Imgur says physics and half of it is people falling down... This is what I call physics. Get ready for mass effect field generators

Apr 19, 2017 8:21 PM

SonOfSanguinus

Views

26172

Likes

479

Dislikes

79

Dark energy.....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I swear I did this in college chemistry class. No, I don't think it was an error in measuring the mass beforehand. (Joke)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Did I hear someone say Element zero?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not bs. https://www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-negative-mass.amp

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's the first step to making wormholes. That's one small step towards a great many things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excuse me?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Isn't negative mass like wormholes and shit though

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But can they explain why kids love cunnamon toast crunch?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Negative mass=reverse gravity=hover boards.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

You crash into a wall and instead of bouncing back you just crash even harder

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

That is indeed how this stuff works... worth it

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Omg, live TV on my phone or tablet!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't wait to wake up one day inside a black hole!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like FAKE

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And yet it's not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know how a rotating mass will exert a torque force that's orthogonal to the direction of rotation? Well couldn't a negative mass (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(2) use the same force on one side, like a bicycle folding in half, in order to create unlimited energy? This has to be an observation error

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It "behaves" like negative mass momentarily. But it's not

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I want to read the publication to see what they think is going on and what they did exactly to cause this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Warp drive motherfukas!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So we had a fake news trend, now it's time for a fake science trend too...oh humanity, what will we do with you?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe sauce is there

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not at all what the paper suggested, it's a complete misunderstanding by the media who are clearly not educated in particle physics lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ffs this isn't negative mass. This is no different than putting a backspin on a bowling ball, albeit at a much smaller scale.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

We will advise the actual scientists. And they spent all that time and money chilling atoms to just over absolute zero and all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not trying to belittle what they achieved. This is bloody impressive. But let people be impressed for what it is rather than making 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it into something it's not. That part I put on the writer of the article and OP rather than the scientists. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So much dumb in one headline.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Why?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OK, seems I'm wrong. A physicist friend says it's valid, but really hard to explain, as in they don't get into it until graduate-level (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

physics courses. The "negative mass" and "backwards acceleration" set off my "bullshit pseuduscience" detectors. I was wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough. Points for coming back and saying that. Rarely happens here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't understand. If it's meant to do the reverse of newtons law, then earths gravity is at 9.81m/s^2, this fluid should float up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not if it is in some sort of container

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I've always wondered how they do that. Since the gravitational field by earth being GM/r^2. What container would distort?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even in a vacuum the gravitational field would still play a factor. Our air is just a medium.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which ways backwards

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wells that's the crazy things.. Newton's third law has to do with opposing forces. Essentially force on matter pushes back before moving.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Negative mass/energy is what is theorized as necessary for actual warp drive systems. Pretty cool.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't get too excited you're still looking for about -1 nonillion tones of that for the alcubierre drive.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very true! It's exciting if confirmed because until now we couldn't even be sure negative mass existed at all.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want a warp drive

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With a personal warp drive, you could take it AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR BUTT

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know right, that'd be badass.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is weird, but can anybody tell me how this could be applied practically if it were scaled up? I can't think of anything.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Non-consumable reaction mass for spacecraft launch systems?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hm. I guess if it reacts to the "pull" from gravity, and starts going up?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Negative mass/energy is what is theorized as necessary for actual warp drive systems.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Think of space travel, if mass shifts towards 0 when momentum is greater than 0, then velocity increases

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I guess I'm not gathering that from "With negative mass, if you push something, it accelerates toward you." It just sounds like it becomes-

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

-harder and harder to move. Right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think as soon as force stops being applied, it rebounds back. Like a baseball that flies backwards when you release it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hm, maybe. I guess we need more information! :D

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The concept of 'scaling it up' is pretty inconceivable right now. As is, the environment necessary to produce this effect requires...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

supercooling the material. Just touching it would provide enough heat to make it behave quite normally. This is only useful as a pry into

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some very extreme cases of particle physics so that we can check/write more fundamental physical laws we might get to exploit later.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What makes the acceleration backwards instead of that being its natural direction of movement?

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I think it's something along the lines of pushing a balloon down under water?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In the article i read it's basically like pushing a glass across a table, but it pushes against your hand. No fuckin idea how that works tho

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

SCIENCE!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So...if Im reading this right, the glass doesnt actually, ya know, move...like...at all?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's not a glass, it's quantum mechanics. It's more like a glass on an conveyor belt, the belt moves to the right but the glass goes left

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Only the glass is a particle and the conveyor belt is a force

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe that's why we can't see aliens: it's actually us that are "dark matter", compared to the other 95% of the universe.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So... Dark lives matter?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One of the best responses I've ever seen

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hold on, mobile device screen shot, no name of source, multiple share buttons, yep we got ourselves some bullshit over here.

9 years ago | Likes 370 Dislikes 26

It cites itself maybe?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It clearly cites science.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Actually not bullshit. Google will confirm for you if you need...

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Google will also confirm the earth is flat, and everyone has cancer. Get some real sources up in this bitch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

'You can't trust google' is the battle cry of idiots.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.155301 This wants a subscription to see but you can read the abstract.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, except it isnt as Ive seen this half a dozen times in my news feeds for the last few days. Read more dumbass.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Im gonna need more than a journalist writing about it, how bout the method they used and everything? It makes sense but Im skeptical.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Congrats you get @OP's upvote for providing the source he should have

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

Sauce added

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Sorry, OP forgot the rules

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

Typical Perkuns

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I preferred my life of ignorance you bastard

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Will add for everyone when get on PC

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

But... "Science"

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

It's legit, check the top reply

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Skepticism denied! ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0