit "too" at the end, that people don't seem to get.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Will you people please shut the fuck up

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

I'm sorry, doesn't make her 'opinion' any less racist because she wasn't enforcing a law.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Blacks can't be racist right? right? of course they can.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(1/1) While the woman's behavior is abhorrent, this article doesn't mention the other protesters that were yelling at her for saying that

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

(2/2) that she completely ignored which the Washington Post does mention

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Social justice perspective says its impossible to be racist to whites. It's all semantics tho, everyday people view it as racism.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I believe OP is not trying to say that the two things are equal, which they aren't, but rather that the thing that BLM is fighting for 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

(Racial equality) is the opposite of what they are doing. So that's where the irony is, not that The two events are the same thing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am genuinely disappointed in you guys. the racism has been worse around here lately, but this requires an additional dose of pure stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 14

I couldn't agree more. It's sad to see a lot of racist post get to the front page.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Complaining About BLM is the new Complaining About Feminists on Imgur.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 14

Don't forget vegans. Did I mention I hate vegans?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They knew exactly what they were doing.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

If it was a white person yelling, blacks to the back, the media would lose their shit...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I stopped taking you seriously when I saw that the article was from The Blaze

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

One that isn't irony and two the first one was a law( enforced very thoroughly mind you)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is like 1 Klan member left. The other 4999 are all fbi and atf agents.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm African American and both make me fucking sick. There is no excuse for either. If you know what the sting of discrimination feels like..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At the very beginning of the civil rights movement. My fellow black people please get rid of the chip on your shoulders it does the cause no

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I support BLM but nothing is going to get done without the help of our white brethren. By the way we've had the help of white people....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

good at all!!!!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then what the fuck are you doing oppressing others with it. What are we trying to accomplish with these protests? Will this help the cause?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Totally agree with most the comments saying they're not the same. But I feel like one of the hallmarks of the Civil Rights protests was

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

(1) the idea that there was some semblance of unity. I thought whites and blacks would march together

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

who said that the bottom part isn't racist? however, one was a request the other was a law, huge difference imo

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

"Request"? ... Did you watch the video?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The bottom one was referring to asking white attendees to step back so everyone else could get a chance to speak/hear what was going on.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why do I see more complaints about this kind of crap on imgr than all the horrible shootings of innocent black people?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

If the data is any indication, Imgur is mostly white and mostly male, and both groups feel threatened when other groups speak up.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Except that the first one was a government enforced LAW while the 2nd is just some Yahoo's in a park. Don't mean to crush your soapbox tho.

10 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 69

The "soap box" is referring to the fact that the "civil rights" activist in B is implying the bigotry principles that Rosa Parks fought.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

for idea to live (Yahoo's in a park), there first must be idea. So for the LAW to exist you need idea.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 14

This one time, on imgur, there was a post that was supportive of black people. It wasn't today, as we're 5 bitching about blacks posts deep/

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Straight up fact is, black people don't feel welcome here, there was a bunch of discussion about it last year. It's only gotten worse.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

But for real, any one else getting sick of every fkn post about black folk being negative douchy & smug? User Sub needs to grow the fuck up.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

I'm super sick of it too. Some fuckwads are submitting baity circlejerk images to capitalize on fresh waves of negativity and spite.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Like-I get it, racist pricks figured out brigading user sub. Congrats, they make imgur super unwelcoming to black folk & look racist as shit

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It's not that one is more racist than the other, it's that there is a huge fucking difference between a private opinion and a law.

10 years ago | Likes 612 Dislikes 164

But what starts as an opinion can turn into laws. We want to stop racism before it continues to grow.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

i don't think anyone's gonna make a law to regulate how a group can protest. that would be the easiest thing to protest ever

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Upvote this to heaven

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

So you say a private opinion can't be racist? This is wrong. It always starts with a private opinion.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

My private opinion is that you remove yourself from this earth and make room for someone else.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Private. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Regardless of this, MLK Jr is rolling in his grave.

10 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 15

You have no fucking idea how MLK would react to the state of the world today. He'd probably be pissed about the lack of progress (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 34

to true equality rather than worrying about what some fringe group does at a single rally. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 25

The dude wouldn't like blacks resorting to violence against police or promoting racism against whites. He was against that shit. You're dumb

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

I'm sorry, are you saying racism isn't racism because it isn't institutionalized racism? Because it sounds like you are defending racism.

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 13

They are what I call racism trolls, and anything you can think of they will try to spin it. Racism is racism don't even bother with this.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Tell it!!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

PREACH!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

10 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

Freddy Gray's killers were let off the hook today, yet not one post about that on FP.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It was on FP yesterday when it happened.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do you feel the need to defend one instead of condemning both?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And a private opinion that most people in the BLM movement don't share, at that.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Well then "most people" in BLM need to find a way to silence these people before they derail the entire cause.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, wait... you're saying it's okay if private schools and businesses starts refusing service to black people? Or to segregate their places?

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 17

No...I'm saying it's a false comparison. A

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

That was Goldwater's hang up on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. People deride him for not signing it, calling him a racist when in fact he

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

sponsored two previous civil rights acts that did not pass. He didn't like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because he believed that people

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

have the right to refuse service to whoever they want for whatever reason they want. He didn't necessarily agree with that but believed that

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

was what the Constitution said. Here we are 50 years later fighting over something he said would be an issue caused by the Civil Rights Act

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0